the big picture is a netzero impoverishment and premature death. to follow up on that if indeed let's say there's an average global temperature change from one to five degrees by the end of the century. it would make more sense nonetheless to adapt and spend what we have to rather than necessarily trying to get to netzero carbon emissions. >> the netzero should not eon the table if you actually look at the full context. what policies should you have given that energy is so -- to engage in low carbon alternative. were fortunate we have anev unbelievableea low carbon alternative and it's cheaper for electricity of fossil fuels. nuclear was virtuallyel criminalized by the green movement to the point that nuclear prices are most 10 times more today adjusted for inflation than they were in the 70s. i think everyone shouldul in far of decriminalizing nuclear as well as liberating natural gas. they work to reduce the ot emissions. you can't have it as a priority but they make energy more available to more people. with the green movement' in look at profes

the extremist language of how existential it is and zero by 20 60 --netzero by 2060. it is really pushing through some very forceful regulation, including the fcc regulation. i looked on mckinsey's website, they have a lot of good information about what these regulations would cost and how unattainable they are. i think they estimated going met --net zero by 2060 like over $700 trillion. this is really forceful and aggressive. i do not think attainable. calling it existential, meaning our very existence. i heard politicians saying we have 12 years until we are dead. the oceans are rising. i have information with decades -- from another lawyer with decades of experience in climate science, they know that the adding of ocean and land is only expected to be at a maximum three feet, a maximum three feet. host: what would you like our host to address? caller: how about taking some of the money that the regulations is costing us and turning the market loose for supporting the market to investigate how to restore educate best energy -- restore energy because until batteries

so the fact that this is not mentioned or acknowledged as significant by the netzero movement shows a kind of bias that we're going to see much more apparently with climate mastery and here's where we really get into problems with that view. it is a fact that climate related disaster deaths so from extreme temperatures storms floods wildfires and drought are down 98% over the last century and it is also demonstrable that fossil fuels which provide 80% of the low cost reliable energy. we use to master climate that they are a key cause for example using fossil fuels to power irrigation and transport to make us safer from drought our master. so great that a hundred million people in the world live below high tide sea level or they live. yeah, so i mean in terms of like the sea level for 100 million people, they're below it and they're totally fine. so here's what i find totally objectionable. this is never mentioned. the ipcc does not mention. it's got thousands of pages. it does not mention it professor destler. i've never seen him mention it. he doesn't mention it here. this is like di

manufacturing sectors while supporting communities and develop skills to leverage those competencies in a netzero there he will need a comprehensive framework that builds on recent legislative assessments to support the entire ecosystem for ccus carbon rove ccus carbon rovera. they are three areas that we need to focus on. first upstream investments in innovation including research development and demonstration. second downstream policies like extension and expansion that can help. and grow market and technologies in third facilitate the of the structure that can provide promising technology. all three areas of policies are necessary. supporting technological innovation through spending without creating market demand will strain technologies and labs will provide a market incentives without the enabling policies leading deployment stalled below its potential. robust policies across the entire innovation ecosystem celebrated the point is ccus help me climate economic justice brett thank you chart topper in member capito for hosting us during the opportunity to speak with you today. i look forward

. >> if we got the true netzero, the temperatures on earth would stop going up with a lag time of as little as three to five years. >> reporter: headaches from this heat wave have included amtrak slowdowns and in philadelphia we saw a public pool having to limit capacity. now the pacific northwest gets a taste and in parts of washington state today, we could see temperatures hitting 115 degrees. the savannah? >> jesse, thank you. >> let's check out the forecast here. there is a rumor there is relief in sight. good morning. >> good morning, ladies. >> it's not just a rumor. some areas are getting relief today across parts of the northern plains. but in the meantime, 49 million impacted by the heat the southern plains and pacific northwest is going to get a heat wave in the northeast, of course, right around here we're still going to see 90-degree temperatures today there's a cold front coming bringing relief to cincinnati today with the mid-80s st. louis around 81. but it's still really hot south of the front from raleigh to atlanta and, yes, d.c. with a heat index of 105 today. so it