it was included the that it was excluded from the net neutrality order. -- it was excluded from the net neutrality order. >> in a recent speech to the federal bar association, you urged restraint. that is the best way to put it. i will read your words. >> we must resist the urge to stray from our original purpose." >> if there is a problem, we can fix it. i am afraid that we will engineer a one size fits all and we will lose the innovation and experimentation that makes this industry so robust. there is an article, and op-ed in "the washington post" that is good. it talks about the same thing. government is having to find a solution for everything. i agree with george will. we do not need to do that. we used to talk about politics in a limited manner. now, any social policy has an adjoining public policy to it. this is a place where the industry is doing well without our help. we need to exercise restraint and humility. >> where does the fcc need to exercise regulatory control? >> our traditional guideline is radio, television. we have public interest responsibilities, localism and broa

gain as opposed to a net loss for the city. with respect to the direct cost of the city's treasury, if you take a look on page 3-2, we are stating it will cost the treasury of $11.9 million whereas previously we reported it would cost the city $57.8 million. that is a significant improvement over the original deal. the reason for that reduction in cost, the primary reason is that it would be used under the proposed northern waterfront alternative agreement that requires further improvements and a reduction in city costs. and the cost of any dredging and needed to prepare for the event was previously proposed as a cost of the the prior agreement and is now an event authority cost under the northern waterfront alternative agreement. in both instances as well as the development rights, in both instances, this deal has significantly improved from the prior deal that went before you. supervisor mirkarimi: anything else? supervisor avalos: one more question. you mentioned 1765 permanent jobs, what types of jobs are you expecting? >>

our guest is ray ramsey, president and ceo of tech net. >> host: rey ramsey, what is tech net? >> guest: tech net is a bipartisan political and policy organization that's been around for about 15 years, and be our whole focus is to move an innovation agenda across the country. >> host: who -- which companies are members of technet? >> guest: i'd say we've got a nice list of good companies, large and small, from the silicon valley to boston to texas, so, you know, some of the names that you would hear of, that you would know of from microsoft, google, cisco, intel, but also companies like autodesk, a nice mix of companies. >> host: what is a technology policy? >> guest: technology policy is really all about technology-driven innovation. and so all the way from education to biomedical to social innovation, things that use technology. those are the things that get our attention. >> host: so specifically when we talk about issues, let's say net neutrality. what is it that technet does when it comes to net neutrality? >> guest: well, we take a position, and we get in the game of pol

in addition to net neutrality. what else do you see him acting, what other priorities do you see for him? >> guest: well, certainly universal service reform. he comes from a rural state, that's a very important issue for rural residents, you know, to get all services and to the extent there's higher costs in rural areas, you do need some kind of subsidization. the debate recently has been about reforming the program to cover broadband subsidies, so i think that's going to be an issue. he's bringing on as one of his staffers someone who chaired the state regulatory group on universal service. and certainly the vice chairman of the subcommittee, lee cherry, has had a longstanding interest as has chairman rockefeller. so i think you are going to see that be a focus too. >> host: speaking of chairman rockefeller, will he push usf reform this congress, and do you see it happening? >> guest: i don't know if i see it happening. chairman rock rockefeller's very interesting in that he is very consumer-oriented in the avenue

the city would realize an estimated net gain of $12.3 million. you were asking about the comparative number. that gain compares to the previously estimated net loss of 14.6 million. the reason for that difference that compared to the estimated net loss, under the originally proposed legislation agreement, as shown in table b, this is due to the removal of peir 50. and is due to a smaller infrastructure improvement costs requirement of the event already. -- event authority. that means that the city would capture more incremental property taxes rather than having to use the larger amount of incremental property taxes to reimburse the event authority for subsequent infrastructure improvement costs. that is the basic difference between our original report, the prior agreement, and this report. under the prior agreement the the event authority was going to pay no rent under the proposed northern waterfront alternative agreement, the port would receive a commercially reasonable payment from the authority. it would be partially offset to provide reimbur

