"the new york times" apparently covered it. "the new york times" barely covered the holocaust. "the new york times" is owned by a jewish family. it barely covered the holocaust because mr. sollaceberger decided he didn't want his newspaper to be seen as sort of a jewish newspaper. he wanted the newspaper to be more of a universal newspaper. fdr didn't want to focus on the holocaust. so "the new york times" comply. they wouldn't accept evidence that was coming, being printed in european publications. they pretended the evidence was not quality evidence. it wasn't good enough. people had escaped, firsthand accounts, for the most part, they ignored it. three scholars in particular written about this. how many people know that "the new york times" self-censored when it came to the holocaust ten years before, when stalin was slaughtering the ukrainians and slaughtering them to death, they had a correspondent in moscow, they got a pulitzer prize for the reporting, covered up what stalin had committed against the ukraine. this is "the new york times," can any other in the business surv

the president today calls that the failing new york times. at you laid out is one of the biggest failures in journalistic history. the time sort of pioneered the idea of unbiased journalism, at least attempting to do so yet when it came to the holocaust and world war ii, they were worse than bad. why? >> it's shocking, and what's also shocking is how most americans don't know about this. the rest of the media pre-much covers it up. everyone keeps quoting the new york times. tell me, how many businesses would still be around if they did their very, very best to censor what took place in the holocaust? i don't take a lot of them would be around. >> active censorship. >> in real-time. >> many scholars i write, the new york times during the course of the holocaust did everything they could to push it to the back pages to the extent that it was ever printed which was very rare. the new york times knew a lot of what was going on in the attempt to exterminate all the european jews and there were eyewitnesses to this, there were four news reports, the

let me go back to "the new york times" and "the washington post." times," for example, contradicting their own headline, and very clearly stating to special counsel emphasizing nothing in the attorney general's march 24th letter was inaccurate or misleading. the witch hunt continues, then we see adam schiff, well, now they are just going to move over and start checking and empowering the irs and asking banks and fishing in this whole and that hole. financial immigration on trump. two at what point is this abuse? >> i think it is beyond abuse now, sean. they decided that they wanted to impeach the president the day after the election. if you look at adam schiff, he has been lying to the american people public, he is chairman of the intel committee, the committee that gets to know all of the things happening around the world. how can we trust them? nancy pelosi needs to remove him. one of the questions that needs to be asked, sean, why did they carry the investigation so far gone? why did they go past the election? was that also political to leave it h

"the new york times" barely covered it. barely covered theho holocaust "the new york times" is owned by a jewish family. because he decided he didn't want his newspaper to be seen as a o jewish newspaper but more universal. fdr didn't want to focus on the holocaust so "the new york times" complied they would not accept evidence it was coming it was in european publications they pretended the evidence was not quality evidence people had escaped with first-hand accounts and they ignored it. three scholars in particular how many knows that they self-centered the holocaust ten years before when stalin was starving them to death they had a correspondent inor moscow who got a pulitzer prize for his reporting covering up the slaughter that stalin had committed. "the new york times" as any other business survive that to be called the paper of record? 's and still have significantly dealt with this to massive genocides in the last century you would not find a hell of a lot about it in the pages at "the new york times" at the time tha

"the new york times" apparently covered it. "the new york times" barely covered the holocaust. k times" is owned by a jewish family. it barely covered the holocaust because mr. sollaceberger decided he didn't want his newspaper to be seen as sort of a jewish newspaper. he wanted the newspaper to be more of a universal newspaper. fdr didn't want to focus on the holocaust. so "the new york times" comply. they wouldn't accept evidence that was coming, being printed in european publications. they pretended the evidence was not quality evidence. it wasn't good enough. people had escaped, firsthand accounts, for the most part, they ignored it. three scholars in particular written about this. how many people know that "the new york times" self-censored when it came to the holocaust ten years before, when stalin was slaughtering the ukrainians and slaughtering them to death, they had a correspondent in moscow, they got a pulitzer prize for the reporting, covered up what stalin had committed against the ukraine. this is "the new york times," can any other in the business survive that. al

