well, the editor of the new york times, jill abramson is here now. you are printing this new international edition. why are you doing that? >> we are still printing than international -- the "thenational edition and new york times" itself because we have a healthy audience of people that like reading a physical newspaper and it is a wonderful way of delivering the news. >> sure, but does it prove you are not with the beat? what's the point is we are a global news -- >> the point is we are a global newspaper now and we have been editions of "the new york times," and a very viable digital edition, both the global home page and the home page of "the new york times" are full what the best quality information and there is a tremendous hunger among readers all over the world for the highest quality kind of journalism, and that is what we do. >> you are working on the premise that journalism that you pay for a somehow better than journalism you do not pay for, is that correct? >> that is not necessarily my premise. "the new york times" business model involve

the new york times se suma a esto. >> esta vez el pedido no vino de una organizaciÓn proinmigrante, sinonfluyente diario the new york times, el periÓdico le dice al presidente obama que vaya mÁs allÁ de la polÍtica y escuche las voces de los indocumentados, voces como la de bertha, que vive hace 14 aÑos tras las sombras. >> no ha sido fÁcil, vilma, porque hay momentos en que uno sale a manejar y el miedo estÁ. yo tengo dos niÑas, una de 19 y una de 8 aÑos y pienso mucho quÉ pasarÍa con ellas. >> su hija es una "dreamer" o soÑadora que se beneficiÓ de la acciÓn diferida pero vive con el miedo de que un dÍa le quiten a su mamÁ. >> yo sÉ que tengo un alivio en este paÍs pero mi mamÁ y mi papÁ siempre manejan con temor, tienen que trabajar escondidos, tienen el temor de ser deportados y es muy difÍcil. >> el new york times seÑala que el presidente mantiene una cifra frenÉtica de 400.000 deportados, basados en argumentos polÍticos y no de seguridad. obama hablÓ para la nueva cadena "fusion". >> berta, como el new york times, le pide al presidente que actÚe. >> que Él tiene el poder. Él no tie

it was in the "new york times". >> oh, "the new york times", oh, okay. [ laughter ] >> jon: oh, "the new york times", the paper of record for crackheads and liars. just out of curiosity financial journalists seem to feel that the "new york times" reporting is beneath their veracity standards. is there a new source that is fact-filled and trustworthy enough to quote on your hallowed cnbc air. >> mandatory reading the editorial in the wall street journal. >> want to talk about the editorial in the wall street journal. >> shakedown as "the wall street journal". >> if you you have to work at the editorial board you might as well be at the "new york times". >> the only place the financial guys consider factual enough for rebroadcast is the one part of the rupert murdoch bias machine explicitly labeled opinion. there may be one fact that jp morgan found themselves in when taking on the liabilities of washington mutual and bern sterns. >> the government asked jp morgan buy up bear sterns and buy washington mutual. >> they came to jpm hat in hate in order to save them from collapse. >> they b

in a "new york times" story, the "new york times" interviewed her brother and sister to talk about how good of a person she is. and her character. and the white house was nowhere behind her. >> well, but in another "new york times" story, a person who was not mentioned by name, but it was described as having been close to both sebelius and the white house says, well, kathleen has the title, but she doesn't have the responsibility or in many respects the kind of wide authority and access to the president that she needs to make a difference. so the white house seems to be, you know, she doesn't really do much so it's not kind of our fault. >> which is ridiculous. somebody does need to take the fall for this. whether or not it's her is up to the president of united states. there are reasons for it, reasons against it. but it needs to be done and it deserves covered. >> one of the things we do on this program is we try to cut through the accusations. during the shutdown, republicans were getting pummeled in the press and politically. the democrat and president are having a hard time of it

." >>> "the new york times" under scrutiny for big stories. is the paper right, wrong or somewhere in between? 13 days into the government shutdown and two big stories dominating the media landscape. >> breaking news on capitol hill, meetings under way right now and new questions on whether the gop is about to cave to white house demands on a debt deal. >> the news of the day in which the house gop has essentially offered the six-week clean debt ceiling while the government stays shut down. >> cautious optimism has gone away. are we back to square one now? >> are media too focused on politics rather than consequences of the stalemate and when there are so much spin and talking points, how do we get the facts? we'll look at the challenges and importance of fact checking and explore whether a growing focus devoted that intersurprienterpr making a difference. we'll talk with a report's author about the administration's crackdown on whistle blowers and its impact on journalists and news and commercials you can use in just six seconds. >> how much n

