would in new york times be so forgiving and white was replaced with black new york times i am an older white guy and you find it ok with sarah jong inflammatory racist comments to be just fine shame on your double standards. are on the stance that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable of the times and we are confident that she will be an important for us for the editorial board moving forward. it's rector of the blockbuster guardians of the galaxy movies james bond was just fired after a bunch of tweets dating. from two thousand and eight i guess. the day a.b.c. stepped up did the right thing canceling the hit reboot of roseanne after the star of the show roseanne barr doing something so abhorrent i wish i didn't have to repeat it. all you have to do is take these tweets that she said and change it to tino change it to black or even just say when men in the place of whites and people would have burned the new york. times down all over the fact that they were defending her behavior of course there's a double standard what i'm asking for is not that we burn any buildings down

would the new york times be so forgiving if white was replaced with black new york times i am an older white guy and you find it ok with sarah jong inflammatory racist comments to be just fine shame on your double standard. sour on the stance that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable of the times and we are confident that she will be an important force for the editorial board moving forward. it's rector of the blockbuster guardians of the galaxy movies james dunn was just fired after offensive tweets dating from two thousand and eight i guess. today a.b.c. stepped up did the right thing canceling the hit reboot of roseanne after the star of the show roseanne barr doing something so for i wish i didn't have to repeat it . all you have to do is take these tweets that she said and change it to no change it to black or even just say when men in the place of whites and people would have burned the new york. times down all over the fact that they were defending her behavior of course there's a double standard what i'm asking for is not that we burn any buildings down not that we

would the new york times be so forgiving if white was replaced with black new york times i am an older white guy and you find it ok with sarah jong inflammatory racist comments to be just fine shame on your double standard. sour understands that this type of french rick is not acceptable of the times and we are confident that she will be an important for us for the editorial board moving forward. its rector of the blockbuster guardians of the galaxy movies james dunn was just fired after offensive tweets dating from two thousand and eight i guess. today a.b.c. stepped up did the right thing canceling the hit reboot of roseanne after the star of the show roseanne barr doing something so abort i wish i didn't have to repeat it. all you have to do is take these tweets that she said and change it to tino change it to black or even just say when men in the place of whites and people would have burned the new york. times down all over the fact that they were defending her behavior of course there's a double standard what i'm asking for is not that we burn any buildings down not that

the racial majority we should never be encouraging people and certainly not at the wall at the new york times to use racial categorizations as a basis for casting aspersions we should never do that black white or brown so briefly why do you think the new york times decided not to fire junk despite the public outcry. it appears and that's why i said i'd love to hear from ms york john herself it appears that the target of her comments it was ok because they were white americans only thing i know is that she says these were just jokes i don't believe that you could use those same comments and joke about women or joke about blacks or joke about any other group and have it be seen as ok because you're just joking we shouldn being gauging in rhetoric where you cast aspersions or you group people according to race that shouldn't happen the new york times ought to be trying to set an example when daniela bloomberg blumberg wrote a piece for the business insider defending the right of a straight actress to play a transgendered person she was actually fired her piece was removed and she was encouraged

in a follow up report after its original story "the new york times" reported that president trump's lawyers don't know how much don mcgahn told the special prosecutors. mr. trump's lawyers realized on saturday they had not been provided a full accounting after "the new york times" published an article describing mcgahn's cooperation. mr. trump's lawyers never asked for a complete description of what mr. mcgahn had said, according to a person close to the president. yesterday in what was for reasons we will get to later rudy giuliani's most spectacularly ridiculous tv interview ever, giuliani actually admitted that the trump lawyers do not know everything don mcgahn told the special prosecutor. >> we have a good sense, obviously, of what mr. mcgahn testified to. i can figure it out. >> how do you say that, good sense? have you debriefed him? >> no, no. but mr. dowd has a good sense of it. he talked to them at the time. >> the times reports that rudy giuliani refused to follow trump's orders on television yesterday. the article sent out of a scramble on saturday. the president sequestered at