guest, as i mentioned, one of the reporters delivering the breaking news of the night in "the new york times." the breaking news tonight is that "the new york times" has obtained ten years of donald trump's tax information. "the new york times" report tells us three big things. one, donald trump doesn't pay taxes. two, donald trump loses massive amounts of money in business. and three, donald trump has always been financially dependent on his father. those are all things that donald trump does not want voters to know about his financial life. all of those things clash with the image of successful businessman that donald trump presents to his supporters. it is possible that the six years of tax returns that have been legally demanded from the irs by house ways and means committee chairman richard neal would reveal a similar partner for donald trump possibly with financial supporters other than his father, like perhaps a russian oligarch or two. those tax returns are being illegally withheld from chairman neal by treasury secretary steven mnuchin, but chairman neal will eventually succeed in o

what this "new york times" report shows us is it was ualwas a scam. even in the years leading up to "the art of the deal," he'd lost hundreds of millions of dollars. while he was losing money, his father was making money. in fact, his fathers only losses were investments in his son, and he'd already given his son the equivalent in 2019, like $415 million to get him started. he lost all of that money. he lost all the $415 million and more. >> this is the second chapter in a story that began by the same group of reporters at "the new york times" in october, when they wrote the piece about fred trump, donald trump's father who gave donald trump all the money he squandered over the years. this is the next chapter in a story that, again, does more than poke a hole. it deflates the entire narrative around donald trump, which is that he made himself into this magnate in new york city. got on tv, wrote books about how to be a magnate. >> so rich. >> got a tv show that was based upon the fact that he was great at business and he could teach you to be great at

everything you need to go. >> first new york times issued rather bland statement after antisemitic cartoon. netanyahu as dog being led by president trump and then came a second statement to the paper, deeply sorry, next was time's columnist stevens calling out paper and finally new york times editorial, the opinion pages of national edition last week, appearance of such an obviously bigoted cartoon in mainstream publication is evidence of a profound danger and not only anti-semitism. i still look at this cartoon and say how on earth is does this piece of filth get published? >> it's not a bigoted cartoon but bigoted columnist. it's disgusting, the new york times has a serious problem when it comes to dealing with these types of issues, we saw after the 2016 election when they came out and we need more people in news room who understand religion, yet, here we are, you know, more than two years later and we still continue to see them having problems when it comes to coverageover -- coverage of deeply important issues that they should be more careful about. >> the times has perceived by jewis

spying for political reasons or spying because the fbi had concerns. >> it is important that "the new york timesdid not use spying and they did focus on the counterintelligence that it was president trump that chose to shape it in that way and all of a sudden the failing new york times is not failing so much because he's now extrapolating from that. >> this comes in the week of facebook banning several people including alex jones on the right, twitter also and the president has been complaining repeatedly about unfair censorship of conservatives, he tweets this, when will the radical left media apologize for not only getting the russian collusion delusion story wrong, why is new york times, washington post, cnnn, allowed to be on twitter in facebook, much of what they do in fake news, it's now censorship to keep media organizations on social media? >> unless they are seeing outrageous things, but on this i think when we talk about the facebook and the twitter angle what i found most interesting about the farakon statement they were saying he was right wing which he was not. huge error. once agai

she's a reporter at "the new york times" and a fellow at the council on foreign relations. she was "the new york times" bureau chief in beirut from 2012 to 2018. we last spoke to you when you are in beirut. this is a horrific story. talk a about the scope, the numr of people you believe have been detained, the number of people disappeared from and killed in syria's prisons. >> and forcefully, nobody knows the exact number because the government keeps this behind closed doors and does not release any information to the families of most of the people who are taken. but according to the syrian network of human rights, they have counted, not estimated, but who have28,000 p people been reported by their families or by witnesses to be taken by the security forces and not emerged from the prisons. 81,000 of those people, their families have not had any word from them whatsoever. this is a sprawling system. human rights groups estimate the total number of syrians who have passed through could be in the hundreds of thousands. nermeen: you have been working on this for several years,

this was in the international edition of "the new york times" ten days ago. we reported on this. get into the paper? >> it seems that this newspaper, the global edition of "the new york times," does not have as much oversight as the actual new york times we see here in print in the city and around the country. >> they say only one editor picked out this cartoon and nobody else saw it before it was prind. >> which is insane. you would expect some other paper, lower staff and facing cutbacks but "the new york times" has been doing quite well and it's "the new york times" so you would think it's subject to two or three editors before it goes to print. the fact one editor can make this terrible decision and not have had oversight is crazy to me. >> yeah, the publisher of "the times" came out and listed five steps that have been taken as a result. he said they're changing the production processes. they're not going to run any more syndicated cartoons. they canceled the contract with the company. they're taking disciplinary steps with the editor that picked up and update unconscious bi

