it was meant to be a neutral platform. internettely the allows people to be truly wicked from behind that anonymity. they take every effort to upset each other, to undercut the platform, so it's an area that is fraught. this is a very important protection. >> is not just to make them upset. people use tools to destroy lives, post nude photos, and sure can't get a date, keep their jobs, get a new one. they threaten. did amateur he information that one can never respond to, i am not a prostitute, so that the kind of stuff that we have seen isn't just like things that hurt feelings, not just offensive speech paired it is speech that we would say is not even legally protected, that we can criminalize and ensure liability for. there are sites that make a business out of hosting this kind of thing. say, sumi, good luck, i am immune from liability. i think it is just important to -- ithat this mischief help with filtering crazy is fors, but we -- it more than that, like any wonderful tools for great things and also for ill to see

what our carbon neutral pathway is. scope two emissions which are zero out of the public utility commission but scope one is challenging. there's a central plant by natural gas and once we environment ability to electrify this which we think will fall under the new decarbonization code that has been draftedly likely this commission and the department of environment, we'll reduce 80% emissions on campus from that one change. so big changes afoot for our airport. we're work on a variety of strategies and i'll cover that on the next slide but i want to show you that this looks complicated but we have a step-wise approach to carbon neutrality. but in terms of scale, when you look at the airport's total impact, relative to our full scope of emissions, so if you include scope 3, what comes from our tenant's operations, it grosgrows dramatically. so that's a fraction so when you look at cities and counties themselves and the businesses that operate are the largest driver of your emissions. it's a thumbprint when we look at the

or not neutral. it's not just defamation and not just pornography. >> a professor said that facebook is powerful, but i think you quickly understand its limits. it would likely play into this kidands to have in power trying to play presidential politics. they are already out there waiting. congress has these concerns, but i do not think they are real. the capacity to control the marinette strings is -- >> as i discussed this issue, i find there are a lot of republicans who are convinced that they see there's 20 twitter accounts suspended by republicans for every one that might be on the others. have there been studies looking at any of these issues? >>>> there has been a lot of anecdotal discussion for a variety of concerns, which can we talk about solutions now? so this is probably the most sort of -- >> didn't we just say it's anecdotes? if you dig in, it seems untrue -- i can come up with 10 stories about black lives matter's protesters removed from facebook and twitter. so does that make sense, i

know and that can only be done if you replace the fossil kills even by sustainable fuels so carbon neutral that sounds brilliant is that something that can be done within the next 510 years is that doable technologically it is just easy to do so that is proving you know what we need is an industrial age and a political agenda to invent that and you have the feeling that berlin when it comes down to german aviation is doing the right thing well if it comes now to politics we see one of the ideas of the german government is is that the fall of that idea would be very much proof that the government understands the importance of sustainable fuels for aviation we support that very much that there's a lot of talk of course about people shouldn't use domestic flights anymore and go to other modes of transportation does that make sense in your view. well it's the market demands. and what we see there is an increasing demand so what we need to do is to make it more compliant as prime for traction so alternative renewable fuels is the one answer and the carbon pricing and that in an intelligent way

americans want net neutrality protections. i think the republicans need to step up and move this forward. >> do you think that will be an election issue next year, too. you see a lot of democratic candidates mention net neutrality. virtually, all, all the major candidates, this exception of joe biden refer to net neutrality in their platform. how do you think they view that issue? maybe lesser on the tier of issues. >> there is a subset of my constituents or of any constituents that feel very strongly about this. this will be a single issue for a lot of those folks. i think rightfully so. they need to know that information is not being blocked something that one of the big companies does not want to see out there is blocked or throttled. this is an issue with a small subset of my election. i want to serve all of my districts. if i do not take their issues into consideration, then i am not doing my job. >> congressman, do you hear from your constituents on the issue of global call? >> i certainly do. that is an issue that is dr

