>> but that's a fact. >> that has nothing to do with the "new york times" -- the "new york times," "newsweekother publications are following these leads. you can try to trace it back to an author but you're actually going to have to condemn the "new york times," joe becker and mike mcintyre because they're the ones that wrote this story. >> first of all, i haven't seen the story and neither have you. >> well, i have. >> the last 35 minutes, i don't have a laptop here. but i will say that there is an epidemic of really sloppy reporting that goes from the top to the bottom about people who put stuff this before they're ready to get all the facts. and i'd like to see what all the facts are here because so far we haven't really -- >> why didn't you read the story before you accuse the "new york times" of being sloppy. >> because in general "new york times" has been sloppy. particularly their politicality times. by the fifth paragraph in any political story, we could probably find one right here whatever the political story on the front page is by the fifth paragraph, they're substituting their j

stories appeared yesterday in "the new york times" and then "the washington post." "new york times" says the nbc's internal investigation expanded to include a half dozen new examples of exaggerations, including when he was in egypt's tahrir square. he was there, but apparently he said he was on a balcony and in another instance he said he was down there looking somebody in the eye. "the washington post" then says there are 11 instances of exaggerations. nbc now looking at it. now, this followed a briefing for a top-level nbc officials, including steve burke, who runs the place for comcast. what does it say that these stories were leaked from within nbc? >> howie, absolutely you and i have done this so long that i have no doubt, those stories are not out unless nbc wants them out. that's a given. the only question is to what end are they doing it? i can't think of any good end for brian williams with those stories being leaked. and, by the way, if you have all of these instances, how in the heck do you bring back -- remember i was like the night it happened i said if

are you surprised by the depth of the reporting just by "the new york times" alone? >> actually those of us on the right are surprised it's "the new york times" reporting on this. really what they did, they are building off peter schweizer's story. they ended up having additional interviews looking at public records and really what they wrote almost sounds like a political novel. we were absolutely surprised about this. they went so forward deciding to investigate. what you've seen is slate.com, "the atlantic" all these liberal onliners saying you know what? there is something fishy here. what are we doing all this work with the democratic candidate hillary clinton? >> anything questionable about "the new york times," "the washington post," abc and fox news teaming up with peter schweizer to dig into the clinton foundation? >> absolutely not. it is a very good news story. there is no smoking gun though. that's a problem for republicans. the problem for democrats is are, howard dean is going after "the new york times." not the "washington times." sloppy reporting. the

"the new york times." are you a daily reader? >> no. read "the new york times" every day. >> you're not. >> no. i read it occasionally depends on what the article is but i don't. ic it up and read it every day. i read the "wall street journal." i read my local newspapers. i read a number of other online publications but i try to get the best information i can and that doesn't always mean that the "new york times" is going to deliver that for me. >> now here's why i respect what huckabee said. sure he took a shot at the "times" but he said "i try to get the best information i can." he said he reads a lot. and that's why it's silly, at best and dishonest at worst for candidates to say they don't even read the nation's paper of record. whatever its faults are -- and it's got faults -- "the new york times'" reporting is vital for our country. it is one of a handful of major news rooms that makes news that breaks news that holds people in power accountable, including democrats, as we were recently reminded when the "times" broke the news abou

but he handed it over to the "new york times." the "washington post." fox news. of us have done our own reporting now and confirmed. and it's not done. but bit by bit, these stories are getting confirmed. >> you know you said before i was a true believer. i'm a proud supporter of bill and hillary clinton and also a proud american. and like most americans, i believe in the facts. and i believe in fairness. and i think for mark to not bring up when he was discussing in his previous segment the fact that this issue of the russian company acquiring uranium mines began during the bush administration. it didn't start during the obama administration. >> but it was approved while she was secretary of state and he took us through the long history the clintons have with the guy who founded the company that became uranium 1. >> right. and the reality is that had no bearing at all on the fact the idea that this uranium 1 company was acquiring united states mines. >> why did they apparently hide or mistakenly forget to include -- the donations that company made to their found