that's just bizarre, and i think this bombshell "new york times" story heightens the need for congress to be able to look at his report. for one thing, the information "the new york times" reported tonight is so unusual and so strange. the sheer magnitude of those losses and his reliance on tax breaks for write-offs really means that congress has a need to look to see if the irs is properly reviewing his taxes. they did that with nixon, and although the irs had praised the accuracy of his report, found that it wasn't accurate at all. it also raises questions about how deeply the president may be dependent on others to fund his activities or may be in debt to them through his businesses. i think that kind of conflict of interest creates a vulnerability that congress has a need to explore. >> yeah. wow, that certainly put it into perspective. april, 1994 up until the present, i wonder what's there. i'm sure many people are wondering what's there. if this person had legal access according to the "times," maybe there are others who have access to at least the president's tax records. he's

headline, again, this is just posted tonight at "the new york times." "decade in the red. trump tax figures show over $1 billion in business losses." this is from russ butner and suzanne craig, investigative reporters at "the new york times" who recently won a pulitzer prize for their reporting on the president's financial history and specifically on his tax history. you might remember their previous reporting from a few months ago. that's how we learned that even though trump had long told this self-ing self-agrodizing tale how he was a self-made man, the only thing he got from his family was a little $1 million loan he had to pay back to his dad, last year this investigation in the "times," in fact, found that trump had received at least $413 million from his father and that appeared to be most of the story of donald trump's wealth and his purported business success. it was all a matter of good planning. he planned his birth perfectly to inherit nearly a half billion dollars from his father. it was excellent acumen, right? the "times" also reported last year on numerous s

the "new york times" obtained 10 years of tax information about donald trump between 1985 and -- there is the news story. in 1995 he reported losses of $46 million from core businesses, largely casinos, hotels and retail space. they continued to louis money every year totalling more than a billion. according to the "new york times," year after year, mr. trump appears to have lost more money than any other individual american taxpayer. when compared his results with detailed information the irs compiles on a sampling of high income earners. this is coming oust nowhere. the first grab at it. all the losses means all the taxes not required to be paid. these are all deductions. basically. >> this is trump's greatest fear of people actually being able to see he is not a great business man. and two, there is real tax fraud here. >> as joe biden would say, folks, it's time to reexamine the news report. what about the first look at the news breaking now? paf paf it follows on the heels of the investigation that the "new york times" has been pursue into trump's taxes. it's important to keep in

new york pest. rather "the new york times." ecades of low new tax records reportedly reveal. the tax records according to "new york times" by somebody with legal access. ainsley: that is disturbing. steve: we don't know if it is one of his attorneys or tax guys. somebody in the government. brian: michael cohen maybe? steve: we don't know. they didn't name that. these particular reports and tax returns apparently were from all the way from 25 to 35 years ago. so that was a long time ago. and there is nothing in ther to to suggest that donald trump did anything wrong. so he went on twitter to explain how the real estate business in the '80s and '90s worked. ainsley: he said real estate developers in '80s and '90s more than 30 years ago were entitled to massive writeoffs and depreciation if one was actively building show tax losses in all cases. was non-monetary. sometimes considered tax shelter. you get it by building or buying. you always wanted to show losses for tax purposes. excuse me. almost all real estate developers did and

new biotene dry mouth lozenges whenever i'm on the go, which is all the time. new biotene dry mouth lozenges. freshen breath anytime, anywhere. >>> this "new yorkreporting about trump's taxes from the '80s and '90s is huge. but we can't lose sight of things that happen right under our nose that really matter. for example, it's the final indication that it is all hands on deck to clear this president from any wrongdoing. listen to this. >> the special counsel's finding is clear, case closed. case closed. >> must be nice if you say it twice. senator mitch mcconnell with his signature naked play for advantage. he knows by definition mueller didn't close the case on obstruction. and he didn't even mention it. he would certainly say differently, mr. mueller, and certainly mr. mcconnell if you switched the r to a d next to this president's name. if you did that, then senator mcconnell would say things like this. "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for president obama to be a one-term president." do you remember that? all-out opposition. >> some have said it was indelicate of me to suggest that our top political priority over the ne

