i don't see a lot of invasion at the network level or local level in the format of the news. we're using the same format we used 30 years ago. you can react to that some >> i would say the morning news harry, their formatting it a different way. most of the new things that we tried, the explorations we tried are occurring on the weekends and in the morning news block and i think this is an evolving circumstance. i don't concede in any way next generation people won't watch our news. i think the style -- >> would you say they're not watching it now? >> i think they're watching it in fewer numbers. i'm not satisfied with neilson measurement. i think neilson has a very hard time capturing viewership of younger demographics. we know that the sample is small and those rating samples are very unstable. there are fewer people of younger generations watching our news product but i don't concede that they won't watch t we know when there is big breaking news events whether it's a storm or shootings at the navy yard or boston marathon bombing they tune in. they grow into the kind of ne

you come back at the network level with two minutes of tv.ou have a satellite window and have two people yell at each other for 15 minutes for $300. what would you rather do? or you could press a button and take a live helicopter from los angeles. i'm not saying they are that motivated by money but trust me over time facts are expensive and speebs in the fact business. >> i appreciate it. that little description there, i believe is cnn's new mission. it airs sunday saturday and sunday at 6:00 p.m. [cheers and applause] >> jon: that's our show. join us tomorrow at 11:00. here it is your moment of zen. >> the first person of a mayor who happened to be a man. the second person was a mayor who happened to be a lady. >> stephen: tonight, can we trust the people with their finger on the button? i don't know, where's their other finger. (laughter) then, a new way to live life to the fullest-- continue sitting on the couch to find out. and my guest, journalist charles duhigg says we make many of our decisions out of pure habit. not true. i mostly mak

you come back at the network level with two minutes of tv.u have a satellite window and have two people yell at each other for 15 minutes for $300. what would you rather do? or you could press a button and take a live helicopter from los angeles. i'm not saying they are that motivated by money but trust me over time facts are expensive and speebs in the fact business. >> i appreciate it. that little description there, i believe is cnn's new mission. it airs sunday saturday and sunday at 6:00 p.m. [cheers and applause] >> jon: that's our show. join us tomorrow at 11:00. here it is your moment of zen. >> the first person of a mayor who happened to be a man. the second person was a mayor who happened to be a lady. ♪ chappelle's show, chappelle's show ♪ ♪ chappelle's show ♪ chappelle's show ♪ chappelle's show ♪ ow! ♪ whoo-hoo-hoo! ♪ whoo-hoo! ♪ yeah, yeah. [♪...] let's start the show. [♪...] man: dave chappelle, come on down. you're the next black comedian to get his own show! [the price is right theme playing...] oh, my god, i did it. hey, every

no matter the outcome at the terminal the breach occurred at the network level at the point-of-sale system. of they have to have laws on the books that has to protect consumer information gerri: six national retailers have been hit. not just the target and neiman-marcus is seems you will get a real outcry saying this has to be fixed. so far they have them lackadaisical but what are you prepared to do if it gets ugly? >> i was on the phone this afternoon with the congressman that his phone is ringing off the hk. i think we will. he wi have a hearing and we appreciate those. the time is now. the american sumer needs to have the national standard to protect consumer data just like credit unions. gerri: this is a really complicated string of transactions just for a simple credit card transaction. so what part of the transaction are they screwing up? gimmick they need to protect their networks better. this is nothing new. a lot of these breaches will keep going o and you'll hear more than just six other retailers coming forward. they have to do a better job to protect consumers information into