but new hampshire -- "new york times" will cover what happened in new jersey and they will take that coverage and include it as part of their coverage in new hampshire. >> the "new york times," again, i'm not a guy who bashes the "new york times," but again, you look at the headline this is just -- >> way down at the bottom a quote from somebody who was there, his name is bill mcdermott, he's 76 from new hampshire, in the past we've seen him so frequently in his role create an impression of ill tempered. but the christie he listened to he said was much more laid back more thoughtful. he told his story in a way that was much more professional than i'd given him credit for. >> draw. anyway, so there you go. >> nothing like -- >> we'll see if they cover it straight moving forward. we had jeremy saying i should run pr for the "new york times" because all the nice things i say about it. i think he'll probably take back the position when he comes here at 7:00. >> i do agree with the headline. >> the good news is the u.s. attorney is investigating. indictments come down this week or next and

like "newsweek," "the atlantic" and "new york times" not exactly known for being right leaning. >> i'm to accuse the "new york times" of having bias. they do. everybody has bias. i will say, there is an epidemic of really sloppy reporting that goes from the top to the bottom. about people who put stuff in before they're ready to get all the facts. and i would like to see what all the facts are here. because so far -- i mean howard would you say that i'm a sloppy political "new york times" journalist? i would say that is an overly broad generalization that aligns my colleagues and i think it's unfair of you. >> i would not. but there are plenty of people who write for "the new york times" and other papers that are incredibly sloppy and i could name a lot of them. >> laura ingram great to see you. >> don't you love that megyn? howard dean going after the "the times" "the times" all upset, offended. >> i'm sure howard has always hated "the times." he says can you name the reporters and doesn't. and doesn't accuse the two who wrote this piece of being sloppy. and he hadn't even read the pi

and "the new york times" writes for an audience of, you know, cosmopolitan liberals in new york, and like every newspaper, every major newspaper in america, most journalists working for "the new york times" are probably politically left of center. >> a reflection of -- yeah. >> so in that sense, but i don't think that's -- i don't think while all of that adds up to some of the things that my fellow conservatives like to complain about with "the times," i think it doesn't make "the times" a liberal newspaper in the sense that, like, "the guardian" is a liberal newspaper or something. >> >>: right. >> it's a newspaper that does amazing reporting that sort of, you know, doesn't fit into any kind of partisan box. >> with no ideological cast or tinge to it. >> right. but the audience -- i think it was jerry maserati maybe that -- >> yeah. -- "the times" -- one of "the times" magazine editors gave an interview once where he just -- he talked about sort of the dynamic of, you know, what -- who "the times" writes for, what it covers and where it is and how that sort of shapes things. and i th

guy: i don't think the public editor of the new york times thought it was particularly savvy, but thelity is that when you look at the new york times story paragraph 12 and 13, it reveals the facts of the story that mark is talking about, which is hillary clinton was not involved in the decision. that nine agencies including the defense department, treasury department, and the state department, were all involved in the process, and she was not directly involved until after it happened. whether it is savvy or not, in this particular case we are finding as facts become revealed that this is a lot about nothing. john: here is a different angle on the same question. the clinton world has been fantastic at gutting books like this before they make any waves. carl bernstein's book, they would get a copy early and use than you are times in washington post, wall street journal to undermine the book before it appeared. they seem flat-footed here. they see mike they did not know this was coming. how could it not be? guy: it reveals the way this clinton operation is communicating. brian fallon co

this was in "the new york times" this morning, fox news tomorrow night with a special at 10:00 p.m. eastern delving more specifically into this deal. russian company, uranium one, basically getting a corner on the u.s. market as they were pouring millions of dollars into the clinton foundation. last few moments, brian fallon reacting saying no one produced a shred of evidence that hillary clinton ever took action as secretary of state in order to support the interests of donors to the clinton foundation. to suggest the state department under then secretary clinton exerted undue influence in the u.s. government's review of the sale of uranium one is utterly baseless. this was approved while she was secretary of state. there had been an agreement at the beginning of the administration there would be no conflicts with the clinton foundation. that put pressure today on chelsea clinton who had this to say. she has a big role at the foundation. >> we'll be even more transparent to eliminate any questions while we are in this time. we won't take new government funding, but that the work wi

