following, it would be so appealing to trial lawyers, and indeed now there's a whole new field called, neurolaw. which is looking at the implications of brain science for understanding the criminal mind. but it's a really nice story that criminal -- that defense attorneys can tell. you see, your honor, my client has this in his brain. he could not control himself. he could not form the intent needed to commit a crime. this is a misreading of neuroimaging. sometimes, without question, people do have problems with their brains that render them legally insane, so that they're not culpable. all kind of damages -- damage can happen to one's cognitive apparatus, rendering people either not cull -- not culpable at all or, less culpable, so they're not excused but their sentence is mitigated. that happens clearly, but the point is that, at this point in time, and things might change with technology evolving -- at this point in time we cannot distinguish who those people are through brain scans. we can't distinguish an impulse that is irrye zestable from one that was nose resisted. this is a key point i