prosecutor had been looking into energy giant on whose bored sat jerry brown's son hunter biden "new york times remarkable for a presidential lawyer to press a foreigner government to pursue investigation could it help trump's reelection pain, rudy to his credit discussed on the record with "new york times" a backlash he then told others on canceling the trip is this the case of the presss exposing something that turned out embarrassing to the president's lawyer. >> maybe. i mean -- >> the press didn't have to do much composing, the trip no secret. and the reason behind it perhaps the reason behind it well the reason, behind it was we know that biden, in 2017 went to ukraine, had bundled of money in former loan guarantees to give to that government as a condition -- >> of -- >> yeah. >> i'm sorry 2016 excuse me, and -- and he said you are not getting the money unless you fire that prosecutor. >> the prosecutor at the time was investigating among other things, a company with when his son beau biden was affiliated, well, look i am not sure that it was a good reason or bad reason to do that. but b

there's a story in "the new york times" that says an aide to the committee suggested on friday, this is quoting the "times," that though the panel is confident in the merits of the argument that the tax records should be turned over, mr. neil and lawyers decided to go straight to court. they feared a judge could simply throw out the case for lack of standing, essentially rendering the use of the tax code uninforcible whenever the executive branch objects, in other words that donald trump could make it impossible to enforce it. is that delay happening? >> this is unchartered territory, so we're doing everything we can to get this right. the chairman has been really clear on this. we're going to take a methodical approach. the problem we saw in 6103 is that we've never had the irs say no. >> right. >> it was never even anticipated back in 1924 that there would ever be a question as to whether the irs could comply with a legitimate request from the chairman of the ways and means committee for a tax return. so issuing the subpoena gives us the tool that we need in the event that they don'

the "new york times" has it right. they're trying to square his previous testimony with what michael cohen said, which was that donald trump jr.'s knowledge of the development was more extensive than he said it was. he also made public statements where he said we basically didn't know about this project. so they're trying to square that. this subpoena was issued about three weeks ago, is my understanding, and there's been some toing and froing between the two of them. and now donald trump jr.'s allies are beak building a campaign against richard burr. we've seen quite a few republican lawmakers come out firing shots at him. so this is a civil war inside the republican party in the last 24 hours. >> i wasn't going to start this. i was going to do the fact check. let me put up what you're talking about. this is the statement from donald trump jr. -- or a source close to him. don is a private citizen who's already been cleared by mueller after a two year investigation. no lawyer would ever agree to allow their client to p

maybe the president will see this story from the "new york times" as an opportunity. next.nd live your lives. that's why we redesigned humira. we wanted to make the experience better for you. now there's less pain immediately following injection. we've reduced the size of the needle and removed the citrate buffers. and it has the same effectiveness you know and trust. humira citrate-free is here. a little change can make a big difference. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ask your doctor about humira citrate-free. here's to you. ♪ ♪ our new, hot, fresh breakfast will get you the readiest. (buzzer sound) holiday in

provided by a leaker here is what was written in the new york times regarding the case. the new york times among many other news organizations have precisely the same kinds of documents from wiki leaks without authorization from the government it is not clear how this is legally different from publishing classified information now it's important to note that some of the voices now speaking up with concern regarding the julian assange case are voices that have not been juliana songes biggest fan in the past these are some of the very voices that have been harshly critical of wiki leaks and its activities but even they are voicing some very serious concerns in the aftermath of this new indictment is a pretty aggressive new move by the justice department a big deal here for a 1st amendment advocates the government is now trying to assert this brand new right to criminally prosecute people for publishing secret stuff and newspapers and magazines and investigative journalists and all sorts of different entities publish secret stuff all the time that is the bread and butter of

president, to the left of "the new york times" editorial board. to the left of "the new york times" editorial board. nevertheless, we should celebrate the progress that we're making today. the senate passage of this legislation marks a huge step forward for communities across the u.s. that have gone far too long without receiving this federal assistance to help them get back on their feet. finally, the millions of americans who grappled with nature's worse are closer to receiving the supplemental aid they need. the western communities that are sorting through the ashes of record-breaking wildfires, and puerto rico where hurricane damage damaged homes an critical infrastructure, the deep south communities victimized by tornadoes, and for those still grappling with the floodwaters that surged over towns across the midwest and my own state of kentucky. i'm grateful that senator shelby, senator leahy, colleagues of ours, including rubio, ernst, thune, blunt, sasse, and others have brought us to this point with their tireless work on this subject. so

