this is new submittals. that's kind of what would be good to alleviate some of this question that everybody is coming through in an equal manner. >> to answer some of the questions. thank you, commissioner walker. first of all i was in the county all the time before, 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. generally by what size of the roll. generally when they come in the building department over the counter, usually they are not new building, not addition, not changing use. generally they are simple or ti jobs. you saw those big jobs rolling in. most are ti. ti job because the architect wants to charge more money, right. they pay by page. mostly details. you don't want any major change in the ti. i had expense when i was in the counter with the director approve for over the counter. we help to take the pressure off the plan checker. when there is an issue, they should go to the supervisor and ask to review it. the job i had before like a change from a b to a and then lots of changes on the counter. that's why someti

we didn't make a submittal for a new contract and funding will cease july 1. we respectfully request that you consider the plight of the people that we use and use your discretion to restore funding. we need $78,000 a year to survive. thank you for your help. >> thank you. next speaker please. >> i am eric booker and the manager of st. francis living room. like peter was saying we do need your help because we have 100 people we feed on a daily basis and [inaudible] some barely walk and in wheelchairs and safe environment for them. we help them with clothing. we help them with shower information. we counsel things that really need you guys' help on and without the help from the city we won't be able to stay open. guys look forward -- everyday, monday through friday and get a nutritious meal and do stuff and we show them love and i appreciate if you all can really, really, really put in your hearts to keep us -- to keep this funding going on for these guys because they really need it. thank you all. >> thank you. >> hi i am edmund larry and want to show you a co

to include all changes in project scales that are regulated under the planning code, or the submittal of any new information. is it a change to something we regulate? then it needs a new c-e-q-a document. has new information been submitted? then it needs a new c-e-q-a document. the decision of the ero today without that ordinance is truly a decision that is left at the discretion of the ero. as this new law takes effect, it would be merely an application of law without discretion. this is the main reason we believe a new hearing process for appeals should not be established. in addition, i'd like to describe two other reasons why we believe a new process is not warranted. first, there is an existing avenue for appeal. if a member of the public believes that a new permit is based on a c-e-q-a review of a substantially different project, that permit may be appealed to the board of appeals. the board of appeals is the proper venue for appeal of improperly issued permits. we heard yesterday at hpc hearing some folks don't like the board of appeals, that it's too hard [speaker not understood], but ju