again, net neutrality is ill suited to attack competition problems. we have an fcc that's very capable, and they've studied broadband and isps for years, so if there's a competition problem, no one's arguing for the wild, wild west. the fcc is there and enforce the competition laws of the country. finish. >> guest: well, i mean, there's certainly not competition when it comes to getting access to the internet. the beauty of an open internet is that there is abundant competition because the isp can't play any role in blocking or discriminating against content. that's why we have so many options online, because of an open internet. >> host: what about the global issue, brent skorup? is there a global effect, in your view, to this decision? >> guest: i don't think so. i mean, each country has their own version of preventing these competition problems, and it's telling that the e.u. actually backed away from the fcc's one size fits all net neutrality solution. and so you will see there will be policing of deals, specifically prevent competition problems,

net neutrality is ill suited to attack competition problems. we have an ftc that studied broadband for years. no one is arguing for wild, wild west. the ftc is there and can enforce competiti competition. >> the beauty of the open internet is there is abundant competition. that is why there is so many options online: because of the open internet. >> host: what about the global issues? what is the global affect in your view or is there one? >> i don't think so. each country has their own version of dealing with the problem. and you backed away from the fcc's one-size-fits-all net neutrality solution. there is going to be policing of deals to prevent competition problems. but the global affect for this decision, i don't see any major affect. >> host: who do you think are the biggest winners with this decision? and are their losers in your view? >> consumers will win in the end. isp's are available to bring new pricing business models to consumers. >> the isp's are the winner. the big corporates won out in this one. they have the influence in wash

net neutrality is very ill- suited for competition. one had a piece in the atlantic that what we're talking about this competition. we can do that directly. a lot has to do with regulations that are at the state and local level. that is where we should be. >> do you see any upside to the court ruling? >> i think the real upside is thecourt did not question reason i'm putting the open order and place. the fcc made the argument that without the open internet order, innovation would be harmed. abuse their monopoly power. that is a bright spot there. the court actually offers some really clear guidance. how they need to classify broadband in order to make sure they can enforce these kinds of rules. in our opinion, the best possible move forward is for the to reclassifyt broadband as a title to communication service and put in place these roles that will protect and seamers -- consumers. it is a mainstream idea. usa today has said it is something the fcc should do. takenw york times have action online already because of the concerns of the

it's not clear if net flex is pay more to complex, but the internet's net neutrality is now under attackpatricia sabga has the report. >> reporter: now that net flex has direct access this comcast broadband pipes, it looks forward to fast streaming. but advocate of a open internet are worried consumers could end up on the wrong end of the deal. >> i find in the end, consumers always end up paying. so eventually we find their hands reaching into our wallets. >> reporter: higher bills could just be the beginning. last month a federal circuit court struck down the sdc's net neutrality providers. much like a public highway is open to all, net neutrality ensured the infrastructure used to deliver contentwould be open to provider and consumers. family hungry services like video streamers will limit consumer choice and possibly undermine freedom. >> you can innovate without permission. this suggests it is getting lot harder to do that. >> but opponents argue that charging for priority access will generate revenue to upgrade networks -- >> democracy is so overrated -- >> reporter: creating a bet

the reason there's a net neutrality on the merger is comcast was violating the net neutrality and blocking the file sharing. they have a record of this. it is a cold comfort to me that o, no, no, we are going to arafat net neutrality, don't worry, trust us. what you don't hear on the list from the consumer benefits are lower prices, that never comes, the only direction that the cable prices have gone are up, up and up again. >> craig can't have it both ways. the concern has been about vertical pressure, the fcc, congress, always afraid if cable providers got too big too much leverage over programming and i will stipulate that could be a concern and was in the 1990s when the cable channels owned by the cable operators and that number is low today. what we are talking about is a situation with comcast already has their hands tie and can't leverage their own content. >> for four years? >> yes, four years and maybe longer, and the fc contraction has rules, broad authority under the decision i mentioned at the d. c. circuit handing down and the antitrust law and the point here, craig is complai

