struggle with his brothers, because his brothers tried to lead the anti-horde movement, the famous nevryuev’sn alexander’s side, which in general brought troubles to russia a little less than boty’s burden, according to one point of view, but alexander’s position can also be understood , because russia then, at least the lands subject to it, could not resist the horde, that is, they simply did not have the strength, this was very well shown by batu’s invasion itself. lithuania more or less succeeded, but it also temporarily fell under the power of the horde, and of course there is power the horde was weaker due to the fact that russia resisted; russia spent a lot of effort. there is also a complex political connection here, which needs to be understood, which is very easy to swing ideologically in one direction or the other, yes, discarding very important fundamental details, and from gorsky’s point of view, alexander’s activity, on the contrary , contributed to some kind of local limited yes. which, from the point of view of many historians , was the key to the independence of the subsequent