>> somewhere near the bottom of the retaining wall and the poles for the netting. commissioner fung: thank you. commissioner hwang: i have a couple of questions, also. i have a question about the reason for the fence. the first question actually is the fence was existing over 20 years without any permit. is that correct? >> without any encouragement. commissioner hwang: without any encroachment permit. it's only at the time the complaint was filed -- >> that usf understood that was an encouragement at all. commissioner hwang: during your oral presentation, you talk about protecting the public. have there been any safety related issues with children or members of the public attempting to in any way harming themselves? >> there have been a lot of issues around the baseball field. again, this fence has been there quite some time, so, no, there have not been issues with children falling into it -- commissioner hwang: that was one of your arguments, to protect the public you need the encouragement. at that to protect the public, you need a fence that approximately -- he

if that occurs, the net cost would drop to $11.6 million. if it does not occur and the dredging still is a city cost -- by the way, it would be higher at the northern waterfront alternative then it would be with the original plan -- then the city's net cost would be $47.6 million, assuming that the city incurs all the costs at the high end of the range of estimates from the port. for the long term development rights, the change. in the northern waterfront alternative agreement, there are ~ will properties instead of three that would be transferred. pier 50 was excluded. there are lease payments required now which were not required in the original. the lease payments, however, would be offset to some extent by the repayment -- the credit to the event authority for the $55 million that they are required to spend on infrastructure improvements. the incremental property-tax could also be used under the terms of the property agreement for repayment of the $55 million, said that would also have some impact on the city, but we do not have the compa

immigrants are a net contributor to the economy. it is easy to be distracted by the fiscal analysis which is about tax revenues and expenditures. entire categories of people at a certain phase in their life and a certain period in their economy are net users of tax resources. as it happens since we're running a big federal deficit right now, we're all net users of resources. if you add us you will up together, we're not producing enough revenue to cover the expenses of the government. people that are older, children, those are categories of people who are net drains on the economy. that's a fiscal analysis, not an economic analysis. so point number one for your friends who are not persuaded that immigration is a good thing, get them off the fiscal analysis and ask them to focus on the economic analysis. that's a bigger picture analysis. yes, a child of 7 costs money because they attend school and no, they don't work. the last time i checked, that was a good thing. later when they go on to do wonderful and innovative things, whether

one, i don't think that net neutrality was necessary. there's no problem that we're addressing, there's no market failure. this is the one part of our economy that's working, so from a fundamental standpoint, i don't think we need the legislation. but the second part is we have exceeded our authority. there is no place where in this our statute that congress has given us jurisdiction over the internet, so we have exceeded our authority. i think that it's a very healthy discussioning to talk about the internet and jurisdiction of the internet and what to do, but i think that's congress' choice. so i'm happy that congress will continue to have these discussions and tell us what the proper role of the fcc is. >> host: do you think that the court is going to uphold the net neutrality regulations? because many have speculated that there are sure to be lawsuits challenging it. >> guest: i find it highly likely that the court will overturn our or rules. what we've done is, basically -- and not to get too legalistic -- but what we have done is b

when it comes to net neutrality? >> we take a position and we get in the game of policy. the game of policy can be messy sometimes, so we try to reach a consensus among companies. we try to work with companies that are not even part of technet and try to get a coherent policy in place. we work with the fcc, we work with house committees from congressman waxman to senator rockefeller. >> so what is it technet's position on net neutrality? >> it is interesting, because net neutrality is one of those issues -- it is all how you define net neutrality. we live in a time where no one can favor discrimination in terms of the internet. i would say our position is to try to seek a balance between innovation and investment. you want private-sector investment in the infrastructure of broadband, but at the same time you want to make sure that on to careers are protected and not discriminated against -- make sure that entrepreneurs are protected and not discriminated against. we don't know where technology is going to take us, so

