so by the time that whole new part of the mueller investigation that we didn't know about before, by the time it made it into "the new york times" a couple of weeks ago, the "times" was only able to report that that company is, quote, in liquidation. mueller started asking around. they decided to disappear. you start asking questions, stuff happens. things get forced into the light, stuff happens. this week we learned that it had happened again. in a very similar fashion but with a different foreign firm. this time it was cambridge analytica, which is the data firm that was hired by the trump campaign. they've since gotten themselves into a million different kinds of trouble. last year we learned that mueller's investigators had started looking at cambridge analystica. they asked the firm to hand over communications, happened over e-mails from their employees. the "wall street journal" reported that cambridge analytica had been in touch with wikileaks, offering help in distributing democratic documents during the campaign that had been stolen by russia. well, in march of this year reporters started tracking down yet anoth

so by the time that whole new part of the mueller investigation that we didn't know before -- by the time it made it into "the new york times" a couple of weeks ago, the "times" was only able to report that that company is, quote, in liquidation. yeah, mueller started asking around. they decided to disappear. you start asking questions, stuff happens, right? things get 40sed into the light, stuff happens. by russia. well in march of this year reporters tracked down yet another scandal about the firm. the story of the firm using its own stolen data, tens of millions of private profiles that they stole off facebook without consent and used to build basically the spine of their operation as a company. reporters started asking about that in march. well this week, the financial times in britain reports that those questions that reporters were asking about that scandal, questions caused two things to happen at the firm. number one according to the financial times the questions from reporters about the data scandal caused the cambridge analytica ceo to withdraw $8 million in cash from the company. and to take it home. and nu

i think this could have a chilling effect. >> the "new york times" reporter involved, ally watkins who has been a reporter at other news organizations prior to the "new york times," she's the one subject to this subpoena at the "new york times." and the justice department release on this says that james wolfe was arrested today, or tonight, he will make his first appearance tomorrow in federal district court in maryland. and that's because that's where he lives. he was arrested in maryland where he lives. the release also makes this very clear that this is not part of robert mueller's investigation. special prosecutor has nothing to do with this. it's the release tonight says, the investigation into this matter is being conducted by the fbi's washington field office. the case is being prosecuted by assistant u.s. attorneys for the district of columbia with the assistance from the counterintelligence and export control section national security division of the u.s. department of justice. and julia, all of that means this investigation is being conducted routinely. that's who would routi

amy: you went to "the new york times" -- >> no, i went to people i had worked for. had a commitment from "life" magazine. "look" magazine was talking to me. i went to the new york review of books. i was a friend of izzy stone. izzy stone had some sort of -- i've been a reporter for the pentagon for only about a month or two. he saw sometething in my stories -- he's to go out sunday morning to the newspaper stand and buy 20 papers. i knew who h he was through my mother-in-law who had been a subscriber for years. one morning about 6:30, i was newly married, it was sunday morning, the call comes and it is izzy stone sang he was seeing page 19 in the "philadelphia inquirer today." we became friends. if you ever want a tutorial from anybody in the world, you want i it from izzy stone. the whole idea of reading -- all he did was read everything. he did it alall byby simply brainpower. he is amazing. anyway, he was a mentor. i could not get anyone to buy.. bob silvers wanted to do it. he was going to remake the magazine. i came to him late. i will never forget this. i have

the "new york times" has seen this 20-page letter. eginning to wade through it ourselves but the question as summarized by the times here is that lawyers for months have been waging a campaign to keep the special counsel from trying to force him to answer questions in the investigation to whether he obstructed justice. the conclusion of this letter, again according to the times, is president trump cannot be compelled to testify, arguing in that letter he could not possibly have committed obstruction because he has unfettered authority over all federal investigations. dana goldman, who was speaking with a few moments ago, former assistant u.s. attorney is back with me. i want to get your reaction generally. what this centers on is this argument that we've seen play out in speeches, on twitter, in legal circles as well about what kind of power a president has, whether he has to sit down and answer questions. we certainly heard from rudy giuliani, now the president's personal counsel that conditions have to be right for that to happen. yo