craig aaron, we should talk about net neutrality. the internet is important to both of these companies? >> this deal in many ways is all about broadband. it's the future. comcast is the nation's largest internet service provider. time warner cable as a big footprint as we talked about earlier. so in the end, i think in many ways, this is about broadband. this is about an effort by companies like comcast to keep typing that product, a very profitable company to them to their television services. if they can keep you subscribing to keep the content you want to see online, that's good for their business. for most americans, these compacable companies and this cable company might be their only option. not in every market but in most places if you want truly high-speed internet, you are talking about the cable company. if this happens, that company will be comcast. >> how does net neutrality and the rules and the debate about the future of the regulation of the internet play into this corporate merger, baron? >> it's a red herring for two

looking forward, we see less, we see a declining ability to generate net revenue. we see that revenues are projected to grow about 16.7 million or an average of 3.8 percent per year, but expenses are projected to grow 21.3 million, or 4.9 percent per year. so this graphic indicates that we're not that far off if you look at the operating revenue line. it shows we're certainly able to meet our operating and maintenance costs and almost pay, almost invest appropriately in renewal costs, but we're not generating that net income result that would allow us -- we're not projected to generate that net income result that would allow us to invest further. and this is really a cue for management, careful management intervention, the same way we've managed the last 5 years. the diversity of the port's portfolio, low vacancy rate, economic recovery, commission policies are all -- work together to show very strong growth on the real estate side. these assumptions assume interim releasing generating 25.4 million in 2018. they also assume investments we're proposing come online,

this isn't enough if your concern is net neutrality. if you want to stop blocking on the internet and stop discrimination and interfering with resources you can only do title two court. the fcc has said we think we can do it this way, no we have this other there ory and the court rejected it. here comes the fcc again saying well, maybe this might work on a case-by-case bases. i don't think that is good enough. the millions of internet users are asking for decisive decisions. >> host: tom wheeler left it on the table. >> guest: he did. and that was the only notice he descended on. i thought it was so harmful to the market that we have a form of regulation that was formed in the 17th century with canal regulation and railroad operation hoisting that online. this is why we need a communication update that looks at everything we are talking about today through protection law rather than based on what you used to do in terms of your old technology. i agree this is a newsfla flashd i think it is going to be risky on the fcc going forward if i

that's the five .2 net assets, you think that's the only thing that counts.here is something else that counts. as a visual you created that shows generally on the upswing and if that visual had reflected what division was before the retroactive activity you would have had a big increase in the americas and it did decrease in switzerland and that would be a hell of a lot different than what you charted. would you agree with back? it would be a very different impression visually. >> i would agree and i agreed the numbers need to be accurate. i agree with those comments, yes. >> now is the bank going to look at this process to try to avoid this kind of a situation where your internal books i'll call them are different from your external to this degree? are you going to change any procedure at all? >> we are going to look into the whole process and we will take whatever measures we need to take and i think it's mr. cerutti said it's premature to talk much about that mr. chairman but certainly we believe it has been a process but we will look at it and make sure t

>> when they tried to pull the nets into the boat, tinky's foot got stuck. alvin said he tried desperately to get tinky's foot out of the net, but he was unsuccessful. >> he said he wasn't going to make it. he had asked god to take care of his son. >> tinky told alvin to try to save himself. >> so i told him i was going to go try to get some help. that's when i started swimming. >> just moments after alvin jumped into the water, the boat slipped below the surface. >> like that, the boat was just gone -- down. >> alvin said he managed to grab hold of a piece of wood and swam for 14 hours until he was rescued. >> i was doing everything i could to try to catch my -- keep my head above the water. you know, it seemed like i was swimming forever. >> he's told his story. he tried to save his captain. it was tender. it was endearing. it could have happened to anyone. >> but alvin didn't want accolades. >> i don't see myself as -- i feel that what i was doing, i couldn't get no help to get him. >> several days later the coast guard found tinky's body floating in the