the "new york times" reporting he's clearly -- "the new york times" reporting clearly has gotten him fired up. what's he saying this morning? >> that's right, chris. this "new york times" reporting has certainly struck a nerve. the president says he has nothing to hide. the president is now adding this tweet to the collection. he says, where's the collusion? when there was no collusion, they say there was obstruction of a phony crime that never existed. if you say anything bad about the rigged witch hunt, they scream obstruction. the president is drawing a tricky line on the russia investigation. collaborating with and conspiracy to break the law certainly is a crime. back on this mcgahn issue, the president's early outside team of attorneys believes if anything it was a mistake to think cooperating with the special counsel team would quickly bring this investigation to a close. remember, the president's first outside team of attorneys, ty cobb and john dowd. so they made no effort to keep him from those interviews. mcgahn who represents the office of the presidency and not donald tru

jodi kantor has been covering weinstein for "the new york times" and is a cbs news contributor. >> she did not comment on "the new york times" story, and so i think people today felt very much like -- you were so vocal, such a proponent of me too. how do you address this seeming contradiction. >> the degree of hypocrisy that this development demonstrates is beyond stunning. >> reporter: ben brafman is harvey weinstein's attorney. weinstein denies assaulting argento. do you think this calls into the question the validity of what asia argento said happened to her? >> my guess is no law enforcement agency and no legitimate media outlet will ever again take her seriously. >> reporter: we reached out to argento's attorney and have not heard back. the x-factor show in italy is considering dropping argento from that show. they say, if they can confirm "the new york times" report and weinstein accuser and actor rose mcgown tweeted that she was heartbroken over the story about argento. jeff? >> jericka duncan with the latest interview with weinstein's attorney, thanks. >>> coming up next, a pri

new york. thanks for being with us. breaking news, counsel cooperation, a new york times report claiming white house counsel donald mcgahnoperating with robert mueller. what this unusual move could mean for the president. >>> plus who is next? president trump is vowing to revoke more security clearances. this as former cia director john brennan speaks out to msnbc for the very first time since having his clearance revoked. >> what really gets under my skin is mr. trump's lack of decency and integrity and honesty and his lack of commitment to this country's well being and national security. mr. trump is motivated whatever is in the best interest of mr. trump. >> and pitch problems. steve bannon talks about his plan to save the president. but wait until you hear what he has to say about the infamous trump meeting. >>> we'll start with breaking news out of the new york times in the last couple of hours. white house counsel done mcgahn reportedly cooperating extensively with robert mueller obstruction inquiry into president trump. a dozen current and former white house officials say that mcgahn shared, quote, detailed accoun

new york city. we'll start this hour with breaking news from "the new york times" on robert mueller's obstruction inquiryo president trump. white house counsel don mcghan has reportedly been cooperating extensively in the special counsel investigation. we just learned this from "the new york times" within the last three hours. in this report, mcgann was centrally involved, they are reporting, in the president's attempts to fire mueller. and now investigators are focusing on trump's comments and actions during the firing of former fbi director james comey and his repeated attacks against attorney general jeff sessions for his recusal from the russia investigation. but trump's former lead counsel in the russia probe, john dowd, in reaction to this report saying this -- the "times" report is, quote, complete fiction while claiming

joining us now with reaction, the author of the number one "new york times" best seller, the russian hoax in the illicits scheme to? to my clear hillaryth clinton, gregg jarrett and the author of why we fight, fox news national security strategist dr. sebastian gorka.n doctor, let me start with you, let's start with the big latest lie of thehe media. they all went with it, they never did their research and they all basically like sheep follow each other. >> it's remarkable, sean. it shows you how they have nothing. let's be very clear, hopefully they are taking notes. there is no crime to meet with a foreign national to obtain opposition research. especially when it turns out that that individual took that meeting under false pretenses. however, it is a crime, it is a crime, to engage somebody at the cost of millions of dollars who is not a foreign registeredd agent but at the same time as a former intelligence officer, that's christopher steele, and to use his russian propaganda material as the grounds for a surveillance warrant in a fisa court. greg can give you all the chapters, al

