what the house members have said, some of the progressive groups have talked about potentially ned lamonting democratic candidates if they don't -- >> liberal primary challengers. >> if they don't hold firm as you're holding the line particularly when it comes to the public health insurance option. i want to get your reaction on that and if you think that's a possibility in 2010. >> it is the possibility. here is the problem. we're deep in this big political fight and people have lost focus on the policy fight. the bill doesn't work without a public option, which is the big divide between the center left and the right. so if you have a bill with no public option, basically you're giving $60 billion a year, which is the cost of the bill in the house to the insurance companies. that is probably the worst thing you can do. so i think the position of progressives is going to be if you don't want the public option, then forget it, don't have a bill. you can do insurance reform, doesn't cost you a nickel. do community insurance and rating, doesn't cost a nickel. the rest isn't reform and you're ma