line so van ness brt is running and going to be stopping at lombard there is 3 blocks left on van ness the first block continue lombard and chest newly nut we're proposing other buses move over to the side running lane and the last two blocks from the north point has a transit only lane that supports the 49 and 47 and, of course, the hocking no parking removal but the delay is next to the parking lane and a if you bulbs a number of outreach for the proposals held our own open houses as well as a number of community oriented and developed meetings including the presentations to the community and the citizens were called total with several meetings to hear about the proposals and listen to what we're coming up with i have another publicly meeting the middle of december a thousand postcards the corridor and over 6 hundred people take the survey asking for feedback along the proposal to get input and what did we hear a couple of message lourtd one the community someone said the transit riders if so a need for the a.m. peak transit only lane they also were strong option to the traffic

line so van ness brt is running and going to be stopping at lombard there is 3 blocks left on vaness the first block continue lombard and chest newly nut we're proposing other buses move over to the side running lane and the last two blocks from the north point has a transit only lane that supports the 49 and 47 and, of course, the hocking no parking removal but the delay is next to the parking lane and a if you bulbs a number of outreach for the proposals held our own open houses as well as a number of community oriented and developed meetings including the presentations to the community and the citizens were called total with several meetings to hear about the proposals and listen to what we're coming up with i have another publicly meeting the middle of december a thousand postcards the corridor and over 6 hundred people take the survey asking for feedback along the proposal to get input and what did we hear a couple of message lourtd one the community someone said the transit riders if so a need for the a.m. peak transit only lane they also were strong option to the traffic si

was the director of the mta it was considered to be sur plus and realize would the coming with van ness brt they needed it again and hadn't thought that through so it isn't listed as sur plus because now the mta thinks they need the bus yard but i propose we explore the possibility of a bus yard with housing above. >> the reason and ask is it makes me wonder what other pieces of property are out there that the city ons that is unaccounted for. just food for thought. >> it was interesting-this is a divergence fl to the prop k thing but i laughed one of the ochbl properties that showed as sur plus is the fire chiefs house on bush street. >> thank you for your comments and commissioner peskin i would throw another thought in the mix. i have want vetted this with mta but hawj debate about the need for a training facility and there are concerns about us potentially entering into a 9 and a hamp year lease for 2.something million dollars without guaranteed certainty after that period of time and looking for a large space to have the new ones trained and retrained so i'll throw that into the mix as

was the director of the mta it was considered to be sur plus and realize would the coming with van ness brt they needed it again and hadn't thought that through so it isn't listed as sur plus because now the mta thinks they need the bus yard but i propose we explore the possibility of a bus yard with housing above. >> the reason and ask is it makes me wonder what other pieces of property are out there that the city ons that is unaccounted for. just food for thought. >> it was interesting-this is a divergence fl to the prop k thing but i laughed one of the ochbl properties that showed as sur plus is the fire chiefs house on bush street. >> thank you for your comments and commissioner peskin i would throw another thought in the mix. i have want vetted this with mta but hawj debate about the need for a training facility and there are concerns about us potentially entering into a 9 and a hamp year lease for 2.something million dollars without guaranteed certainty after that period of time and looking for a large space to have the new ones trained and retrained so i'll throw that into the mix as

was the director of the mta it was considered to be sur plus and realize would the coming with van ness brt they needed it again and hadn't thought that through so it isn't listed as sur plus because now the mta thinks they need the bus yard but i propose we explore the possibility of a bus yard with housing above. >> the reason and ask is it makes me wonder what other pieces of property are out there that the city ons that is unaccounted for. just food for thought. >> it was interesting-this is a divergence fl to the prop k thing but i laughed one of the ochbl properties that showed as sur plus is the fire chiefs house on bush street. >> thank you for your comments and commissioner peskin i would throw another thought in the mix. i have want vetted this with mta but hawj debate about the need for a training facility and there are concerns about us potentially entering into a 9 and a hamp year lease for 2.something million dollars without guaranteed certainty after that period of time and looking for a large space to have the new ones trained and retrained so i'll throw that into the mix as

