had a question about the south of market legislation, is that -- are they waiting for the new land use committee to be set and then -- do we have any idea of the timeline on that? >> we don't, but that's a good yes. i'm happy to follow up with the supervisor's office. i know with the change in committee compositions, i'm not sure that any of the -- [multiple voices] yeah! >> yeah, because i'd like to partake in that hearing, if i can. any other questions? all right. is there any public comment for mr. van houten? >> there's none. >> all right >> all right. we'll close public comment and we can move along to number seven which is hearing and possible action regarding applications for permits undered jurisdiction of the entertain commission and deputy director asvito will introduce this. >> i have one permit on the consent agenda -- agenda this evening. you rubbed off on me there. so, for conditions, i want to point out due to the zoning district of libreria which is our consent agenda, this would have to end by 10:00 p.m. rather than 11:00 and the permit officer include one standard calendar and

had a question about the south of market legislation, is that -- are they waiting for the new land use committee to be set and then -- do we have any idea of the timeline on that? >> we don't, but that's a good yes. i'm happy to follow up with the supervisor's office. i know with the change in committee compositions, i'm not sure that any of the -- [multiple voices] yeah! >> yeah, because i'd like to partake in that hearing, if i can. any other questions? all right. is there any public comment for mr. van houten? >> there's none. >> all right >> all right. we'll close public comment and we can move along to number seven which is hearing and possible action regarding applications for permits undered jurisdiction of the entertain commission and deputy director asvito will introduce this. >> i have one permit on the consent agenda -- agenda this evening. you rubbed off on me there. so, for conditions, i want to point out due to the zoning district of libreria which is our consent agenda, this would have to end by 10:00 p.m. rather than 11:00 and the permit officer include one standard calendar and

used the services of financiers, nine criminal cases were initiated. in belarus, since the new year, the conditions for the purchase of land plots have changed. as they say to the state property committeeinnovations of the land code will go for the benefit of the citizens. so they will be able to get additional land without an auction and without the reconstruction of residential buildings. this rule applies to legal entities, as well as individual entrepreneurs who need additional land to expand production. and this is just one of the innovations for business. the norm will be relevant, allowing you to change the purpose of the plots before the completion of construction. that is, some economic entity built one object more economically, but in the process of construction, the market situation changes, the request of the society and instead of the proposed construction of the facility. he can repurpose it. mm to build another object hmm without completing the previous construction. this was previously prohibited. part of the norm of the updated land legislation came into force on september 1 last year and has already proven its effectiveness. new year's traditions and rituals in moscow

new target more affordable housing under the housing element that was approved earlier on our agenda. and - but have to say based on what we heard yesterday in the land use and transportation committee it is very clear that there exist no sir tension in the mayor's office to scale up to come close to meeting our new affordable housing target you meeting those goals will require planning and collaboration and openness to new stwraejz and a commitment 0 using all available funding to achieve those goals and pressure the state for merry funding. i'm frankly alarmed by some of the statements yesterday from the mayor's office of skuchlt the lack of urgency the refusal to spend funds that the board has appropriated more affordable housing to budget prop i funds the willness to renege on the deal struck by board of supervisors more affordable housing. and certificates of participation that is financing and refusal to collaborate to move forward the board of supervisors to achieve the affordable housing goals the housing element so one can't watch that hearing and urge you if you didn't have a chance to watch that and look at the contrast that the planning department with the hard work and

us now from capitol hill with new reaction today over republican committee assignments. welcome, julie. how are members of congress reacting to the controversial figures? there were landing spots on some top committees. >> the members of his parties that are allies of former president trump. i want to take a look. -- i am with scott and we'll worry i. -- they are back on committees that they were booted off of. democrats were citing threat these lawmakers had may. there is the language and rhetoric that they used against other democrats. now they're being put back on those committees. most are back on the energy committee. there is the committee of oversight. the house is number one panel of republican means. this is the number one tool of holding the federal government and biden ministration accountable. all of them will have access to a pretty information. a lot of it is classified. they will have upgraded clearance to access that information. marjorie taylor greene is an especially interesting one here. in the last several months, reporters, including myself, they have watched her transform into an ally of mccarthy's. always supporting him from start to finish for tha

new target more affordable housing under the housing element that was approved earlier on our agenda. and - but have to say based on what we heard yesterday in the land use and transportation committee it is very clear that there exist no sir tension in the mayor's office to scale up to come close to meeting our new affordable housing target you meeting those goals

