ndavid, to kirsten's ponent is accountability on the health care.p sebelius walk away or fired and did the president hold her accountable. and is accountability a broad brush in the election. >> accountability is always an issue when it comes to government. what is accountablity. kathleen resigned or pushed out or fired. it is irrelevant. what are the actions with the irs? what is the oversight pushed forward by congress? kirsten is right. our government should be transparent to us. we give them pour in the constitution. and not only in this administration, it is bureaucracy that are entrenched in their model and protecting the bureaucracy than doing their job. >> good to have you on today. thanks. >> new report finding that a department of education stands to make billions of dollars off of student loans amid president obama's repeated requested to make college more affordable. >> over the next decade. department of education could generate 127 billion in profit off student loans. and the president made it clear as he spoke, that reforms to student

ndavid, any way you slice it. it is a tough case to bear.n of proof is on the prosecutors because they claim it was pre-meditated murder and he was wait for the tones. >> it is beyond a reasonable doubt. this man had 12 prior fell no break ins, and increasing violence. these kids smashed his window out and violently entered his home. what does the prosecutor want? him to wait until he is stabbed or shot himself? minnesota law is clear. a homeowner can respond to an act in his home with deadly force. if a home invasion or burglary. he can use deadly force which is precisely what he did. this verdict has no option other than than not guilty. i suspect that will happen. >> to davids point. a person may use deadly force to protect his or her home. but did smith go too far here? >> absolutely he went too far. it is called the castle dock rin. and not the okay coral and not the wild, wild west doctrine. two key point tots doctrine. the homeowner has to be in immediate threat of grave harm. it is no evidence they were armed and mr. smith has a duty