was reduced and next tax base was arguably reduced -- you would see a net fiscal negative. we do not want to penalize the entire area because there was a goal in the entire area. what this says is instead, we will look at a new definition, which is basically a half mile radius around a proposal ifd and to the net fiscal analysis within that zone. to be specific, there was some of selling that allowed substantial new development. the ifd study area were to encompassed that generally and some adjoining parcels and blocks, and it would not necessarily penalize east soma for a separate decision that was made in, let's say, central waterfront. that is the reason for that study, but again, what we do within the area is we look at the zoning before and after. we do projections 30 years out and say this is the development we would expect compared to the development we would expect without the rezoning, with the original zoning, and they would net out all the associated costs. if there is a fiscal surplus, if the rezoning results in more money for the general fund, the area would be

could these net neutrality issues be clarified with the rerouting of the telecom at? >> last year there was a lot of talk about free in fighting the act and i don't think that's going to happen early on in this congress because you have a lot of new members who don't have the decades of experience that some of the departing members had, so i think you might towards the second half of the year start getting into hearings to help educate those members, but i don't see that happening early on because of the priorities and putting it net neutrality. >> i agree. i think because of the factors that were just mentioned and also because you have this situation where nobody is in the majority to read nobody feels the full control i think the first focus is going to be on the oversight hearings and investigating specific matters and when things calmed down that itt might be able to see a chance of having kind of contemplative discussions and gatherings of people who want to look at different sections of the act and there was talk about that happening last congress. and when the

in addition to net neutrality, what other priorities do you see for him? >> well, universal service reform. he comes from a rural state. that's a very important issue for rural residents, to get all services and to the extent therlhi areas, you do need subsidies. so that's going to be an issue. he's bringing on as one of his staffers someone who chaired the state regulatory group on universal service. and clearly the vice chairman of the subcommittee, lee terry, has a long-standing interest in universal reform, as has chairman rockefeller. >> speaking of chairman rockefeller, will he push u.s.f. reform in this congress, and do you see it happening? >> i don't know if i see it happening. chairman rockefeller is very interesting, in that he is very consumer oriented in the avenues that he pursues. so on the one hand the argument could be made that if u.s.f. is reformed, those will go down and that's a consumer angle that can be pursued. it will be interesting to see how that plays out. i actually think that one of the key players in u.s.f. would probably be

big jam-up in front of the net. it squirts on to the back and is gotten by letang. led it back across. given back to him by martin. a drive into the catching glove of varlamov. >> eddie: odd man situation, shorthanded for the capitals. then the penguins come right back, chance for crosby. didn't get a lot of it. bouncing puck. kunitz there as well. crosby coming in looking for any kind of rebound. the capitals doing a good job of battling in front. >> pierre: very good job. especially brooks laich, number 21, one of the forwards coming down to help out the big defenseman, schultz. is there enough presence by the penguins right now? >> mike: goligoski, a shot. that one is held by varlamov. >> eddie: the last chance off the face-off, they had a chance to go right off of that face-off, set up matt cooke got right to the front of varlamov. you see the numbers for the capitals. the last handful of games. >> pierre: that's something bruce boudreau needs to improve from last year and they have done that. their penalty killing has improved a ton. evason and woods have done

mike knuble threw one across the net mouth wide.ound attempt but failed. held off by marc-andre fleury. eddie olczyk, as the coach that you are, it's nighttime and outdoors. what concerns do you have? >> eddie: i think, doc, the ice is pretty wet so you've got to do everything hard. also watching the warmups in the corners, i was having a tough time trying to find pucks that were coming off center. i think if you're telling your players any time you get an opportunity inside the offensive zone, get pucks to the net because the goaltenders, the perception, the fans are away from the rink, you want to be able to test them at any opportunity. >> mike: you have any concern about shadows at all as we get a shot there? >> eddie: right from the point, hannan took that shot. looked like marc-andre fleury fought that shot off. he saw it at the last second. it wasn't very hard. but i don't think he even realized it hit him. >> mike: it's got to be a tough read for a goaltender in this situation because you're not using the usual marking point