money, employers can save money, workers can save money, there can be more incentive to work, sort of net-net good. so in think being is the affordable care act helping the economy, i think that's the important question and in that regard, you know, i would answer the question yes. >> for those of who you are new to that in option trading, what the heck do you mean? >> i'm saying there's a lot of provisions in the affordable care act. a lot of them will create different incentives here and there. i'm not saying that no one anywhere will have any -- no employer will have any new incentives to do anything. there will be some that will have incentives to increase something here, to decrease something there, to raise something, to do something different there. will be different, you know, incentives on net, though, that aggregates out to something that is, quote, slightly effect, unquote, is c.b.o.'s word, labor demand or what employers are doing. >> just to follow up on. this if you can't answer the question by saying no, how do you answer republicans who now have this big piece of evidence that

this is a video that first put net nominations on the globe map.is was a video shot down in australia. these guys were net nominated and if you remember the trend was all about chugging beers and doing something completely ridiculous while doing it. at the end of these videos these people would nominate somebody else to do something just as stupid. this trend sadly caught on globally. just recently two men in ireland were found dead. investigators believe it was a result of a net nomination stunt. i do have a positive spin for this story. down in south africa a guy named brent lindekue, he got nominated and he decided he would change net nominations and make it about a random act of kindness. >> i'd like to make my nomination that originates from australia and i'm going to show you how south africans do it better. ♪ you never alone >> for you, buddy. thank you. hold on. ♪ always be there >> in this case they are actually doing something really good for someone else. >> yes, it's catching on! and now there are other videos of people in south africa

net neutrality. they have a record of this, so it is pretty cold comfort to me that comcast is now indicating on day one of this giant merger, that oh, we will went respect it forever, don't worry, you can trust us. but you never heard on the list of these great consumer benefits are lower prices. because the only direction that cable prizes have gone are up, up, and up, again. >> again. so the concern of course has always been, as i said earlier, about vertical pressure. congress was always afraid that if cable providers got too big, they would have too much leverage. i could stipulate that could be a concern. and it was in the 1990s when most were owned by cable operate r toes. what we are really talking about, is a situation where it really has it'snd has ties. but what it can do -- >> for four years and maybe for longer, and even when that expires the sec still has it's own rules. it had broad authority. the point i am trying to make, is complaining about two problems. the second problem he menti

they're way up there and the nets are still down the line a little bit. the other thing is, the nets have a losing record in nba even though they're trying to make the plaintiffs. in contrast to michael sam. michael sam is a big deal because he is an up and coming player and a guy who is going to be protected starter. this is a guy who is just going to be a fill-in guy. not the main guy for the brooklyn nets. >> i wonder -- so, l.z., no one said we cannot let the nfl get ahead of us. we're the nba and first openly gay player and i'm just raising the question, l.z. >> well, first, one last chance to differ with terence, they're a new york team and we always care about new york teams. we talk about the jets when they have losing record and giants when they are losing records. as long as they're in new york, the media hub of the world, people are going to care about them. now, about the court. you know, i don't think jason's going to have a large impact, particularly tonight because of the style of play that the lakers play. come is small ball. and the chanc

the brooklyn nets tweeted this picture of jason collins signing a ten day contract next to him is nets head coach jason kidd. kidd was colin's teammate when its seven-foot tall center was drafted by the then new jersey nets in 2001. >> he is a basketball player. you know, he's a great guy. can help this team. >> collins played 12 seasons in the nba until being released by the washington wizards last spring. then came the game changing moment when collins told "sports illustrated" he is gay. if i had my way, he said, someone else would have already done this. nobody has. which is why i am raising my hand. for the next ten months collins was unemployed. he didn't receive a single invitation to training camp. now with the nets fighting for a play-off spot, collins will play backup center to star brook lopez. on friday nets guard joe johnson said collins would be a great addition. >> i had a chance to play with him for two years in atlanta. great teammate. and you know, we would gladly welcome him here with open arms >> being a basketball player was his main goal, not necessarily being the

and we've done this revised this slide shows on estimated net land value of 4 to $7 million. we've received some revised stimulates we've been work with the city for the hoe down yard and the net land of the purchase price might be more like lifting millions in the dog patch area. i can share some follow-up >> whatever use it is it's still called the hoe down yard. >> we'll welcome that. >> sorry i did have is a question but i can't remember what it was exactly. so forest hill is not necessarily to receive the hoe down yard >> what's that. >> who would receive it. >> we think this option will rest under the current structure of the agreement the option is available to the department of real estate. >> so before we've talked about the office of economic workforce development now you're saying - >> yes. so the department of real estate is involved in the real estate transactions so in the amended resolution we've changed did option from o e w d to the department of real estate. they'll see the 10 year option or could transfer it to a third party they'll probably go through land