judge jeanine: sarah jeong, the woman from the "new york times," and the "new york times" dug up their hates whites, she hates men. the excuse and the "times" bought it, she said i feel like i have been harassed. >> this is how liberal ideology gets ingrained in our culture through our education system and the media. roseanne lost her show. lost her show. but the "new york times" is standing by this woman. by the way, these tweets go back to 2013. this is five years of virulently racist tweets. they are standing by her because they say she is an asian-american woman so by default she is a victim of racism. the white people she made the tweets about, they deserve it. judge jeanine: when you say five years, the "new york times" says they are old tweets. 2015 is old? what are you up to next. >> we have big things planned for the walkaway campaign. i would like to you have me back on your show so i can announce it. judge jeanine: that's a good tease. we'll be right back, everybody. ... (vo) when bandits stole the lockbox from the wells fargo stagecoach, agent beekman was one step ahead of

that the media doesn't like you, isn't this proof that, in fact, that is the case, that the "new york timeseted hundreds of tweets, like not just a handful like this, would get hired at the "new york times" of all places? i think it kind of reenforces, sadly, donald trump's message. >> i've got to take a break. but i want to continue this. we're going to go on. but this is the thing. you don't have to respond by twitter. it always gets you in trouble because there's no context. if you're going to do something like that, then you write an article where there's context, where you can respond to people and it's just not sitting out there like that. and i do have to say, matt, i think it's a very good point, if i saw something like that from you i would say, you know what, i'm not sure matt should be working here anymore and you probably would not be working here anymore. who gets to decide what's racist or not? we'll talk about that after the break. and whiskers on kittens ♪ ♪ bright copper kettles and warm woolen mittens ♪ ♪ brown paper packages tied up with strings ♪ ♪ these are a few of my

ime new york times -- i am the new york times most loyal reader. made thosewould have first six paragraphs the first for a rough, but essentially i will get facts. you cannot turn to the gold standard of journalism and expect to get facts. we need to destroy the media and rebuild it among more ethical lines which is one thing we may get out of donald trump. host: if you destroy the media, what does that mean for you? media,we still have a just an ethical media. they would tell the truth. it would not be fake news. they would not be sending away citizens in a democracy that needs facts with a false story. host: on the conclusion that -- a delusional,e may be chemotherapy for the country. you vomit, your hair falls out, your hair falls out, but it kills cancer cells and you live. the presidency may be an -- gosant thing to do -- through but everyone on the new york times editorial board will die. host: have you heard from them? guest: many are my friends and there are one or two good reporters on the new york times but enough to were not. the editori

those questions arose this week regarding "the new york times" new hire, sarah jeong, a 30-year-old technology writer being hired for their prestigious editorial board. typically i would go to the times for my read in, but there was nothing as to what prompted jeong to write hatred for white people, the police, et cetera, et cetera. that's something i prompted on twitter this prompted someone else to say what else do you need to know. she tweeted "f" the police multiple times. the president re-tweeted the drudge report which calls her out. one time she said "f" the police she included a clip of an animated film she was walking in which dog raccoons with magical testicles, i kid you not, have a standoff with cops. i might question her taste in film, but does that mitigate the comment on police? no outlet is in a better police to tell us that than the times. hopefully they'll be more forthcoming. what do we know any sarah jeong? on paper she sounds impressive, a senior writer at the verge and wrote the book "the internet of garbage" and the online harassment and the difficulty f of -- and she wa

down "the new york times" story. according to our sources this led to the president privately fuming wondering allowed if mcgann himself had been a leak that led to that original "new york times" story. so the fact that trump's personal attorney rudy giuliani is blame being team mueller is ironic. >> again, the former lead attorney saying that "new york times" report was fiction it appears based on your reporting that is not the case. darlene, just to get everything on the record. there is so much to get on the record so far. the accusation mccarthyism against mueller from the president. well, that's just another example of the president. you've seen him all week tweeting about the investigation trying to undercut the special counsel robert mueller. he had a lot of tweets early this week about bruce orr, a justice department official. this is the individual the president said day or two ago that he may revoke his security clearance there are tweets over the weekend about the rigged witch hunt and now today you have hi