the evidence of "the new york times" story i think is a little bit weaker than it appears. f the stuff about kazakhstan came out in the 2008 story in "the new york times," and then there was a piece in forbes debunking some of that, particularly the allegation that clinton had flown in with this -- the canadian mining magnate whose name i'm not going to pronounce correctly. >> why. right. >> but in fact they hadn't flown in together, at least according to forbes, which got his flight manifest. clinton was flying with ron burkle. the mining magnate was already in kazakhstan. not that this makes them look so much better, but it does suggest that it wasn't like him bringing clinton along to sweeten the deal. so already some of the facts are a little bit weaker than the times presents them. the one thing in the piece that i think the clinton camp has to explain -- i think it looks really bad that they haven't tried to explain -- is the fact that -- >> disclosure. >> but they had an agreement with the obama administration to publicly disclose these donors and they didn't. not onl

you have "the new york times" on her now.e "washington post," and fox news channel. >> everyone i know that knows elizabeth warren says she is deeply frustrated in the u.s. senate. newspaper reports have suggested that hillary clinton is assuaging her. >> roger, you've been following the issue with bill's relationship with jeffrey epstein. this might be a huge problem for them in light of that? explain. >> there's a huge development actually. on april 15th, the judge in the civil case regarding the epstein nonprosecution agreement essentially released or i should say declassified all of the documents involving the plea negotiations. so we're now just rooting through that to see if the clintons are involved if there was political influence involved. that bombshell is still out there. the other thing we -- >> i heard a rumor, but i haven't been able to confirm it that there might be a letter in there from bill defending epstein. any truth to that? >> there is a rumor among attorneys involved that that is the case. i have not ye

she is vowing to take on wealthiest americans, according to "new york times." clinton spoke to economists in off the record meeting about a plan to strengthen the middle class. "the times" saying quote mrs. clinton intensely studied a chart showing income inequality at united states. she pointed at top category and said the economy required, a quote, toppling of the wealthiest 1%. but hillary is part of the 1% herself. her estimated net worth was more than 15 million in 2012. so rachel is this her campaign theme? if you elect me president i will bring myself down!? i will fight myself every step of the way? >> in fact one of her operatives said she was elizabeth warren before elizabeth warren was elizabeth warren. >> sounds like an "snl" skit. >> whole thing does. she kill topple herself. topple her neighbors. in hillary clinton was really serious about dealing with the 1%, she would deal with the 1% in five counties surround washington d.c. richest counties in the country. reason they're rich, because of lobbiest and big government and businesses trying to nego

when david rohde was kidnapped the new york times decided to ask other news organizations not to cover it in the time he was taken to the time he escaped. it was not covered. that was a very hard decision for us. we are in the business of communicating and disclosing things, and here we were calling al jazeera and the washington post and everyone else, saying please don't cover it even know you know about it. -- even though you know about it. it is a very tough calculation. in the first couple days, going public is probably always a bad idea because you don't know what your person has told the captors. you don't know if they have said they are a canadian aid worker. the last thing you want is the "new york times" say their person was taken and undercut that. the second thing you hear from professionals in this area is that you lose control of it. if you go public, you can't stop, especially in today's world, you can't stop what gets said. you may make it worse for your son or your colleague. with all that said, it does really concern me that the silence takes the government off the hoo

that's the reporting from the "new york times." they both spoke at a gathering of top republican donors in new york city today. according to two people who were there, he told the group of donors, we will support whoever the candidate is, but it should be scott walker. the sound you are hearing is champagne corks popping in every corner of scott walker-ville. might be time to get on that. we'll be right back. my cut hurts. mine hurt more. mine stopped hurting faster! neosporin plus pain relief starts relieving pain faster and kills more types of infectious bacteria. neosporin plus pain relief kills the germs. fights the pain. >>> here's something to watch. next week, the supreme court's going to hear a couple of blockbuster cases. the one about same-sex marriage. that could result in marriage equality all across the country. or the opposite. the court hears that case on tuesday. but then the very next day, wednesday of next week, the court's going to hear a second blockbuster case on the death penalty. they're going to hear a challe