you -- not everybody is sitting there surf offing the net ten -- surfing the net ten hours a day. we have survey data that college students are doing a lot less on the internet, and the bloggers tend to come from a rather, you know, well-off part of the social -- >> right. >> let me say since it's 8 and we can only go two more, i see three questioners, right? so you're the last three questioners. we'll do your three questions and then call it a night. >> thank you. perhaps i can ask a question to perhaps link the two sides, but i don't think actually it's that antagonistic. >> well, that's no fun. [laughter] we both think the telephone is really important. >> if i was in europe, if i was in asia and i was listening to a debate like this, it would be strange because it would be two people talking about mainly american business innovations and cycles. >> yeah. >> so perhaps the question that i would like to pose is this amazing ability of the american economy -- at least in the 0th century -- 20th century -- to produce and dominate these successive waves of media content, software/h

as the cyber wars increase government control over the net will increase as well along with journalism two point zero we saw with wiki leaks the citizen journalists now people have their own cameras to take films of things that we only used to have film crews for now videos instant they want to crack down on the freedom of information they will use cyber war as another element in the war on terror to take freedom away from us and freedom of net neutrality and by the way the united states is passing a new net neutrality act or well could've made up a bed and a biz nothing neutral about the net neutrality that they're talking about it gives government virtually complete control to put anybody at a business as homeland security did during the christmas season when they said that companies violated copyright laws you have no recourse you're gone you're out you're over and we saw it with wiki leaks. they closed them down on amazon pay pal stop doing business with them bank of america master card one after another the government's closing them down clamping down the greatest fear that govern

software exporters in the world well all the other countries are just net importers it doesn't mean that they don't export at all but their imports considerably exceed their exports to net exports are the united states and india. at the moment there are signs that china and russia have a good chance of joining this club of net exporter russia is not the last power in the world to my mind is the most mature market branch of industry in russia i would largely explain this by the fact that it developed in post soviet years and was nonexistent in soviet days when it emerged in the post soviet period and developed into the strong influence of transnational corporations which brought with them absolutely standard models of work market models applied worldwide. today i t. is the most mature market segment of our economy absolutely transparent and deeply integrated in global infrastructure if we manage to do the same with other technological segments we will largely fulfill the task of innovative development. which you. thank you very much for this interview. shows that so much if you're go

in sum, we expect the product to generate $17.5 million of annual net surplus to the general fund. during build out, in addition to the permit at $17.5 million net surplus, we expect $13 million to $60 million of one time revenue, primarily because of transfer taxes and construction payroll. finally, and surprisingly, the project appears to generate a net positive fiscal impact on sfmta operations, ranging from $3 million to million dollars at annually, and is based i sophisticated model -- and this is based on a sophisticated model, improved upon by the ss mta finance division. they peer reviewed multiple versions of the analysis, and all of the numbers from that were derived for the eir. this is tightly integrated, and i could go into greater detail if there are questions. a broader impact numbers, the first piece was fiscal benefits. these are projected tax revenues for the city. there is also the larger economic impact for the city. in sum, this project we estimate over 20 years will bring about $6.3 billion of hard and soft costs. it is a sizable sum, of which about $5 billion

last nets don't stop fishing. there have been cases of strangulation in the home for the species of seals and sea lions. beaches species of whales have suffered in incidents with plastic. plastic can maybe even kill. and also suffocate. although the volunteers of the marine mammal center managed to save dozens of animals every year the vast majority are inaccessible. but we can see that it's very deep the biggest problem with something like this is this animal male female she's going to grow some more and that entanglement won't and after awhile it could end up strangling her or stop her from being able to eat for all to find plastic only times found in the sea come from what we threw away and land here is some of the first collateral victims three hundred marine species of victims of plastic. twenty years ago young i'm from adult seabird specialist started an experiment on food becoming species in northern europe. he wanted to know what they ate. a completely straightforward investigation. but its results were bi

one of russia's an old people says republics has not been named as security chief seek to close the net on those who helped him carry out that trial city. with the seventeen dead as protests raging across egypt president hosni mubarak refuses to quit by the points of poland's president for the first time ever and the new prime minister after firing his government meanwhile weaken big diplomatic cables reveal washington's biking with a revolt leaders and how the u.s. has been planning to overthrow the country's leader if we see. on those critics claiming american news has become a force bald to corporations many in the last as seeking tentative information sources with big business is not calling the shots that skepticism grows more and more people are turning to the internet to avoid corporate. as the headlines up next martin andrews follows a trail of russian wings in london. a specification is a quintessential british. green. dress him from his three hundred sixty five's today so mr densher business area in the early twentieth century it was. originally known as the crown and public h