> when you say you don't note what happened last year, there were various reports on -- at the network level every day, so you're saying you didn't hear and see any of those things? >> i don't hear, but i don't believe all the reports. i wasn't in the locker room. so i was worried about my season, my team at the time. and when i'm with the washington red skins, i'm not going to read about the eagles or the cowboys. i'm going to worry about the red skins locker room and making sure we're one team with one goal, and every intention of winning as many games as we can. >> joseph white with the associated press. i was actually going to ask something else, but you said you don't care. surely one of the first things you'll do is review -- >> absolutely. >> -- what's gone right, what's gone wrong, what you want to keep -- i get you would want to rephrase that. >> we'll review the plays and place from the year before and we'll find the best players that we want to keep moving forward, the free agents that were available that we want to re-sign. the things that we can help each player improve upon and

not nearly as bad in print or wire or web, but in broadcast news, at the network level on failuree is complete to cover this adequately. at the same time, there's a huge revenue stream from the people who would dearly love to see this topic ignored. >> peter dykstra, can you talk about "the new york times," which last year dismantled its environmental reporting pot and ended its green blog? took a slight dip this year. actually, it wasn't as big as i expected and a lot of people expected. just about a year ago, they shut down their environment desk. they no longer have a full-time environmental editor. the reporters there don't have a champion and a backstop on in karmiel stories. a few months after that, they shut down their green blog, which is one of the main outlooks. clear, there are still an enormous amount of reporting talent focused on this issue and some very good work been done in "the new york times hurco in quantity, it was less. what bothers me most about shutting down the environment as, shutting down the blog is that if you are an up-and-coming ambitious reporter in a p

i don't see a lot of innovation, neither a the network level or the local level in just the format of news goo. we are using the same format that we used 30 years ago. can you react to that? >> i think the morning format is done in a different way. the new things we try, the escalations we try occur on the weekends and in the morning news block. i think this is an evolving circumstance. any way thatde in next-generation people won't watch our news. >> would you concede they are not watching it now? >> i think they are watching it in fewer will -- in fewer numbers. i think nielsen has a very hard time capturing viewership of younger demographics. smallw that the sample is . that the ratings samples are very unstable. i don't kid myself, but there are fewer people of younger generations watching our news products. but i don't concede that they don't watch it. we know that when there is big breaking news events, storms or shootings at the navy yard or the boston marathon bombing, those people tune in. i think people grow into the kind of news that we do. there is a bit of a generational

the wiretapping occurs up the network level. it is a subject of negotiations when companies like apple going to the market. what features do they enable or disable for governmental electronic surveillance? apple has not disclose that. there's no doubt in my mind that they will be cooperating with the surveillance of the chinese want. that matches your shirt. >> i got this so that i could see it at 2:00 a.m. in a piano bar room it is great -- in a piano bar. it is great. >> you better erase that before the nsa gets to that if you travel. we have much more coming on "bloomberg surveillance." nba commissioner david stern and -- itcoming commissioner doesn't always have to be about [indiscernible] this is "bloomberg surveillance." >> good morning, everyone. mr. mckee has top headlines as morning. dozens of people wounded when an explosive device was thrown into a truck carrying antigovernment protesters. demonstrators have stays daily marches every day this week. they want the figure second elections to be postponed. in the u.k., re

america so the real risk is the internet where each country sets up not only its policies at the network level but says lesson we want to make sure that our technology is in the network and in the computers. we are going to have national level policies about what kind of cryptography we can use or how you stay or your data. that means everyone is making this technology needs to make a separate chip for each country. that really is going to hurt innovation and sort of change how the cyberspace evolves. >> two things on the domestic side links to classic cybersecurity questions and one is what this has done to the politics of cybersecurity on capitol hill where look, we haven't had major cybersecurity legislation passed since 2002. that's five years before anyone heard of the iphone and because of this and a number of other factors it will be another year at least before we get anything around it as we have this whole other bundle of questions that just got tied into it. the other goes back to original idea of trust and its trust in the computer labs and in silicon valley, which you know i met w

i don't see a lot of innovation, neither a the network level or the local level in just the format of the news. we are using the same format that we used 30 years ago. can you react to that? >> i think the morning format is done in a different way. the new things we try, the escalations we try occur on the weekends and in the morning news block. i think this is an evolving circumstance. i don't concede in any way that next-generation people won't watch our news. >> would you concede they are not watching it now? >> i think they are watching it in fewer will -- in fewer numbers. i think nielsen has a very hard time capturing viewership of younger demographics. we know that the sample is small. that the ratings samples are very unstable. i don't kid myself, but there are fewer people of younger generations watching our news products. but i don't concede that they don't watch it. we know that when there is big breaking news events, storms or shootings at the navy yard or the boston marathon bombing, those people tune in. i think people grow into the kind of news that we do. there is a bi

