just last month, the "new york times" breathlessly reported that there were new sexual misconduct allegations that have emerged about brett kavanaugh's time at yale. yet, in "the times" initial reporting, and i am only picking on the "new york times" because lee represents the "new york in the initial reporting, the paper completely omitted the fact that the women woman who was supposedly the victim doesn't even remember the incident and that she declined to be interviewed on this reporting for this topic. that was a serious lapse of journalistic standards to omit these important facts that would have given readers a more fulsome perspective on the allegations themselves. and pre-sullivan rollback, i suspect they would not have been admitted. should the press be restrained? yikes. what a loaded question, it harkens back to images of reporters in handcuffs. let me be clear, i'm not in favor of imposing criminal liability for defamation. [laughter] should the press be restrained also raises another important question, restrained by whom? so i don't really love the way that question is framed bu

broke the story prompting rare words of praise from the president. >> i hate to say it, the new york timespect to the new york times for putting it up. >> suddenly they are news in this instance. >> i would love to see more reporting on what adam shift new. he says he didn't know at the time, there are a lot of questions to be asked on who told him what? i would love to see them report on that. >> a different situation with mike pompeo when everywhere he played his interview. >> what do you know about those conversations? >> you gave me a report about a whistleblower complaint. was i on the phone call? >> mike pompeo was on the phone call and this was a huge story, a little contrast. >> mike pompeo flat out said this is about being on the actual call. adam schiff needs to be more careful but this is pretty brazen as well. with all the hysteria you see from the right about adam schiff they are completely ignoring mike pompeo was on the call and pretended not to recall it. that you get as much scrutiny from the media on the right. >> cover top officials in both parties when they live. is the

coaled the detainee open radio transmission this is why all the supposed evidence presented by the new york times is worth less than the paper it was printed on and number 2 with the gadgets used to pick up these radio frequencies and which are featured in the new york times article are too expensive for ordinary residents to afford moscow says that these are most likely connected to an air strike warning system developed by an american company deployed by british intelligence and handed over to the white helmet and so the ministry has cast serious doubt over. a serious suspicion as to who exactly are these anonymous sources there is no other reason except the connection to the white helmet which acts on that the thought to have just had to explain the absolute in the name of all sources in the new york times article. there was also something about one of the hospitals being located in a cave right there was one located in the cave of kafir is eat up and just recently actually my colleague roman kosar of visited caves in the same area as that one he was part of a press tour that included 80 corre

apparently the new york times thinks police are the problem. is furious ended up next to react to that outrageous article. >> i don't know why there aren't uprisings all over the country and all over the world. >> stop the madness. the rnc firing back at democrats impeachment push. - [narrator] the following is an urgent appeal from the international fellowship of christians and jews. - right now in the former soviet union, there are thousands of jewish holocaust survivors trapped in relentless poverty. there's no heat, no electricity, no running water, they're cold hungry and sick and they're suffering and dying needlessly. christians and jews together stand obedient to god to listen to his word. god gives us a special calling to help the orphan, the widow, the weakest, the survivors and he makes a promise that if we stand with them, so too will god stand with us. - [narrator] please open your heart and act now. you can save lives and honor god by helping elderly jews in dire need in the former soviet union. your gift today of just $25 will ru

so it's actually going to embarrass "the new york times." said you're going to embarrass "the new york times." >> i said why. >> he said when it's all said and done, "the new york times" is going to apologize to in re readers process. >> okay beal see what happens. we released the second tape in washington, d.c. >> girlfriend is a prostitute. >> okay. >> and i don't know. >> i kind of figured that. >> i'm using the money she is getting you know what i mean. >> with the police you don't know where it's coming from we're looking out for you. >> okay that's deep. >> by the way, the negotiating post put a big story. put it on the cover two days in a row. we went to new york they told to us bury the illicit proceeds in a tin cane. >> bury this. >> a tin i put the money in a tin. >> in a tin and push it in the earth there. put the grass over. >> we were beside ourselves. this story was big. it blew up. and extraordinary -- an extraordinary series of events just as andrew breitbart predicted, official washington responded, even before any reporters

