-- >>ut she wrote how "new york times" failed in coverage of fate of european-jews in her book, buriedmes . the times publisher, buried news about the holocaust. deep within the paper, or ignored it. she writes, although the war was dominant news, it was not only front page news. "new york times" printed between 12 to 15 front page stories every day. fewer than half of these concerned war. times first story on nazi campaign appeared on page 5, on bomb of column of stories. less research, like that of. found that the times and media overall withheld or buried much of what they knew about the holocaust from american public and wrote the way that press in general, times in particular presented the facts, play a role in the gap between information and action. the they told the story of holocaust no chance of rousing public opinion. >> it goes on. it was not just the holocaust. that would be bad enough. also stalin. durante for 12 years was bureau chief in moscow, during that time, he was bureau chief when stalin was reigning in 1932. stalin ordered extermination of ukrainians, genocide, hi

during the holocaust but "new york times" in particular. ten about how the "new york times" failed in its coverage of fate of european jews from 1939 to 1942. she asked what was it about prevailing press san stards, and policies and personalities at the times. a damning disclosure, the times judgment, that murder of millions of jews was a relatively unimportant story reverberated among other journalists trying to assess the news. times publisher, intentionally buried news about the holocaust, deep within his paper or ignored it all together, and she writes: appeared on page 5. to the bottom of a column of stories. less research mound found they buried much of what they knew about the holocaust from the american public. and continues to write: a story about that possible bureaucratic snafu appears on front page, the same day last voice from the abyss was relegated to page 4 it goes on and on, it was just not holocaust but also stalin. duranty for 12 years was bureau chief in moscow, he was bureau chief what stalin was reigning and 1932 when s

but then as you mentioned, we all, we have this amazing visual investigations team at the new york times. and i essentially went to them and said, here's where this happened. here's the coordinates in the time of the strike. tell me what you can tell me. and they came back with with you. they had found footage from that day that appears to show the very striking question. they were able to pinpoint it using their own process. and it just led to sort of the immediacy of the, the reporting that you could see it. and in a lot of these images, you can see women and children are in the area before the strikes happen. i mean, it is amazing to sort of look at the, those clouds rising in the videos a lot. you know, just, you know, choreographed along with the writing as you told the story. what happened on eric, when you, when someone write a piece like this in drops, you know, essentially a journalistic bomb. as you have my, my experience is that lots of other stories begin to come in. other pieces, either that corroborate or are in conflict with the stories begin to come in and help fill out a

she's contributed to the new yorker, the "new york times" and many others. and so without further ado please join me in welcoming mike and alexis to the stage. hooks well high. >> hello. kirk's first of all congratulations for this new book. i know all of you have picked up because you are here tonight. but if i can encourage you to overspend i would recommend buying a second copy or getting it from your library

they are communicating with the "new york times."" this is a scandal of epic proportions. worried about this should hang up their journalism card and als first amendment lawyers as well. >> tucker: here's the "new york times" participating in the defense of the regime it's supposed to be covering. thank you. we are not in the habit of browbeatingri people into exercising their constitutional rights. if you are in dallas, texas, on saturday you can support the southwest airlines pilots.at at 10 a.m. there is a freedom rally at the entrance to love field. you will meet nice people.e. you can watch all of our documentaries and be certain we will be back every weeknight at 8 p.m., the show that is the enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness and group think. the great sean hannity. >> sean: welcome to "hannity." a fox news alert. day 8 of the kyle rittenhouse trial is in the books. only closing arguments remain and then the jury will deliberate. the case could be thrown out. the prosecutor's case is weak. wendy rittenhouse's kyle's mother will join us tonight. many question why this