i do not see a lot of innovation, either in the network level or the local level.and just the format of the news we are using the same format that we used 30 years ago to it can we react to that? >> i would say that the format is an indifferently. i think most of the new things that we tried in the explorations that we tried are occurring on the weekends and in the morning news block and i think that this is an evolving circumstances. i do not concede in any way as next-generation people won't watch our news. i think this style -- >> would you say they are not watching it now? >> they are watching it in fewer numbers. i'm not satisfied with the measurement. so, i think that nielsen has a very hard time capturing the viewership of the yen per demographics. we know that the sample was small and very unstable. i don't kid myself that there are fewer people in the number generation's watching our news product but i do not concede that they will not watch it. we know when there is a news breaking even with storms or shootings were the boston marathon bombing, those peop

ruling said fcc you are not allowed to order comcast and verizon and others how to run their networks, level the pipes to comcast. they have been in a fight, you shouldn't charge higher prices for data load, should be the same rate for every one. now you can't do it. and that could hurt level 3. charles: i don't think they will get hurt. it will be a huge opportunity for them. the point you make. apple music goes to the pipes. they have to be upgraded and someone has to pay for it. they had it out between the content providers and these guys are more middle managers if you will and i think it will be a huge victory. cheryl: stock up 5%. charles: higher than normal risk idea. cheryl: apple is preparing to squeeze more out of its deal with china mobile. joline kent is covering that story. dennis: tech you can wear in public. looks like something from star trek. as a business owner, i'm constantly putting out fires. so i deserve a small business credit card with amazing rewards. with the spark cascard from capital one, i get 2% cash back on ery purchase, every day. i break my bacaround here. fi

so i think where each country sets up policy on the network level and wants to make sure their technology is used. there is a separate chip for each country. and that will hurt the space of innovation. >> and on the domestic side, like the classic cybersecurity questions and one is what has this done to the pop politics on capital hill. we have not had major security legislation since five years before the i-phone. it will be another year before we get anything around it. the other goes back to your original idea of trust. it is trust in the computer labs and in silicon valley. i met with a senior leader at a silicon valley company that felt they were in an arm's race with the united states government. and the same when it comes to -- in the book we talked about the importance of finding the i.t. crowd and some of the governmental agencies have a major issue at the same time we need to recruit cyber talent. we are only getting around 10% of the cybersecurity professional we need. now it is more difficult paubece of the tenor around the subject. >> i would like to take questions from the a

talk about what you've done at a network level to make all this happen. >> if you go back to 2006, theorganic investment into the networks, expanding the network with spectrum acquisitions. you put all that together, we've invested over $150 billion since this all began. this is, i this i, joe made the comment earlier. this is a capital intensive industry. and what we've had to do obviously is create this mobile internet capacity which means sell sites. new antennas, the technological obsolescence curves are impressive. in 2006 we were deploying 3g technology, multibillion dollar investment. 2013 was all about deploying 4g, obsoleting 3g, going to 4g. they are running four and five-year obsolescence cycles. >> that's facilitating huge innovation. >> dare i say we are a subsidiary of comcast. do you see a day where you are able to provide over-the-air video that competes with cable? >> i made the comment that our -- kind of our philosophy in life at at&t is mobilize everything. and the iphone mobilized the internet. that's really what it did. we built networks such we can mobilize the i

overall economy because because stocks are such a huge component of people's networks but you know at a really fundamental level there doesn't seem to be any reason for q.e. to cause a currency collapse in terms of raise some sort of money i'm so sorry to cut you off and come back and talk with us more i we have to wrap it up there but thank you so much for your time here and say that as you call it rushing around or a prag have that time now for today's big deal. teddy bears and the one the only he joins me now to talk about the lifestyles of the rich and be disgraced. now after a very stern collapsed in march of two thousand and eight and lehman brothers six months later of global financial crisis was all but inevitable however the u.s. government they stepped in pumping seven hundred billion billion with a b. and bailout funds into the market in order to prevent such a catastrophe today many of the top wall street bankers who were largely responsible for the disaster and whose companies either collapse or. billions in government bailouts are unemployed and it seems fair but they are certainly not not living