to explain the absolute in the name of all sources in the new york times article finally russian jets in syria don't receive talking to. open radio transmission this is why all the supposed evidence presented by the new york times is worth less than the paper it was printed on so that's basically a wrap up of the ministry of defense defenses response to that so we'll of course keep our viewers updated on any new information ok we're going to go back to we're going to go back now to riyadh to the king of saudi arabia to welcome president putin just a matter i'm told. they're going to talk about economic cooperation lots of the for a state visit but there's also the situation with syria and iran. it's a return visit. that. you can see a little bit of a ceremony there. yes. they will also be discussing this with several $1000000000.00.

on that the thought to have just had to explain the absolute anonymity of all sources in the new york times article finally russian jets in syria don't receive target coordinate detainee open radio transmission this is why all the supposed evidence presented by the new york times is worth less than the paper it was printed on. the piece mentioned something interesting about a cave as well tell us about that right one of the hospitals that were allegedly seen it was located in a cave called kafr zita and just recently actually my colleague roman kozar of visited caves in the same area as this one as part of a press tour and what he and other journalists saw were not hospitals in these caves but arsenals a large arsenals of weapons many which were made in large part in the west actually so with the ministry of defense is response it seems the facts clearly aren't clearly against russia and the situation as the new york times is claiming one quarter joining us in the city thank you for that report. armed men attacked a mosque in burkina faso in west africa killing at least 16 people it's not c

one of the most common claims is that it is unique and i will show you some graphs from the new york times which have gotten a lot of attention over time. >> i will try to speak loudly. it's a set of 14 countries where it shows homicide per 30 million people in the united states. here is something from the new york times with 11 countries and 11 developed countries in the united states with three or 400,000 people sweden and switzerland and other countries. there are issues with this. one of the issues is there is a lot more countries in the world. a lot more developed countries. there are 36 countries that meet the standards that are considered developed countries an organization called the oecd which is the club for developed countries with rules based on income and production. but first of all how the united states compares to all countries and then all developed countries. the blue line is the average. the green is the median and the red is the united states. so more than half of the countries around the world have a higher homicide right - - rate united states. a couple things to poin

we're going to start with some breaking news that has come in from "the new york times." this is the news that honestly we've been expecting for some time or thinking that if things got really bad it might come to this. as of tonight according to "the new york times" it has come to this. as you see, this is the headline just posted. justice department is said to open criminal inquiry into its own russia investigation. i'll quote to you from the article. again, this just posted tonight. quote, president trump has repeatedly attacked the russia investigation, portraying it as a hoax and illegal. even months after the special counsel closed it. now mr. trump's own justice department has opened a criminal investigation into how it all began. so this is about the review that trump's attorney general, william barr, has been overseeing and has been very personally involved in for the last few months. he technically assigned the u.s. attorney in connecticut, john durham, to oversee this, but william barr himself, the attorney general, has apparently been an investigator in this pr

new york. /s >>> right out gate tonight with some breaking news that has just come in from "the new york times,honestly we've been sort of expecting for sometime or thinking that if things got really bad, it might come to this. as of tonight, according to "the new york times," it has come to this. as you can see, this is the headline just posted at "the times." justice department is said to open criminal inquiry into its own russia investigation. i'll quote to you from the

a very different from what the new york times emerges them to be now the ministry mentioned a number of problems with these radio recordings number one being the fact that russian pilots don't actually communicate bombing targets over radio in the 1st place russian jets in syria don't receive target. open radio transmission this is why all the supposed evidence presented by the new york times is worth less than the paper it was printed on and number 2 the gadgets used to pick up these radio frequencies are far too expensive for any ordinary resident of that area to afford moscow says that they're most likely connected to an airstrike warning system that was developed by an american company deployed by the british government and handed over to white house in syria so the ministry has cast serious suspicions on who exactly these anonymous these anonymous sources really are. there is no other reason except the connection to the white helmet which acts on the story to have just had to explain the absolute in the midst of all sources in the new york times article there was also something

