dubious things in their biographies pages, for example, at one time, they refused to recognize nelson mandevas a prisoner of conscience because they said that he committed violent acts and simply the apartheid regime with from their point of view, this is already a very big drawback for him, he can no longer be a bar for freedom , that is, here, in principle, this criterion of nelson mandela was absolutely applied to ukraine in the same way, because their country should not resist any violent actions, ukraine simply should to observe and expect that this situation will be resolved in some other, non-military way, and of course, again, this raises a very big question, why will such an organization be needed in the future, if it is not only does not protect human rights or the rights of a separate ethnic group that suffers in the conditions of a military conflict, but on the contrary, with its statement, it puts these people under new threats because this report was immediately used by russia for its propaganda purposes and if you remember you see, there was a tweet from the russian embassy in