and not enough to counter act the housing deficit and berkeley looked at the feasibility for new housing under s.b.50 in high-income areas such as menlo park and lower income areas. the new housing under s.b.50 would be profitable in menlo park. and most speakers expressed concern about the senate bill. and some changes were wanted from a community process. some are concerned the current bill may cause pressures on stressed communities and it was recommended they work with the state legislature on amendments that would protect our interest and enable support of the bill. the committee then forwarded the resolution to the full board with minor amendments. at the full board this week, supervisor peskin's union square open space fee and inclusionary housing fees passed and a church passed the first read and on consideration of s.b.50 at the full board specific amendments were considered so it could not be combined win state density bonus to weaken local code and offered amendments to protections for sensitive communities and suggested an anti-monster home provision and asked for more clarity on the a