every conversation is secretly taped. >> that's right. >> did that bother you quick. >> with the new york times we and our colleagues are working with secretive figures all the time so we were not surprised but it wasn't really useful to us so you really have to make sure the reporters and the editors because weinstein was trying to call the publisher at the new york times said make his case known so they really didn't give him any opportunity to come in the back door to intimidate or bully us out of the story. >>. >>. >> was there a disagreement quick. >> it wasn't even as much of a disagreement as a worry. two months before we publishe published, megan finds out about the really irregular series of transactions that was involved in for years so i will tell you something about my partner when you get into something you don't really let go. [laughter] so very quickly there was a suggestion that turned out to be true that weinstein had properly - - improperly used a charity auction and the money they thought they were giving to aids was really going to help weinstein. so the disagreement that we

that's the reference to the man as of 10 minutes ago the "new york times" says is under investigation by the new york feds, rudy giuliani and his allies trying to make money off of the foreign policy. individuals who have been named as contacts of giuliani may well have believed their personal and financial ambiltions were stymid in ukrain. she was forced to leave kiev the very next spring and number two told her although she'd done nothing wrong, the president simply lost confidence in her. he added there had been a consrco concerted campaign against me and an effort to remove her since 2018. she was name checked with the president of the heart of ukrain and the president said then it was quote bad news and the people she was dealing with in ukrain were also bad news, quote. so i wanted to let you know that. trump was expressing that view unwhat he thought in that moment was a private, secret call that would remain secret like most of those high-level foreign calls. he couldn't have known it would soon leak or tip off the impeachment probe to a new height or that she would know what

in response to "the new york times," the biden campaign came out swinging. they said we right to protest how little the times has investigated, particularly after giving top billing's two-way nemesis peter schweizer. are you truly blind to what you got wrong in 2016? are you deliberately continuing policy is that distort reality? after the glaring mistakes of 2016, the times has given an underhanded task with the validation of its platform. star words. peter schweizer, the president of the government accountability. good to have you with us this evening. my first question for you is where you surprise that "the new york times" agree to publish your peace? >> no, actually not. in fact "the new york times" reached out to me to right the piece for them. i've written for them in the past and they've always been very fair and we do vigorous fact-checking at the government accountability institute and every word and that op-ed was backtracked by "the new york times" as well. i'm thankful they wrote it. the biden reaction is not a surprise because their entire strat

in "the new york times" story it says it's not the first time that bolton expressed concerns over rudy giuliani and giuliani being part of this. >> i think, frank, what he was saying -- obviously he thought something nefarious was going on, something that was unusual. >> right. >> because sort of this back door operation. >> right. >> he doesn't mean drug deal, per se. he means what's going on is so ridiculous, so beyond the pale he's comparing it to a drug deal. i do wonder, though, what administration did john bolton think he was joining? you know, his shock here is well-earned shock and we should all be shocked. we should be appalled by what's going on. but the idea he didn't expect to see this, he must have been sleeping through the trump administration prior to his appointment. >> you know, this reminds me, though, of the interview, the abc interview with george stephanopoulos when the president said it was okay to dig up political dirt on his political -- >> anybody would use it, he said. >> that anybody would do it. and it just -- the state of mind for him -- >> i think the pres