overall economy because because stocks are such a huge component of people's networks but you know at a really fundamental level there doesn't seem to be any reason for q.e. to cause a currency collapse in terms of raise some sort of money i'm so sorry to cut you off and come back and talk with us more i we have to wrap it up there but thank you so much for your time here and say that as you call it a russian downer of prague have that time now for today's big deal. teddy bears and the one the only he joins me now to talk about the lifestyles of the rich and the discrete yes. now after a very stern is collapsed in march of two thousand and eight and lehman brothers six months later of global financial crisis was all but inevitable however the u.s. government they stepped in pumping seven hundred billion billion with a b. and bailout funds into the market in order to prevent such a catastrophe today many of the top wall street bankers who were largely responsible for the disaster and whose companies either collapsed or accepted billions in government bailouts are unemployed. seems fair but they are certainly not

you need oftentimes you need a network of lower-level people.ed runners and you need people who you can sacrifice if things go wrong and it's much more difficult than you would think to actually pull the dollars out of stolen identities. >> the bigger cases they came out, you probably remember his name, can't remember it. he was linked to compromising 30 million debit card filings. they demonstrated he had earned $200,000 over three or four years. that is not a lot of money for a smart guy in the tech industry. >> that being said he probably has a million dollars buried in his backyard. what we are focused on is the infrastructure that the criminals are leveraging. over time and you will see as we go to the panel today the evolution of the cybercriminal and the of the structure that supports them has developed. they are now the ones that are industrializing the commoditization of malware leveraging other types of dentzer schachter -- infrastructure. that's going to continue to provide the anonymity and stack and what his team does in their recen

risk a vulcanized internet were each country sets of its own policy level and says we want to make sure our technology is in the network. we are going to have national level policies about what kind of crypto algorithm you can use the at everyone making this technology needs to make a separate chip for each country. that is really going to hurt the pace of innovation and change how this whole cyberspace evolves. out --e are two things on the domestic side we see the classic security questions. this has done to the politics of cybersecurity on capitol hill. we have not had major cybersecurity legislation passed since 2002. that was five years before anyone heard of the iphone. because of this and a number that and a number of other factors -- because of this and a number of other factors it will be a number of years before we see this come to fruition. it is trust in the computer labs , which -- ivalley met with a senior leader of a silicon valley company who described it as an arms race with their own government, with the u.s. government. in the book we talk about the importance of finding the i.t. folks and how we dea

we're joined right now by one of the founders of the network of volunteers who came together to map radiation levelsoughout japan after the fukushima daiichi meltdown in 2011. they soon realized radiation readings varied widely, with some areas close to the disaster facing light contamination, depending on wind and geography, while others much further away showed higher ratings. safecast volunteers use geiger counters and open sauce -- open source software to measure the radiation and then posted it online for anyone to access. their effort comes as japan recently passed a new secrecy bill. for more we're joined by pieter franken, cofounder ofs. welcome. you are turning smartphones into geiger counters? >> not really that simple. what happened after the disaster, we were all looking for information and could not find any. we tried to create a website where we could collect data and share with people so everyone could know what is happening. very quickly we found out there was a most no data. we were basically in the dark. after we did that, we said we were not going to give up. we were going to purc