"new york times" which obtained a copy of the book that it asserts that -- and to mr.on through high speaking fees received favors from mrs. clinton's state department in return. >> the campaign says the example cited a free trade agreement for colombia and reconstruction for haiti were obama priorities, not clinton's. >> as for the candidate herself, they tried to brush off the bubbling controversy. >> well, we're back into the political season, and therefore we will be subjected to all kinds of distraction and attacks, and i'm ready for that. i know that that comes unfortunately with the territory. >> anthony weiner, former democratic congressman, clinton supporter, married to one of hillary clinton's top aides. welcome. >> thank you. >> we'll talk about the foundation stuff in a moment. i thought this tweet was fascinating byrne yorking a good political journalist, covering the event. he said tweeting the event is boring, yes it is, but covering serious, important stuff, gonna get word of mouth. and i heard maggy saying this reminded her of the 2000 race. >> you kno

new york has given him special treatment. he says he has a tax settlement. the balance according to the "new york timesif i didn't pay taxes i'd be handcuffed and you see me you know one of those pictures a mug shot. there is a dieing senate majority leader in new york. his son owes $69,000 he's going to be sentenced next week. okay. al owes more. how come this guy is getting sentenced? >> i don't have an answer to that. >> i have an answer liberals are only generous with your money. anyway. that is their definition of fair share. when we come back our question of the day is straight ahead. every truck can tow a boat. every truck can climb a hill. every truck can haul a trailer. but not everyone can say they're the fastest-growing truck brand in america. guts. glory. ram. once there was a girl with important people to impress and no time to spare. luckily, she protected her dress from odors with new downy fresh protect it's like deodorant for your clothes. just toss it in with detergent and like deodorant, it neutralizes ododors on the spot protecting fabrics all day long so even on the busiest of days

"the new york times" did an unorthodox thing by putting an online instead of the paper. some strong rebuttal points in the middle of the day which doesn't diffuse that they completely but if they can reply substantively, they can put the story away to a much greater degree. mark: it has always --john: it has always been your contention that they had to use substance to rebut. the nexus of money, the foundation, and the state department continues to be a very rich vein for people to mine. the book is by no means going away. it is not even published yet. mark: they won't find quid pro quo's, but what people will look at is where clinton and other people in the government interacted with foundation people. there is no doubt that if you are a clinton foundation donor and you want to calls returned, there is no doubt you got your calls returned. they are better responding on the merits for the clinton campaign, not simply ad hominem mccarthyite tactics. the author of the forthcoming book "clinton cash" is being called a hitman by clinton allies. he is right -- he is writing a

most ask reporters in the world right for "the new york times," report for "the new york times" to a falling just updated it or you know who to trust it's hard to make heads or tails of the. >> and alex, you obviously, what is most important things about what you guys are doing and what others are doing is you really are knocking down the walls. not so long ago about of us can remember the only news source of network cbs, abc, nbc "the new york times" and "the wall street journal" and that was it. it. >> the biggest change you will see in 2016 is you guys yourselves are actually a new source for your friends and family and relatives. i think that's what we really capitalized on. we are trying to tell a visual story people to share that with the friends and family. that's going to really change the balance of power because its largest distribution channel is doubt anyone here. you are going to pick and choose what you think of the relevant interesting and you will shut out, focus on that and actually going to change i think a campaigns are covered for over. >> drew, should your newspa

so i called "the new york times" and a random right away. [laughter] that's why we love "the new york times." in 2006 i have been working in darfur for two years. i started covering darfur and august 2004 because i need a break from iraq and i went into darfur. in 2006 i was working with lydia pulled green who is an incredible correspondent for the new times and we're trying to get into darfur so we went to chad because of the sudanese government wouldn't give visas easily to journalists. they didn't want journalists seeing what was happening. so we went to chad and while we were there we heard that there's been a massacre of sudanese government soldiers, many of whom were conscripted from south sudan. in order to report on it we had to actually see what had happened. so we went to a group of rebels, we went to the border we're in chad and we said can you take us across the border? they said well there are russian aircraft flying overhead and it's possible the government will bomb if they see people going over to the site. we said we have to

but we've read a version in "the new york times." ere's a summary in "the new york times" and allegations are truly.com damning. they showed time lines of tricks to the family foundation and decisions made by mrs. clinton favorable to the contributor. or tricks to the family foundation and sky high $500,000 unheard of in this business. speaking fees to her husband or contributions to the family foundation and two years later. sky high speaking fees mrs. clinton. the essence of bribery is the quid pro quo. you do something for me or in my behalf, and i exercise my official governmental powers in favor of you. that's what senator mendez was indicted for. having to do with visa sas and medicare reimbursement. >> you're saying that this is not only potentially unethical but she may have actually committed felonies while in office? >> i am saying that if the version of the book that we have read stands up under scrutiny, the justice department must commence a criminal investigation of mrs. clinton's behavior about the time period about whi