two days from the cnn and "the new york times" democratic presidential debate. n a battleground state of ohio. new jersey senator cory booker will be on that stage and joining me is his campaign national press secretary, sabrina. good morning to you. >> thanks for having me on today. good morning. >> there are a lot of people on that stage. what is the mission for senator booker? >> as you said, there is a lot of people on that stage. twelve candidates. a short amount of time to make our case to the american people tuning in. you know, i think this is a great opportunity for copper cory to highlight why he is the best candidate in this race. a president in the white house is stoke on dividing this q country and stoking hate in our country. cory is on the platform of uniting people together and i think what you'll see a lot of come tuesday night, talking about how we can bring this country together and how he will heal this country and really leading on past experiences to showcase that, whether his term as mayor or senator in congress today. >> the senator has, a

their work on the weinstein story led to "the new york times" along with the new yorker, winning the pulitzer for public service last year. [applause] >> in a review in "new york times," remarked that the book reads a bit like a feminist all the president's men. so, it's particularly fitting that jody and megan will be in conversation with bob woodward. [applause] >> bob has been observing and regarding on major developments in washington for nearly half a century. he has shared in two pew pulitzers prize nor to coverage over the watergate seasonal and second in two were to lead reporter of the coverage of the 9/11 attacks but -- fears his devastating look inside the trump presidency came out last year, it was his 19th book, all have been national best sellers. i wouldn't bet against another one coming out in a not too distant future. please join me in welcoming jody kantor, megan twohey and bob woodward. [cheers and applause] >> thank you, brad. it's great to be here. let's get right to it. first of all, this book is a masterpiece. a landmark. [applause] >> of journalism and -- but p

it is interesting to see this "new york times" piece. john kerry's name mentioned, i don't know if john kerry leaked that to "the new york times" but i think there's a lot of worry about joe biden as a front runner and you are seeing mayor pete move up the polls in iowa. the question is an alternative to elizabeth warren is what the democrats are possibly going to look for. >> shannon: i want to talk about your book, "three days at the brink" i'm not done with it yet. so many untold stories about what could have happened in world war ii and what did end up happening. if >> the allies really could have lost world war ii and we forget that, looking back in history. at this moment november 1943, fdr, churchill, and stalin agreed to meet in tehran of all places, stalin makes the meeting. they get there and eventually agreed to plan world war ii d-day, the biggest battle of the war that ends up changing the course of history. what is in this book are a lot of nuggets that never ended up having before. it bounced back from how fdr gets to that

and joining us is one of the reporters who broke the story for "the new york times" tonight. michael schmidt, washington correspondent for "the new york times" who covers national security and federal investigations. michael, thank you so much for joining us with your breaking news report. what more can you tell us about this possible second whistle-blower? >> well, look, this is a person that has more intimate knowledge, is closer to the actual, you know, complaint, what the issue is at the center of the complaint, than the complainant. the person who filed the initial complaint is someone that was at the cia, who was not at the white house, who was not intimately involved with this. look, the interesting thing that's going on here is that the president is having to deal with whistleblowers now. there could be a second whistle-blower who would create another problem for him. it's different than the mueller investigation. in that case, it was a contained federal investigation. a lot of things weren't supposed to come out. but whistle-blowers have a different power, a different

and according to tonight's "new york times" story there were two specific edits. one was a reference, an invocation to burisma, the ukrainian energy company, by president zelensky of ukraine and the second was the reference you mentioned to recordings of joe biden. the first edit, to me, the reference to burisma, could be completely innocuous. of course the white house observers tend to be those who don't have in-depth knowledge of ukraine. and that is why we have people like colonel vindman. the second edit and reference to recordings of joe biden seems to me much more nefarious. that doesn't seem to be the sort of content that could just be left out of the reconstructed transcript. and i think that brings me to something that has always torn at me about this transcript that was released by the white house. and that's this strange notation that you see on the transcript. it says on the upper right-hand corner, package number short. and what should be there is a number. the fact that there is not a number there suggests this was never finalized. this document was