"fake news", new york times caught lying on the crowd size on the trump rally in nashville. t trump called them out. the faming and corrupt new york times estimated the crowd at a thousand people when in fact and the arena was rocking. r they are dishonest people who don't get me and never did. new york times reporter julie davis tweeting that president trump is correct. my estimate was way off and we corrected the story to reflect the fire marshall's estimate. when we get it wrong we say soy. >> and times down playing the size of the crowd. and the president's campaign estimated 8000 strong and we are going right here with 8000, right now. and don't you love the fact that edrollins, former white house dprektor and prizewinning columnist are with us tonight on this historic occasion which is the new york times. michael,ment new york times admitted they were wrong and wronged the president? >> on days like this i don't tell anybody. just keep it amongst ourselves. >> lou: what is amazing, you are sitting in the crowd and estimating, how can you be so wrong unless it is part of

a statement to the "new york times." the phony filing "new york times." >> clear it up. >> that's not a statement to a high tribunal of judges. that's a statement to the phony "new york times." frankly, he shouldn't even speak to the "new york times" because they only write phony stories anyway. although yesterday they wrote a nice story. >> i don't know. i have question to formulate. just go. >> i mean, so many thing to look at there. obviously, that is just -- the simple plain truth of it is that's a question he didn't want to answer and didn't come close to answer in any way. all he did was object few skate, turn on the fog machine, and say next question, right, while throwing a few elbows at the "new york times." >> right. >> if you try to pars it in logical terms his argument would be something like the "new york times" is fake news so it's okafor me to lie to the "new york times." which is obviously ridiculous. >> let's go through it. >> there is that, obviously ridiculous. also, as we all know, when the president,

the new york times taught me well. i think i was using the new york times.y colleagues may differ but i think this is what i was trying to do. >> there's a starks borough vermont also. >> start at four in the battle of bunker hill and he was very good, and then he got into a fight, they wouldn't promote him to general or something so he said to hell with you and he went back to his farm in new hampshire, and then they needed somebody to call out to the militias and he agreed to do it unconditionally and have nothing to do with congress because he loafed congress and they had turned him down for promotion to colonel or general and so, he always hateongres in the way that some people do today. but he's the one who turned the troops out. so he got them all to come out and they came across the border and they just push down and basically saved vermont from being overrun. he was remarkable. when i gotnt that and went through his stuff, what's interesting, congress is so cheap they never paid him. and so he had to try to borrow money from george washington pretty

new talking point. they lost no time testing it. that is part of "the new york times" piece responding to that caller and where they are with health care. illinois is calling from if's, --elroy is calling from memphis, tennessee. theer: i just want to say government took my limbs in my to speak on my own. to get ad a have to do higher judge circuit court judge to see [indiscernible] what is the major thing i can take to the courts if they are have full control of everything, my limbs and everything, dictating what is coming out of my mouth and stuff? of got washington papers and the d.c. core, but i'm getting railroaded or something so will get the exact information i need. even if i do before the supreme court and stuff like that, how am i going to be able to defend myself knowing the key leadership under u.s. government knows what they did to me? host: thank you for calling. we have charlie calling from jonesboro, arkansas. caller: i would like to say something about donald trump. i heard him say one time anybody that sells a dirty car is a loser. it is kind o

still ahead for all of us, more on this "new york times" report. ing me next, harvard professor lawrence tribe who has argued before the supreme court 36 times and has a new book out about impeachment. his thoughts coming up. the first survivor of alzheimer's disease is out there. and the alzheimer's association is going to make it happen. but we won't get there without you. visit alz.org to join the fight. ithe race for governort. has turned into a scam. gavin newsom's trying to elect a republican who was endorsed by trump. and villaraigosa's being bankrolled by a handful of billionaires. it's everything that's wrong with politics. and none of it is helping struggling families. here's my pledge to you. i'll keep our budget balanced. invest in affordable housing. fight for universal healthcare. and stand up to donald trump. as governor, you can trust me to do what's right- because i always have. californians are leading against donald trump. our senator should, too. kevin de león is the only candidate for senate who passed laws protecting immigrants