has the new york times reached out to you about that -- the new york times editorial board will die. has the new york times reached out to you about that? ann: no, i invited them to a book party. there are one or two good reporters at the new york times, but there are enough who are not and certainly the editorial most recent addition, a woman who has dedicated all of her free time to cheering for the genocide of white men. that is going a long way to making the media look objective and fair, new york times. good job. host: we're talking with ann is "futile."book we're taking your calls. sawer: the first thing i when trump was elected, i was watching on several networks and i had a feeling we were going to get to this point when i saw don lemon in his words say if trump was elected, there is no way to polish this turned, i've never seen this -- to polish this turd, i have never seen this kind of disrespect. after $17 million, we come up ad discover that there may be small infraction, may not be an infraction, there is no russian collusion we have not proven russian collusion. we're ti

would the new york times be so forgiving if white was replaced with black new york times i am an older white guy and you find it ok with sarah jong inflammatory racist comments to be just fine shame on your double standards. sarah and the stance that this type of rhetoric is not acceptable of the times and we are confident that she will be an important voice for the editorial board moving forward. its rector of the blockbuster guardians of the galaxy movies james dunn was just fired after offensive tweets dating from two thousand and eight i guess. today a.b.c. stepped up did the right thing canceling the hit reboot of roseanne after the star of the show roseanne barr doing something so boring i wish i didn't have to repeat it. all you have to do is take these tweets that she said and change it to no change it to black or even just say when men in the place of whites and people would have burned the new york. times down over the fact that they were defending her behavior of course there's a double standard what i'm asking for is not that we burn any buildings down not that we

new york. day 581 of the trump administration, and just tonight a short time ago, in fact, new legal troubles potentially for the president on a new front. we'll let "the new york times" tell it. quote, the manhattan district attorney's office is considering pursuing criminal charges against the trump organization and two senior company officials in connection with michael cohen's hush money payment to an adult film actress, according to two officials with knowledge of the matter. a state investigation would center on how the company accounted for its reimbursements to mr. cohen for the $130,000 he paid to the actress, stephanie clifford, who has said she had an affair with president trump, closed quote. mostly along those same lines a big story today had to do with a long time friend of the president who has apparently turned on him. "the wall street journal" broke the news that the publisher of the national enquirer, david peck pecker, has been granted immunity by federal prosecutors for information on michael cohen. a person familiar with the mat harz c er has confirmed the report to nbc news. make no

at this point the president's legal team has not responded to "the new york times" report. sarah sanders says shethey're n concern. but rudy giuliani put out this tweet an hour ago that doesn't talk specifically about "the new york times" report. but julian says, quote, time for the mueller investigation to file a report. we will release oushrs. the president had nothing to do with the russians and didn't obstruct an investigation. 1.4 million documents and 32 witnesses know witnesses, no privilege raised. they want this investigation to wrap up. one more point i will make is i've been in contact with someone that has direct knowledge of the mcgahn legal strategy is it relates to all of this. and that person said they would not agree with the insinuation in "the new york times" report that somehow mcgahn was providing incriminating information about donald trump. they say that he was just telling the truth as he was required to do. so there's a lot of moving parts to this story and we're still waiting for the president himself to respond to what the "new york times" is repor

we get this "new york times" article. e "new york times" is suggesting don mcghan, the president's white house counsel is cooperating with the special counsel mueller suggesting the "new york times" suggesting that he's being teeed up to take a fall for the president. what do you think of this? >> you are right the article could sound stwhait. but the reality is the president encouraged all the people who testified to tell the truth. to take as long as they needed to to do that. as long as they did, they would have no problem with the president or us. we have no reason to bleach don mcghan didn't do that. as john dowd, the president's lawyer said, don mcghan was the strongest witness for the president. meaning he completely gave testimony that said that the president didn't do anything wrong, which the president didn't do anything wrong. judge jeanine: who would plant a story or suggestion or create an effort to legitimize a claim mcghan is trying to take the fall. does it tell you that the "new york times" is making stuff