now, this is not even news, because actually the president himself pointed this out many times. one being the very first episode of "the apprentice" in 2004. "the new york times" is finally catching up. there is no secret he went through an incredibly tough financial period in the '80 end '90s. that's when atlantic city casino business actually went belly up. watch the president in 200 200d "the new york times" that they reported this week. this is beyond idiocy. >> i own buildings all over the place. model agencies. the miss universe page and demand pageant, jetliners, golf courses, casinos, and private resorts like mar-a-lago. one of the most spectacular estates anywhere in the world, but it was not so easy. about 13 years ago i was seriously in trouble. i was billions of dollars in debt. but i fought back at, i won, bigly. i use my brain and my negotiating skills and i worked it all out. >> sean: he told the whole story himself. maybe before the media mob breathlessly, historically tries to disperse the president over his taxes, maybe they should just go back and watch old episodes of "the apprentice." separate news from the less hype and hysteria. t

states government going after the mere publisher opens up the possibility of going after the new york times the washington post or the pentagon papers case as you know the supreme court didn't say in that case that the ready washington post the new york times couldn't be prosecuted all they said is they couldn't be stopped from publishing it but after they publish it it was left open the possibility of going after them the government of the united states under the nixon administration chose not to do that but they had the option of trying and now years later the truck administration has taken out the supreme court and on that option and indicted somebody for mere publication if this case actually starts and britain extradite teaching this stuff a decades professor what you're really saying it reflects on the foundations of the united states itself on the history of this stuff political pamphlet is like james calendar and thomas paine yes i mean you know your history calendar was in many ways far worse than anybody publishing today he specialized in a made up law is he was paid for what he n

the "new york times" story right now says two. that's up from one. my guess it's a lot more other than that. if you listen to what the attorney general barr said yesterday, as sophisticated as this operation was to have a fisa warrant on someone there had to be more involvement with the level of people. i hold to what i said a year ago. i want to know how spies were run into the trump campaign. i don't know but we will get the answer and get it out to the american people. >> sean: i count 3 instances with fisa. don't stop what you are doing. this is too important to the foundational principles of the country. when we get back. right out of a bond movie. set up. pretty young girl and spying. george papadopoulos on america getting to the truth and spying on the trump campaign. straig >> sean: as we told you the "new york times" got around to reporting on real spying on the trump campaign. the fbi sent a female government investigator to meet with the trump campaign advisor george papadopoulos to get dirt on trump's connections to russia. dirt we know n

a new investigation by "the new york times" exposes the financial schemes at the root of the new york city taxi drive crisis. the repoport reveals t that a gp of industry leaders titificial inflateded the cost ofof taxi medallions andndrchestrated a predatatory lending g scheme, collllecting millilions of dolls in the process and putting many drivers into debilitating debt. city agencies did little to curb the system, which a harvard professor quoted in the report called "modern-day indentured servitude." while the advent of rider apps like uber and lyft contributed to a loss of income for licensed taxi drivers, the investigation finds that the taxi medallion bubble had already laid the groundwork for the current driver crisis. at least eight drivers have died by suicide since the start of 2018, with at least some of the drivers linking the decision to their crushing debt. in atlanta, billionaire investor robert smith stunned students at morehouse college when he announced in his commencement speech sunday he would pay off the student debt of the entire graduating class. every classe

where was that story "the new york times?" well "the new york times" is fake news. >> dana: jennifer griffin is live at the pentagon. in doubt people saying we got to hear more about this. what do you know about "the new york times" report? >> well, dana, it was one of several options that was presented to the white house last thursday by acting defense secretary patrick shanahan. as the president mentioned, was first reported by "the new york times." a top british general, the deputy commander of strategy and information for operation inherent resolve said point blank from baghdad he has seen no increased threats from iranian backed forces in iran or syria. >> there have been no increased threat from iranian backed forces in iraq and syria. there are a substantial number of groups in iraq and syria. we don't see any ingreased threat from any of them at this stage. >> a statement that stands in stark contrast to the unnamed defense officials who have claimed there is an elevated threat to u.s. forces across the middle east from

the left has a conniption every time they hear the word any new "new york times" is coming around toecognize what it was that the surveillance by the fbi was actual spying. . >> it's interesting to see that using the word spying. but it is pretty clear that the obama administration was potentially looking into the rival administration and president trump has a lot to be upset about. they have been dragged through the mud for the past two and half years despite what we learned from the mueller report now they go into obstruction xyz and why they felt the need to buy off the campaign and then we need to get to the bottom of exactly what happened. people should support this by the way. judge: "the new york times" it is not pejorative. it is a real word. so why was there such a frenzy for them to deny they were spying? . >> i think it was counterintelligence work that wasn't necessarily political but what was his him asking to spy on joe biden and political opponents that's why he could not answer kamala harris question. that is bigger than watergate. judge: you are on the show to answer