i would like this to become a habit at the new york times. i'd like to see them continue down this path because we have known of for years from reporting on the ground from a independence social media reporting and independent investigators in these countries that this has been happening. we've known from the documents leaked in particular by a guy named daniel hale, that this was the norm, not a sort of aberration. he now been in prison as a reward for telling us this. so, you know, it is there, there is courage in the sources named an unnamed behind this story. and we need more of that courage because many, many of these stories are doubtless being covered up in part out of fear of, of going to prison for telling people what's happening in each paragraph in the story seems more and more extraordinary. one of them do accept the claim that those 60 people 3 in 4 of those killed where a quote likely come buttons. well, i'm a 100 percent convinced with the military admitting to 80 dead that those 80 dead were all human beings. ah, and people wi

finally, here are some the best selling nonfiction books this week according to the "new york times".pinge the list is a book we will not be covering on book tv andd is musician memoir the storyteller, after that to rescue the republic fox news host brett bears looks at ... s grant. ron and clint howard reflect on their acting life in hollywood and that is followed by peril the washington post, bob woodward and robert constant report on the transition between the trump and bidenlo administration. wrapping up our look at that "new york times" best selling nonfiction books is midnight in washington that's california democratic congressman adam schiff's argument the trump presidency has weakened america's institution t. that is look at this week's publishing news and the legs and nonfiction books. thanks for joining us on about books. and a reminder that about books is available as a podcast is c-span's new app, c-span now or wherever you get your podcast. ♪ ♪ weekends on cspan2 are an intellectual feast. every saturday american history tv documents america's story. on sunday book tv bri

new york times retracted the story. they moved to a different story. khater is seen spraying bear spray into the face of officer bryan sicknick. it was bear spray. it was bear spray that killed officer sicknick. revolver news found the video shows no spray coming out of the container. it's a lie. sure enough, eventually, the media admits that revolver news was right. the dc medical examiners today ruled that capitol hill police officer brian sicknick died of natural causes. officer sicknick died of natural causes. he did not die at the hands of the maga mob. and yet you still see in the mainstream media this reporting that it was a deadly mob. a murderous mob. murderous mob. the murderous mob. deadly january 6th attack on the capitol by a mob of trump supporters. they got the word deadly, from this false reporting on sicknick. it was a blood libel. and again, the national security state was operationalized on the basis of that narrative. just as non existent

and the new york times covered it. the some of the new york times accidentally did the real reporting this past weekend. not sure what happened, but i can tell you, someone's going to lose their job. bruce's, when new york times revealed that the us hidden errors strike that kill dozens of civilians in syria in 2019. but guys in is intentionally kind of a chevron, d 70. they killed 70 n as in pe paul in syria with just a few bombs. but at least our military took full accountability and let everyone know they did it. they, they sent out emails they went on late night, showed like calling in and jimmy kimmel to talk about it. top pentagon brass even did that. other car pool carry. okay. with james gordon, where they sang whole areas off k, about massacre in children. they told merge on the pentagon website like mugs and shirts and stuff. they even a beer co, he's dead, said shari about killing. they'll do this in people in syria country. we shouldn't even have been involved in, but we were because they're outside our cent

what he talked about is the lead story in the new york times. rge companies have until january 4 to require shots, the new rule applying to companies with 100 or more employees is considered to cover workers who are vaccinated. it lays out details of a plan president biden announced in september invoking emergency powers over workplace safety's -- workplace safety. -- that receive medicare and medicaid funds must ensure that all employees are vaccinated january 4 with no option for testing. the president previously imposed vaccine requirements on federal workers, a group that includes or than 4 million people and companies that have federal contracts. that is a little bit from the new york times. charlotte, north carolina, republican line. what do you want to talk about? caller: i want to talk about how things are going here in the country. we just have different ethnic groups running things, things would be that way. we just have people running everything. this is a diverse country. we need african-americans, chinese, mexican, puerto rican, what