you know let's let's be clear it's not as though the new york times had fired a reporter for something that they wrote at the time or didn't. if you have any sense you know you make you make some interesting points that is new york times journalists as you pointed out these actual tweets from the past before time. it raises an interesting point though we've seen quite a number of high profile people recently released jobs because of revelations of tweets they made in the past you know raise the question of whether that. history of her should have been covered a lot sooner well i'm not so sure we've seen so many people fired in the past i mean if you have some tell them to me we've had people fired for bad behavior in the past like with me tube. but i can't you know nothing leaps to mind of somebody having been fired for a tweet they did five years ago well i'm thinking of the guardians of the galaxy direct. thinking of well more recently i think it was roseanne barr with tweets that she sent out and that was more contemporaneous but it seems like there was. this is something that now b

but she is the rich harvard law grad who works at "the new york times" "new york times." >> she madeor choices in her language. no way, no wait, no way, tucker. white people are not the oppressed group. that is white for agility. see what i'm not saying they are. look, i am not oppressed, never have been. are these universal principles? a parent may not. ethan, thank you. >> thanks, tucker. >> tucker: chadwick more as a journalist in new york city, and brooklyn specifically, and he js us tonight. chadwick, i am fumbling around in the dark for the new rules, and i get the rules are that you get to say things according to your race, certain races good to say some things, other races can't say other things. why is that not a racist worldview? by definition? >> well, it is, by definition obviously. what we are seeing here is a very dramatic and a broader escalation of a creeping trend at "the new york times." >> tucker: yes, that's right. >> yes. we have always known "the new york times" is left-leaning, jill abramson, very brief stint there. famously said, we don't have a liberal bias,

"the new york times" finding out about it, writing a story about it, and then the president ordering tell "the new york times" it didn't happen only for mcgahn to say, no, it did happen i can't say that. when you take those circumstances and say mcgahn told the special prosecutor that, what does that mean for the investigation? what does that mean for robert mueller? is it a silver bullet for obstruction? could it lead to a silver bullet? >> you've named four particular instances and i would say four times zero is zero. not one of those four instances separately or together would constitute obstruction. the real key is does mueller have something that is -- that constitutes classic obstruction, which is hush money, paying somebody to tell a lie or to not testify at all. you know, explicitly dangling a pardon in exchange for somebody testifying the right way. all those classic things, which is what -- destruction of evidence, which is what nixon and watergate was about. if mueller has something like that, all of these other statements and things that president trump did would be evide

according to documents obtained by "the new york times," actor/musician jimmy bennett alleges the assault room two months after his 17th birthday. argento was 37 years owed at the time. they had acted together in a 2004 movie in which bennett played argento's child. msnbc has not authenticated the documents in these allegations. stephanie gosk, what more do we know about the allegations and how this payment came to be? >> it happened, the allegations center around an incident in 2013 when jimmy bennett, 17 years old at the time, the age of consent in california is 18. >> he goes to a hotel of asia argento and he alleges, according to these documents obtained by "the new york times," that he was sexually assaulted by asia argento. now, speed up to the #metoo movement. asia argento comes forward in "the new yorker." she alleges that she was raped by harvey weinstein, which he denies, and then soon after that according to the documents jimmy bennett was traumatized by her coming forward and gang this high-profile role that he went to her and threatened to sue her. the suit that he threatened

back, we will continue this discussion and be joined by nat rich, who is written a piece in "the new york times" magazine that is the entire magazine come only the second time in "new york times" history that one article covers the entire magazine. the issue? climate change. stay with us. ♪ [music break] amy: this is democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman with nermeen shaikh. nermeen: with unprecedented fires, floods, and heat waves sweeping the globe, 2018 is on track to be the fourth hottest year on record. the regions most affected by the disastrous effects of global warming are overwhelmingly not the countries that have contributed the most to climate change. according to the 2018 global ninete risk index, the leas countries most affected by climate change in the past 20 years are developing nations, including hunter is, haiti, burma, and bangladesh. text andy reports " contribute less than 1% of the world's greenhouse gases blamed , yetausing global warming its 200 million people are among the world's most vulnerable victims of the growing consequences