new journalism 5 g. lab at the time this lab is going to be based news room and it will work very closely with times journalists in new york city across america and around the world . it will paula with dr who's open innovation group and gets early access to 5 d. technology and equipment. during tovan has been on the new york times board of directors since 2004 until 2009 she was verizon the vice president and chief financial officer after her retirement from horizon to open was given 3 and a half $1000000.00 and then signed a year long consulting contract that paid her a whopping $125000.00 per month as for the articles experts on 5 g.b. ryan fox spent 15 years at the national security agency and was a computer analyst in the us army now he's an executive at the cyber intelligence firm new knowledge the very same firm that ran what its own internal report called an elaborate false flag operation in the 2017 alabama special senate race and then there's molly mchugh a new conservative think tank or unregistered foreign agent who once wrote that fighting a new cold war would be in america's interest so whose interest does th

that's one of the explosive new details in a "new york times" investigation. the times obtained details from tax returns from 1985 to 1994 showing losses of more than a billion dollars. joe johns at the white house with much more on this. i'm not sure the president will enjoy reading that overnight. >> probably not. the significance of the issue is it advances the issue of the tax returns and may indicate at least partly why the president has been reluctant to give up his tax returns. important to say the "new york times" didn't report it got ahold of the tax returns. they say they got transcripts, summaries of the tax returns from the middle of the 1980s to the middle of the 1990s. those transcripts show massive losses for the president. 1.1 17 billion dollars that the president didn't pay income taxes during that period for eight of the ten years. he was able to get write-offs, had a lot of business in mortgages and real estate interests. some of the interest has been called into question. the president's tax lawyer contacted by the newspaper said this infor

the president publicly criticizes sessions in a "new york times" interview. within hours of the president's meeting with lewandowski on july 19, 2017, the president gave an unplanned interview to the "new york times" in which he criticized sessions's decision to recuse from the russia investigation. the president said that sessions should have never recused himself and if he was going to recuse himself, he should have told me before he took the job, and i would have picked somebody else. sessions' recusal, the president said, was very unfair to the president. how do you take a job and then recuse yourself? if he would have recused himself before the job, i would have said, thanks, jeff, but i can't, you know, i'm not going to take you. it's extremely unfair and that's a mild word to the president. hicks, who was present for the interview, recalled trying to throw herself between the reporters and the president to stop parts of the interview, but the president loved the interview. later that day, lewandowski met with hicks and they discussed the president's "ne

where a huge selection of investors are talking about china trade and, yes, a lot about that "the new york timesport. york times" report will be like, "wow, maybe i'll glow too if i book direct at choicehotels.com". who glows? just say, badda book. badda boom. book now at choicehotels.com ♪ applebee's bigger, bolder grill combos. now that's eatin good in the neighborhood. if you have moderate to little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ready to treat differently w

it looks like the new york state legislature may be giving you some help as well as the help you got last night from the "new york timesll, of course, the report in the "new york times" shows what a loser this president is, that he demonstrated in business about the same negotiating skill he's shown recently with the north koreans, and it points up why we really need these returns, because there's so many lies that are here and so many questions about how americans can have confidence in the tax system if the president is not doing his part and has not done his part. as far as the new york action, i think it's important. i'm pleased they're proceeding, but there is other information, the working papers, the auditing, the questions about whether he was even under audit that we need to get directly with chairman neal's important request under article 6103 or section 6103. >> mark, actually, i want to call you mr. secretary because the last time we talked, it was in your office at the treasury years ago when you were the assistant secretary for tax policy. so many issues to deal with. first of all, i learned from you in t

it turns out, and other "new york times" confirms, it was a sting. if you read down further, it starts with papadopoulos because they're so shady, they were investigating him. if you read further down in "the new york times," they say they never turned up anything on him. in the end, what he got in trouble for was lying to the people who were trying to trap him. when you look at the circular logic of all of this, the best of the democrats can come up with now -- and we heard it during this hearing -- against the president is, "well, you didn't report it." they are saying, "when we try to trap you, you then didn't turn around and report to the people who were trying to trap you that we were trying to trap you." >> harris: the irony of that, too, ed henry, on the one side it's being alleged that the trump campaign got a debriefing on people targeting them, foreign governments. if this was in fact our own government, it would be a moot point whether or not they got a briefing on foreign governments interfering or listening in. >> ed: absolutely. think ab