>> first, let's get rid of the nda because ndas are effective only until meet judicial process like thena and throw them out the door. you raise an interesting question. a fascinating debate going on a long time between congress and the executive branch. congress says the courts have addressed this issue. there is no absolute immunity for former aide, especially in the case of liewandowski who wa never actually an aide of the white house. the executive branch takes a s fascinating position. we know about the court decision and we disagree. we believe that aides have absolute immunity and possible executive privilege and we don't agree with the court's decision. here is our justification. >> literally does matter at what point this individual, let's say corey lewandowski, worked for the president, whether it was 20 years ago, before he had any dreams of becoming president of the united states, till now? >> it matters a lot. because absolute immunity always hinges on how close the relationship was. we know that there is such a thing as executive privilege. but we've never really fully fle

there was a financial incentive to not have that occur or be registered or have an nda. now you can't create condos where there was a buyout. >> we have no desire to condo convert. >> the one issue i have is how this was represented as a single family house when clearly there were two units and your architect is a professional, you are a developer, you submit plans, you are the project sponsor and registered agent this was single family house and really wasn't. i am not inclined to support your project. i am inclined to you legalizing the second unit. >> commissioner fong. >> commissioner fong: i am supportive of their project. >> you can sit down. >> commissioner fong: i am not supportive of the fourth floor. it is too large for that area, therefore, i would if we were to approval this i would apply a condition to remove the fourth floor. >> thank you, commissioner hillis. >> mr. horn, can i ask you about discussions with supervisor mandelman. you said he was close to that? >> yes, either the members of the corporate heights neighbors also can give background on this. t

heaviest volume is fmdley tn nda .hast etheenta bgon.minutelo sw e melaysoundestb w tunnel.ro we alsoav some eastbound delays over ho t4the 1st normal. earlieio rbyyhrouar goo l problem free on our as withubo dunownd d tarelowighu protts for climate change. e.sw rdake.ro m on tim back to you allison. it 6:37 on a monday. romises fame and other perks in exchange for your ok, wse're really happening and most of all how to avoid it. that's coming up. s ♪ at'se > plrculing on instagram tha eople's vansity. thege ay messages asking if they're interested indorsec andy yes products and more exposure, you know, fame. they a seskor corases.e m thess better busine bureau says victims never receive their, quote, commission and they didn't getre aut thenyy doe money and steve you know what staie allen saidin'shere youe.m rt paying. nobody is going ask you to be a brand ambassador. bottomin le.adut i kollecting ae tv's and bes rtcollect things like location information and share it w itchte > anleas there.h as com wing u♪ e rsthing ouabout was my fam

talk this morning about what the speakers are doing on prescription drug prices have gone from that nda conference it's very clear and abundant reminder that we face huge issues as a nation and the american people send us here in order to come up with solutions and the speaker has a choice to make and she continues to make the choice on the side of partisanship. it's one thing to be pushing for a set of issues or be pushing for a set of partisan solutions in an atmosphere in which bipartisan agreement is not possible but on this issue of prescription drug prices every one of us here around the country about the impact that is having a people and we know it's an issue that we have got to solve. the white house step forward and as you will hear in a minute representative walden we had bipartisan agreement on three bills that could have not only passed the house but also pass the senate and gone to the president's desk for signature. there is simply no way to make the case is attempting to solve a problem we had the opportunity to fill those bills on the floor and we know it would have gon

and welcome to both of you, to nda.a, and to you, li i knew cokie and admired her so much, but to the rest of us the three of you were inseparable. i'm so sorry foryour loss. >> well, i guess we've had a little longeto get used it than other people, but itself a terrible loss for everybody. my phone, my e-mail, they're all bursti with tears. some pretty hard-bitten female reporters called me bawling on the phe. 's a terrible loss for those of us who loved her and knew her for a long time and knew what she meant to journalism and to women. >> woodruff: linda, what are you thinking about today? are you thinking back to those early days when it was the three of you? >> yes. it was an interesting time. and cokie and ti workegether to on the hill during peace time and together on the cam pawn when we were catching the bus, riding the plane. i stayed on the plane a she stayed on the ground talking to voters, an she did some of her best wk talking to voters. you know, she carried that out to making those polls comee ive, all t