they turned that video over to the new york times. they posted that video to the new york times tonight. we have a little type play if you tonight. the mayor explained what happened, and in terms of the turning over of this video and the decision made to bring charges against this police officer. >> we do not look at the responsibility we have lightly. we take the role that when do wrong, we do wrong. the lesson that we take out of this and hopefully the general public takes out of it, is that when an incident occurs, give us the appropriate time to investigate. find out exactly what happened. and we will act accordingly. >> the mayor of north charleston explaining that the officer in this case made a bad decision. there have been a number of high profile police shootings of civilians in recent months. it has happened a few times, in the last few months, and in february there was a colorado springs police officer that was charged in the same week. charged again in february. in january, too, albuquerque police officers, but it is rare w

something the "new york times" did not want her to do. miller was forced out by the times. read the book and i'm exhausted by that lead. in all right, let's take it step-by-step. there is an awful lot of stuff there. first thing is that you looked into the anthrax letters that were sent a few days after the 9/11 attack in 2001, all right? >> i actually got a letter that was filled with powder that they thought was an anthrax letter. >> it was a false alarm. >> it was, thank goodness. this doctor the fbi said committed suicide. did he do it in your opinion. >> i don't know because i didn't do the reporting on that because it's one of the stories i wanted to go back to and look at that i wasn't permitted. >> so you don't know whether this doctor who was a, i guess a fizz physicist. the fbi committed suicide after that so they thought he did he it. >> the problem, bill before they were convinced that dr. bruce ivins did it, they were convinced that another scientist did it, and they hounded him for about six or seven years. >> but he was exonerated in the end. >> he was exoner

after the break "new york times," "new york times" is questioning money that was flowing into hillary foundation. brent bozell media critic is up next. >>> two more episodes of "strange inheritance" with jamie colby, 9:00 eastern time. take a look. >> a century old amusement park that could be loss forever. >> we're dying on the vine down here. >> our time is over. serious. >> divided family on the verge of a painful split. >> no amusement park in the world has been owned by a family as long as this one. friday night, buddy. you are gonna need a wingman. and with my cash back, you are money. forget him. my airline miles will take your game worldwide. what i'm really looking for is -- i got two words for you -- re-wards. ♪ ♪ there's got to be better cards than this. [ male announcer ] there's a better way with creditcards.com. compare hundreds of cards from all the major banks to find the one that's right for you. it's simple. search, compare, and apply at creditcards.com. first round's on me. >> i'm nicole petallides with your fox business brief. stocks are hovering right around sessi

when david rohde was kidnapped the new york times decided to ask other news organizations not to coverhe time he was taken to the time he escaped. it was not covered. that was a very hard decision for us. we are in the business of communicating and disclosing things, and here we were calling al jazeera and the washington post and everyone else, saying please don't cover it even though you know about it. it is a very tough calculation. in the first couple days, going public is probably always a bad idea, because you don't know what your person has told the captors. you don't know if they have said they are a canadian aid worker. the last thing you want is the "new york times" say their person was taken and undercut that. the second thing you hear from professionals in this area is that you lose control of it. if you go public, you can't stop, especially in today's world, you can't stop what gets said. you may make it worse for your son or your colleague. with all that said, it does really concern me that the silence takes the government off the hook. that there is not political push. th

jonathan. >> what the e-mail part or "the new york times" part?ney part. >> see, you know mitt romney would have a point, and would be right if -- if the clinton foundation got money, and as a result this uranium deal went through, because hillary clinton herself and only herself could sign off and approve that deal. and that's not what happened here. you had a bunch of agents that had to weigh in on this. so if you take the time to read the story, it's not as big a there there. but i grant you this -- >> the refiling of the disclosures. >> it's a huge problem for the clinton campaign that's going to come back and bite them every week, every two weeks until all the news organizations start diving deeper. >> well we don't know what influence was shared with those agencies saying that the secretary of state would like this to happen. we don't know that. >> people came forward and said no conversations happened between her. >> let's see the record. all on a server that doesn't exist. >> that's easy. >> no, it's not easy. at the end of the day that se