as the ombudsman for the new york times margaret sullivan knows. don't be surprised when you lose the contacts you have. marcel la pisarro on the role of the media ombudsman. >> being the one who takes the reared's complaints to the journalist responsible can put you in a corner. ♪ >> become a media ombudsman and your days of newsroom camaraderie are over. >> an ideal ombudsman has got to be a diplomat. possibly a masochist but mostly a diplomat. >> the area of the ombudsman, every newspaper. >> you have an extremely thick skin and i might add it might be better if you actually enjoy conflict. >> it is a sort of a persona nongrata job. >> only ombudsman should know, earlier this year, antigovernment protests erupted in the sense of istanbul over a project to build a local park. most media outlets ignored the protests then gave more air time to the government. he was working for sabah daily, criticizing the paper for its coverage. the articles were censored. then came his new york times op ed, taking the authorities to task for their close ties to t

the truth is "the new york times" brand as journalism means that there's a real market. ommit to "the times" and to pay for skrup subscriptions to "the times." we want to broaden our portfolio products, to have a broader range of price points. some cost less, some a little bit more. if you like, we tap that demand for effectively and find, you know, new audiences alongside our existing ones. so this is really the second stage in rolling out what so far, i think, has been a very successful model. >> isn't it amazing, mark, how things have changed? because a few years ago, right, nobody thought that a pay law would work. and when some rolled out and they didn't do well, everybody maybe like obama care started piling on. now that's the way it is. however, we've also seen the rise of so-called aggregator news sites. you know what i'm talking about. >> i do. >> right? they'll put a few paragraphs and say link here. what's your take on the future of pay walls and whether or not these aggregator sites can, indeed, survive? >> i think firstly -- >> are they good for you or bad? >

time at "the listening post." re# #a# #d# #y# ##fo# #r# ## banned. >> this is al jazeera america. live from new yorkity i'm thomas drayton with today's top stories. >> i say to my fellow republicans on this side of the senate, time is running out. >> the government shutdown and debt ceiling just days away. >>> high winds, torrential rains and massive power outages

times." it is not just different but it has a new name "international new york times." edited from paris, london, new york, and hong kong. it is a news report tailored to the valued members of the global audience, and the global is the key word because "the new york times" says the future is global thanks to the digital revolution. "the new york times" went from being an american paper to becoming a global paper and with this move -- quite an all basis -- alteration mood -- the first global daily to be in both print and digital. "international new york times" it shows it wants to keep its fan base loyal as well. you can see an older man saying i should go digital, while the grandson says "i should try paper." hoping for a broad readership. >> despite that many -- the many changes, papers feeling nostalgic. >> "international herald tribune" -- a person saying no longer seeing a person strolling down the champs d'elysee. roger: also saysade bonjour "international leader times." hemingway read the paper. it is time to move on. living in a digital age and time to move on wit

and i'm very glad to see back at the table, the distinguished author, journalist, former "new york times"man, former bureau chief of the "new york times" and the author of several remarkable books. i first became aware of you when wrote that great book on russia, when i first went there. you're also the author of a very significant book which we talked about on the program recently, "who stole the american dream." and we have had more comments on that particular interview than any we've done in many years. people are very concerned and they're very, very grateful about what has happened to this country. why are the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer and the middle getting skeezeder. if you squeezeder. > well, you can. >> a former man on the hill, and who was the other distinguished -- >> i used to work were senator warn ruddman. >> so you've been in the front any times. i'm so glad -- [laughter] don't worry, you can keep your clothes on. except you, charlie. charlie allison of the philadelphia tribune, also of sirius exm radio where we sometimes perform together. lovely to have you

a "new york times" reporter talked about the waiters going into the water and caught your dinner andt did not happen. >> the hoaxer thought that other people had what a grudge against that restaurant and had written these bad reviews so he was going back and showing how ridiculous the online reviews can be. >> this has gotten into the question of law enf in new york state after obtaining $350,000 in fines against the reputation management firms which sounds benign but they are either doing these fake positive reviews or trashing someone else's business. >> so, there was a year investigation in companies that create fake reviews and charter bus operators, teeth whitening service, and an adult entertainment club. >> amazon is in the business of removing reviews where the company determines that someone has a financial interest either in the book or competing book or competing product but i don't think your mother-in-law gets caught in that so you have to be skeptical. >> and yelp filed a $25,000 lawsuit accusing a law group of gaming the system by planning fake positive reviews of the