monitoring. >> you have no moderation at ra all. >> electric wires are neutral.forms are not. they have the way they work in the way their users use them and that's not neutral in any administrable offense. >> while you are referring to the piece of legislation and the judge holly missouri where the commissioners from the fcc would be appointed they would have to certify that these platforms were politically mutual if they want to get the section 230 protections that would apply to think specifically the very largest platforms. one indicating already is that a good idea and if you didn't think it was a good idea, could you actually do it? like how would that actually work? if you wanted to certify the platforms as being politically neutral. >> you would have to have a federal speech agency. [laughter] that concludes my answer. to try to have any federal body determine whether a platform or any speaker is neutral and fair. we had a fairness doctrine at the fcc irt for a very long time. i think that debate is over. that ship has sailed. yes of course congress will

mcnerney: folks want to have net neutrality protections. the big throttling, blocking, paid prioritization, those things are pretty clear. we need to protect consumers from those. and right now, the federal communications commission has basically abdicated any authority. so the companies are free to do whatever they want and that is going to lead to problems. i don't know how long that will be before problems start cropping up, but they will. in the house, we passed a pretty strong net neutrality act this year. it is not going anywhere in the senate. i think that's a problem for my republican colleagues. americans want net neutrality protections, and i think republicans need to step up and move this forward. john: do you think that's going to be salient as an election issue next year? you have seen a lot of democratic candidates mentioned net neutrality in their platforms. virtually all the major candidates, possibly with the exception of joe biden, referred to net neutrality in their platforms. how do you think voters view that issue? is t

>> guest: books want to have that neutrality protections. the big throttling, blocking, state prioritization though things are pretty clear and we need to protect consumers from those land right now the federal mitigation is basically advocated abdicated in the authority so the companies are free to do whatever they want. that will lead to problems. i don't know how long that will be before problems start cropping up but they will. the house we passed a pretty strong net neutrality act this year and it's not going anywhere in the senate and that's a problem for my republican colleagues is that americans want net neutrality protections and i think the republicans need to step up and move this forwa forward. >> host: do think that will be salant as an election issue with using democratic candidates mentioned that neutrality and their problems so far. i think virtually all the major candidates possibly the exception of joe biden refer to net neutrality in their platforms and how do you think voters typically view that issue? will that be someth

it has been dominated by the net neutrality debate, and net neutrality, as i said on your show in prior years was, to me, never a battle over first amendment rights and freedom against blocking and things like that because those issues were never really in question. it was really a commercial dispute between one set of companies, google, facebook, and netflix in particular, who were perceived as the good guys and who wanted to make sure the transport for them was free, and one set of companies that were perceived to be that guys, verizon, at&t, comcast were sellers of transport that one of transport to have a price. this conflict between transport is free -- transport has a price, was essentially cap slated in the next challenge the debate -- net neutrality debate. when it was good guys versus bad guys, it was an easy public policy wing to say we are on the side of the good guys, the white hats, google, facebook, and netflix and everybody was against the bad guys, at&t, verizon, and comcast. there are no good guys in the room left. google and facebook in particular are no longer viewed

>> guest: the folks want net neutrality protection. of course the big throttling, blocking, paid prioritization, those things are pretty clear. we need to protect consumers from those, and right now the federal fumigation commission is basically abdicated any authority. so the companies are free to do whatever they want and that's going to lead to problems. i don't know how long it will be before problems start cropping up but they will. the house, we passed a pretty strong net neutrality act this year. it's not going anywhere in the senate. i think that's a problem for my republican colleagues, is that americans want net neutrality protections and i think the republicans need to step up and move this forward. >> do you think that would be d next year? icing virtue all the major candidates also did with exception of joe biden referred to net neutrality into platforms. how to take voters see that issue? >> guest: it is an animating force. there's a subset of my constituents or of any district constituents that feel very, very strongly a