, and ultimately -- i kind of feel like "new york times" paraphrased wasn't necessarily fair. at least or as accurate as it could have been. "the new york times" story about yesterday rally in tennessee they describe an autopsy of a thousand people and the fire marshal and trump again this morning -- fake news it was much bigger than that fire marshal said it was 5500 people so about five times bigger than "new york times" so they correction. so these are just -- these are own goals. these are -- these are -- you know self-inflingted wounds. i don't mean to pick on "new york times" two of the most in my head but an amazing newspaper and they do a lot of great work an impossible to publish a million facts a day and not have a couple of them wrong but we just need to be really, really diligent and careful because the the most powerful man in the world is trying to undermine us. and he's doing so at least according to what leslie of 60 minutes said he told her i do so when you report negatively nobody will believe it it it is tactical. that's -- why he's doing it. we have to be be

[laughter] >> but the techniques work and you know, new york times, they taught me well. but and so i think i was using the new york times, my colleagues may differ, but this is what i was trying to do. >> in new hampshire, named stark, is that related? >> there is. >> starksboro, vermont, also. >> stark, he had fought in the battle of bunker hill and he was very good and then he got into a fight with the-- because they wouldn't promote him to general, i think, or something, so he said to hell with you and he went back to his farm in new hampshire and then they needed somebody to call out the -- to the militias and he agreed to do it on condition he had nothing to do with congress because he loathed congress and he turned them down for a-- he turned them down for promotion to colonel or brigadier general. and so he always hated congress in a way that i guess some people do today. and, but he's the one who turned the troops out. one of the interesting -- and so he got them all to come up and they came across the border, and they came down and they just pushed down and basic

to say that you can only performance and chief of staff in the past what do you make of the new york times report these called the white house a miserable place to work well i guess we should take his word at it for it you know remember when he said that taking the job might have been god's punishment. leon panetta told him to go out and buy a big bottle of scotch right at the beginning it's a thankless tough twenty four seven job even in the best of circumstances this is a difficult challenge for any chief of staff in fairness to kelly but i do think he's failed not only to manage up with donald trump but to some extent he's failed to manage down you know in a in a functioning white house with an empowered white house chief of staff who really acts as an honest broker people within the west wing feel that their voices are heard they feel that they're there they're vested they're invested in decision making and you have an happier shop. stay right there we'll have more politicking right after this break. climax keyser with more of my guide to financial survival this is a fun it's a device

in "the new york times," as i read in "the new york times," into thinking their data would not be shared. >> what can be done? we're not shaming facebook. the stock price is not suffering unduly as a result of this. >> it's astonishing. >> what happens? >> a class-a idiot would say users are going up. that's not true. users have no other choice. that's a classic monopoly. it's time the lef and right understandket forces clearly do not allow the market to correct a market problem. users have nowhere else to go to see their friends. it's time for the regulator to act. by the way, where in the world is the ftc? the ftc has by my math a multi trillion dollar tong cebook back into line. their claim in the entire discussion is they didn't have to disclose their deals with apple and so forth because they considered apple to be part of facebook, an extension of facebook. well, wond i wonder if the shareholders of microsoft feel facebook is part of microsoft. we get to decide what's part of facebook. i live here in silicon valley. i'm an investor here, entrepreneur here. regularly i'm asked by pe