old man from one of russia's north republics has not been named as security chief seek to close the net on those who helped him carry out that trial. with over seventy dead as protests a breakdown across egypt president hosni mubarak refuses to quit but appoint a vice president for the first time ever the new prime minister after firing his government meanwhile weaklings diplomatic cables real washington's backing for the rebel leaders and how the u.s. has been planning to overthrow the country's leader for a day. and with critics claiming american news has become a voice box for months to corporations maybe mistaking alternative information sources for big business is not calling the shots skepticism the rows are more and more people are turning to the internet to avoid corporate money. martin andrews follows a trail of russian links in london. hello and welcome. is a quintessential british pop. green. groups from the three hundred sixty five so misadventure business. in the early twentieth century it was. originally known as the crown and public house and drank here. to the spot now f

up of bet and a business thing neutral about the net neutrality that they're talking about it gives government virtually complete control to put anybody at a business as homeland security did during the christmas season when they said that companies violated copyright laws you have no recourse you're gone you're out you're over and we saw it with wiki leaks. they closed down on amazon pay pal stop doing business with them bank of america master card one after another the government is closing them down clamping down the greatest fear that governments have our freedom of speech and exposing the corrupt in this the ineptitude and the double dealing going on that they don't want the public to know about so the more freedom of information that goes out they're going to start using cyber war the war on terror as an excuse to take that freedom of the internet away from the people political trends what kind of political trend in the u.s. do you think we will see in twenty eleven and change a progressive libertarian libertarian in the sense of the government staying out of people's lives bu

or that net neutrality gets such good press because those two interests answers are lined. >> that is the government trying to tell people to be better. net neutrality as common carriers which is the public pressure you were talking about. >> with common carriage peregrine to be winners and losers. >> that is what you are asking for. >> what i'm asking or is the recognition that telecom and other big players including google have an obligation to serve the public rather than their shareholders for themselves or their own vision. that is what i'm asking. >> the other question, we are getting toward the end we want to move onto the next question. >> this is a two-part question. one in terms of the overarching arguments of the respected text how did you compensate for or how do you see the switch between say a telephone or telegraph wherein one person is sending to one of the person and then they sort of at least much ballyhooed aspect of one person committee caving to many and being a content provider as a quote previous user on the internet and then two, what i see potentially as a fee

netting brilliantly it's japan up next for the three. or i thought brings us to the greens where with a day to go it's as you were at the bob hope classic johnson of a house on garri woodland still enjoying taters at the five million dollar event american woodland is doing all the come to keep the craw and its host country for the eighth straight year his sixty six propelling him to twenty four under par after four of the tournaments five runs but five birdies in a row on the back nine venice will invest joining the summit a first p.g.a. tournament winners on the cards for the twenty five year old but a full eighteen holes of golf remain in california. over nicely maria reached posted her third dawn hill win of the world cup season the german beating americans julie of months. on the second and third place respectively. clinching her first courting spot in the span. years on my ration while extended her overall growth company but volume retains top spot in the dying house that. the four remaining n.f.l. playoff teams are gearing up to vi

neutrality and by the way the united states is passing a new net neutrality act orwell couldn't have made up a bed and they there's nothing neutral about the net neutrality that they're talking about it gives government virtually complete control to put anybody at a business as homeland security did during the christmas season when they said that companies violated copyright laws you have no recourse you're gone you're out you're over and we saw it with wiki leaks the greatest fear that governments have our freedom of speech and exposing the corruption this the ineptitude and the double dealing going on that they don't want the public to know about so the freedom of information that goes out they're going to start using cyber war the war on terror as an excuse to take that freedom of the internet away from the people there is a mystery try and i don't know if you'll give it away.