raskin, the new york times' labor reporter saw it differently. on trend because the unions wouldn't let them. and in 1965, after many efforts to break through the publishers, for reasons that remain incomprehensible gave bert powers of big 6, the typographical union here in new york an absolute veto power which he wanted. so that he then had the whip over automation in the composing. you could not move toward improved technology except with a green light from the union. this new contract aimed at preserving jobs by making automation possible, but difficult and expensive. the profitable new york times and the daily news swallowed the costly agreement. but for the herald tribune the outlook was red ink. after the 1965 contract, the herald tribune desperate to cut costs threw in its lot with the journal american and the world-telegram and sun. the papers' workers paid the merger's price. over 2,000 layoffs including more than 400 big 6 printers. the contract designed to save jobs had, many thought wound up costing jobs. april 25, 1966 was to have bee

different voices with a different type of institutional authority the perfect example of "the new york times". >> this will interest many. >> there was a very gifted op-ed column in "the new york times". about one month how does it have a healthy ego? he printed every e-mail he ever wrote. my fingers were destroyed. but what i found is one wrote to house to set the goose so much i have a son at harvard studying law and your magazine is so informative they gave the mobilization theory and a set of terms to demonstrate people do believe in god and "the new yorker". all these things can have that synthesis. to be a great columnist for the times where does that come from? it comes from "the new york times" not from any religious confession. we would be hard-pressed to find a religious leader to command a national voice like someone of "richard john neuhaus" or kaufman or the reverend martin luther king as a preacher. rick warren can get on tv to organize his approach to the evangelical christianity but to go beyond that confession talk about a new house as a writer. but with a lot of name droppi

that's the reporting from the "new york times." blican donors in new york city today. according to two people who were there, he told the group of donors, we will support whoever the candidate is but it should be scott walker. the sound you are hearing is champagne corks popping in every corner of scott walker-ville. might be time to get on that. we'll be right back. ford is taking the ecoboost challenge all across america. here we go! check out escape and find out why ford is the brand more people buy and buy again. wow! that's a four-cylinder? i thought it was a six. i definitely feel the ecoboost in the ford escape. that's like a sports car. i just opened my trunk with my foot. i prefer, without a doubt, the escape over the cr-v. take the ecoboost challenge at your ford dealer. for a limited-time get an escape with up to two-thousand total cash back plus seven-fifty conquest cash with a qualifying competitive vehicle in your house. i will take beauty into my own hands. olay regenerist. it regenerates surface cells. new skin is re

why do we have to wait for the new york tooimsz to"new york times" to find out? >> what is it you're asking for? >> be honest with us. i want the president of the united states to keep his word. he said he was going to be transparent, about why and how we conduct war from a robot in the air blowing people away. some bad guys -- >> when you say transparent, what would you like to know? >> i want to look at the rules of engagement. can we really -- when the president of the united states says we're going to deal with near certainty, really? how do you come up with near certainty? is that just a talking point you say two years ago and then we find out you can't do it? let's put some meat on the bones, mr. president. >> it seems to me they probably had near certainty. what they didn't have is actual certainty. that's always going to be the case. it seems to me there are two separate questions. one is whether it's a wise policy to basically eskew the business of trying to capture these terrorists enemy for interrogation purposes and whether they kill some with drones.

the evidence of "new york times" story is weaker than it appears. came out in the "new york times." and there was a piece in forbes debunking some of that particularly the allegation that clinton had flown in with the canadian mining magnate, whose name i'm not going to pronounce correctly, but in fact they hadn't flown in together aleast according to forbes which got his flight manifest. clinton was flying with ron burkle, but it does suggest that this wasn't him bringing clinton along to sweeten the deal. already some of the facts i think are a little built weakitan the "times "" presents them. the one thing that they haven't explained -- >> disclosure. >> right. they had a deal to publicly disclose this and they didn't and they violated what was a clear rule. >> and the response just doesn't address that. >> the larger takeaway was we caught the clintons from a quid pro quo, selling u.s. policy for a speech to bill clinton but it's not therehere. >> here's the thing that me nuts. it's this idea of quid pro quo. the colombia free trade deal colomb

and the "the new york times" is out with a critical look at jeb bush's 2016 efforts. bush's early campaigning looks like the juggernaut that wasn't for the bush family in he have itability is not what it used to be. joining me senior political editor mark murray. mark, let's start with rand paul in this teaser video. let me play a snippet of it and we'll talk about it. >> sure. >> it is time for a new way, a new set of ideas, a new leader. one you can trust. one who works for you and above all it is time for a new president. >> mark what new way or new ideas is he bringing to the table? >> tamron there are a couple ways he can bring freshness, and where his campaign is incredibly interesting. he is trying to make in roads with demographics that democrats haven't done well. he does better among inched pentss, some has to do with getting libertarians involved. he also does better than republicans have in past elections among african americans. for example, his statement after the ferguson missouri conflict there. so you have those demographics on one hand. on the other

