if you remember netscape went public in the early one nine hundred ninety s. and before then there was no browser really that people were using on the internet there was no way to just jump onto a browser and start surfing the web it was done in a way that was extremely user unfriendly then you had net. skate the netscape went public and then you had google and you had the bay and you had this whole phenomenon known as the internet but it's based on that browser technology right now there is no similar ease of use technology then people will be buying and selling because engine will not and the moment ever think about the block chain or so toshi or cryptology they'll never crossed our mind they're just be buying and selling but going but so this is the mad dash for to be taking advantage of what is going to be a multi hundred billion multi-trillion dollar market so the internet before netscape was when paul krugman said the internet is just a fad it will never be bigger and more important to the economy and the fax machine and looking at it then that the ugly

all the testimony was that netscape navigator worked wonderfully on windows.at microsoft did anything to prevent pc manufacturers from installing netscape navigator on computers. both microsoft and standard oil used its power to require its suppliers, their suppliers, to give special deals to them that they did not give to competitors. both required some of their suppliers not to do business with their competitors. both tied one product to another in order to restrict competition. the law that was developed, you know, 50 or 100 years ago, and is taught, of this kind, is still valid today. but what makes it so hard in the computer industry to apply is that we don't know, in the case of a new computer software program, whether the program is one product or two. and that is the guts of the question. i don't necessarily want to install a spell checker into my word processing program. i don't necessarily want to install a calculator into my operating system. so the firm does it for you, and in that way economizes on your time and better suits your needs. schoumache

. >> the whole thing began as a battle between microsoft and computer company netscape.er netscape president jim barksdale says that microsoft unfairly used its power to limit consumer choice. >> it's much like in your industry. it's, like, wouldn't it be a disaster if all television sets came pretuned to abc? >> yes, it would. >> you wouldn't like that, would you? >> no. >> all right, well, if there was a lock on the tuners of this world for tv sets, there's a high likelihood that if abc owned them, that's who it would be tuned to. >> the federal judge agreed with barksdale and went on to say that microsoft routinely bullied its competitors. >> i've been around in business for 30-some years. i was amazed at some of the tactics that were relayed back to me by our people in the field that were being taken against us. i could not believe it. >> what do you think they were trying to do? >> i think they were clearly trying to put us out of business. >> no question. >> no question in my mind. >> everybody wants to understand the culture here, culture. part of it is arrogance.

on the same day jerry garcia died, netscape went public and i thought i wonder if the potential that i am seeing for a new environment is subsumed by the industrial age. it may very well be, but i believe if it is, most of us are going to die. i really believe that we've reached the limit of that way of doing things and trying to create the most appetizing ways of describing what it might be like to live in a world where we have a sustainable roach to live together, where we stop looking at life as individuals are a nation and this thing were going to win rather than the same we will keep doing. >> are you taking the media revolution and using that said we could change these other things, like nation had been all this other stuff as opposed to letting it go back? >> i don't know if it will go back. i've got to be in the boardrooms. when i look at the way corporations exist now, they are dying. corporations live to help them collect money. they cannot make money anymore. corporate profitability is going down steadily. they don't know how to keep doing it. so icl they are at the crossr

them crack this case and get to the bottom of this and the main thing, you know, like the ceo of netscape said the main thing is trying to keep the main thing the main thing. the main thing is no more bombs. >> what you know about this bomb, jim, is it possible that this could have been put together on site? that it didn't have to be carried on an airport? that the type of bomb with the pressure cooker and the battery pack and the circuit board, all that information we have about how it was packed with nails and bbs, could that have been done with a simple instruction book without ever bringing anything by aircraft? >> absolutely, chris. you could have come in here on an airplane with just cash and desire and hatred and that could have been from any point in the u.s. or around the world. nothing else. cash, desire, hatred, knowledge, that's all you need. you could put these bombs together in a day, day and a half, two days. buy a backpack, buy a pressure cooker, buy your materials, put it together. you might have practiced it at a place where you came from, detonated it. that's why they m

internally on competing and trying to brow beat the competition in some cases like they did with netscape and intel with us, they lose sight of where the market is going. i believe the reason they are struggling in mobile space is they weren't paying attention to it enough. i was running a communication business at motorola in the late 1980s. i remember having meetings with microsoft people talking about mobility back then. they weren't paying attention to it. intel is the same way. if you look at the company, it's having a tough time. the challenge intel faces today are much bigger than the ones they faced when they were competing against us. >> hector, thank you. i appreciate it. sounds interesting. >> thank you. >> good luck with the book. >>> still to come on "squawk" this morning, quarterly results from boeing, procter & gamble, ford, sprint and eli lilly. before we get to all of that and as we head to break, look at yesterday's winners and losers. i know what you're thinking... transit fares! as in the 37 billion transit fares we help collect each year. no? oh, right. you're thinkin