mayukh sen: he was someone who championed her in the pages of the new york times. positioned her as america's authority on mexican cooking. he put so much praise on her cookbooks in the new york times. he did the same for another figure in mexican cooking who now reigns supreme in the american mind. some american home cooks 90 familiar with the name diana kennedy. she went to mexico and was so fascinated with the food wave of that country that she started to document them. i think her first cookbook came out in 1972. that was around the time that elena passed away. that allowed kennedy to serve the previous decade. when you look at the story, i think you can see quite clearly how american memory functions. there is usually only room for one figure when it comes to certain cuisine. especially if that cuisine is not part of continental europe. in this case, diana kennedy has the right portion of being that person for mexican cooking. host: this happened after the car crash that killed her husband. it shows her determination. she and her son started a frozen food busi

so then on february 12th, "the new york times" the weekend before the senate trial for trump's secondal, "the new york times" retracts the story, says never mind, that's not what happened to him based on anonymous accounts and so oops, and that was the extent of it. but nothing else has been retracted, just that story. >> tucker: in the meantime, his body light and stayed in the u.s. capital. >> yes it did. >> tucker: it implies no disrespect for the officer or his sad death to note that his passing was used as a political weapon by the left. >> it created so many objects right after "the new york times" published that article. so you had a procession of police cars through washington, d.c., silence throughout washington, d.c., as they are carrying his body and then of course he lied in state for two days. he was eulogized by nancy pelosi and chuck schumer. joe biden and jill biden showed up to give up their respects. you can see joe biden walking away shaking his head. he is then transported to another formal ceremony to arlington national cemetery where he's buried. so these are all

recognize the sciences achieved. >> speaking of striking the balance, how did you get to the new york times and how do you describe your politics? >> i got in "the new york times" by being fortunate of coming of age as a journalist early in the internet era. i graduated from college in 2002 and in my 20's i worked as junior editor at the atlantic magazine as my day job and then i did as one does a lot of writing on the side. i wrote some books. i wrote endless freelance essays, book reviews, all kinds of things. i had a personal blog that this was the beginning of blogging. the golden age of blogging, i guess, you can look back and say. so i was sort of there doing a lot of different kinds of works at a period when the internet was just transforming journalism and in third ways transforming it for the works in the sense that the internet very quickly, you know, weakened the position of all kinds of -- all kinds of american newspapers and my wife was a newspaper reporter, she was at the baltimore sun by the time we got married and i watched firsthand how the economic effects of the internet

is it from ford, daily new york times or fake headline? >> new york times. kennedy: it's forbes. und, to appease. carol. the great outdoors was made for white people. new york magazine, the nation for a fake headline? >> new york magazine. kennedy: you know, from the nation. okay, that's okay. >> i knew it was real. kennedy: you get two points for this, ethan, brave woman says she doesn't like underwear, is that new york magazine's slate or fake headline? >> fake headline. kennedy: no, new york magazine. you can win it all with your final headline, thete rugrats we always we are icons. is it mike.com, variety or fake headline? >> mike. kennedy: that is right and last minute, i walked off home. anthony fischer with the whole thing. another in the trashcan. party panel, thank you so much, that was great. competitive until the end. thank you all. coming up, a favorite new game, the rich and famous, the panel is wealthy back up with something crazy they bought or have done, you can play along, next. ♪♪ welcome back to our biggest usually game night special, totally brought to you. we

biden's daughter ashley.fo according to o'keefe, within an hour of the first raid last week, "the new york timesached out for comment. how did the times know about the search warrant so quickly? i don't know, it's just one of those many unanswered questions, kind of sounds like that predawn raid on roger stone, fake news cnn cameras just happened to be there at 5:00 in the morning. anyway, here to explain more, first interview, the ceo and founder of project veritas, james o'keefe, along with his attorney. welcome both of you. i think it's important to establish other media -- and i'm not comparing it to other media but other media use undercover cameras and have for many years, even 60 minutes and nbc's "to catch a predator." this is not a new form of journalism.. you acknowledge that. >> well, sean, on saturday morning, i acknowledged that but i woke up to a predawn raid. banging on my door, i went to the door to answer the door and there were ten fbi agents with a battering ram become a white blinding lights, they turned me around, handcuffed me and threw me against the hallway, partially clo