it's been a prosecutor, judge nda for 30 years. nonsensical. >> you take that one step further in the book by writing the following. why isn't the chief justice of the united states supreme court john roberts reviewing what is painfully obvious to the nation that a make-believe story paid for by hillary clinton written by a foreign operative became the basis of award to spy on us citizen in order to spy on the trump campaign. the book is called "radicals, resistance, and revenge" teresa is joining us from tennessee. good morning. >> hi judge. i know you thought you would get a fair shot here on washington journal c-span but as you see, you get six or seven democrat callers to one republican. they are just as bad as cnn with the fake news about donald trump. they attacked him just as much is anybody. so preach it while you can sister because you probably won't be invited back. >> let me jump in. that's not true. we are taking calls from democrats, republicans and independents. we welcome her for the hour and judge jeanine, you are w

now it's critical that the final nda which is being gauched right now include very strong pfas provisions. -- provisions. this is what we need to do to protect public health. thank you, mr. chairman, i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: for what purpose does the gentleman from virginia -- from arkansas seek recognition? >> i ask unanimous consent to address the house for one minute and revise and extend my remarks. the speaker pro tempore: without objection, the gentleman is recognized for one minute. >> mr. speaker, i rise today to honor the life of dr. clifton gaines jr. who passed away earlier this month at the age of 97. after dedicating 73 years to his alma mater, harding university in arkansas. dr. gaines began his journey at harding in 1939, majoring in bible and history. soon after graduating he began teaching at harding in 1946, ultimately chairing the history department and serving as dean. mr. hill: in 1965, he was elected as harding's third president, leading the then-college to university status and significant growth. he served in this role for 22 years, becoming the unive

or they can do it for an nda. the idea is that will expand to include lots of stuff.ng run, a lot of the legal services will be handled by software. your corporate lawyer will be spending fewer hours doing general lawyer stuff. carol: i feel like some of it makes a lot of sense. we have been talking about legal work and so much of it is formulaic. there's no reason you can't involve technology to walk us through it. >> and we have seen this on the personal and of legal services. -- end of legal services. there are websites that will help you prepare a will. aetrium is interesting as it is going after sort of the core of the legal industry. these big corporate law firms that generate enormous amounts of revenue and pay very well educated lawyers millions a year. jason: and pursuits, it is all about food. carol: our editor writes about a new trend, vr dining, and yes it is exactly what it sounds like. >> vr dining is something we look at really skeptically. an author pitched it to us and it has been something slow to take hold. i don't know if you've ever been subjected

she signed an nda agreement. she was compensated heavily.there is also two things to know as far as the height of the building. it is the building right next door to my right, if i am looking out my front door is higher than the proposed building. my neighbor right next door is higher than the proposed building. the neighbor behind, barbara, built a huge home. it took five years and there was no complaints on each side of another speaker, they have two buildings that are higher than what the mcgrath's wanted and one of the people have 3500 square feet in their home. >> your time is up. next speaker, please. come on up. >> afternoon, commissioners. i am kelly. together with my husband we own the property at 42ord court. >> if you are the project sponsor you are under the project presentation. >> i was misinformed. >> this is the second hearing. your time to speak was during the presentation. next speaker, please.

. >> is an nda enforceable given the position she held?ose things are generally not enforceable but she has to make a determination whether a book would be the right step for her. so i can imagine she's going to test out the job market for the next six months. if she can land something. if not, and you have publishers, here's a million dollars, that's sometimes hard to turn down. >> emily, what do you think this says about the current climate inside the white house? >> it's -- trump is having trouble maintaining spaces, whether it's her level, cabinet levels. we have hurricane dorian bearing down and he doesn't have a fema director in place. it's inability to retain people around him. >> daniel, emily, thank you very much for being here this morning. >> thank you. >>> amid yesterday's mayhem in texas emerged acts of tremendous generosity and courage for one of the shooting victims next. maria ramirez? hi. maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career ad

