line so van ness brt is running and going to be stopping at lombard there is 3 blocks left on van ness the first block continue lombard and chest newly nut we're proposing other buses move over to the side running lane and the last two blocks from the north point has a transit only lane that supports the 49 and 47 and, of course, the hocking no parking removal but the delay is next to the parking lane and a if you bulbs a number of outreach for the proposals held our own open houses as well as a number of community oriented and developed meetings including the presentations to the community and the citizens were called total with several meetings to hear about the proposals and listen to what we're coming up with i have another publicly meeting the middle of december a thousand postcards the corridor and over 6 hundred people take the survey asking for feedback along the proposal to get input and what did we hear a couple of message lourtd one the community someone said the transit riders if so a need for the a.m. peak transit only lane they also were strong option to the traffic

was the director of the mta it was considered to be sur plus and realize would the coming with van ness brt they needed it again and hadn't thought that through so it isn't listed as sur plus because now the mta thinks they need the bus yard but i propose we explore the possibility of a bus yard with housing above. >> the reason and ask is it makes me wonder what other pieces of property are out there that the city ons that is unaccounted for. just food for thought. >> it was interesting-this is a divergence fl to the prop k thing but i laughed one of the ochbl properties that showed as sur plus is the fire chiefs house on bush street. >> thank you for your comments and commissioner peskin i would throw another thought in the mix. i have want vetted this with mta but hawj debate about the need for a training facility and there are concerns about us potentially entering into a 9 and a hamp year lease for 2.something million dollars without guaranteed certainty after that period of time and looking for a large space to have the new ones trained and retrained so i'll throw that into the mix as

amendments has to do with adding language to address the amounted to the first time for the van ness brtject which concludes the replacement of trees along the van ness coordinator not ruled in an environmental review so we'll request the board to consider amendments to on the second page to the resolution to the second whereas and adrc two new whereas clauses regarding the van ness project eis irs and a final resolve clause that was adding language that says and constitutes the finding of the board so those are all amendments related to the amounted to the van ness project. >> still below the policy service you policy can't exceed 5 percent we're in compliance and the agencies our credit rating this is a time to go to market and take advantage of our dead ratings so we're asking for your approval. >> mr. chairman none has indicated an interest in addressing on this matter i don't see anyone making a move forward. >> the first action to adopt the amendments; right? >> motion to adopt the >> all in favor, say i. >> i. >> opposed? the i's have it. motion to adopt the amendment and >> all i