if you're going to blame anyone on the journalistic side i would go a level higher to the editors, and the producers, the tv networks. they could have assigned stories to the investigative reporters they do have and actually dug deep and tried to find some of these things out. nobody really did that for a long time. so yeah, look, there is plenty of blame to go around, and the players deserve their share and so did a lot of other people. >> jonah, isn't there a question mark over a lot of this because many of the people who were spoken of routinely as being tainted have never actually failed a drug test or been caught doping. >> no doubt about it. if you wanted to be a writer, you couldn't go around smearing somebody. you needed evidence. but now it's the other way, mike piaza is being accused because he has acne on his back. these are not at all reasonable standards to exclude someone from baseball's highest numbers. if the numbers are there and there is guilt, butt the put th. i think we've swung the other way. i think it's the writers who feel they feel burned. if they didn't do it the first time, they're sure as

bundle channels together, particularly in the case of a fox broadcast network with the rsn, something like that, you probably on some levelget broadcast network reasonably economic terms on the other networks. the bundling together gives a lot to this ecosystem. if you could suddenly unbundled the broadcast networks, that could be disruptive to everyone. investors have said, aren't the cable networks far less vulnerable because of aereo and this is really about the broadcast networks? i would argue that it is really an ecosystem and want to start unbundling and driving a la c availableaking these like that, it becomes disruptive. >> nothing like an existential threat on a friday morning. little eight dimensional media. >> happy to see you. when we come back, it is probably hard for some of these guys to criticize the one percent with a straight face. the record number of millionaires on capitol hill. it is bloomberg television streaming on your television, bloomberg.com, and now on apple tv. check us out. ♪ >> gambling and pro sports? for years, there has been an arm and arm relationship. no longer. ofwill be talking to t

going to blame anyone on the journalistic side, i would almost go a level higher to the editors and the producers of the t.v. networks. they could have assigned stories to the investigative reporters they do have and actually dug deep and tried to find some of these things out. nobody really did that for a a long time. so, yeah, look. there is plenty of blame to go around and the players deserve their share and so do a lot of other people. >> jonah, isn't there still a question mark over a lot of this? because even many of the people who were spoken of routinely as being tainted have never actually failed a drug test or been caught doping? >> no question about it. i mean i think that there needs to be a burden of proof and, you know, i think in the past, rob talked about the idea of being -- that you wanted to be sure if you were going to be a writer, you couldn't just go around smearing somebody and use evidence. it's gone the other way now. we are talking about the hall of fame. mike piazza is being accused of pd use because he as acne. geoff bag well was muscular and played in the '90s. therefore, he is a steroid

but at the local level future of iraq virtually any local television news network it comes to pass if it leads it leads. they cover car wreck samphire because it is flashing lights and visual santa looks good on television. but the other side is this year is some animosity fed phelpses representative of mainstream plays in to many people's narratives of evangelical christianity even the wood is not true. is what they want to believe so there will continue to cover like that cross burning pastor like down in florida. >> as a foot know how much of journalism i thought of it as partly a public service the debt now where is the profit line? we need to do the news if you look at william randolph hearst becoming would of the wealthiest man on the planet long before the era but allows jews segue the upcoming gatt of nonprofit organizations within the secular arena or the corporation for public broadcasting lot that because it is a different organization but like npr that receives funding. and public of the is a nonprofit center privately funded unfortunately from my point of view they tended

level trajectory. and the ultimate is clearly the infrastructure. neil: but to what end? one of the leading up to? >> we are focusing on the ultrahigh networkse they are focused on this. this they are focusing on the large-scale gain on the state level. >> when it tells you that they are playing upon their own vulnerability. and so the second part is that you adversely affect the economy because you make people reluctant to go shopping. it really didn't affect the cemetery holiday season, but it will affect us more going forward because it made their point. in the last part of making the statement is all of a sudden when the lights go out or traffic lights stopped working, that is going to make a much bigger statement about control of the country and who is really in control. neil: choppers were worried for your very life when their identities were stolen. part of the concern is that would put a pall on spending. and you're thinking that something like this has a more pervasive nature as well. >> we have over 400-dollar billions per year. and they are exploiting the vulnerabilities and part of that is the ego and reluctance to conduct a sol