and now "the new york times," of all the papers, is saying the administration has been trying to mislead us. that report when we come back. >>> "the new york times" says the white house put off issuing major rule s regarding obama cae until after the last election. the reason, not wanting to give any republicans firepower. the translation, this administration sucks and if people find out about it, we're going to lose. that's four disasters buried in order to win an election. benghazi, the irs, the doj and now obama care. this is not white house, it's a mass lium of mistakes where they spend more time stashing skeletons than a medical college. why this corrupt strategy not a win in november? those scandals refused to die. are emerging, demanding their pound of flesh. obama fears latest of the undead, who just heard the free part of obama care. now it's time to pay and the zombies are hungry. how hilarious is it a program meant to enhance your health requires its own warning label. it was never about helping people it the real zombie is the amoral beast of big government marching forward w

g >>> new york times. >>> "new york times" piece asking is the game over. now we are in the playoffs, and the author says baseball has bigger problems than declining ratings that it has in his view fallen out of the national conversation. joining us from los angeles, jim gray of fox sports. i love baseball, but i have to admit i have not watched many games lately. >> things have changed over the course of time, and our society has changed and the biggest thing are these devices. you think about how everybody uses them in everyday life, and baseball is the national past time, and they may want the scores and highlights but they are not tuning into the games and the game itself is a luxury that we all kind of now think if we had the time maybe we would, but it's better just to get the score and we get the score right away. you can't watch a baseball on one of the tvs walking around on the telephone, and "the new york times" that was an excellent piece. >> yeah, i was thinking about the great announcers from the golden years of baseball, and now as you say, yo

this is the new york times. but that it makes of on satisfying assurances about reviews, on their way, platitudes about the need for security in an insecure aged and the on defense that the president just did not know. well, joining me now, the "a-team", author, radio talk-show host of fox news contributor, fox news legal analyst and chris courtliness, democratic strategist, former chief of staff. well, let's start out with -- i will turn to you first. the president has a few friends left in the media. this is no way to sugar coat this. >> well, if you are talking about obamacare. >> a want to be specific in my answer. the president might have turned a caveat and to avert. the fact is we're talking with the president saying he can keep your plan to keep your doctor. turns out that they knew as early as march of 2010 that that just was not true and kept repeating and repeating what is, for any other oracle, live. don't you think? >> here is what i think the problem is. this has happened in countless administratio

listen up, the "new york times." i know what's going on here. you published some liberal j.d. about awards being terrible and losing the s the best right after i win these. (cheers and applause) skrao *ed. (cheers and applause) clearly, clearly, clearly somebody is jealous. because while i've been showered in gold, the only golden shower the "new york times" gets is congress teal urine. (laughter) finally, folks, everyone knows i'm close to the jesus. he carries me on that beat so often he got a baby bjorn. that's why i'm giving a wag of my finger to science for slandering my religion. >> the institute of applied immunology showed one of the worst contaminated water sources on the planet is in churches. 86% of holy water contains fecal matter. (audience reacts) >> it would explain why they're always burning incense. (laughter) now, folks, i've always known holy water was dangerous. i mean, just look what happens when you drink it. (laughter) (screaming) a moment on the lips, an eternity of not having lips. (laughter) but what if there's fecal matter? listen to the so-called so

but if you look at these cases, you -- "new york times," "washington post", "washington post," "wall street journal," fox news. they're main stream media. don't listen to the way they brand themselves. they're main street. they have deep enough pockets to sustain the sort of investigative journalism that is not the swelling and this is often the result of a lot of hard work. this is stuff that takes time. it takes money. and -- >> expertise. >> yes. and so this -- while i think, yes, this -- the -- these issues do pose a threat to journalist rick large, what we see thus far in my humble opinion, the principal kind of threat going forward is to the largest news organizations out there. those that can devote national resources to such. so the flip side of it for the administration, any administration, should be the track record of the large corporations. i have people who say who put you guys in charge of determining when the public should know. but when presented with sensitive material, the main street news organizations have almost always undertaken a thoughtful examination of how to