megan and joey's work on the weinstein story led to "the new york times" winning the pulitzer for publicservice last year. [applause] susan in her review she said of "the new york times" remarked that the book reads a bit like a feminist altar president spent so it's particularly fitting the jodi and megan would be in conversation here this evening with bob woodward. [applause] bob, he's observing and reporting the list of elements in washington for nearly half a century. he has shared into pulitzer prizes first for coverage of the watergate scandal and the second in 2003 as the lead reporter of "the washington post" coverage of the 911 terrorist attacks but the prices alone hardly begin to reflect bob's enormous journalistic legacy. fear is devastating look inside the trump presidency came out last year and was his 19th book. all have been national bestsellers and i would not bet against another one coming out in a not-too-distant future please join me in welcoming jody, megan and bob. [cheering and applause] [cheering and applause] >> thank you, brad. it's great to be here. let's get r

and then late tonight, "the new york times" dropped another one. a story that says we may hear from a second whistleblower from inside the intelligence community on the topic of trump and ukraine. the president won't like that. michael schmidt and adam goldman write, the official has more direct information than the the first whistle-blower whose complaint that mr. trump was using his power to get ukraine to investigate his political rivals touched off an impeachment inquiry. the second official is among those interviewed by the intelligence community inspector general to corroborate the allegations of the original whistleblower. this as democrats ramp up their impeachment inquiry as we watch. oversight committee chairman elijah cummings along with the chairs of intel and foreign affairs subpoenaed the white house for documents related to the president's dealings with ukraine. tonight, they write, quote, we deeply regret that president trump has put us and the nation in this position. but his actions have left us no choice but to issue this subpoen

let me read a portion of what the biden campaign sent "the new york times." here's a letter they sent yesterday. what was especially troubling about the times' active participation is that prior to its reporting on the subject by ken vogel, this conspiracy had been relegated to the likes of breitbart, russian propaganda and another conspiracy theorist hannity guest john solomon. >> active participation in a smear campaign is what the biden campaign is accusing "the new york times" of. and their beef comes down to a couple of things. one is this "new york times" story that was written by reporter ken vogel back in may. it gave life to this idea really that biden perhaps abused his office as vice president to benefit his son hunter biden. the times' was widely panned at the time for publishing the story because it didn't note until the 19th paragraph there was no actual evidence of wrongdoing. the times got a lot of criticism back then. and then yesterday the times published an op-ed by peter sweitzer who has given life to a lot of right wing conspiracy theorys

it is interesting to see the new york times piece, john kerry's name mentions. i don't know if john kerry leaked that to the new york times but there is a lot of worry about joe biden as a front runner and you see mayor pete moving up in the polls in iowa. the question is an alternative to elizabeth warren is what the democrats possibly are going to look for. shannon: i want to talk about your book which is out today, 3 days at the brink. we are battling over this book. so many untold stories about what could have happened in world war ii and what did end of happening. >> the allies could have lost world war ii and we forget that looking back at history and at this moment november 1943 fdr, churchill and stalin agree to meet in tehran of all places, stalin makes the meeting. after a long journey they get there and agree to plan d day, the biggest battle of the war the changes the course of history. there are a lot of nuggets, it bounces back to how fdr gets to that point. it is chock-full of other books i have written about eisenhower and reagan. >> we wish you t

news to bring you tonight. this time it's the "the new york times" that's just broken news, some fairly explosive news about theestimony that just wrapped up today from lieutenant colonel alexander vindman who's the top ukrainian expert on the national security counsel. we know because "the new york times" was the first to report last night on the content of colonel vindman's opening statement. we know he was due to tell congress today in the impeachment proceedings about his concerns and the fact he raised an internal alarm after listening in on the president's call to the president of ukraine because he believed what he heard was improper and he reported it up the chain of command. now according to "the new york times" we've got more detail as to what colonel vindman testified about. let me just tell you what the lead of their piece is. quote, lieutenant colonel alexander vindman told house impeachment investigators today that the white house transcript of a july call between president trump and ukraine's president omitted crucial words and phrases and that his attempts to restore them failed. citing three pe

