the other mandatory or required light standards and infrastructure they are required to run on van ness brt >> who would maintain them? >> it could not be mta. >> commissioner hasz >> thank you. just from a construction side because i live in the marina and travel van ness and when the light pole thing came up it took a long time observing light poles down and the way they are built is concrete around rebar and they busted open and rebar expands and pops the concrete off. in my opinion there is no saving them because they are just built strucktually unsound and you would literally just tear them apart and rebuild them and it is brand new light poles. i just sonet think there is any saving them in a safe manner. there is concrete falling off and those things will just knock right over. as much as i hate to lose them i dont think there is a reasonable financial way of saving them. >> i also add this project hasz has been going through years of process and shocking it takes so long to build bus rapid transit in a area that needs bus rapid transit. adding the [inaudible] would take a gigantic s

the other mandatory or required light standards and infrastructure they are required to run on van ness brt >> who would maintain them? >> it could not be mta. >> commissioner hasz >> thank you. just from a construction side because i live in the marina and travel van ness and when the light pole thing came up it took a long time observing light poles down and the way they are built is concrete around rebar and they busted open and rebar expands and pops the concrete off. in my opinion there is no saving them because they are just built strucktually unsound and you would literally just tear them apart and rebuild them and it is brand new light poles. i just sonet think there is any saving them in a safe manner. there is concrete falling off and those things will just knock right over. as much as i hate to lose them i dont think there is a reasonable financial way of saving them. >> i also add this project hasz has been going through years of process and shocking it takes so long to build bus rapid transit in a area that needs bus rapid transit. adding the [inaudible] would take a gigantic s

this is not a effort to halt the van ness brt but preserve the history and character of san francisco. as renew things we can save the past and do new things. these concepterize not exclusivement if you look in the eir so many diagrams so the historic street poles. this is a resolution calls upon the mta and those representatives here i know you can figure it out. this is the satey that goes how. with a little ingenuity it isn't tee too late. we can speed up buses and have light-rail brt and preserve a little of our patrimony and history. those thingerize s are not excluse ive and i have a few very brief amendments i passed out to all of you that are just technical in nature changing the number of street lamps moving-changing bay treat street to north point street. they are small technical in naich rb so like to move those amendments before you. >> supervisor peskin made a motion to amend seconded by avalos. can we take the amendments without objection the without objection the amendments pass unanimously. supervisor peskin that's it? >> colleagues can we take same house came call? wi

the other mandatory or required light standards and infrastructure they are required to run on van ness brt> who would maintain them? >> it could not be mta. >> commissioner hasz >> thank you. just from a construction side because i live in the marina and travel van ness and when the light pole thing came up it took a long time observing light poles down and the way they are built is concrete around rebar and they busted open and rebar expands and pops the concrete off. in my opinion there is no saving them because they are just built strucktually unsound and you would literally just tear them apart and rebuild them and it is brand new light poles. i just sonet think there is any saving them in a safe manner. there is concrete falling off and those things will just knock right over. as much as i hate to lose them i dont think there is a reasonable financial way of saving them. >> i also add this project hasz has been going through years of process and shocking it takes so long to build bus rapid transit in a area that needs bus rapid transit. adding the [inaudible] would take a gigantic ste

this is not a effort to halt the van ness brt but preserve the history and character of san francisco. as renew things we can save the past and do new things. these concepterize not exclusivement if you look in the eir so many diagrams so the historic street poles. this is a resolution calls upon the mta and those representatives here i know you can figure it out. this is the satey that goes how. with a little ingenuity it isn't tee too late. we can speed up buses and have light-rail brt and preserve a little of our patrimony and history. those thingerize s are not excluse ive and i have a few very brief amendments i passed out to all of you that are just technical in nature changing the number of street lamps moving-changing bay treat street to north point street. they are small technical in naich rb so like to move those amendments before you. >> supervisor peskin made a motion to amend seconded by avalos. can we take the amendments without objection the without objection the amendments pass unanimously. supervisor peskin that's it? >> colleagues can we take same house came call? wi

this is not a effort to halt the van ness brt but preserve the history and character of san francisco. as renew things we can save the past and do new things. these concepterize not exclusivement if you look in the eir so many diagrams so the historic street poles. this is a resolution calls upon the mta and those representatives here i know you can figure it out. this is the satey that goes how. with a little ingenuity it isn't tee too late. we can speed up buses and have light-rail brt and preserve a little of our patrimony and history. those thingerize s are not excluse ive and i have a few very brief amendments i passed out to all of you that are just technical in nature changing the number of street lamps moving-changing bay treat street to north point street. they are small technical in naich rb so like to move those amendments before you. >> supervisor peskin made a motion to amend seconded by avalos. can we take the amendments without objection the without objection the amendments pass unanimously. supervisor peskin that's it? >> colleagues can we take same house came call? wi

>> if you frequently travel before i van ness i might be surprised van ness will goodwill go the first transit corridor to have brtas more frequently known the goal to get conveniently van ness and geary boulevard one of the most reliable transit systems in the country van ness avenue is a major connecter between potrero hill and mission on the south side of san francisco correcting connecting us to the marina and state highway in the financial with the western edition neighborhood it is mostly residential a lot of the geography of van ness the rain that is wide it was uses is a firebreak in the 1906 san francisco earthquake a lot of building occasion that helped of hoped to stop the fire from jumping van ness had a light rail or sprash separating and along geary 0 when we came to the question of how to address the needs on haven because of its cost effectiveness we have found in the brt system with the new vehicles. >> the new mr. secretary is a change we will actually have transit in the middle ♪ the far legal unit and a broadly prom >> one of the reasons it is in the center a was it is an clouf right-of-way a s

>> if you frequently travel before i van ness i might be surprised van ness will goodwill go the first transit corridor to have brts more frequently known the goal to get conveniently van ness and geary boulevard one of the most reliable transit systems in the country van ness avenue is a major connecter between potrero hill and mission on the south side of san francisco correcting connecting us to the marina and state highway in the financial with the western edition neighborhood it is mostly residential a lot of the geography of van ness the rain that is wide it was uses is a firebreak in the 1906 san francisco earthquake a lot of building occasion that helped of hoped to stop the fire from jumping van ness had a light rail or sprash separating and along geary 0 when we came to the question of how to address the needs on haven because of its cost effectiveness we have found in the brt system with the new vehicles. >> the new mr. secretary is a change we will actually have transit in the middle ♪ the far legal unit and a broadly prom >> one of the reasons it is in the center a was it is an clouf right-of-way a se

obstruction i was but support brt from of the early days you are now aware of and even more aware when you hear item 9 of the movement to save the historic street lamps of van ness and submitted a purpose asking for a plan for the reuse of lamps to your staff and to the project team supervisor peskin is working on a policy resolution asking you to do that with the knowledge of the local and national support for the use of lamps and 21st we ask you to improve with the caveat the scope of work will not lengthen the street light lamps and fithd please help us. >> (calling names). >> good evening i can say this time i'm kathy the policy and program manager for walk sf i'm attempted to stand and dance i might need to do that but i don't think that leading pedestrian can be ray will be that interesting i am here to quickly express our support of project and urge you to moving forward as quickly as possible great i'm starting to dance great pedestrian intervals and bulb outs that reduce the crashes are proven to keep people safe so move move move i would not i'm not going to - >> next speaker, please. >> (calling names) that's the last person that turned in a speaker c