neil schwartz opposed and filed a dr on a similar project in 2019. both call for the construction of a new detached dwelling in the same location in the rear yard. difference with the tw projects had you ever is as follows the previous 29 then project was smaller. 850 versus 975. but tall in height 21 feet versus 15 feet 11 inches the main difference is the previous 2919 project was discretionary, triggered a rear yard variance and subject it a dr process before planning. a planning commission hearing was held on january 23 of 2020 and the commission voted to continue not reject as the appellate stated. the item. why in contrast the current project is ministerial. meets all provisions out lined in the program. and entitleed a stream line review and approval process. by way of background to explain the change, shortly after the planning commission hearing condition the item scientist law changed. allowing for mule detaches structures in the roar yard. as long as they are no more than a thousand square feet in size. setback 4 feet from the line and mea