brooklyn nets signed the league's first openly gay player. he hasn't played in a league since then and now he is about to become a pioneer as the first gay player in one of the major sports leagues. joining me with more on this. >> it is absolutely 100% official and he's going to play tonight? >> he can suit up and be in uniform and he's in los angeles and thee could be on the court playing tonight. >> wow. >> i know, but before all that, he had to sign his contract and they did, they tweeted a picture of jason collins signing his contract. i like when you see pictures like this. pretty neat there. piece of paper. >> be excited about an nba contract, ten days, ten years. that's wonderful. >> exactly. brooklyn nets released a statement shortly after and they emphasized this is a basketball decision, which is the way it should be. the game that gets factored into this decision. >> now, this is a return to the nets, though, for him. he played long ago. >> he is going back there and coached by jason kidd, who he was formally a teammate with. >> t

they want to bring send a net neutrality rules -- strengthen the net neutrality rules. and they potentially want to make broadband a common carrier. is that a new interpretation? >> that is how they are describing it. it is a disappointing move from the administration. i do not think it will strengthen the neutrality. i think it ignores what the court did. they are trying to salvage a victory out of a defeat. they are trying to piece together the shred that the court left and went. your concern is net neutrality. if you want to stop walking on the internet and discrimination interfering with web services, your only option is reclassification. they made that very clear in their agent. the court rejected it out of hand. they said, it is up to you. we are saying that you cannot do it this way. here comes the fcc again. maybe this will work on a case-by-case basis. we are not sure. i do not think that is good enough. they are asking for decisive action. that is not what they got. >> i dissented from that oceeding. i thought it was harmful to the market. the idea was counter

we're not saying net neutrality is a bad policy, we're saying you can't do it this way. and yet here comes the fcc again saying, well, maybe might work on a case-by-case basis, we're not sure. i don't think that's what the millions and millions of internet users who have contacted them are requesting for. -- asking for. they're asking for decisive action from the fcc, and that's not what they got this week. >> host: well, tom wheeler left title ii on the table. >> guest: he certainly did. that's the only notice of proposed rulemaking i flat out dissented on because the idea was counterproductive that we have, basically, a form of of regulation that was formed in the 17th century with canal regulation and then 19th century railroad regulation, foisting that on the internet which operates in a completely different way. so let's rethink this. that's why we need a communications act update that looks at all of this through the lens of consumer protection and competition law rather than legacy regulation based on what you used to do in terms of how you used to have your techn

the sound a basketball makes going through a net? yeah. "swish" is the sound. swiss! "swish" is the sound of the ball going through the net. it's "swiss." "swish"! uh, ok. why don't we settle this over a game of horsh. yeah. try "horse." ok. [ hoarsely ] why don't we settle this over a game of horsh. [ male announcer ] did you hear the news? honey mustard & swiss chicken sandwiches are here. and start your day with a 99¢ morning drink stop. [ click ] this is how you sonic. the inventor of great taste and less filling. the one that dared to say, maybe light beer should taste like beer. and for a limited time, miller lite is back in the original light can. ♪

natural monopoly power media and technology consolidation video content delivery via data play the net neutrality you name it it's a part of it now alex can you break down the comcast netflix brouhaha in layman's terms for. sure i'd call it negotiation genius on net flix as part signing this deal with the timing that they did this isn't something that netflix and comcast have been negotiating for a long time the idea that netflix is traffic is anywhere from ten to thirty percent depending on who you believe of all the bam with that travels over comcast network and yet netflix displaying the same amount to push that traffic into comcast network zero dollars and zero cents that any other random web site on the internet is and so comcast is seeking sort of a tariff pay for all that excess capacity that netflix is using and of course they're going after netflix because they're a competitor directly to comcast for the first time in history two thousand and twelve in two thousand and thirteen so all net cable subscribers in the united states shrink that has never happened before and it's now