it's a statement to "the new york times." not a statement to the high tribunal of judges. >> that's the president admitting he misled "the new york times." emboldened after the meeting this week with north korea dictator kimr. jong-un, trump returned to the united states eager to go on offense against his political opponents. and hinted there will be rewards down t road for his allies if they stay loyal. the president's attorney rudy giuliani said on friday that the mueller investigation might get cleaned up with someen presal pardons. before pulling back. >> he's not going to pardon anybody. in this inves'sgation. but ot obviously going to give up his righ to pardon if there's a miscarriage of justhee. >> latel facing little own party. m his >> it's become cultish. >> some may beef done endingel mur if the president acts against him. >> what i think about the mueller investigation they ought to'srap it up. it gone on seemingly forever. >> mr. trump is relishing the lack of congressional and politica guardrails also making fal

seasons a new york times response more or less off the bike. what politicians to do something to. put themselves on the line to get accepted or rejected. so when you want to be president i'm sure. some want to be preached. to going to be pressed to see what before three in the morning can't be good. i'm interested always in the waters about how. best to. apply for many clubs over the years so i know the gunman so i got some. football isn't only about what happens on the pitch put a final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the super money kill you know a loan to spend spend be true to the twenty million one player. it's an experience like nothing else not to because i want to share what i think what i know about the beautiful guy my great so what will chance with. the base it's going to. i. welcome back the f.b.i. has seized the e-mails and phone records of a new york times reporter is it news to plug ongoing leaks of classified information the issue has come to a head under the trumpet ministration but as artie's nichiren explains it dates back long before

because i have two colleagues on the new york times who are here who wrote better stories than i did. you are in luck tonight because i had a program what i was going to talk about and i left it at home. what i want to do is talk a bit about the book, how i managed to write it. it was ten years ago this month that i signed a contract and it changed and i found more stuff and it took me in directions i had no idea where there. as i said, i became a foreign correspondent, i came to work for the new york times to satisfy my curiosity and you get to go out and do interesting things. i know somebody checked my expense account. what i want to do is talk about

new york. the product of the president's b-team lawyers. that's how one presidential lawyer to date described the memo leaked to "the new york times" in explosive new reporting. "the new york times" report makes clear for the very first time that the president's defense in the obstruction of justice investigation being conducted by robert mueller is essentially to assert that a president can't obstruct justice, not that he the memo also lays out the case for depriving bob mueller of an interview with donald trump, something one trump advisor told me today is essential if the president's lawyers want to prevent robert mueller from adding lying to federal investigators in any report he plans to send to congress. from that "the new york times" report, quote, in a brash assertion of presidential power, the 20-page letter sent to special counsel robert mueller and obtained by "the new york times" contends that the president cannot illegally obstruct any aspect of the investigation into russia's election meddling because the nstitution empowers him to, quote, if he wished, terminate the inquiry or even exercise his power to pardon. the story landed w

i want to bring in new york times reporter. anyone watching would start with the feeling of wow, a lot of shade balls around this story. what jumps out as important with this new development of the case against davidson. we showed why he's in so much hot water traditionally. >> davidson is somebody who warrants scrutiny and in the winter i flew out to l.a. and was trying to track him down. i went to his office in beverly hills which was like a ghost office. there was nobody there. >> you went to his office before all this. >> i went to his office, his home. he refused to come out and answer questions. some of my colleagues have been able to talk to him. he has recognized that he -- it's not in his interest to be in the spotlight and undergo this type of scrutiny. i think his past, the fact there were these previous investigations is significant but it's also important to note they didn't -- he wasn't charged. as of right now the only thing on his record is a brief suspension of his license and i think it was 2010 for like 90 day

with me now is michael schmidt from the "new york times," on the investigative team there. help us distill this 20-page memo. the up shot is these lawyers believe president trump cannot be compelled to testify, he cannot be subpoenaed. >> it's a strong view of presidential power that essentially says that because the president is the head of the executive branch, he controls everything that goes on inside of it. he can end an investigation, he can pardon whom ever, his powers are essentially absolute. and this is made in the context of whether he should sit for an interview. the lawyers are arguing that mueller had no need to talk to the president because this investigation, there is nothing to it and he had already been provided with the answers to the questions he wanted to talk to the president about. >> michael, help me stand here how much this conversation has changed. we've heard from the president's legal team. rudy giuliani wielding an upper hand, talking about leverage, especially when it comes to the role of this informant. how much has that conversation changed?