they've been printed in the "new york times."hey are available for the whole country to read showing that they were specifically told not only was she a russian attorney, but the point of the meeting was part of the russian government's effort to support and assist donald trump and the campaign. rudy giuliani, the former u.s. attorney, has just been reduced to lying on national television to try to avoid the obvious conclusion that that meeting did, in fact, constitute a conspiracy against the united states and to violate the campaign finance laws. >> okay. you've answered every question i would have had on that. i want to get to the "new york times" report about white house counsel don mcgahn doing those 30 hours of volunteer interviews with the white house counsel in october of last year. it's being called extraordinary. what is your take on it? >> i'm not sure it's extraordinary. i don't think it's surprising that mueller would want to speak to mcgahn and would want to learn about those conversations that took place before the

"the new york times" reporting white house top lawyer don mcgahn has cooperated extensively with the investigation and met with the special counsel teams three times totaling more than 40 years starting in november. people familiar with the investigation said mcgahn gave them the president's mind set of the days leading up to the firing of james comey and how they handled michael flynn and how president trump berated attorney general sessions and tried to get into control over the investigation and threatened to fire him. president trump tweeted saying mcgahn's interview was part of the white house's effort to be cooperative and reiterating his battle cry that the investigation is a witch hunt. rudy giuliani, meanwhile, is accusing the mueller team of leaking the story, saying it is part of an effort to think mcgahn is setting him up for a fall. here is what giuliani said in an interview last night. >> the best analysis would be that the mueller team is panicking. they know they don't have a case. there was no collusion. there was no obstruction. they can't prove it and they are tryi

president trump's lawyer rudy giuliani, lashing out at special counsel robert mueller over the "new york timesthat white house counsel don mcgahn has cooperated extensively in the investigation. here's what rudy giuliani told chuck todd moments ago, down playing the trump tower meeting but here's a new twist. >> this mcgahn thing leaked from them. if they had some kind of evidence that there was collusion or there was obstruction, don't you think it would have been leaked? they leak everything else. >> i mean, let's talk with collusion. the trump tower meeting itself is at least evidence of you better investigate. >> it's not -- >> how is it not? >> well, because the meeting was originally for the purpose of getting information about clinton. the meeting turned into a meeting -- >> which in itself is attempted collusion. you said it. the meeting was intended to get dirt on hillary clinton from a criminal lawyer. >> no, no. >> that was the intention of the meeting. you just said it. >> that was the original intention of the meeting. it turned out to be a meeting about another subject. it was no

the stock tanking today after elon musk's"the new york times." it's fallen 20%. for more on this developing story we go to phil lebeau in chicago. >> a lot of news in this interview that elon musk did over an hour's time with "the new york times." first of all, with regards to the tweet that started all of this last week and the price target of $420, he had a lot of people speculating, was elon musk smoking dope when he put this out because $420 is used within the different realms of discussing marijuana use with regard to that, elon musk wrote, the $420 price seemed like better karma at $420 than $419 but i was not on weed. to be clear, weed is not helpful for productivity that was one topic that he touched on during that interview. what's the week ahead for tesla? musk and the board of directors, let's start, first off, with "new york times" believes musk and the board of directors will likely meet with the s.e.c., perhaps as soon as next week there's not a firm date we've been able to learn at this date. will the board of directors take action and will elon mus

given what she has set in the past, that marks a very steep change in what is happening at "the new york times coincidental that this happened now. it was revealed earlier this year i believe in may of that george soros invested $3 million into the new york company, and a couple months later "the new york times" published a glittering profile of him. i used to freelance at "the new york times" and i'm very familiar with the ethics policy. i used to live in fear of their ethics policy because it's very intense and dramatic, especially with a conflict of interest and their sections on public neutrality when it came to political issues. this is clearly not the paper i knew. and i was so shocked and they may either want to be a globalist operation where they've decided to make a business decision to just be a left-wing tabloid, like "huffington post" ." and the glittering jewel of american journalism, because it was completely out the window. and i think we should be worried about that. >> tucker: speaking of new york city going crazy, new york is naming a street after a dictator who committed rac