the new york times se suma a esto. >> esta vez el pedido no vino

the press has accelerated, almost in every case, and there are a couple of exceptions and the new york times is a notable exception, but with a few exceptions, people have systematically cut back. investigative reporting is risky and doesn't always yield stories, it makes enemies, it's not commercial, and it's impossible to turn a profit into such, and that's why phil's operation is a non-profit and that's why ours is as well and depends on donors, and there is a systematic cutback across the board. i would add one note that goes the other way. i would have to say that the reporting this summer in the last six months that we have been able to play a small part in with the guardian and the new york times, based on the snowden documents, has in many ways been some of the most important, and i think will very clearly prove the most productive investigative reporting perhaps in 40 years in this country. i think there's a serious crisis in this area, premature. >> talking about the hostile climate in investigative journalism. chris says: mike says: and manuel says: jordan, talk toking you about t

all have been in mainstream outlets, nbc, "new york times." what is it like to be behind the scenes, being the only person, the raisin in the buttermilk. you can write that. what's it like? >> i think at nbc, there is definitely -- they get it a lot more. they understand it. you need to be more diverse, particularly in the newsroom. nobody is perfect but i think there is a good mix and i'm in those big meetings when they are deciding what stories are going to go out and what's going to happen in the day. i think it's very important. i think, look, america is diverse, as we all talk about. i think it's important that the newsroom reflects america. not just our skin but what we think. >> i think what's also interesting is that all of you in response to the lack of diversity didn't just complain about lack of diversity, you found new outlets, new spaces to offer your vision of the world. how important for the next african-americans to have spaces in the division. >> i think it's incredibly important. for so long only a few were allowed in. now yo

but i do want -- speaking of straightening things out, i do want to go back to this "new york times" story if i can, that the market is reacting to right now. i want to tell you that "the new york times" is sourcing this all to one anonymous house republican. what "the times" is saying is boehner has told colleagues that he is determined to prevent a federal default and is willing to pass a measure through a combination of republican and democratic votes. that according to "the new york times" according to one house peb that they have talked to. clearly that is the type of outcome, if that holds up, if that turns out to be true and can be sourced to a broader did he grier of sources here, that's the type of outcome that these wall street chieftains would have liked to have seen yesterday. that's why they came here. >> josh, handicap how you see this proceeding in light of that latest development. >> well, that's a huge positive sign because we're seeing the limits to which speaker boehner's willing to go on this. before that, what we saw was that house republicans did not want to nece

and i'm very glad to see back at the table, the distinguished author, journalist, former "new york times"man, former bureau chief of the "new york times" and the author of several remarkable books. i first became aware of you when wrote that great book on russia, when i first went there. you're also the author of a very significant book which we talked about on the program recently, "who stole the american dream." and we have had more comments on that particular interview than any we've done in many years. people are very concerned and they're very, very grateful about what has happened to this country. why are the rich getting richer, the poor getting poorer and the middle getting skeezeder. if you squeezeder. > well, you can. >> a former man on the hill, and who was the other distinguished -- >> i used to work were senator warn ruddman. >> so you've been in the front any times. i'm so glad -- [laughter] don't worry, you can keep your clothes on. except you, charlie. charlie allison of the philadelphia tribune, also of sirius exm radio where we sometimes perform together. lovely to have you

i have said that throughout. >> a "new york times" report reveals that today's shut down actually is rt of a mobt's long strategy to tie government funding to defund obama care. actually told the "new york times" we felt very strongly at the start of this year that the house needed to use the power of the purse. behind the republican pursestrings are the coke brothers who have been deeply involved in financing the overall effort. >> we should not shut down the government. we should fund every bitd of the government. everies a pektd of the government. 100% of the government except for obama care. >> joining me now, msnbc political analyst. cryst crystal, there is ted cruise saying the talking points as developed by the strategy. >> they certainly found a willing partner there. they talked in this article how they felt that they were spinning their wheels. they were not getting the aggressive defund. i think the two key ingredients that they got over the summer. and when they also are great with the tool kit that you are mentioning at whipping up this frenzy among the base. using these

when you look at the cases, "the new york times," "washington post." inaudible] "the wall street journal," fox news. they're part of the main stream media. don't listen to how they brand themselves. they are mainstream in large. -- journalism that this is not and so -- the track record of the large organizations. i would like to think. i know, i have friends in the military and the intelligence community laugh when i say it. who put you in charge of determining what the public should know but, you know, when presented with sensitive material, particularly national security nature, the mainstream news organizations have almost always undertaken a thoughtful examination of how to publish -- what to publish. when agonized with. and even when provided with the entire wicky leeks, we -- wicky leaks. we used it as a basis for journalism then going out -- "washington post" through bart in the receipt of material -- which they're used to engage journalism and portions of it are being pickup truck there. you are only somebody with the expertise can thandle way t