there are biased reporters at the new york times, there are fine and honest reporters at the new yorkimes but the president gets more than his share of fake news. and things are published about him and his family that are untrue. above all, he is a counterculture and i think a very effective one . >> new york, independent line. >>. >> i like the answer that t you gave to the last caller about illegal immigration. i wanted to say that when you think veterans, i start to see that as just let service because i see the democrats and my own town hall tripping over each other to help illegal immigrants tand do nothing for us. dynasty in the ms 13 stuff here in the brentwood area and displaces turning into a third world country and i le can't get the town to do anything about it but you've got these houses loaded up with you will only happen people. you've got five to aroom and the single-familyhouses . the town isn't doing anything about it . they're getting all kinds of benefits i never get and i appreciate the comments you gave to the last person about them coming in here illegally. on ta

. >>> breaking from "the new york times" tonight, with mueller closing in, manafort's allies abandon him. >>> plus is rigorous preparation prior to a summit with a cagey north korean dictator overrated perhaps? the president says the meeting will depend more on attitude. >>> and on the eve of a visit to canada for the g7 summit, president trump insults the host. that would be the canadian prime minister. "the 11th hour" on a thursday night begins now. >>> well, good evening once again from our nbc news headquarters here in new york. day 504 of the trump administration, and president trump assured everyone today he doesn't need to prepare very much for the upcoming nuclear summit with north korea. just hours after launching a fresh round of attacks on the russia investigation. we are also following a new report from "the new york times" tonight that details how associates of former trump campaign chairman paul manafort are abandoning him as special counsel, robert mueller, closes in. we'll have more on that in just a moment. >>> first, the president's all-out barrage against special c

"the new york times" reports al-nashiri was tortured at a separate cia black site in thailand in 2002, a prison that was overseen by gina haspel, who was confirmed last month as cia director. in spain, prime minister mariano rajoy y lost a no-confidence voe in parliament today, as a major corruption scandal toppled his administration. rajoy insists he was unaware of an alleged bribery ring that saw members of his conservative people's party receive cash payments in return for political favors. pedro sanchez, head of the opposition socialist party, will replace rajoy as spain's prime minister. sanchez has the support of regional parties from basque country and catalonia, but has said he won't support catalonia's bid for independence. italian lawmakers have agreed to a coalition government led by euro-skeptic populists, with giuseppe conte as italy's new prime minister. the coalition brings the right wing anti-immigrant league party together with f five-star movement, which seeks to abandon the euro as italy's currency. in nicaragua, armed supporters of president daniel ortega opened fi

it's a statement to "new york times." the phony, failing "new york times." just -- wait a minute. wait a minute. that's not a statement to a high tribunal of judges. that's a statement to the phony "new york times." in fact, in fact, frankly, he shouldn't even speak "the new york times" because the only write phony stories anyway, ail though yesterdays they wrote a nice store about what a great done. >> did you dictate i. >> the igy report you said twice out in i ex-ron railed and you proofed that -- >> if raw read in the ig record if have b totally exoneratessed. >> nothing do with we. >> take a look at the investigation. take a look at how it started. take a look the horrible statements that peter struck this chief investigator say and take a look watt what re different with hillary clinton, i. take a look -- >> collusion. >> i would -- you're asking me about peter strack being fired. i'm amazed that he is still at the fbi. and so is everybody else that read that report. and i'm not even talking about in the report. i'm talking about long before the report. he should have been fi

who broke several high-profile stories related to the intelligencece committee's work for "the new york times" and "the newlets full cap york times" reports watkins and wolfe previously had a three-year romantic relationship. a "new york times" spokesperson blasted the trump administration's efforts to spy on its reporter, saying -- "freedom of the press is a cornerstone of democracy, and communications between journalists and their sources demand protection." this all comes exactly one year after the trump administration arrested former u.s. intelligence contractor reality leigh winner, who's accused of leaking a top-secret document claiming russian military intelligigence launched a cyberattack on at least one u.s. voting software company just days before the 2016 election. reality winner has pleaded not guguilty and remains j jailed awawaiting trial. the trump administration said thursday it will not defend key parts of the affordable cacare t as a number of states led by texas challenged the constitutionality of president obama's signature health care law. in court filings, justice depart