will enable us to maintain the momentum so that by the time central subway comes on line and van ness brtes on line and will have big suvs increase in the next budget we are well positioned to execute those. >> thank you, director. >> so, i wasn't going to necessarily go through all of what is on these additional slides. just wanted to kind of point out that there are lots of needs that the agency has, some are very clear and direct like adding more hours of muni service. others are maybe a little back of house but equally important. for example, the federal transit agency which is part of the united states department of transportation through a recent rule making that came out of mat 21 passed federal transportation bill and was reinforced in a more recent fast act that the new transporpation bill created a new requirement that transit agencies implement a safety manenment system and think it is a good requirement. it will take staff resources on our end to implement that and think it will make a better agency and safer system but there are a number of things like that, additional outrea

was the director of the mta it was considered to be sur plus and realize would the coming with van ness brt they needed it again and hadn't thought that through so it isn't listed as sur plus because now the mta thinks they need the bus yard but i propose we explore the possibility of a bus yard with housing above. >> the reason and ask is it makes me wonder what other pieces of property are out there that the city ons that is unaccounted for. just food for thought. >> it was interesting-this is a divergence fl to the prop k thing but i laughed one of the ochbl properties that showed as sur plus is the fire chiefs house on bush street. >> thank you for your comments and commissioner peskin i would throw another thought in the mix. i have want vetted this with mta but hawj debate about the need for a training facility and there are concerns about us potentially entering into a 9 and a hamp year lease for 2.something million dollars without guaranteed certainty after that period of time and looking for a large space to have the new ones trained and retrained so i'll throw that into the mix as

will enable us to maintain the momentum so that by the time central subway comes on line and van ness brts on line and will have big suvs increase in the next budget we are well positioned to execute those. >> thank you, director. >> so, i wasn't going to necessarily go through all of what is on these additional slides. just wanted to kind of point out that there are lots of needs that the agency has, some are very clear and direct like adding more hours of muni service. others are maybe a little back of house but equally important. for example, the federal transit agency which is part of the united states department of transportation through a recent rule making that came out of mat 21 passed federal transportation bill and was reinforced in a more recent fast act that the new transporpation bill created a new requirement that transit agencies implement a safety manenment system and think it is a good requirement. it will take staff resources on our end to implement that and think it will make a better agency and safer system but there are a number of things like that, additional outreac

was the director of the mta it was considered to be sur plus and realize would the coming with van ness brty needed it again and hadn't thought that through so it isn't listed as sur plus because now the mta thinks they need the bus yard but i propose we explore the possibility of a bus yard with housing above. >> the reason and ask is it makes me wonder what other pieces of property are out there that the city ons that is unaccounted for. just food for thought. >> it was interesting-this is a divergence fl to the prop k thing but i laughed one of the ochbl properties that showed as sur plus is the fire chiefs house on bush street. >> thank you for your comments and commissioner peskin i would throw another thought in the mix. i have want vetted this with mta but hawj debate about the need for a training facility and there are concerns about us potentially entering into a 9 and a hamp year lease for 2.something million dollars without guaranteed certainty after that period of time and looking for a large space to have the new ones trained and retrained so i'll throw that into the mix as wel

will enable us to maintain the momentum so that by the time central subway comes on line and van ness brts on line and will have big suvs increase in the next budget we are well positioned to execute those. >> thank you, director. >> so, i wasn't going to necessarily go through all of what is on these additional slides. just wanted to kind of point out that there are lots of needs that the agency has, some are very clear and direct like adding more hours of muni service. others are maybe a little back of house but equally important. for example, the federal transit agency which is part of the united states department of transportation through a recent rule making that came out of mat 21 passed federal transportation bill and was reinforced in a more recent fast act that the new transporpation bill created a new requirement that transit agencies implement a safety manenment system and think it is a good requirement. it will take staff resources on our end to implement that and think it will make a better agency and safer system but there are a number of things like that, additional outreac

will enable us to maintain the momentum so that by the time central subway comes on line and van ness brts on line and will have big suvs increase in the next budget we are well positioned to execute those. >> thank you, director. >> so, i wasn't going to necessarily go through all of what is on these additional slides. just wanted to kind of point out that there are lots of needs that the agency has, some are very clear and direct like adding more hours of muni service. others are maybe a little back of house but equally important. for example, the federal transit agency which is part of the united states department of transportation through a recent rule making that came out of mat 21 passed federal transportation bill and was reinforced in a more recent fast act that the new transporpation bill created a new requirement that transit agencies implement a safety manenment system and think it is a good requirement. it will take staff resources on our end to implement that and think it will make a better agency and safer system but there are a number of things like that, additional outreac