a fuss about this take us through all the controversy was and of the day while the puck was in the nets and the goal was disallowed it was allowed then the russia would have won the game so it was controversial as far as russia was concerned because the net had moved. the goal was disallowed because of the good of the nets was moved it was disloyal from its moorings and the goalie was moving from. one site to another site and he does it he moved the post. so what are the thoughts that maybe it was done purposely and we're not saying that but they have been saying on the twitter sphere eccentric cetera what do you say to your professional you know these guys they're professional too well it's a very fine line between. terming it intentionally or in unintentionally but in this case i think it was one hundred percent unintentional on the side of just on the quick because he was just moving from one side in a moment to another side and the situation was not very dangerous terms of the goal a lot of the russian side saying why was an american a goalie there anyway i would say he's an america

is a safety net, dana is right. so is unemployment insurance, food stamps, all these safety nets. what they're doing is at some point realizing that they have been right for the last 60 or 70 years saying you can't keep extending these payments, these transfer payments to people from the makers to the takers. it disincentivizes them to work. >> you leave your job, a paying job, you go and get health care and that's subsidized. you get food stamps and maybe unemployment benefits and that's what you get, the total safety net we're talking about? which means they're much worse off. i want to know who these people are. >> first of all, it would be helpful if we could all be operating from the same information, which is the cbo report, which we have all spent the last two days reading. the point is there's not 2.5 million people who are all of a sudden not going to have jobs. it's lats of different things. one of the things cbo explains is let's say you have a 40-hour a week job, but you're working 40 hours because that'

the sound a basketball makes going through a net? yeah. "swish" is the sound. swiss! "swish" is the sound of the ball going through the net. it's "swiss." "swish"! uh, ok. why don't we settle this over a game of horsh. yeah. try "horse." ok. [ hoarsely ] why don't we settle this over a game of horsh. [ male announcer ] did you hear the news? honey mustard & swiss chicken sandwiches are here. and start your day with a 99¢ morning drink stop. [ click ] this is how you sonic. you raise her spirits. we tackled your shoulder pain. you make him rookie of the year. we took care of your cold symptoms. you take him on an adventure. tylenol® has been the number 1 doctor recommended brand of pain reliever for over 20 years. but for everything we do, we know you do so much more. tylenol®.

so expense growth is projected to outpace revenue growth resulting in a negative net income position throughout the projected period. atz i said, it still shows we can cover operating and almost get to renewal, but it's really the grants and contributed capital line again that small line starts at 25.8 million out to 1.8 in 1718 that is going to enhance our position. so it's other sources of revenue, it's the general obligation bonds, it's grants from other city agencies -- i'm sorry -- grants from other grantors and just contributed capital that continues to improve our position. here i'm showing you that contributed capital line again in the light green which are the partnerships that we project to continue to have success in forming that drives an improved financial position. we project debt service coverage levels to at least 1.3 mile 81 1.3 times but far above that, 4.7 times, well above the requirement for the next 5 years. so our coverage looks very good. so in terms of summarizing what the past tells us and what the future suggests, our operating revenues are diverse and stab

there is no net loss of open space. >> no net loss? >> yes, that's the policy proposal which says charcoal was -- instead of saying what some people read as no building, it says when it happens, because it has happened, buildings have happened, expansion has happened, all these things have happened. so, instead of just saying no, we said, all right, what happens, how do you get to that, how do you make that decision? some people could read into the language in different ways and it was [speaker not understood]. try and clarify it and lay it out. >> thank you. >> director ram. >> just to reinforce that, the previous language, if you read it very strictly, rec/park couldn't add 5 feet to a maintenance building. so, that really became a challenge. now, obviously there were times when it didn't need to be read that strictly. but the fact is that's why we've changed it to the notion of no net loss open space. buildings change. buildings have to move, have to expand, contract, whatever. and it gives some flexibility. but i think the clear fi