"the new york times" is wrong. and "the washington post" goes even further.didn't just sign off on that, he personally dictated that. and the response was, no no, no, that's wrong, that's wrong. only now in black and white do we say they're publicly aggressively pushing this one story while they're privately acknowledging the exact opposite story. and this has been the problem of working as a journalist in washington, chris, you know this. you say to them this is what we've got. this is what we're working on. oh, we hear you're considering firing rex tillerson and replacing with mike pompeo. no, that's fake news. that's a lie, that's a lie, that's a lie. and then of course that's exactly what happen. >> then it becomes a presidential announcement. caroline, he is thquestion. it seems to me, if you admit that you covered described something differently than you believe it was, if you tell the papers, go out plan publically and say you know what? that was just a meeting about adoption. we all know people who have adopted kids from russia, and it was a tricky th

and peter baker, chief white house correspondent for "the new york times." welcome to you all. jonathan, i'm compelled to ask what else did rudy tell you today, and where do you think we are in this stage of the fight? >> rudy giuliani has hit on something that, for the most part, has been effective. it's a theory i've been kicking around, and i presented it to him today when i spoke to him and he's in israel. the idea he feels like he can say things about the investigation. he can lay down markers. he can move the goalposts about significant developments, suggesting for instance the special counsel will wrap this up by september 1st, suggesting the special counsel is open to limiting the scope of the possible interview with the president. and he knows he can say these things because the special counsel, as we all know, is working in secret. >> silence. >> that's exactly right. robert mueller is not saying anything at all. he's not out there correcting complete falsehoods. nonetheless trying to add his opinion to anything rudy giuliani is saying. and giuliani believes that this

news this hour on the russian investigation. and on saturday a short time ago about three hours ago, the new york times publishing the contents ofttorneys to special counsel robert mueller. it is containing allegations of collusion and obstruction of justice defense. and they are taking the stance that the president cannot be forced to answer mueller's questions. and joining us we have our political analysts. let's start with you, if we can, and let's look at the discussion of what stands out to you, and this is something that i look at it, jure is all kinds of things that are familiar to us in the 20-page memo, but there are a couple of things that are new. what is standing out to you? >> well, first ott of all, the president has now admitted that he on air force one dictated the let her about his son's involvement, and what the rea n reasons were for having that infamous meeting with the russians in trump tower during the election, and that is an admission of the president that he was in fact doing something that some people may consider an obstruction of justice r, and do not forget that both richard nixon and bill clinton we

but regarding the special counsel interviewing the president, "the new york times" writes, mr.ller, the president's attorneys argued, needs to prove that the president is the only person who can give him the information he seeks and that he has exhausted all other avenues for getting it. would this type of argument hold up in court? >> you know, i don't think it would. i mean, clearly, the president's duties are waity and all-consuming. that's the argument made time and again by the office of legal counsel in the opinion memos that olc put out in both 1973 and in 2000. now, it's important to remember that the office of legal counsel is an organization within the department of justice. so the president is ultimately the head of and in charge of olc. that's not to suggest that the olc opinion is in any way unfair or improper. but, you know, institutional pressures often come into play when an agency is making a decision about whether its own leader can be subjected to sort of a criminal proceeding. but balance against the olc opinion that a sitting president, for example, can't b