the online retailer pledges to become carbon neutral what has it gone far enough? making money out of the rugby world cup. how the event is boosting the japanese economy. good morning, asia. hello, world. it isa good morning, asia. hello, world. it is a friday. glad you could join us for another exciting addition of asia business report. let's start off with amazon because the online retail giant has promised to make the company carbon neutral and make the company carbon neutral and make the goals of the paris climate agreement by the year 2040. chief executive geoff a source says it is triggering to make changes across the global economy. —— jeff bezos. it will drive the economy to build products and services that these large companies need to make those commitments. the bbc has more on amazon's announcement. amazon is calling this the climate pledge and it is making three really big goals. first they want to decarbonise and they will be issuing a lot of strategies in order to do that. they will be tracking their emissions and reporting them on a regular basis. th

we would be neutral to underweight, and neutral to in the secular, growing part of the market.f things like 5g build out. alix: again, it is a trade war risk. you hedge that or take a longer term view? katie: there's a lot of semi companies, and we had jet by being super selective of which one to own. they are more exposed to the secular growing areas of semis. alix: let's talk about more breaking headlines here from germany. we got the news earlier that looks like the package is going to be a little more than 50 billion euros. it will be a budget neutral, though. now you have angela merkel's coalition targeting about seven by8 million electric cars germany. we are going to break that down as well. there's also some other details that wind up trickling out. they are banning new oil heaters from 2026, raising subsidies for e-cards under 40,000 euros -- ars under 40,000 euros. we will get more on that as well. this is bloomberg. ♪ alix: this is "bloomberg daybreak." i am alix steel. you made it to friday today feels like a soft, soggy, tired market. will we be able to sustain the

in the france, 63% said they wanted to stay neutral.out a potential conflict with china. now, of course, we know there are widening differences between the united states and europe on a number of issues, and president trump has voiced fierce and vocal criticism of the european union and many of its leadsers. but it's still troubling that after all the united states has done to defend european security, after all the sacrifices this country has made and burden that it continues to bear to protect the freedoms of people on the old continent that so few europeans these days willing to acknowledge the debt they owe the united states by supporting this country. well, that's it for us this week, and i'll be back next week with a look at how cutting edge technology's being used to improve health care. thank you for joining us. ♪ ♪ant anybody doing it, their life will be put in danger and humanitarian thing but discouraging people from coming here. >> thank you it is been too long. lou dobbs is next.. lou: good evening we began with breaking ne

in those circumstances, why be neutral?we offer the british public a final say, and we will campaign to remain in the eu. similar position to tom watson, the deputy leader — wasn't right for people in your party to try to abolish that post on the eve of conference? guv‘nor, it was ridiculous, preposterous, undemocratic, and those people should reflect on their behaviour. haveit should reflect on their behaviour. have it out in an argument. at worst, put another candidate against tom watson, don't abolish the post because you do not like tom watson or what they stand in for. we are a big tent, we are a family. of course we have differences, but we come together when we realised that at the general election the choice is between a no—deal brexit prime minister not understanding the needs of the nhs, policing and schools, and a labour party led byjeremy corbyn with tom by his side campaigning for the many, not the few. that he can, many thanks, the mayor of london making his view very clear, saying to delegates, don't listen t

the company that makes barbie rolls out new toy dolls with a gender-neutral appearance.ew toy dolls with a gender-neutral appearance. to severe psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for psoriasis, 75% clearer skin is achievable, with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. for psoriatic arthritis, otezla is proven to reduce joint swelling, tenderness, and pain. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or plan

the club will also promote carbon neutrality by reducing fossil fuels, import volumes and define exitom coal financing. 130 volumes and define exit strategies from coalfinancing. 130 banks, one third of the global banking sector signed up to align their businesses with the paris agreement objectives and the sustainable development goals. all of this in addition to the clear called by asset managers representing near half of the world's invested capital, some 3a trillion us dollars, who are demanding urgent climate action and calling on global leaders to put a meaningful price on carbon and fossil fuel meaningful price on carbon and fossilfuel subsidies meaningful price on carbon and fossil fuel subsidies and terminate all coal power worldwide. i want to once again salute those countries that have already increased their climate finance support, especially those that have doubled their contributions to the green climate find. today, today others went even beyond doubling their overall climate finance commitments. we absolutely must guarantee the implementation of the commitment by deve