it's rukmini here from the new york times . hey, you see this? >>> all right. the biggest presidential primary debate in history just one day away hosted by cnn and "the new york times." tomorrow night 12 democratic hopefuls will take the stage in westerville, ohio. that's 12. in the buckeye state. what do the candidates need to do to stand out? that's the key question. joining us to answer it is michael smerconish. all right. michael, i want to start with you on that big question. you've got biden and warren center stage. they've both been rising in the polls. so two questions, your advice to them. one, what can biden do to stop warren having the big m.o. and what can warren do to show folks she could be a credible general election candidate and not just popular with the progressive base? >> you know what's interesting, despite the intense interest in these debates so far, the needle hasn't really moved as to where they stand. the race has not been shaken up thus far although the betting markets in contrast to the polling data suggests actually it's elizabeth w

lo publicÓ el diario the new york times. para detener la ola de inmigrantes. trump negÓ que fuera cierto. pedro: el presidente trump querÍa cocodrilos y serpientes, o balear a los migrantes en las piernas para detener su llegada masiva, segÚn publica el new york times. las escalofriantes declaraciones que habrÍan pedido a funcionarios al dignado muchos. >> es un modo de pensar tan feo y tan horrible, tan racista que es increÍble. pedro la congresista verÓnica escobar dice que esto solo demuestra el odio y la diferente: e diente le -- indiferencia que el presidente le tiene los migrantes. >> no puedo creer que tengamos un presidente, que los estados unidos tiene un presidente que habla de este modo. pedro: trump habÍa sugerido las medidas ante una docena de asesores. >> desgraciadamente este efecto lo que ha estado poniendo el presidente trump. son muy preocupantes. pedro: de acuerdo al reporte, a trump pidiÓ el cierre total de la frontera en menos de 24 horas, ante la constante llegada de inmigrantes. sus asesores le advirti

peter baker from "the new york times," it's always great to have you on. ank you so much. >>> coming up, a battle over president trump's taxes unfolding right now in a new york appeals court. how the president's attorneys are justifying trying to keep those tax records under wraps. but first we're expecting an update soon on the teachers strike in chicago. it's huge. the mayor is set to speak with reporters in just about 20 minutes. she's expected to tell teachers that chicago simply does not have the money to give the union what it wants. we've got the strike impacting hundreds of thousands of students. it's been going on for almost a week now. outside of city hall we'll see the mayor, teachers are expected to rally and protest. wich, your mammoth masterpiece. and...whatever this was. because we make our meat with the good of the deli and no artificial preservatives. make every sandwich count with oscar mayer deli fresh. at bayer, we're into the golden years. with better heart treatments, advanced brain disease research, and better ways to age gracefully.

" turns up its nose at current list of people running. >> i think the "new york times" usually conservatives would say. failing "new york times" so much hog watch, this time i noticed that conservatives are like we like that story. we will read that story, democrats are imploding. but, they said people are thinking about john kerry, are you kidding me, why would i? kennedy: you wouldn't. >> no. >> and oprah winfrey. kennedy: how about oprah kerry, they could get married. >> that is succulent. kennedy: they base it on big democrat donors in new york city, talking about their frustration for various reasons, in the article. wojuan said hogwash. >> it may be a reflec reflectios not necessarily personalities but the message. their response is the economy is failing, we're all broke, so let's go for socialism, give then message, i think people think that message will not sell against backdrop of a growing economy, they need someone with a better message, they should focus that message should be better, not lack of proper messengers. kennedy: outlets need something. if donald trump is

new york. >> i am chris cuomo and welcome to prime time. breaking news a report of a second possible whistle-blower on ukraine. it's hard to know what more is needed because tonight we'll show that people put in place by this president felt what he was asking from ukraine was wrong. proof of an obvious expectation bayou crane that investigating biden would get them the relationship desired with trump. what do you say? let's get after it. >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> this breaking news is from "the new york times." a report that there could be a second potential whistle-blower on ukraine. the "times" says it's a second intel official, one who is also alarmed by president trump's dealings and may have more firsthand information about the situation. however, tonight we don't have to wait. we have the truth in front of us. it comes from the president's former special envoy to ukraine. he told congress nothing anonymous, he was there in person, he is real and bona fide. you haven't even heard the president bad mouth him and he gave

