authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa and sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but t

year-round grazing and you talk about the nepa process. if were going to make a change of that scope would you agree that the same environmental impact statements would apply to cattle as they do to buffal ? in fact if we are going to make this scale of change? >> i know there's a national bison plan , i'm not specifically familiar with how bison raising range versus cattle raising range. all that would be taken into account if we took federal action to impact that but we are happy to get back to you with more information on that. >> the national bison plan is by a group that, i've never had a problem on public or private land when you do it as long as there are provisions in place with the cattle and buffalo can live in a relative area of harmony but on public land, they were obligated to have the same environmental review on it and if there are problems they need to be addressed and the buffalo plan to my knowledge has never been through the state of montana where it affects. lastly,the question is parks. i'm sure we all agree on the imp

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa and sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to adminis

. >>> coming up, the attacks any brussels and we're going to show you messages of hope from nepa >> also ahead, inside the minds of those isis bombers. we'll hear from an expert on counter-terrorism to get more insight. >> and the heartfelt memorials and symbol offices strength after attacks. so unforgettable. you're watching abc's "world news now." so i mowed the lawn, put up all the decorations. i thought i got everything. almost everything! you know, 1 in 10 houses could get hit by a septic disaster, and a bill of up to $13,000. but for only $7 a month, rid-x is scientifically proven to break down waste, helping you avoid a septic disaster. rid-x. the #1 brand used by septic professionals in their own tanks. don't even think about it. cough if you can hear me. i took mucinex dm for my phlegmy cough. yeah...but what about mike? it works on his cough too. cough! it works on his cough too. mucinex dm relieves wet and dry coughs for 12 hours. let's end this. (sound♪ of music ♪histling) introducing new k-y touch gel crème. for massage and intimacy. every touch,

given the forest service experience with nepa and solutions and streamlining authorities, how can we utilize that? we have h.r. 2657 the resilient federal forest ask which is intended to help in terms of streamlining nepa. how important is that to you? >> what's important to me is that the authorities we have our authorities that are supported across the board so we can actually successfully implement those. i look at the authority sticking out of the farm bill. the work we're doing with insect and disease, doing with good neighbor authority. that is allowing us to be able to expand our work because there's a support. those authorities were put together in a way to provide some assurance as to those that have some questions and concerns about forest management. at the same time it allowed us to reduce some of the paperwork, some of the documentation of analysis. so they were very effective. so as we look forward for any authorities, for me it has to be something that provides that level of trust. so that we can actually use it. if you don't have that it creates more controversy and w

he 27%av ence 2 onlyhicr bruno at gy oone of tse ricts nepa onth requingn nss be n tion now thideau t get constaefe ercising a funnt nstional sms d sest ting nt state wm mzio respd byroil ould men e s d provida sied d error pridincoberehey cotacte sfunction drugligr" f.y, wile n r ally, nted t meeahis weekend,o ught ] thosein rtrictis haome commonple over t lastivyerday, e emurt he ars aanti-abortio tas pretty viouy atryg to art >> it that kbulaicenterslso quir abon ovve ating iles alohoals. ensult in is t 5on w reprtige m be left withy on cli. h:cs 5.miwome d ma mrsorse, itros ju hon " om l sta wli unow texas lawmakers ai w s are st to pr s a noese laaks ca taylive abrtiocoro aerna pntouere are ma urha sk. ies, los w d o and of ce threas lonoies 'teged likertns is that a haveand ear [ eep " ht ]kagawas joy r le jti hammg a mar po nethe undu buis. rrenrg , n ta two lsho. t nd she has traay a tof treat. driving 0 mio methcaho tr n th had tgo sturte anet wh counr h a who anta out? oh psive[ ht ]itas jus ruth bsbur e errepren d clahat the onweomen hehehase d outhata man has the fundl ght

that we have hr 2567 in the federal forest act which is intended to help in terms of streamlining nepa. how important is that to you? >> that we have those that are supportive of christopher did so that we can successfully implement those. i look at the authorities that came out of the farm bill and the good neighbor authority that is allowing us to expand because they were put together in a way that provides assurances that had some questions about forest management. but at the same time, it allowed us to be able to reduce the paperwork into some of the documentation of analysis so they were very effective. as we look forward for any authorities for me it has to be something that provides that level of trust so that we can use it because if you don't have that it creates more controversy and it will shy away from those using different authorities so that is the challenge as we go forward and once again, the word from the 2,014th farm bill and the insect and disease they are proving to be helpful and we are implementing those now. >> thank you madam chair. in recent years the budget ha