gettingcertainly we are back to a more neutral position. 1:20 to the pound. very skewed toward no deal. 125, 126, it is more neutral. 130, you could probably say they are pricing a lot of good news. we are somewhere between the two. we are toward people starting to think some kind of compromise is possible, some kind of deal is going to be reached. we are not all the way there yet. the next couple weeks, it looks as though europe and the u.k. can get together and do some thing serious, even if it is a last-minute deal. the pound probably has more upside. if it turns the other way, unwinding momentum and people start moving back toward no deal, the pound has long way to fall. we're going to see a lot of volatility, but it is not fully priced in. were upside is the -- if the good news continues -- more upside if the good news continues. anna: let me ask you the question of the day we have been wrestling with. how far could stocks rally? what does success look like? , a china hawk,ry has shot rates through china, hasn't he? what is your assessment? >> what inves

and that can get bundled in a phrase, net neutrality. and oftentimes people say, "oh, you are against net neutrality." that is not the case at all. david: you must go to washington from time to time k to legistors or other people, and is that a painful part of your job? brian: i like advocating for comcast. i am passionatt our company and our beliefs. i think we represent sort of what the american dream is allbout. you start from literally tupelo, mississippi anno business, and you take risk capital. we have never had a guaranteed rate of return, like a phone company. we've borrowed $60 billion to build the company. no one says we will be here in 50 more years. we are 50-plus years old. and we he created 150,00jobs, and they are all, mostly, 90%, 95% here in america. so from time to time, depending where the pendulum is going, there are proposed things that are going to have real implications, and you try to articulate and advocate for that. at we've been heavily reg business, at least from my perspective, since the beginning. david: you

so it's not in the true sense a neutral detached as a magistrate judge would be. ate standalone system in which their recommendations or rulings cannot be adversely impacted on their careers, correct? there's that independence built into the system. >> i think, if i may, the original idea of article 32 and article 34 was to ensure there weren't baseless charges that went to court marshal and talking again pre-2014. so taken together, those vehicles were to ensure, again, baseless charges, maybe trivial charges that shouldn't see inside of a court marshal anyways, those kind of protections -- so some of the features carried over for example the waiver still remains with the accused. the accused says i waive my right to article 32. that doesn't have to be accepted by the authority but they do not and not required then you don't have a pc determination for article 32. still resides with the convening authorities and the advice of the sja. the sja can say we have jurisdiction and the there's probable cause these offenses were committed. just to ensure the very basic a

i'm not sure how you can be neutral on the most important binary austin of a generation.r and election and they are going to win. this is cuckoo land, isn't it? going back to that vote, labour said they wanted to back remain in the election, a show of hands vote, a very odd way to decide policy in the zist very odd way to decide policy in the 21st century. the person counting the votes seem to say that the labour party side had won, then turning to a close ally ofjeremy corbyn, who said no, labour's policy is to remain neutral. so there is outcry, why when people are allowed to have a vote with a paper ballot? why a show of hands? why does this individual have the power to intervene? other papers are calling ita intervene? other papers are calling it a stitch up. and even if it was totally fair, which it may have been, it wasn't a good look for labour orjeremy corbyn who built his image on listening to the grassroots, giving them a say. we are going to dictate policy from the top down, now it looks like with the help of the unions, that is what he has done. also, a lot of

