, here again the question is quite rhetorical, because nestor shufrych does not renounce from medvedchuk, and as you remember, he did not vote for depriving medvedchuk of even the mandate of a deputy of the verkhovna rada. and in general, the reincarnation of dmytro tabachnyk . what can the p-victorivna testify about? well, they haven't pulled it out yet. i don't even know who who else can be pulled out of that old cage of people who are already here? they were on political pensions even in ukraine for a long time , already during the existence of psg. you will work as a deputy, so the fact is that this is a very natural thing. there is definitely not enough of them. now there are people who know all the ins and outs of ukraine. moreover, i am convinced that by this time, not all collaborators from the authorities have been purged by the security services of ukraine. periodically to us informs about the fact that some criminal cases have been opened. are there any enforcement rights ? but nevertheless, it seems to me that there is a complete purge of the ukrainian authorities from those

there were many deputies who felt his in er himself is constantly in medvedchuk's team regarding nestor shufryche question is quite rhetorical because nestor shufrich does not renounce medvedchuk and, as you remember, he did not vote to deprive medvedchuk of even the mandate of a deputy of the verkhovna rada councils and in general, the reincarnation of dmytro tabachnyk. what can the victory of viktorivna testify to? well, they haven’t pulled it out yet. i don’t even know who. who else can be pulled out of that old cage of people who are already here. they were on political pensions even in ukraine for a long time. oops, where was this tabachnik, well, in israel, he was quietly resting his stolen money, and here they drag out a person, and now you will be a member of the parliament in melitopol

next hall they usually vote for that's why cooperation is it is obvious, and if you listen to nestor shufrychen he plays the role of one of the leaders of the majority because he constantly takes the floor and calls on people's deputies to vote less to speak and to vote and praise the decision and regarding the declaration well, it seems to me what exactly is this investigation? this is another vivid example of the fact that there is a problem with the obligation to declare. and only investigations of journalists are anti-corruption. they demonstrate the way of life of people's deputies , even in spite of martial law, about their wealth and property, and that's the same. recently, there have been a series of such revelations, and we can actually see quite similar schemes here, when people's deputies , er, transfer all property not to themselves, but to their relatives, well, similar examples, we can remind them of servants of the people er investigations, when cars were registered as property of mothers, brothers, sisters, etc. , apartments or other real estate, etc. of course, this is a craz

unfortunately no thank you dear colleagues nestor ivanovich shufrych, after that we will vote thank you sir i announce dear colleagues, this draft law really regulates the issue of serving sentences for minors and those who are imprisoned for life and those who are under investigation and arrested today, but we must understand that in connection with the war and the conduct of martial law, certain circumstances have changed and we must proceed from the realities and we can make changes to the second reading only when we vote in the first reading, therefore, please be determined and accept this draft law thank you thank you dear colleagues, we have completed the discussion of this issue, therefore, i am proposing to adopt as a basis, with amendments to the provisions in accordance with the first part of article 116 of the regulations of the verkhovna rada of ukraine, the draft law on amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine regarding the functioning of the institution for the execution of punishments and institutions pretrial detention under martial law, registration number 82-92 ,

and for society if with the help of these votes, for example, i feel the same way about nestor ivanovich shufrychlove the naivety of the most capable ukrainian parliamentarian , the laws necessary for the people are voted on, you should not talk about shufrych like that, that he is rain, you respect him because this track tried to enter the parliament, so the people respect him well he votes for ivan franko, and listen, we see how this faction, the remnants of the opzj, vote together with well , the majority, and sometimes there are laws - laws that come from their voting are well, not that harmful as among the corrupt, we remember the draft law 56-55 and what about this urban planning activity that all er well, who is involved, who understands it, all the local self-governments, architects, well, public activists who analyzed said that this is a corruption law, but these are the remains of passengers in order to to save themselves from responsibility for their anti-ukrainian activities, they simply vote for monomajorities and thus save their school, because very often they are the majority who d