within the nda, there are really important wins that are creating robust jobs. both serve on the armed services together. >> what about infrastructure, gun control, health care, those issues which are so near and dear to the american voter, infrastructure, potholes in the street, bridges collapsing -- hopefully not collapsing -- schools, et cetera. >> those are so frustrating. we're passing bills to make people's lives better but the large issues that could move the economy forward, two of our biggest infrastructure projects -- >> which had funning. >> which had funding. and the portal bridge is fully funded. the transportation simply won't move forward on that. and it's striking. that was the one area when this president was elected to office i thought maybe we can move forward on some infrastructure because that's so important to north jersey. and the fact that we haven't, the fact that we still haven't been able to start, start work, to get shovels in the ground on the most infrastructure project if the nation is really troubling. >> what is the block? >> i f

all three major averages starting the week off strong, though the nda up nearly 2% on the week finishingnell: yeah, i think it's friday. it better be. melissa: i'm melissa francis. connell: i'm connell mcshane this is after the bell and we'll talk more about it and all of the big market movers but first here is what's new

she did break her silence after the nda on 60 minutes sdplp was . >> was it hush money to stay silente story was coming out again. i was concerned for my family and their safety. >> you said i'm not denying this affair because i was paid in hush money. i'm denying it because it never happened. that's a lie? >> yes. >> if it was untruthful, why did you sign it? >> because they made it sound like i had no choice. >> she'll get questions like that in a hearing with both parties as well, right? >> yes, she will. this is the point of an inquiry. all the electives get to ask the questions and they goat ask all the questions. what the american public deserves is to hear from the witnesses. what is it that happened and let the public draw up conclusion about who they believe. we're talking about a sitting president. we're talking about a process where it's absolutely squarely congress' responsibility to determine whether or not we have someone sit ting in the white house who actively commit a crime but they don't have to prove crime. they just have to prove the conduct. >> right. we always le

so the kind of dish don think nda knows and that's what the book is out. he has -- i think an interesting kind of -- he breaks away from his brother. he and his brother grow up and they're in the same context, the same kind of parenting, and his brother decided at point the is for all intents and purposes an african-american. that's who his, takes that pathway and says -- and tunda stays in a place of saying, well, i feel like an african-american but i also feel like there's something else and that's very dangerous and sort of unfavorable place to inhabit. i read dreams from my father by barack obama and the thing that ising is that barack obama takes a decision, i'm going to be an african-american. it's a very distinct decision and the early parts of the book about i'm going back and forth and figuring himself out of and then said i'm going to be an african-american. >> goes ahead and marries michelle. >> that's the part of the store. so i was asking myself, what if somebody doesn't make that decision and existings in a weird space but that kind of in bet

i love the new nda authorities that have been great to do ,ervices, taking a sabbatical direct entry. i'm not a big fan of the purple haired cyber warriors that we would induct directly and make them lieutenant colonel's. i hope i'm not crushing your feelings on that. talent froming in the outside or a reserve component, you can directly meet an army need, i think that is wonderful. i want them to meet our physical fitness and other standards. it we can't confuse that person we just commission, lieutenant colonel, with some other person activent 18 years on duty or regular army. they are not the same. they are different. just like you would not put an army doctor in charge of an infantry battalion, he would not want to take someone like that and give them responsibilities of not been prepared full. i think it is wonderful flexibility. a remember talking to general siemens about it. he was excited. i probably did not answer very well. i will say this, the army has traditionally focused on preparing officers for service at the next rank. that is been the fundamental -- if you are a brig

we did a good bit of that in the nda and that will likely survive relatively intact from the conference from everything i'm hearing. you have many priorities as you would take position to talk about how you would approach the implementation of the provisions that will be included in the ndaa on this. >> look for to dissing the oute of those negotiations in congress, and building upon what congress directs. i would look forward to participating, if confirmed, in developing an agency that is focused on capability in space, not on building structural bureaucracy but instead building the capability for the war fighter and for the american public. >> back to my first question. you would agree with me that it would be very difficult for us to protect our investment in space without some kind of a rule-based order that of the nation's are agreeing with. it's hard to either have bilateral or unilateral rules in space because activities of other nations could jeopardize our investments. just as our activities could jeopardize theirs and less as an international set of rules. >> i agree completel