that includes new york times, fox news, cnn, msnbc. false stories were shared at rates comparable to actual news stories by mainstream outlets. at least when it comes to twitter and the 2016 election there was misinformation shared. as actual news however it is true that every user shares this information at similar rates. we found significant -- to the extent to which they were likely to share misinformation. the two most important factors for age and ideology. 16 and more were five times were likely to share false news stories on twitter then those ages 18 to 25. interesting to your point about young people being more savvy. conservative uses were twice as likely to share false news stories as moderates and liberals. this could be explained partially because there was a higher prevalence of pro-trial or anti-clinton new stories -- pro-trump or anti-clinton new stories. there is excellent work. they measured the news consumption in general online during this period and found ge and alignment between ideology and the leanings of a spec

t"the new york times" had to admit today that things are crazy good. >> wow. because i remember my great friend paul krugman thrashing all of us and saying that the economy was going to go into a deep recession, and the stock market was going to crash. i guess the day after the election. so it's a little bit different, the reality. today was another great day for jobs, up 223,000. wages are rising. unemployment is falling. >> laura: we went through it all. >> small business numbers did very well again today. manufacturing reports did very well again today. it's never perfect, but we're on the right track. and you know what, the big issue for my critics and the president's critics and the economic area, you'll never get to 3%, you can't beat 2%. well, right now, we're running four quarters, 2.9%, and the second quarter, according to the atlanta model gdp now, 4.7%, that's their estimate. i'll be happy with 3%. >> laura: when was the last time the economy had a quarter at 4%? >> i probably can't even remember that. i'll say the 1990s. >> laura: yeah, probably '9

but we begin with a shocking allegation that a "new york times" reporter has been in bed with a sourcef accused of leaking sensitive information. "the new york times" has the department of justice has seized phone and email records of ali watkins. and according to the paper, she has been in a 3-year relationship with the former director of security for the senate intel committee james wolfe. he was arrested yesterday and the doj charged him with lying for denying that he even knew the reporter. and for denying that he gave her information on former campaign adviser carter page. the times said that it appeared that the fbi was investigating how watkins learned that russian spies were trying to recruit page back in 2013. she reported that in an article for buzz feed. there is reporting tonight to that there was an effort to buy this to senate intel stafford to purposefully target carter page. that is a move that could've been insurmountable in starting this entire probe into the trump presidency. here is how president trump reacted to the news. >> i know that i believe strongly in freedo

let's start with the new york times‘ take thanks the joining us. t with the new york times‘ take on this latest shooting, another shooting but targeting a media organisation, obviously from our perspective as well, adds a certain piquancy to another fatal attack. perspective as well, adds a certain piquancy to another fatal attackm is, it‘s very sad, and what comes gci’oss is, it‘s very sad, and what comes across in the early reports are the number of people from different backgrounds and the whole community is affected by this, so it‘s really serious. what‘s interesting is there is so much speculation around it and, as faras is so much speculation around it and, as far as we know, ramos himself has not said why he did this, so we are speculating about causes. there is a clear suggestion he had a particular gripe against the paper. that‘s something that‘s been picked up by some online media channels as well, so they‘ve got an idea. certainly. we keep talking about it being a long—standing feud, but we are talking about going back six, seven years. t

yes b i has seized the emails and phone records of a new york times reporter as it used to plug on going leaks of classified information the issue has come to a head under the trumpet ministration but as artie's mickey aaron explains it dates that long said. trump's white house has a serious problem it's leaking a shocking secret memo leaked to the new york times white house's most prolific leakers all the weeks we get out of the way else why this white house leaks and all the reasons it's hid there's always so much fun in this white house is so leaky there is even leaks about why they're leaking and so in an effort to deal with the issue is to find it to move on from its fatigue to war of words with the media and show a bit of muscle wrong with the press. or the press are also where the fire is very. well chums verbal disputes with the press have become commonplace his latest step can be seen as a watershed moment that is crossing the line into spying on journalists now at the center of this is new york times reporter allie watkins whose phone and e-mail records were secretly seized ami