ban after arriving at the airport in new york, where he was set to board a flight to continue his research in the uae, a close u.s. ally. on friday, the "new york timest a new york-based private investigator has been making inquiries about ross as well as former "times" reporter ariel kaminer, who also exposed revealed -- revealed workers faced harsh conditions. amy: asked for comment, a spokesman said -- nyu spokesman john beckman sent a written statement saying, quote, "we cannot know all the thinking that goes into any immigration authority's decisions about who is or is not granted a visa, and we've had people who were coming to our campus in new york on academic matters who have been denied visas by the u.s. authorities, including one in recent days. to talk more about the case, we're joined now by andrew ross sociology professor at nyu and president of nyu's chapter of the american association of university professors. author of several books, including most recently "creditocracy and the case for debt refusal." welcome to democracy now! tell us what happened when you first tried to go to abu dhabi and then what you found out. professor ross: i

this could be a huge bomb shell says "the new york times." >> it could and the "new york times" has alreadyked about t. immediate why will have to cover it and i know him. i've worked with him in the past. he's an amazing guy. he's an investigative guy. it's going to be well researched and a lot of information the media can't ignore. the message here is if you donate to the clinton foundation or pay bill clinton good money to come speak, you'll get a favor. now we need to look if any policy implemented while she was secretary of state favored individuals that gave money to her husband or her foundation and what the implication of that would be. the media is not going to ignore this. this drives the media wild. if it was republicans, they would go crazy. they will go crazy here, too. i guarantee you you'll have left wing media going crazy. >> two money people in the middle of the couch. >> they have to show connection. that's what we've been waiting for. that's what he says he has done through records. this is a "new york times" best selling investigative journalist who has done so many othe

that richard covered some of the topics but i think the clintons are going to have to do as the "new york timested far more in the coming weeks to assuage people that nothing improper happened during her time as secretary of state. i don't think that the initial defense has been overwhelmingly convincing. there is a lot of stuff kicking around out there. i think if they think they're going to make this go away by taking one of these at a time, i don't think that's going to happen. they will have to do far more than they have to make sure the "new york times" has offered one idea. there is lots of other ideas out there to make sure that they say to the american people definitively that nothing improper happened. if that doesn't happen that's going to clearly effect her candidacy. >> you can say all the way you want. the only way you put a nail in this coffin so to speak is by getting these emails. talk about what happened. we will talk in the next block how we try to get emails and sometimes it doesn't work out. richard, take a listen to marie harf at the state department. josh earnst has said d

and i have to say today the "new york times" is having a bit of such an unusual reaction for the "new york times". i said you know the second amendment is not designed to protect hunting or sports shooting. those are wonderful things but that's not what it's about. the second amendment is about protecting our natural rights from god to protect our lives and families and our homes. and it is also fundamentally about a check on tyranny from government and protection of liberty of the people. now i'm not shocked in the live free or die state. y'all understand what i'm talking about. but the "new york times" today said that notion, live free or die, that the second amendment is a check on tyranny and they said it was strange and it was silly and ridiculous and it was absurd. let me tell you some other strange, silly absurd people, thomas jefferson george washington, james madison, justice joseph story who said the second amendment is the pal laid yum of our liberties. we needed to defend the fourth and fifth amendment our 40-fivesy and defend the tenth amendment or as president obama call

he sat for an interview with "the new york times" described him as clearly shaken. here forward if it will make people leave me the hell alone we'll do them like college papers and try to put out footnotes. there then followed where he sent out footnotes of a sarcastic page of footnotes of things he talked about. when explaining why he plagiarized so many times, he blamed it on the stress of his heavy workload. as a junior senator. kwt" "things are done quickly and in a hurry and sometimes i get things sent to me while i'm doing a speech. read this for approval in 20 minutes." he said, we write something every week for "the washington times" and i'm riding around in a car in between things trying to figure out if i can approve it. we need to get stuff earlier but it's hard. we probably take on more than we should be doing. being a junior senator probably is hard. plus a once a week column. it's probably tough. if it is tough enough for you that you cannot handle that kind of a workload without plagiarizing your speeches and columns whole wholesale and threatening to