new target more affordable housing under the housing element that was approved earlier on our agenda. and - but have to say based on what we heard yesterday in the land use and transportation committee it is very clear that there exist no sir tension in the mayor's office to scale up to come close to meeting our new affordable housing target you meeting those goals will require planning and collaboration and openness to new stwraejz and a commitment 0 using all available funding to achieve those goals and pressure the state for merry funding. i'm frankly alarmed by some of the statements yesterday from the mayor's office of skuchlt the lack of urgency the refusal to spend funds that the board has appropriated more affordable housing to budget prop i funds the willness to renege on the deal struck by board of supervisors more affordable housing. and certificates of participation that is financing and refusal to collaborate to move forward the board of supervisors to achieve the affordable housing goals the housing element so one can't watch that hearing and urge you if you didn't have a chance to watch that and look at the contrast that the planning department with the hard work and

new target more affordable housing under the housing element that was approved earlier on our agenda. and - but have to say based on what we heard yesterday in the land use and transportation committee it is very clear that there exist no sir tension in the mayor's office to scale up to come close to meeting our new affordable housing target you meeting those goals will require planning and collaboration and openness to new stwraejz and a commitment 0 using all available funding to achieve those goals and pressure the state for merry funding. i'm frankly alarmed by some of the statements yesterday from the mayor's office of skuchlt the lack of urgency the refusal to spend funds that the board has appropriated more affordable housing to budget prop i funds the willness to renege on the deal struck by board of supervisors more affordable housing. and certificates of participation that is financing and refusal to collaborate to move forward the board of supervisors to achieve the affordable housing goals the housing element so one can't watch that hearing and urge you if you didn't have a chance to watch that and look at the contrast that the planning department with the hard work and

new approaches to affordable housing. the board has the power and responsibility to form working committees immediately to make budget recommendations quickly to establish a resource and land use plan now so we can aggressively purchase development sites and apartment buildsings for long-term affordability. board members spoke in november about the state needing to help out. i want to bring up the fact (inaudible) rights equity all planning coalition has requested budget allocation from the state to san francisco affordable housing efforts. the board can support this request. once the board is focused implementation on racial social economic equity start to advocate for change in the rhna allocation. it is great to have goals but instead of force fed laughable mandates from the state let's start with making the financial district a resilient neighborhood with housing and commercial. it is a huge challenge. start with a fresh approach to affordable housing that puts us on track to house the homeless and stabilize the vulnerable communities and tenants. focus on the challenges (inaudible) >> sorry to cut anybody off but we are timing each speaker at two minutes. next speaker, pl

new approaches to affordable housing. the board has the power and responsibility to form working committees immediately to make budget recommendations quickly to establish a resource and land use plan now so we can aggressively purchase development sites and apartment buildsings for long-term affordability. board members spoke in november about the state needing to help out. i want to bring up the fact (inaudible) rights equity all planning coalition has requested budget allocation from the state to san francisco affordable housing efforts. the board can support this request. once the board is focused implementation on racial social economic equity start to advocate for change in the rhna allocation. it is great to have goals but instead of force fed laughable mandates from the state let's start with making the financial district a resilient neighborhood with housing and commercial. it is a huge challenge. start with a fresh approach to affordable housing that puts us on track to house the homeless and stabilize the vulnerable communities and tenants. focus on the challenges (inaudible) >> sorry to cut anybody off but we are timing each speaker at two minutes. next speaker, pl

new hospital and surrounding campus. i also assume that all parties have the best intentions and i am a member of the ucsf community advisory committee focused on than lands use. i think commissioner eppler may have a conflict because the past 6 years he has been involved as a member of the 5 person leadership team for a ucsf investment in dog patch as a mitigation for land use development, and they gave this team $4.2 million in 2017. 5 years later this week they are discussing with ucsf whether this funding reverts back to ucsf as per the contract, or if this small leadership team will be allowed to move forward with more preplanning funding or if it will go back to the community for a pros. i don't want to take more time then that but $4.2 million of $10 million investment. i respectfully request the appeal approve or decided on a continuance (inaudible) to close the large gap between dpw and community. why? i love-my hands are red from clapping during your questions. the ucsf and applicant brief is clear ucsf, dpw relied on representation and non bindsing agreement (inaudible) screening of the neighborhood was introduced-- >> thank you that is time. >> th