but the net neutrality debate per se is i think noticeably absent from most of the campaign rhetoricamong the democrats because it's not an issue that energizes the base anymore now that it's no longer become framed in this good guys versus bad guys framework. >> host: when you look ahead at potential legislation or regulation, where does section 230 come down? >> guest: you know, i don't know. it's not a a topic that i folld as closely. it's hard to be optimistic about any kind of legislative progress for much of anything right now in the current congress. and so whether it's the satellite reauthorization or the markup on the c-band, unfortunately it's just that much coming out of legislatively, out of congress. >> and on your point that you totally has candidate a more quite issue on the campaign trail this year, i wanted to follow up and ask about antitrust because we have seen the tech policy debate shift toward at the trust, and right now in washington congress is holding a lot of hearings on this issue and both republican-led senate of the democrat led house with investigations

the plan — stay neutral until after the election and then offer a vote on leave or remain. and the morn arrives, i believe people will recognise that there was no stitch—up. here's a proper union for you! but the unions, just like the party, split. those who want labour to campaign to stop brexit now won't go away. so you won't to give up, might you try again somehow? well, i didn't give up two and a half years ago when a referendum wasn't remotely on the radar. why would i give up now when i've got most of what i want? this party's heart is remain. labour is a remain party — remain, revolt, reform. i know young people will hold their vote against us unless we'll tell them we'll campaign to remain. i want to seejeremy corbyn in number ten and campaigning to remain is the way to do it, and the only way to do it — solidarity! this but this afternoon, before too long, this debate wasn't about brexit but a clamour for control. we stand behind jeremy corbyn, 0k, we need to support him, we need to trust him and his team. we cannot tell brexit voters that they are stupid and that

if we focus on carbon neutrality, we can fundamentally change things. to meet our objectives to this end the coop that will take place in europe will be divisive events. the second thing is to bring together our agendas and our actions and this is what i said yesterday. we cannot say we're doing everything brilliantly, it's absolutely find and at the same time continue to depend on coal in so many countries. it is crucial that each and every country with the assistance of the community, with good financing, all of the different components of society, and i understand their limitations, of course, but it is important that each country move on from coal and it is crucial that the major countries of this world stop financing new polluting facilities in developing countries. today we are continuing to export financing and there are so many projects in developing countries financed by developed countries that open up new polluting structures. and we're saying to the poorest countries, you, for you, climate change isn't happening. you can continue to pollute.

to provides neutrality as an army as a neutral army to provide peace and order. later tatyana lotsa revich will show us around her online news office and me tributes are. 100 kilometers further south we're now at the cemetery in croatia. buffy hoti enter 20 year old son trayvon don't come here very often. only the call to my memories of march 26th 1909 are really difficult but it's now been 20 years and is every year on the date of that crime everyone from the village comes to the cemetery to the graves of their family members. but there's no grave for me and my children to visit so instead we come here to the memorial where the names of the missing are listed. persona. came hoti has been missing since the massacre 4 years his wife clung to the vain hope that he had survived. the men who carried out the mass murder were never caught but the atrocity and crew shot did feature in the charges brought against high ranking serbian politicians and military commanders. the u.n. war crimes tribunal in the hague sentence them to lengthy prison terms from a question my lif

i expect lord willing to be here in 2050 when i propose we become a car mon neutral -- carbon neutral country and be held account everyone this is a matter of justice between generations because the longer somebody is planning to be here the more their life depends on us insuring the climate change doesn't make our communities less liveable, the waterways less full of life, and really constraining the possibility of making it with increased frequency severity of extreme weather, and as we know here, this is not just something happening on the north and south pole, something happening on the coasts. it's happening in the middle of the country. live in a river city and we had to fire up our emergency operations center twice to deal with floods that are exposed to happen one every mill -- millena. twice in 18 months and we have to act. what does that look like quadruple our research and development of energy storage, energy efficiency, and renewable energy, and carbon storage. we should be doing this on a level comparable to the moon landing if he mean business, which means much more inv