"new york times" is reporting that. back in a moment. ♪ head in now for applebee's new pasta & grill combos starting at $9.99. ♪ if you build a truck tough enough to pull this much forward... you better make sure it's smart enough to back it all up. ♪ ♪ anna, do you yes! those plans? i just wanted to show you something i've been wor... ♪ james r. and associates. anna speaking... ♪ james r. and associates. anna. ♪ [phone ringing] baker architects. this is anna baker. at northwestern mutual, this is what our version of financial planning looks like. tomorrow is important, but you're ready to bet on yourself today. find an advisor at northwesternmutual.com. my hands are everything to me. but i was diagnosed with dupuytren's contracture. and it got to the point where things i took for granted got tougher to do. thought surgery was my only option. turns out i was wrong. so when a hand specialist told me about nonsurgical treatments, it was a total game changer. like you, my hands have a lot more to do. learn more at factsonha

>> we know, according to "the new york times," and they're citing people who have been briefed on it, that there is a second whistle-blower that is weighing, considering filing an official complaint. we know that this whistle-blower has also according to the "times" spoken to the inspector general of the intelligence committee, the ic ig, in that terminology. it is unclear if an actual second report, a filed report, is necessary, to trigger an investigation. because the ic ig, already has the information from this purported second whistle-blower. this all gets down to how broad the inquiry is going to be. and when you listen to house democrat, yes they're concerned about what happened on that phone call between president trump and president zelenski but also what happened afterwards. was this phone call treated in a special way. and in the words of nancy pelosi about, a week ago, is there a coverup of the coverup? and that is why having more corroborating evidence and a potential second kpibl is important to the expanding, whistle-blower, is important to the expanding potentially inve

show more of you. >>> tonight the "new york times" is reporting new details about ideas president trump for the southern border. according to an excerpt from the new book "border wars" written by the "new york times," privately, the president had often talked about fortifying a border wall with a water-filled trench, stocked with snakes or alligators, prompting aides to seek a cost estimate. he wanted the wall electrified, with spikes on top that could pierce human flesh. his staff told him that was illegal, but later in a meeting, aides recalled he said they should shoot migrants in the legs to slow them down. that's not allowed, either, they told him. senator kamala harris is back with us. your reaction to this new reporting about trump ideas for the border. >> i'm beyond words, to be honest with you, lawrence. it is outrageous. you know, we have -- we have a person occupying the white house right now that is not only lawless, not only probably the most unpatriotic president we've ever had, we have someone who is mean and mean-spirited and is confused about what is the real measure of

tulsi gabbard, attacked by "the new york times" and cnn, joins us fo for a postdebate re. rst it's fair to say a brand-new democratic field. for the better part of a year, former vice president joe biden dominated the polls and the other candidates in the race attacked him from the left which is weird to see. biden still believed in law enforcement and international borders and he opposed forced busing along with virtually every other american, so he was august and one of those right wing extremist from the obama administration. that's what they were telling you on the debate stage. it was bizarre. thankfully that line of attack is over because joe biden's presidential campaign itself is in effect over. nobody thinks biden is going to be the democratic nominee. elizabeth warren is the front runner now. that's not contested. the race is hers to lose. so during last nights debate, arrives on the stage decided to help her do just that. lose. watch. >> your signature, senator, is to have a plan for everything. except this. >> at least bernie's being honest in saying how he's go