authoritiesew nda that have been granted to the services. i am not a big fan of the purple haired cyber warriors we would induct directly and make them lieutenant colonels. i hope i am not crushing your feelings on that. bring in talent from the outside or a reserve component that can meet and army meet, that is wonderful. i want them to meet our physical fitness and other standards. and we cannot diffuse the person we just commence -- commissioned as lieutenant colonel with someone that has spent at the last 18 years on active duty. they are not the same. ant like you would not put army doctor in charge of an infantry battalion, you'd not want to take someone like that and put them in charge. talk -- i remember talking to general siemens about it and he was excited. i have probably not answered your question very well. i will say this -- the army has traditionally focused on preparing officers for the next rank. if you are a brigadier general, i need you to be the deputy general of the next level so you can be a to start. that was the idea

i'm not signed up to the official sequence that did not sign an nda, but i became increasingly worriedhighest priority, and you are right, pharmaceuticals are rated above food, very high level. then amber, where there is a problem but essentially people are not going to die. and green, we can think of something else. i'm more worried about the numbers. i've had no feedback at all about the plan is full to what kind of drugs are you talking about? for example, i had a patient a couple of weeks ago with neuralgia would be on the standard treatment for that and had developed life—threatening stevens—johnson syndrome and had to go on another drug which is second line treatment, which i happen to know is on the list of the ones that is a problem shortlisting and i felt really uncomfortable. i knew it was amber but possibly red. this put me under a huge amount of pressure at the time. at the time of the response from matt hancock, and i hadn't realised this, there was a story in the papers suggesting newsnight were scaremongering, knowing that yellowhammer is not the worst case scenario, it

you hear people sailing ndas so they cannot speak up. —— signing.e lines get very blurred. thank you for coming and talking to us. the podcast is the next episode and is part of a wider investigation and it is looking into the #metoo and the music industry. illegal raves were big in the 90s, and police say they're back on the rise in derbyshire's peak district, one of the country's most famous national parks. it's notjust the noise disturbance and damage to the environment which bothers local residents but the availability of drugs, often to under age ravers, which is worrying. so derbyshire police with the help of volunteers are fighting back. inside out's sarah sturdey went on the rave patrol with derbyshire's rural crime unit. evening, guys. the main aim of tonight is to stop these raves from setting up before they get going. these are previous sites that we've had raves in the last few years. they are all labeled. i've got a briefing intel slide on here about the potential drugs you might find when you go into the raves. nitrous oxide being one

leading civil rights lawyer, who represented a fox news reporter who wanted to be released from an nda to report on this same story regarding the hush payments by donald trump to stormy daniels. joyce, do you see anything new coming here in this strategy? >> i don't think it will be new, ari, but i think it might be fresh. the real question is who will hold this president who has been notoriously tough, accountable. it may be too little, too late. that's what a lot of people think about this strategy. but by circumventing the white house's constant full-court press against subpoenas, by going back to preelection activity, where they can subpoena witnesses and acquire documents, the democrats may come up with a narrative that the american people will finally get to see in full and may find compelling. >> and duncan, sas you know, ths is a legalistic thing, but it's not strictly legal, because we're talking about congress acting in its capacity under the constitution to do what amounts to the indictment of a president when they decide to impeach, if they ever do. and this is something sp

accuser couldn't talk to her own therapist about these allegations without getting some kind of like an ndaettlements are signed by women across america every single day they were used in the bill o'reilly case. they were used in the larry nassar case, and what they are is that often a woman who experiences sexual harassment will go to a lawyer hoping for some sort of help, hoping that the problem can somehow be set right and what they are often told is their best choice is to find a secret settlement the benefit to them is they get money, and they get privacy, and the sort of hope is that the whole thing goes away, but what we have seen ending up happening again and again is that these settlements can really enable predators because it's hush money. the deal is money for silence. these women, once they sign these papers, they can't talk about their own personal experiences and they cannot warn other women that this is happening. >> it kind of perpetuates the system there's some interesting moments, you talk about gwyneth paltrow, she did not go on the record in your initial stories but we