"the new york times." y first week at "the new york times," business class, the korean hotel to start covering the peace process. the french talks in the 1972 peace talks with the north vietnamese. they are not like that anymore. kids going into it because they care. i talked to people when i go to these conferences and i talked to reporters in oklahoma and in the city and they tell me things like they have a manufacturing of baby carriage and he can cut costs on the manufacturers. baby carriages, little toddlers fall out of them for years. a six-month, eight-month baby won't be able to push and fall down out of it now. they've cut back to safety. did manage their lobby, conservatives and reduce the requirements. when they are a pull mechanism. they made it much easier for a child to inadvertently flop out. it is being mitigated. that's the kind of stuff does go after a week on that. indices playing in his bed pan, his sturdy little pan, he was up eight points in the poll. in some of the stuff, i mean, it i

the new york times -- ed: the new york times claimed that. >> the new york times was duped by fbi officialsvestigation and to wire tap the trump campaign and so the new york times is either stupid or -- rachel: a follow-up from that report every day it seems like they have another bombshell that means nothing and they keep thinking they are bringing it down it doesn't work. ed: this morning brennan was on meet the press breaking a few moments ago on a related topic of weaponizing intelligence and john brennan given your knowledge of the law as you apply it here, with the mueller investigation john brennan is claiming he may file legal action against the president of the united states to stop him from stripping his security clearance and the others that might be stripped this week we keep hearing about was james comey or andrew mccabe or others do you think there could be legal action to say the president is sewing his reputation somehow and he doesn't have this authority or will this go nowhere? >> security clearance is not a right and therefore it's not a deprivation of right to revoke it.

this was revealed by an american activist who was suspended off the mimicking of the tweets of a new york times journalist a kind of muppet explains candace owens she's from turning points usa conservative organization in the usa what she did was she took tweets from new york times journalist sarah job and simply replaced the words white with the words black or the word jewish the response of twitter was to shut down her account candace owens says that twitter was right to take down her posts and ban her for making hateful comments regarding black and jewish people she says however the outrage is that sarah johnson was not banned for making these comments about white people on the surface i actually agree with twitter's assessment i believe that what i said what i treated was wrong. not be able to tweet about any race or any group that you want them canceled that they should live underground i don't know why suddenly people think that white people are excluded from that scenario that people can't be racist towards white people when in fact they often are the problem with the new york times esse

the fact of what happened in this meeting between president trump and the new york times. o do we trust answer who do we believe is telling the truth. the president of the united states or the "new york times." howie: if it's the epa or hhs. both leaders who were fired. it'it's -- jim acosta says the president is whipping up violence against him. john kelly is still alive and walking around howie: anyone following the media coverage of john kelly would have been convinced the white house chief of staff was toast, he was history. i am told the president asked kelly what they were going to do about the stories and asked if he would stay on for the rest of the first term and he said yes. what does that say about this media drum beat based on named sources. the a.p., it's leading trump staffers to believe kelly is work on borrowed time. abc, the president has once again started contemplating his possible replacements. >> a source telling cnn the president is talking to friends about possible replacements for john kelly. >> white house chief of staff john kelly may be ready to l

dave. >> we will have david sang everybody from "the new york times" to -- sanger from "the new york ss this. >>> and he e-mail sent by the make trump america great committee demanding a petition for the national anthem to be broadcast on espn. the president says if america is too offensive for anyone in our country, then what are they doing in america. the president has targeted nfl players for kneeling during the national anthem. other networks have not generally aired the anthem and showing commercials instead. >>> "the new york times" reports that education secretary betsy devos is considering an unprecedented move. allowing states to use federal funds to buy firearms. taxpayer dollars to arm teachers. it reverses a long standing government policy not to pay. it is looking into a loophole looking to increase academic opportunities. it does not bar weapons purchases. >> in march, congress passed a school safety bill, but prohibited the use of the money for firearms. education department spokesman said they are constantly considering policy issues. >>> hurricane lane barrelling towa

