wait for sure after the new year. here is this tariff of 7.96, a very reliable situation, because the nercs. naftogaz of ukraine, represented by the head of mr. chernyshov, assured that there will be no numbers until the first of may, the only thing i would like to warn is that there is the same price of gas. and there is also distribution and that is distribution more is happening than actually for the cost of gas, it carries corrections so that everyone is not surprised. if the payment suddenly increases because the cost of distribution can increase and the same thing . here there is a temporarily displaced person, an internally displaced person, but they do not use the services, but there is a subscription fee, the debts do not disappear, they do not disappear, and the subscription fee is due because gas must be supplied for the gas office to work, water must be supplied so that they also work, even if they do not use it but you know, look at how well i understand a person, if he lived last year , he lived with us, well, there is enough volume, but now he does not live , he pays the sub

nerc takes care of 30 u four water canals, it is communal property or some form of concession, and oner local council well, for example, in kyiv. it is the kyiv city council. it regularly allocates funds to kyivvodokanal and increases the statutory fund at the expense of it. it is possible to carry out modernization there, after all, something else. well , they just throw money and keep the tariff at a stable level, others probably do the same big cities, but i will not give a guarantee that all 34 cities are powerful cities. and what to do . if they are not powerful, how can they find a way out of the situation, what is the option? we have many small water utilities, even in the village of hotov near kyiv, it has its own water utility and sewage system. it is clear that he is not a licensee and he, er, raises the tariff for him. the executive committee of the local council is a possible way, but you understand the economy and politics . let's say that there are no elections in the near future, considering the military situation, i think that the local councils can rest more freely bec

when you say when we i notice in 2017, right, we're going to form the nerc, we're going to fight racial and partizan. and you can see the reporters were looking at their watches, their eyes were over. i know. and, you know, i think to myself, wow, we got to make people understand the. reality is, if you care about a woman's right to choose, if you care about climate change, if you care about criminal justice reform, if you care about any of these things, you have to care about gerrymandering. because the reality is gerrymandering can put in place people who don't have seeing desires for reform and will have less support than people who share your views. you know, the district can say, you know, we want have all we stand for criminal justice. we want to make sure that women have the right to choose. that can be the majority a district. but because of the way in which lines are drawn majority people in the state but because of the way in which the lines are drawn, a minority can do things that are inconsistent with the majority of the voters and you end up with almost like a apartheid whe

electric grid groups joining the top power grid watchdog nerc warning are there will be more power blackoutsels to power the electric grid and go to green energy. it's the southwest power pool, pjm interconnection and the tristate generation group. they deliver power to tens of millions of homes in 31 states. that's more than half the country,man. >> liz, it's it's worse than that. we are on the cusp of insanity. it's not just those three groups, it's literally every man and woman i have talked to in the last with two years who is involved in the management of this grid. they are crying out for help. they want to continue to do their job, providing safe, reliable and affordable electricity. this administration is making it more difficult. elizabeth: so we've got senate democrats though led by bernie sanders and elizabeth warren demanding a.g. garland and doj sue and prosecute u.s. oil and gas claiming they're, you know, dissenting from the progressive line on climate change. so what -- but they need u.s. oil and gas to power the electric grid for their electric cars. >> this is utter balderd