we try to address this in the nda and hopefully the language will stay in there. i would like to ask each of you -- can we get a commitment from each of you that if confirmed, you will continue each of your services focused on addressing these issues and ensuring military members and families are provided the housing that they deserve, the transparency, the responsiveness, and i think all members of this committee believe they are important to our family members and the well-being of the military. >> yes, senator. i tried to exhibit that behavior a week ago when we released it to the entire congress. we have a series of recommendations that are in the same spirit of the legislation you just referred to. we are taking appropriate actions and as i mentioned earlier we baselined ourselves against the problem. we weren't managing the contractor as well as we should with the level of diligence we should. we took out the chain of command from the process and you can't empower leaders if you take away their authority in their ability to measure the problems. this isto do

we are trying to address this in our nda and hopefully that language will stay in there, but i want to ask each of you, can we get a commitment from each of you, that if confirmed, you will continue the service, each of your services, focus on addressing these issues, ensuring military members and families are provided the housing that they deserve. the transparency and responsiveness that we believe, and i think all members of this committee believe are important to our family members and the well-being in the military, in addition to our modernization. >> yes, senator. i tried to exhibit that very type of behavior about a week ago when we released the ig investigation to the entire congress. we had a series of recommendations from the ig that are in the same spirit as the legislation you just referred to. we are taking appropriate actions now, starting to fall into place. as i mentioned earlier, we baselined ourselves against the problem. quite frankly, not just the army, the entire department. we weren't managing the contractor the way we should. years ago we took out the chain of c

--nda in new jersey, also caller: good morning, america, my beautiful country that i love.his whole thing to me is so have ang that we administration that is so corrupt and claiming executive courtsge over all the where we can see the evidence. this is what this president is doing. i think he should be impeached and i think mitch mcconnell should be impeached right alongside him. ,is wife should be impeached the transportation secretary, they are robbing us blind. guys, i am sorry. you trump supporters, he is going to break your heart. this guy is a crook and i for putin is an agent . he is going to be found guilty of treason. watch what i am telling you. host: a few collars back we talked about the video president trump put out calling it the real and only story when it comes to the issue of joe biden and hunter biden. this is that video the president 8:53ed out -- saturday at --alsolking about showing clips of joe biden's comments at the foreign council of the -- about the ukraine. you can see that video. larry, taylorville, illinois. you are next. caller: yes, i would ju

we'll report on several motions to instruct our nda a -- in one of those motions will be a republican proposal that we insist on fully funding these projects for our own service members. with the kentuckians i represent, this is simple. kentuckians want our nations to have a secure southern border, kentuckians want full funding for the middle school in fort campbell, funding they have been waiting on for years, funding i proudly secured in the first place. and kentuckians know perfectly well that with everything the united states of america spends money on there is no earthly reason why democrats should force us to have one or the other. they don't want to be used as pawns in democrats political gains. even my democratic colleagues who don't support the administration of border security agenda should not take out their frustration on our armed forces. every single member of this body should be able to support the measure to fully fund military construction. so i will do her child of my colleagues to vote yes on that notion. later today. >> speaker nancy pelosi announced that the house

we'll report on several motions to instruct our nda a -- in one of those motions will be a republican proposal that we insist on fully funding these projects for our own service members. with the kentuckians i represent, this is simple. kentuckians want our nations to have a secure southern border, kentuckians want full funding for the middle school in fort campbell, funding they have been waiting on for years, funding i proudly secured in the first place. and kentuckians know perfectly well that with everything the united states of america spends money on there is no earthly reason why democrats should force us to have one or the other. they don't want to be used as pawns in democrats political gains. even my democratic colleagues who don't support the administration of border security agenda should not take out their frustration on our armed forces. every single member of thi