prepared a series of videos to be posted, that have been posted and several more that will be posted on netscape including some better by the way relevant to the topic we are discussing here that discuss various aspects of privacy and security rules. we are particularly concerned about smaller providers who don't necessarily have the resources of larger institutions so we are looking for opportunities to reach them. >> also understand there are medical schools are regularly touch on these issues as well. >> is minder standing that health care providers covered by hippa must verify patient if the privacy of their health information is reached. what method do you use to notify those individuals? >> they can be notified, they should ordinarily be notified in writing and again when in certain cases provide for notification to the media. >> all right and finally dr. rothstein even with hippa protections we have heard that privacy concerns can cause individuals to actually avoid treatment. could increasing information-sharing through the hippa cause fewer individuals to seek treatment? >> that certain

. >> sometimes i like going on netscape. >> that's a name i have not heard in a long typically. >> ihone into the wall. >> you dial it up and it makes a noise. >> pictures come down so slow. >> when you hear that modum dialing, you know it's working! >> it's so exciting! i hear it and then i go get a cup of coffee, right? and i let the -- then i go back and -- i actually have never made a cup of coffee in my life. >> the drama. >> the drama. it's a slow reveal. >> it really is. >> sometimes it's worth the wait. >>> coming up next on "morning joe," steve ratner is getting his notes ready to explain what is wrong with that jobs report that came out on friday. [ male announcer ] i've seen incredible things. otherworldly things. but there are some things i've never seen before. this ge jet engine can understand 5,000 data samples per second. which is good for business. because planes use less fuel, spend less time on the ground and more time in the air. suddenly, faraway places don't seem so...far away. ♪ but at xerox we've embraced a new role. working behind the scenes to provide compan

mark, one of the lead programmers on the original project that created mosaic, and the founder of netscape, summed up the importance of the investment in the research by saying, if it had been left to private industry, it wouldn't have happened. at least not until years later. innovating breakthrough like the mosaic web browser changed our everyday lives, and established the united states as the world leader in networking and information technology. the federal government played an important role in that. but today we find ourselves in a world in which we can no longer take u.s. supremacy for granted. as we heard during committee consideration of the bill, china, japan, germany, and several other countries are increasing their investments in n.i.t. r&d, as well as their capacity to convert r&d into new commercial technology. we must prioritize cutting-edge large-scale r&d and transfer technologies, focus on the most advanced areas of network and information technology in order to preserve our lead in these sectors. h.r. 967, the advancing america's network and information technology resear

actually have prepared a series of videos that have been posted and several more that will be posted on netscapeluding some that are relevant to the topic we are discussing here discussed the aspects of the privacy and security roles that were particularly concerned about smaller providers who don't necessarily have the resources of larger institutions pity and so we are looking for opportunities to reach them. >> i also understand there are medical school curriculum to touch on these issues as well. >> it is my understanding that health care providers covered by hipaa must notify patients of the privacy of their health information is reached. what methods are notified for those individuals? they should ordinarily be notified in writing. again in certain cases we provide for modification through the media. >> finally come even with the hipaa projections we have heard privacy concerns can cause individuals directly avoid treatment. i'm not sure that i knew that. could increasing information sharing cause fewer individuals to seek treatment? >> that certainly is a concern especially individuals th

prepared a series of videos that have been posted coming and several more that will be posted on netscapeincluding some, by the way, relevant to the topic we are discussing here, that discuss various aspects for the privacy and security rules. we are particularly concerned about smaller providers who don't necessarily have the resources of larger institutions. so we are looking for opportunities to reach them. i also understand there is a medical school curriculum to touch on these as well. >> it is my understanding that health care providers covered by hipaa must notify patients of the privacy of their health information is breached. what methods are used to notify those individuals? >> they can be notified -- they should ordinarily be notified in writing. and again, we also in certain cases provide for notification through the media. >> all right. finally, doctor, even with hipaa projections, we've heard that privacy concerns can cause individuals to actually avoid treatment. i'm not sure i knew that. could increasing information sharing through hipaa cause your individuals to seek trea