and he wants to suck up to the "new york times." elf popular, too, by suck up to the "new york times" telling them what they want to hear. i wasn't doing this to find evidence of collusion and i found plenty of it. they are the ones who told me don't you know what joe biden did, the ukrainians. i said no i don't know what he did. they know like the nose on their face this bribery, extortion and money laundering. one of the payments foa goes from ukraine to latvia to cyprus to little biden's bank account. that's what we call money laundering. that's the typical ukrainian pattern. so there are so many crimes that have to be investigated here. i didn't do it to get joe biden. when he came up, i said to my colleague. you know what that washington press club is going to do? they will crucify us because they will have pulled out one of our protected people. bind is protected. he's been doing this sentence the 1980s and 1990's. in the "washington post" article after article about his brother saying joe will help us. then joe biden says he d

thank you, "new york times." >> jesse: what do you think about this puff piece? dana: the "new york times" think they did her wrong. she thinks they gave the email thing too much attention, et cetera. >> juan: she thinks? how about all of us think? >> dana: this week you hads youd the last two presidential runners up for the wrong reengeg. you had bernie sanders today saying like don't say that about tulsi gabbard. we don't need to have any of that here. tulsi gabbard gets all of this additional attention and mitt romney. >> jesse: you mean what's his name? >> dana: pierre. two people spent their entire careers as the viable presidential candidate. criticized for too canned and too scripted. now you are seeing the other side of that. >> jesse: do you like this new hillary, juan? tweeting, saying sassy things? >> juan: unplugged. to get back to greg's analogy. this is her. to pick up on what dana was saying, when i look at people who lost the presidential races at mitt romney, john mccain, john mccain was back in the senate going after barack obama as i recall. mi

the "new york times" headline tonight, second official is weighing whether to blow the whistle on trump's ukraine dealings. "the new york times" reports, a second intelligence official who was alarmed by president trump's dealings is weighing whether to file his own formal whistleblower complaint and testify to congress, according to two people briefed on the matter. the official has more direct information about the events than the first whistleblower. the second official is among those interviewed by the intelligence committee inspector general to corroborate the investigations of the original whistleblower. the inspector general, michael atkinson, briefed lawmakers privately on friday about how he substantiated the whistleblower's account. it was not clear whether he told lawmakers that the second official is considering filing a complain. because the second official has met with mr. atkinson's office, it was unclear where he needs to file a complain to gain the legal protections offered to intelligence community whistleblowers. witnesses who speak with inspectors general are protected

joining us now, one of the reporters on that very "new york times" piece, justice department reporternew york times," katie benner, back with us and msnbc legal analyst and former federal prosecutor glenn k kirschner with us and katie rofie. >> this says a lot about that question of ethics. and i was justing to page two of your article, where according to rudy giuliani, he says, i really try very hard to be super ethical. >> so that is rudy giuliani's assertion. one of the interesting things here about the story, if we just take a step back, why it is very clear that the president does not trust anybody who he could where a deep stater and that seems like pretty much at the state department, which is why he empowered rudy giuliani, and put giuliani in a position where he, you know, where he has more information than a lot of the bureaucrats around him. and a lot of each the officials around him. more information about the people at the state department. and here, he may have more information about what is going on at the white house than the people at the justice department who are, y

the president literally thinks "new york times" report about adam schiff gives him an edge.oes it really? after this you can get a satisfaction guarantee. ♪ you can also wonder why our competitors don't offer that. schwab, a modern approach to wealth management. ♪ >> neil: all right, it is congressman adam schiff, when did he know it? on capitol hill with a meeting and some eyebrows raising, hey, mike. >> neil, good afternoon to you adam schiff and he responded to "the new york times" report saying "like other whistle-blowers have done before and since, the republican and democratic controlled committees, the whistle-blower contacted the committee for guidance on how to report possible wrongdoing within the jurisdiction of the intelligence community." "the new york times" said adam schiff learned about the outline of the cia officers concerns that president trump had abused his power days before the whistle-blower filed a complaint. so schiff knew about it before last week's hearing, and he also knew the trump administration to release that complaint. schiff spokesman goes o