to react faster to dangerous threats and insults to harmless stimuli no standard response is not a neutral but very emotional. when i read hatred and provocations on the internet for example even after all the research i've done on it i can't control myself it affects me immediately. more watch time more hits and more comments it's really not surprising that you tube favors extreme content the perceived anonymity of the internet also makes it easier for users to overcome their inhibitions and say things they would never say to someone face to face. which is meeting here when i talk to you or i can see your response but with an abstract entity online that's no longer the case they lose part of their humanity and only problem is that we've learned we don't have to worry about being prosecuted even if we spread hate. when. the you tube algorithm appeals to our lowest instincts with content we react to emotionally and spontaneously but does this fully explain the extremist tendencies in you tube the algorithms are primarily designed to increase revenues and watch time of course companies are s

only approaching neutral was too tight considering the trend analysis we did of funds versus neutral.e know that that was too tight and they remain too tight. they really needs to be more aggressive and stop playing defense, and start playing offense. shery: mary, our manager just -- barry,t the threat our manager just asked about the fed put. trump was clearly not happy with what happened yesterday. barry: i do tend to agree. he tends to operate on instinct. we came to the same conclusion, the fed was too tight. andink the trade conflict rebalancing going on is disruptive and the fed does not seem to account for that. also note that with negative rates abroad and very low and negative yields abroad, there is no way the u.s. could have maintained the kind of rates it did without dollar strength, which is inherently deflationary. there have been mistakes all around and it is a tough environment. i am surprised to the market has held -- i am surprised the market has held on as well as it has. amanda: great to have your thoughts as usual, very. very banister, diesel head of -- barry bann

to involvee broadly all countries in focusing on being carbon neutral by 2050. this, we need to continue to work on this crucial strategy. india has just said it is prepared to get on board with this agenda and coalition. keen tohina is very focus on climate. it has done so over the past few years. i know that together if we focus on carbon neutrality, we can fundamentally change things to meet our objectives. they will be decisive events. the second thing is to bring together our agendas and actions. say we are doing everything brilliantly, it is fine and at the same time continue to depend on coal and so many countries. it is crucial that each and respecting all the different components understand their limitations. but it is important each country move on and it's crucial that the major countries of this world stop financing new polluting facilities in developing countries. today we are continuing to export financing and there are so many projects in other countries financed by developed newtries that open up polluting structures and in a way we are saying to

box downgraded to under weight from neutral at jp morgan citing intensifying competition among other things. the price target is $15. the stock dropped 6% to5.96. >>> still ahead, house flips is a ris business. even riskier. g♪may be getting ♪ ♪ alth officials say they doept know exactly what caused the more than 800 vaimg related illnesses that suddenly appeared ararnd thet country. here is w wt they do know. control said that a number ofl patients became sick after using vaping products thatin con the marijuana derivative thc. one particularroduct is sol der the brand name da vapes thcd officials recommend staying away from all vaping products while the investigation continors. >>> cala is known foror many things, including its wine. which is a big par of the state's economy. but grape growers are facing ar ma challenge. fellow farmers whorow legal marijuana. jane wells has the story from california. experiment's great with legal marijuana is running in unintended consequences. especially in santa barbara county whe avocado groves butt greenhouse sees f flowers. >> we have 80 years

humans whose prejudices and opinions flow into the programming so algorithms can never be perfectly neutral they always need ethical guidelines the rainer how much policy founded a nonprofit organization called the ethical tech society to focus. search on the ethics of algorithms. and government can and it is that algorithms can't be programmed to be ethical. but many of the methods we use assert a pendant on the data it's the data that shapes the algorithms or the program that was on the stand so the program has set up the scam. and we provide the meat and the muscle. so the users actually provide the algorithms with the necessary data through their browsing habits but how is this data evaluated. the arena is demanding that the inner workings of the algorithms be open for evaluation and regularly inspected. the youtube algorithms prioritize watch time and advertising revenues many people only watch videos that are recommended to them this is just what you tube likes to see the center this is not interested in quality their interest is primarily monetary keeping users on the site so they'll