. >> what if anything is anchored in "the new york times" article? >> the accuracy is the secretary of defense and the attorney general did approve a supplemental procedures governing committee patients metadata analysis and 2009. what that allows us to do is use metadata that we have acquired under executive order whether it's phone records or e-mails through u.s. selectors to figure out social networks abroad.

this is in the obituary section of the new york times --of "the new york times" -- that in "the new york times this morning. here from "the wall street urinal" -- -- "the wallal street journal" -- that comes as the president is slated to to meet with republicans at the white house on immigration today. that is the latest on immigration. pam from montclair, virginia, what are your thoughts he e -- what are your thoughts? i think she is being disingenuous if she does not know she is being tapped. we still occupy germany. military in the late 70's and early 80's. were all very afraid at that time that germany -- afraid of a united germany am a is what we have now. continue, what does that mean for today? caller: i would expect people are still fearful of a united germany. the presidents disavowing any knowledge, that is what politicians do. that is what they did in the bush administration. i feel like we have more than enough intelligence to protect ourselves. we knew that 9/11 was going to happen. we have only seen an increase of the buildup of military installations and the spying. contin

joined by quentin hardy of "the new york times" and colleen taylor of tech crunch. thanks for coming on the show. it's actually your second time. we can talk about your first time in a minute. i'm now going to leave it to you to explain reddit. and as you do for someone who's ever never seen it and says am i going to watch this alexis guy on tv or not, explain it well. >> no pressure. >> no. >> well, it is a platform for online communities to share links and have discussions about really whatever they want. we just broke 81 million visitors a month, and people use the platform to discuss everything from corgis to nfl to politics. >> most people would be astonished to figure out how many things they see on the news started on reddit. it's kind of the birthplace, where the planets are formed for all the silly things you see. not always just silly but oftentimes the silly things you see on newscasts. >> it is a truly open platform for people to find an interesting link, submit it. and if other people like that link, they'll vote it up. yeah, oftentimes, it's the launch

>> well, "the new york times'" johnson martin had a great piece in "the new york times" that had been wildly quoted. great in terms of it's ais what. is that he says that the elders really see liabilities in this shutdown for the people who are promoting it. meaning that there was a closed-door meeting and that -- >> among republican senators. >> yes, among republican senators who were beating up on ted cruz. and there were anonymous quotes coming out of that, saying that they were questioning ted cruz as to where the end game is. so once that is on the table -- >> let's talk about at none mth anonymous quotes. saying there was a lynch mob in that meeting against ted cruz. that makes me uncomfortable that people say those kinds of things. >> right. they also went to ted cruz according to the politico piece. he says there's nothing the media likes to cover more than disagreements among republicans. and apparently some senators are content to fuel those stories with anonymous quotes. >> you're smiling. >> because you go into the battle with the media that you have and you sort of acknow

. >> "the new york times" is wrong in its article? >> absolutely. here are the facts. what they have taken is the fact that we do take data to enrich it. what is not in front of the statements is the word foreign.

this should not be breaking news, not even for the new york times. so wide as a obamacare only cover 40 percent of the 50 million folks the president said that were passing obamacare to cover. well, according to the new york times there's a simple explanation. because they live in stays largely controlled by republicans that have declined, by the way -- that should be to have declined. and just correcting. they participate in a vast expansion of medicaid, the medicare program for the poor. you're kidding. union the time set a sense of humor. so 26 of our states, 26 states have rejected the medicaid expansion. it already accounts for a whopping 22%, just about 22 percent of our budget, $732 billion. the federal government will pick up nearly 100 percent of that cost from the medicaid enrollees until a 2016. after 2016 state taxpayers will be on the hook for almost 100 percent of the cost. now, 10 percent of the cost, i should say, 10% made it sound like a small amount, but it is big money. in states like new york, that 10 percent would amount to $52 bi

. >> "new york times" lead this morning "the honeymoon is over." is that true?