host: i referred earlier to the network, the outer circle, these low-level crooks who were selling stolen art or stolen cd's who then put the undercover operation in touch with the next level. that was angelo eric hadi and corrupt lawyers in accra city council. they in turn, after satisfying themselves that they were dealing with authentically corrupt arab sheik then passed the undercover agent, or set up meetings for the undercover team with the congressman and the senator. it was a network from the outer circles to the inner circles that is what really made abscam so defective. host: a viewer tweets in -- now, we covered a little bit of that but please go ahead and revisit that. again, was there a targeting of specific officials or was this going to be wide open to all 535 members of the congress? guest: that is the good -- a good question. in the first instance, there was no targeting of an official. the undercover operation simply continued -- let's say, when angelo said i want to introduce you to a congressman who can help the sheik with legislation, it would have been a dereliction

networking is like in china. investigate what is going on on the level of the people and the companies.rnment offered this to those who are providing the telecom capabilities, you folks can do whatever you want, you can make as much money as you possibly pose a long as you threat -- for the economy. bargain thatlly a has served everyone's interests quite well in china over the last 20 years. a lot of us in the west would look at that bargain and say, this is not acceptable to the way that we think about the internet. but at the moment there are few but hardly millions or billions of chinese that say that this bargain is a good one. right now, everyone is pretty much -- >> i see with the entrepreneurs get and the communist party gets, but i don't see what the people of china get out of that. what benefit is this censorship infrastructure? >> for their perspective they have to understand this is relative. society and communication networks are vastly more open and better now than they have been in 40 or 50 years. censorship for them is actually a small percentage of what they are doing on

will have that speech on friday on the c-span networks, and run the gallup organization, a record high. 42% of americans identify as this is at itsd lowest level in 25 years. guest: i think about the nsa thing, it is generally generational. people that are in their late 20's, early 30's, especially looking environment, and knowing that out there whoguy has been listening in on their phone calls essentially since they were in college i think is very unnerving to them, so i think it is largely generational, which would account for that drop in young people support. republican -- what i said earlier is exactly right. if the washington-based republican party would begin offering up solutions instead of just either voting for things they know are not going to get through the senate, just for the of it, see what they would not do, i think that will reverse itself. fore is no gigantic move the democratic party as an identification. >> republicans have done a lot on their own to alienate people. our phone lines are open. the line for democrats, republicans, and you can also join us on twitter or send us an e-mail. i want to have you look -- smoker lin

you see at the local level return on virtually any local television news network and use the come topass the old saying if it bleeds, it leads. .. >> and they will ignore many evangelical voices that they feel deeply about and talking about it. >> how much of journalism, when i was growing up i thought about it as partly a public service that they did as part of their overall broadcasting. but nowadays, it is where is the profit line. we need to do this line. >> that is a very good question. i'm not sure that it has changed a lot. if you look at william randolph, he became one of the wealthiest men in the planet. and you might say that he ushered in the modern news era. but i do think that it is, that you are right that it sort of allows me to set another interesting point. a lot of interesting journalism is coming out of nonprofit organizations within the secular arena or it you had organizations like the center for public integrity, which not the corporation for public broadcasting, but organizations like npr, which is a nonprofit organization that receives running from the public

my own opinion is that it's very fair, the level of scoot any brought to bear. this network and others have ridden this chris christie wave for years because he's good copy. so now that the story turned against him you're supposed to shield your eyes? that's not the way it works. >> certainly doesn't. greatly appreciate you coming on today. see you to recall. >> okay, tamron. thanks. >>> breaking news in new york city where police have confirmed that human remains found last week belong to avonte oquendo, the teen with autism who disappeared three months ago. his remains were identified by dna. pieces of his clothing were discovered at the site. the medical examiner said the cause and manner of death are pending further study. he had been missing since he walked out of school on october 4. the case sparked a massive search across new york city including hundreds of officers, marine units and volunteers. the family's attorney plans to hold a news conference later today. >>> still ahead, a new report on the brutality of the syrian regime. ahead a peace talk scheduled for this