"new york times." president admits focus of trump tower meeting was getting dirt on clinton. "new york times." "washington post". have another one from the associated press. trump acknowledged purpose of

trish: what is wrong with the "new york times"? sounds like we're agreeing on something, right? ere is the "new york times"? why aren't they clamming down on this? >> they have totally different attitude. it is okay to be racist as long as you're attacking white people. >> that is wrong. >> they sent that the staff and entire media. if you're beatings up on white people that is cool. look i was trolled by bob smith, bob smythe you're a white -- she said, quote, white men are bs not just one person. all white people. she said a white female, white females, f-white women, lol. f-white women. lol. not just one white woman, male or female. all people, shocking. "new york times" thinks this is cool and beautiful thing. keep her on staff to share her opinions and hate. reprehensible by the so-called paper of record. should be ashamed at yourselves. trish: you know if -- >> we have to have ends lex wall honesty. trish: would you fire her, trish. >> not fair for deroy say they looked at this joyful and flower -- trish: that not what i'm asking you. you are condemning this. so would you f

jody canton has been covering weinstein for "the new york times" and is a cbs news contributor. >> she did not comment on "the new york times" story. so i think people today felt very much like, you were so vocal, you were such a proponent of "me too," how do you address this seeming contradiction? >> reporter: ben brafman is harvey weinstein's attorney. weinstein denies assaulting argento. >> the degree of hypocrisy that this development demonstrates is beyond stunning. >> reporter: do you think these allegations call into question the validity of what asia argento said happened to her? >> my guess is that no law enforcement agency and no legitimate media outlet will ever again take her seriously. >> reporter: we reached out to argento's attorney and have not heard back. the "x factor" show in italy is considering dropping argento from that show. they say, if they can confirm "the new york times" report and weinstein accuser and actor rose mcgowan tweeted today that she was "heartbroken" over the story about argento. jeff? >> glor: all right, jericka duncan with the late interview wit

the feeling "new york times" wrote a story that made it seem like the white house counsel to rebuild e president when in fact it is just the opposite. "the new york times" that they stand by the support of the pulitzer prize-winning journalist who wrote it. the investigation confirmed to fox news that spoke to the muller team at length on three different occasions. the report in "the new york times" includes a lot of detail about the meetings and the strategy and thinking surrounding it. the interview added up to more than three hours and gave a clear view of the president's most intimate moments with his lawyers. moments like a firing of james comey, the former fbi are. he allowed all others to testify the times reporting doesn't contradict that. the cooperation began because that is what the president's first legal chain wanted. president trump wanting mcgann to speak openly seemed odd to mr. mcgann and his team. he feared that mr. trump was setting up mr. mcgann to take the blame for any possible legal acts of destruction and devise their own strategy to do as much as possible. rud

argento has not responded yet to the "new york times." who has been digging into this. how exactly did the "new york times" get this information to begin with? >> it's very interesting. first of all we just got a response from the attorney that is representing the alleged victim of sexual assault and sexual abuse, a man, young man still, 22 years old. he says it is taking time for his client to process all of this because it has just come out in the the media and he needs 24 hours before he will make a statement. but it is the "new york times" that got an embedded e-mail from an anonymous source. it was encrypted. it gave documentation. they showed that e-mail to sources that were familiar with this case. they said it is authentic. so the documentation that the "new york times" is now pub liring is saying that back in 2013 what asia argento was actually in that film, when he was portraying her son, that according to this young man, jimmy bennett is his name. he was allegedly sexually battered, sexually assaulted by argento. the years went