>> i want you to respond to that neil irwin. >> the fundamental thing with lehman brothers unlike bearns and aig, it wasn't just having a short-term shortage of cash, it was insolvent. and at the time the government had no tools around to fill that gap. later there was the tarp and other tools the government had. at the time of the lehman brothers failure, there wasn't much left in the arsenal. the question is could they have handled things differently back then? you know, there's plenty of things you could have run of how they might have done things differently. but you had a massive financial system that was overextended, that was short of cash, we were hitting the outer limits of the legal authority and really the political will to bail out financial institutions. >> what about the market expectations that abby was talking about? >> you go to europe, and they are still very critical of the american authorities for not doing what they needed to rescue lehman brothers. the american authorities would say we didn't have any legal tools. but lehman was the leading cause of the crisis, bu