networks. the 200 kilobyte per second level is their standard.that is: by modern standards. -- crawling by modern standards. in europe, they are in a panic about why they're behind the u.s. their investment is one half per capita of what is in the u.s. their coverage is half what it is in the u.s. the rural coverage is one quarter of what is in the u.s. is the google? the facebook of europe? they are concerned on infrastructure side and the other side. i don't mean to suggest -- i'm doing a study on this because a room -- everyone wants to know what is going on. there are trying to the nelson other parts of the world and -- they are trying something else in other parts the world and they are not happy. it opens up an interesting discussion about possible futures going forward. >> would like to say on this point about europe. the one debate this -- facebook group and era when we had dsl and cable. they were classified as something but not clearly an information service. then we had this middle. all which to say they have grown up in an environment

level. >> that's right. but when you combine google wallet andxd google search and google shopping express plus the network ofis could become a localized delivery. so amazon fulfill him takes maybe three days on average even if you have prime. what is google's promise? nptr'utes, hours. so this is why i believe uber is aé@nb contender against amazo. >> google hasn't experimented with this. ebay has ebay now where essentially private citiz%on are going to target or whatok not f products and brings to me. >> there is a shipping war going on right new. now is aó[ great time to order anything from retailers because it will arrive in açó few hours for free.ñr they willing to discount the fees. >> they're actuallyjf losing moy on a lot of same day delivery ç& stuff, right? >> i would assume that.xdñr but that is no issue to google. >> just moving back to what you said at the top, what about mobility, is that going to be part -- >> túe+e are all enablers for people to get what they need at a local level. andóthat'szv really the big trd here. >> explain why would a hotel create anq air b and b clause. >> right no

is at the highest level of traffic that we have seen it. it is a network oriented for small groups. groups are not as viral. the best we can hope for is to maintain solid growth like we have had and to expand the user base at a pace that we can sustain. >> do you think it will be a more niche social network? theust does not have potential range of a facebook or twitter. it is just going to be smaller. >> i think the range is there. i think it take longer to achieve that range because it is not necessarily designed to be as viral. >> what about snapchat? obviously, they turned a $3 billion offer from facebook down. are here to they stay or do you think it is a fad? >> i think the volt case is that it is going to stay. case?t is the mike volpi >> i think they will find evolutionary paths to the product. we think of snapchat as it is today and say that is a lot of value. you could say the same thing about twitter at one point in time. i think the expectation is that, in all likelihood, snapchat will be a lot more than what we see today. we just do not know what it looks like. >> turnin

so as we take you outside to the sky camera network tonight, what you will notice mainly clear skies at the lower levelsbut we still have a lot of the mid to high level cloud cover around, also in san francisco, from our san bruno mountain camera, again, you can see there is no clouds obstructing visibility. if you look up you'll find that. did you know we have dry conditions so you don't need to take the umbrella. coming up, when we may actually get some of the much-needed rainfall. saturday's forecast, this area of high pressure that will give sunny skies tomorrow but with the way the wind is directed saturday, it will continue to pump up some warmer air in the forecast, but then as we head throughout sunday, that's going to shift off towards the east and give us more of an on shore flow. cooling on sunday's forecast and the marine cloud cover to linger. you're going to want to enjoy sunday for this one reason alone. as we get a look at the temperature trend graphic, you'll see things shoot up by next week. we think one of the hottest could be the tri valley. take a deep breathe, to have temperatures

networks. but really the bulk of the work must be done at the state and local level and that is where the taxes and increases come from. and so there is going to be more money ithould be with local projects in mind and the federal government should focus on one thing and that is o keep the major arteries of the interstate and thorough fairs open for commercial traffic and potential for military use. neil: republicans and democrats, why are they afraid to rein in on us, it could be anything from good money combat money in the war on poverty. to a number of other initiatives. >> wehave determined whether we care about something by how much we spend on it. and that is always the moniker here in washington dc. you don't care unless you're going to spend money. you mentioned one poverty is the best example that we have spending more money on things is simply wrong. there is a study done looking at e state of california and the state of texas in those states have very similar standpoints, most the same percentage in texas has a higher percentage of african-african- americans in california does. for e