"in-depth" with neil degrasse tyson come alive, from noon until 3:00 p.m.astern on sunday, may 7 on book tv. chairman proposed reversing the obama and ministration's relations on the internet. i shared withay my commissioners a proposal to reverse title ii and returned to the light touch regulatory framework that served our nation well during the clinton administration, bush, and the first six years of the obama administration. >> monday night on "the theunicators" we ask director of indications at the american enterprise institute and the vice president of public knowledge their impacts of the proposal. >> we think the rules we got in 2015 are working. their wildly popular. an overwhelming majority of americans want to have clear rules of the road to protect an open internet. we are concerned that he has made a path to review and potentially repeal some or all of those rules. >> from the internet inception until the days the rules were passed, the internet was free and open. there was not a problem, as the chairman said, there was no dystopian controlled i

can you talk you mention neil degrasse tyson or others who operate in the same sphere talking bill gates to play the role with the public expert with an intellectual and social conscience can you talk about the expertise you are experts on deterrence of russia and the soviet union or what about astrophysics but there are people once you get the expert license and one area their experts in everything. >> and the public plays into this you experts and your credentials if he says i am neil degrasse tyson i will talk about child care. who cares? for those old enough to remember in the nuclear arms committee a talk about her at length in the book talking about the ability of the silos with a first-rate she was a pediatrician. but she had dr. in front of turning. american swing wildly but on the other hand somebody says i am dr. and then you believe them usually anything about medicine. forget vaccine now want to talk about social justice. it is insane. someone the people i have spent time with is the maddening problem of cross expertise violation. i am smart has some deep thoughts about healt

no matter what neil degrass tyson tells you. some issues of social science, which i still believe in the science but that is about the problems of how we live together as a community of people. are not amenable to a scientific answer wedge not weigh democracy. we can try to see it and know when it's working. we can't weigh the kind of things we work on. when do we know deterrence is not operating? when it fails. when there's a war. i guess deterrence isn't operating anymore. but the other problem for science is that -- i think this is where experts make a mistake. scientific exerted. they say the science is clear and, therefore, my -- the policy choice i advocate is equally clear. i said no, no, science is science and policy is policy. climate change. i hate this whole subject. makes -- give monday a migraine. don't want to argue about science of climate change but i want to establish the point that if the people in boston want to make the crazy decision to let the city slide into the harbor in 70. >> that's -- 70 years that's t

then somebody comes along and says i'm neil degrasse tyson. what you think about childcare? who cares what he thinks about childcare? or doctors. this happened a lot during the cold war for those of us old enough to remember it. there was a gadfly in the nuclear arms community and a talk about her at some length in the book. helen had very serious ideas about nuclear weapons, silo issues, should talk about the build of our silos for a stand of strike our civil defense. she was a pediatrician but she had doctor in front of her neighbor she's a doctor. americans swing wildly between these. they say you experts and your credentials take all that nonsense and tell your story walking trip on you then someone says but i'm a walker. all right, go ahead to what you think what usually anything about medicine. if a doctor says i want to talk about vaccines, they say forget that. i want to talk about social justice. now you got me, dock. it's insane. whaone of the people that i spea long time and give credit to lawrence friedman has been a long time talking with me about this problem o

. >> he once called for the removal of pluto as a planet and on sunday, may 7, astronaut neil degrasse tyson will be our guest. >> allow me to tell you that our moon, as small as it was compared to earth, has five times the mass of pluto. pluto lovers were never told that, where you? [laughter] welcome to the company of informed people. [laughter] three-hourur live conversation, we will take your calls, tweets, and facebook lessons from esther tyson, who was also the director of the planetary in new york city and author of several books. watch in-depth with astrophysicist and author no degrasse tyson live from noon to 3 p.m. eastern on sunday, may 7 on book tv on c-span2. >> washington journal continues. host: welcome back. we have been talking all morning about the first 100 days of donald trump's presidency. on how it islook playing out across the country. this is from the fayetteville observer -- after 100 days, trump still controlling conversation. dayp has mocked the 100th benchmark complaining that he would be accused of failing a matter how much he accomplished. but he spent the final

. >> stephen: it was either you or neil degrass tyson.uent musical guest. we did a duet together. >> the nut meg. >> stephen: a christmas special ♪ my sweet nut beg on the 25th ♪ i'm going to color you in ♪ my nut meg >>te were together you had a lovely baby. >> we had a baby, yes. >> stephen: congratulations on that. >> she's a year old now. ( applause ). >> stephen: i mean, i associate-- and a lot of people associate you with love, your love songs, finding love, wanting love, losing love. how has your view of love changed now that you have your own bundle of love? having a wild, how is that joit's a different kind of love. it's very pure, it's unconditional, but they haven't earned it yet. it's like -- >> stephen: what do you mean? >> they didn't do anything. they just exist. >> stephen: right, but you love them completely. >> you love them bleat complooetly but it's not built on an