the second category of performance measures that we looked at have to do with networqu and he find patterns geographically but not necessarily concentrations that ht be inequitable. some of the concentrations say in access to regional transit have to do with density and topography and may not be an inequity but still something to keep in mind as we are developing the investment scenario. some other measures, although there is a geographic pattern, so pavement quality is an example. every neighborhood in san francisco if you look at the best and the worst pavement conditions, every neighborhood has some of the best and some of the worst pavement conditions, there is not a great geographic concentration in those conditions. >> so the pavement conditions or street conditions aren't dependent on socio economics factors? >> the worst and best quality are not concentrations in community of concern. if looking at an area of concern, are they experiencing worse transportation conditions than other parts of san francisco in terms of pavement qualities, that is not true. throughout san francisco you