a couple of thing, we rarely hear the brz speak to "the new york times." it's an outlet that's been wanting more and more interviews with him and haven't gotten them over the years and going to friedman one of the best thinkers in the world to give him his thoughts on iran since this deal was announced a couple of days ago. they had a sound bite interview, this was a 45-minute interview and you can watch the whole thing on the new york times website and he did this with vox where the president can speak at length uninterrupted essentially and deliver his point of view about the world without, you know being condensed into a 30-second sound bite. sound bites are the main way most people hear what the president's thinking. >> right. >> but you can see this white house is never pleased by that. they're going out and looking for ways that the president can speak at length about these issues. >> is it effective? >> i'm not sure how many people actually sit down and watch these long interviews and however, we've seen a 5,000 column about it, so there are a wide

grace redemption, i think we have to reintroduce that word. >> ian to the new york times? >> even to fox news. >> we're much more religion-friendly here than the new york times is. have you been mocked or shunned? >> not mocked or shunned. >> are you sure? that's not what i hear. >> well that's a personal thing, it's not political. but you did, if people want to read the book, the motivation was partially so umted to become a better person. >> i'm not the model character, but the people in the book, dwight eisenhower, francis perkins, those are the models of character. so i want to learn what they did how they came to have a strong inner core. how they came to integrity, generating in their life that made them compassionate, good, strong. >> do you believe in an afterlife? >> i do. >> you do? are you catholic? >> i don't talk about my faith in public. this is not only a book for believers, it's for non-believers as well. >> i was struck by that and you wrote it in your op ed piece that you want to save your soul. he's not taken to lunch by anybody. >> we're a broad catholi

that seems to be their real red line. >> all right andrew roth from "the new york times" joining us via skype from moscow. thanks so much. >> thanks. >> sreenivasan: in a decision with possible repercussions for the world economy, china's central bank announced new banking rules today. they're meant to help spur bank lending and to combat slower economic growth. even so, some analysts questioned whether the move would enable china to reach its 7% growth target for 2015, its lowest in nearly a quarter of a century. recent comments by f.b.i. director james comey have led to a diplomatic flap between the united states and poland. poland's foreign ministry summoned america's ambassador in warsaw for a meeting today after comey said that nazi germany had been aided by accomplices in poland and other countries. the polish embassy in washington sent a letter to the fbi director saying he had, in their words, accused poles "of perpetrating crimes which not only did they not commit but which they themselves were victims of. >> sreenivasan: and now to south africa, this weekend the leader of that

"the new york times" article and "the washington post" article i'll get to in a moment are saying thisa former republican operative, and that the post and the times did their own reporting. the county county supporthillary clinton supporters are saying anything he writes is suspect because he's such a conservative. now they're saying the clinton's themselves have benefitted hand somely with the foundations they're known for heading and supporting. they point out in the washington post story that bill clinton had made $100 million in speaking knees knee fees. the political implication is that republicans are trying to paint the clintons and particularly hillary clinton, has somebody who has approached the ethical line if not crossed it many, many times in the process of making millions upon millions of dollars for the family. >> it's a real connect the dots kind of story. like you talk about, one issue is whether mrs. clinton did favors for russia in order to acquire with 20% of the u.s.'s uranium's reserves in exchange for do nations to the clinton foundation. besides that russia has 2

i mean, you worked for the new york times. >> i would say the new york times actually did a pretty good job on the issue of the children in chinatown through a series of immigration reporters that i actually, you know... i don't think i worked on any of those stories directly. >> hinojosa: but is it still seen kind of in the media that this is... that the chinese, the asian population, is, like, this foreign population, and therefore not american, and therefore... >> i think part of... i will say that chinatown as chinatown gets a surprising amount of coverage, not just in, you know, new york city, but in cities all over the united states, in part because of this exotic factor, for better or for worse. so if there's a crime or there is some kind of movement or there is some kind of building or there's a conflict, in certain kind of things they'll cover pretty well, compared to other immigrant groups, like, let's say, koreans or... korean americans or certain kinds of... like, maybe even south asian americans, i think partially because almost every major city has a chinatown or something

he tells the new york times