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa and sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to adminis

they'rsur cotrated.. g acln.te16ductf ifs gotoe clea ist e`ei. foreadthe ng, rnpinddl nepa,thesfeet servemymyountnt, caiethe weigf a mily, and ed aghr wnis. t i uldn't br mydidietet nereraiaiy lo. nenee dadage fm dietes catirve pain lyrica i ifdprpredreatin. eratto ese dnee pa. ri m ciorg reaio orcil ghghr tions. teour ctight away ifou havthese, neor worseniepressn, or u changes imood bav or sweleing, trouble breathi, sh, hives, bsters,s, muscain with fevertired feeling or blurry vision. common side e cts are zziness, sepiness, gain a elli o (.hds,#l aee t drdrk alcohol wh iicic door machiryknow h lyricicaffey#u. those who ve had a drug or alcohoproble may be more lilylyo mimise lyra. now i have lessabetic berve pai and my biggestson to walk calls me grandpa. on the lon the links and on rara simpson simpson s evywherer%eager clear his name as t t tb.e.t. inanuy ofof99 >> l l l nice. iould not have killed anyone. >> rorte wing and ething wehe f filof nile a you know, hs isisarntntder, fling s britr:sae look' ' r al klers o every fairway in a araca-- >>>>ight. . d evertime he-- he-- had found him. >>

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa and sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to adminis

emphasizing we do have baby five tons of the same kind of material already and we have performed the nepa analysis not for the full amount of plutonium being discussed here but for 13 tons and in fact six tons from the savannah river have been for some time vectored as a preferred alternative to go to whip. first of all the salt bed is almost by definition pretty stable because if there were substantial water flow it wouldn't be there so salt has always been viewed as very favorable medium. finally there has been a recent paper arguing about safety risks we had sandia national laboratory look at that and they find the paper to be without merit. >> leslie there has been confucianist to how -- i have here two different government officials with one administrator testified in the armed services committee that it was over 60% complete and then a year later national nuclear security administration testifying 35 to 41% complete. how would we reconcile those two? >> first of all there are two different things. one is an there's a lot of confusion comparing apples and oranges. one point is the mo

on coal lease sales that were in response to legislative action by congress that the enactment of nepa and the fiscal year 1984 interior appropriations act. but in your order you do generally cite skrars existing statutes but there has not been specific legislation that would offer a similar moratorium today. what is the specific legal justification for your order? >> we will provide a solicitors opinion if that's if that's hel. we went through this in detail, looked at the historic record, looked at what had been done in the prior two times there had been a review of the coal program under reagan and nixon and applies the same tools -- >> without the direction from congress in this case. >> we followed the lead of what congress did last time -- >> which we didn't do this time. >> we're doing a pause on the program because it has not had a review in 30 years, sir. >> but congress didn't ask for this. >> no, but we did listening sessions around the country. we did listen, contrary to what was heard before and we felt -- >> this will be sorted out in the courts. changing subject, accordi

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa and sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to adminis

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to administer.

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepaand sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to administ

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepa sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to administer.

guilty of not listening to flint residents, certainly he was guilty of being overly trusting of mdq nepa but the president says he wants to be part of the solution, he is actively engaged in this and so i am willing to work with anybody who wants to be part of the solution. i think he is sincere about trying to help link it back on his feet. >> we are about to have a vote called on the floor, if the ranking member -- >> thank you very much. i'm a a little stunned by what you told representative, you said you talk to the governor's office about our request for you to test by february 3, by the way it was a joint request, democrats and republicans. he said they never directed to you, the governor never directed you to cooperate with us the house committee on oversight, they just told you to do whatever you had to do, that right? >> basically was to make my own decision about going. because it was an invitation and i was not prepared to sit before this committee, i declined the invitation. that was the extent of the conversation i had with the governor. but the subpoena that you are referri

authorization at the state level to allow cal transin circumstances to administer and over see both nepad sequa documents but i will not comment on the effectiveness, but it is a continuation of an existing policy. and what will bring the high speed rail program to an end. it says that no more bonds could be sold. >> and it will have to go back to the voters and so there is a double layer of protection against this becoming effective. because i don't see this measure moving forward but that one is found on page 15, if you would like more details or more information. we are also recommending support on ab, 2126, on page, 16. of the matrix. and this applies, to the state's current authority to utilize construction manager, and general contractor and authority, for administering projects, large scale, complex, projects and it will be coming to another bill, similar to this in a moment that applies to you, about you this applies, only to the state. the state has the authority to do six and they have occupied the six slots in statute, and this will extend it to 12 for cal trans, to administer