supreme court justices, clarence thomas and neal gore search all say along with alito that there is astrong likelihood, a pennsylvania court decision of separating mail in ballots, violated the u.s. constitution. well, i think that, that, i think i can't question the validity of what they're saying as a matter of law, i don't necessarily agree with that. it's a matter that has to be determined, but it is the one issue which is fundamental, is that even if the court were ultimately did get to determine if it violated the law, it would have to once again affect the number of ballots that would make a difference in the election, that's a fundamental principle that every court recognizes, including the united states supreme court. so as a matter of academic interest. and it may or may not have been in violation of u.s. constitution, but it would make any difference. i think that might be one of the things the court had in mind when it, when it held off to wait until after the election. presumably going to tell me the number of dead people, all of those who voted won't affect those margins