and here's what's coming up tonight on the big picture comcast net flix stream deal is just the latest sign that the internet as an information commons is on the ropes so why isn't anyone in the mainstream media talking about this more on that in just a moment also the twenty fourteen midterm elections are still nine months away but a republican senate looks like more and more of a possibility every day but could medicaid expansion keep the summit in democratic hands and new research suggests that if we don't start tackling climate change right away it could be game over for civilization in just a few generations more on that tonight steely take. you need to know this the fix is in and unless we do something quick the internet as we know it will disappear for good on sunday comcast and netflix announced that they had reached a deal that will give netflix direct access to comcast sprog been network until now and netflix has only been able to send its content to homeowners and energy users by using middlemen companies. cogent cogent which in internet. is known as a backbone backbone prov

circuit court of appeals struck down the obama administration's net neutrality rules is rules were put in place to prevent big internet service providers like comcast and time warner from slowing down your access to certain websites or on the flip side charging those websites to access you for example with net neutrality rules in place comcast would not be able to slow down your access or charge you more for your access to h.b.o. or c.b.s. or c.n.n. just because they wanted you to use n.b.c. which they own and operate thanks to the d.c. circuit court ruling though and the potential takeover of time warner comcast is well on its way to being able to discriminate between web sites and make the owners of competitor websites pay more money to run their websites at higher speeds and to reach millions of american consumers in an easy direct fashion it also means that comcast can jack up internet costs back in two thousand and nine read it user quick created a graphic detail in what internet prices might look like without net neutrality since last month's court ruling the graphic has gone vir

we'll talk to blue bottle founder james freeman, anna net true and the search is on for silicon valley's top enpreprenewer. martin giles of the economic this week on "press here". >> good morning, my first guest would tell you whatever coffee you are sipping this morning is not as good as his coffee. he serves each and every day at blue bottle coffee, so fine and carefully crafted, some would say so fusscy, it's drawn all kinds of attention and money from some of san francisco's most rich and powerful. recently a who's who list of tech entrepreneurs poured their money into blue bottle, including founders of twitter and instagram. to think blue bottle's founder james freeman didn't go to business school. his talent is playing the clarinet. what are you going to do with all that money? >> we're going to build shops. >> how many shops? >> i don't know. we're going to build some r and d facilities and goal is to be better, not just to be bigger. all of our investors are very happy to contribute towards that goal. >> you've anticipated one of my biggest questions, do you take any quality bran

and hoping that that safety net can turn them around. and this whole idea of residency and what really defines a resident is not very specific, but our feeling is the numbers are

and hoping that that safety net can turn them around. and this whole idea of residency and what really defines a resident is not very specific, but our feeling is the numbers are for the homeless residency of san francisco are not that different than the general population

it in splt and you get rental income, that will be part of this new net interest income tax. >> this is just one of several changes for 2013, including higher rates on capital gains and dividends for top earners. higher taxes on many of the self-employed, and limits on medical expense deductions. while tax changes could dent your finances, planning ahead can lessen the blow. the only thing worse than having a large tax bill come april 15th is being surprised about it. so if you're going to owe money it's better to know about it now so you can find way toss gather that cash. >> you can open and makes contributions to certain accounts before the april 15th deadline that can reduce your taxable income on your 2013 return. if you're eligible, you can put up to $5500 into a traditional i.r.a. or $6500 if you're 50 or older. small business owners can contribute up to 25% of their compensation, up to 51 thousand dollars in what's nope as a sep ira, and individuals can deposit up into a health savings account. contributions, earnings and withdrawals are tax-free which used for qualified medi

and hoping that that safety net can turn them around. and this whole idea of residency and what really defines a resident is not very specific, but our feeling is the numbers are for the homeless residency of san francisco are not that different than the general population numbers as far as transiency goes. to sum it up, the magnet theory is not something city services has to worry about as a big impact in attracting homeless. their ability to move around and respond even within the city is limited. we specifically did a study in las vegas in '07 where there what a feeling that in the summertime the homeless would leave las vegas because of the heat and would come back in the wintertime when the weather was better. and we did a seasonal study and determined from that that there's virtually no impact on seasonality. empirically when we did some of the surveys, we found that they had significant challenges in moving around. so, they don't have the ability to quickly respond to things like weather. there are other kind of more normal reason