assume both of your pretty familiar with daniel ellsberg and the pentagon papers case in "the new york timesing stolen, top-secret documents a that they were publishing, they actually set a precedent in the u.s. supreme court 6-3 decision that said they have the right tt publish it even though that was stolen material. do you see similarities? >> the right to publish -- it'se entirely similar. there is no exception to mr. o'keefe and project veritas. the right to take the material,h knowing it was stolen, the righr seek comment, the right to investigate and ultimately the right to publish.. this is outrageous and unprecedented and journalist everywhere on either side -- >> sean: why a year ago, if i'm understanding correctly, why did this come up now? james? >> james, go ahead, i'm sorry, sean. >> i don't know the answer to that, sean, but this is -- they've crossed the bridge here of -- they can do this to me. these are about certain principles that are so fundamental, our first amendment in this country, i'm calling upon all journalists to take a stand against this, a source comes to us wi

that's what the "new york times" did with stalin in the 1930s and castro in the early 1960s. this tradition of lying about the left is nothing new. it has a deep lineage in places like the "new york times." it's spread. it used to be a handful of newsroom is the entire journalistic enterprise. the average american doesn't know what is going on unless they watch fox or listen to talk radio. >> they tell us they care so much more. their intentions wharmatter. -- are what matter. now it's activism. mr. speaker, thank you very much. up next tonight cost of thanksgiving will be higher than of this year thanks to joe-flation. joe biden doesn't want to hear you complain because he left for nantucket. we will discuss. stay with us. qunol is the number one cardiologist recommended form of coq10. qunol has 3 times better absorption than regular coq10. the brand i trust is qunol. - [narrator] modern life, different schedules, different meals, different times. how do you keep everyone happy? with five cooking options, the cuisinart griddler is the ultimate in versatility. it has a full gr

national atmosphere and environment, that did not contribute to many positive way as well read and new york timesey are set new york times is donald trump us, baby there is a fairness and how they should cover the presidents and some of the criticisms might be leveling at the presidents. howard: is one editorial and nobody disputes that fact that is a liberal editorial page braided so we didn't have exactly a high opinion of donald trump nonetheless, i think that i'm with molly and this one, like we need to hold all administrations accountable, not just that hard to understand. thank you and up next joe biden gets a win on if a structure but of all the chaos in the median message. this is the greatest idea you'll ever hear. okay, it's an app that compares hundreds of travel sites for hotels and cars and vacation rentals like kayak does for flights. so it's kayak. yeah, like kayak. why don't you just call it kayak. i'm calling it... canoe. compare hundreds of travel sites for thousands of trips. kayak. search one and done. with directv stream, i can get live tv and on demand... compare hundreds of

"new york times and stanford published those reports online. they are not buying.t has been the case they have been supporting saif al-islam. that's what elections mean. elections don't mean what they meant in 2011. they mean online movements that can be manipulated and social and political movements that can be manufactured. the idea that popularity is something that can be held in your pocket is a myth. it is fashioned. that's why over the last 24 hours we can see on social media a massive uptick in untraffic and things trickling down into -- just the iconography alone. nastasya: ok. >> and what he chose to wear, it wasn't like that was the only thing left in his closet. nastasya: ok, i want to bring yusuf in. we know there have been a huge amount of international involvement in libya, particularly the last few years. it is evident that saif al-islam blames the u.s. for much of what has happened since 2011. we have seen involvement from turkey, the uae, and russia. who do you think is backing saif al-islam now? is it moscow? >> i think moscow is one of the major

. >> up next it's booktv's monthly "in depth" program with author and new york times columnist ross douthat. his books include privilege, the decadent society, and most recently, "the deep places," the message wore about his 5-year struggle with lyme disease. if. >> host: new york times columnist and author ross douthat, before we get into politics and rebigs and conservativism -- religion and conservativism, etc., let's talk about your newest book, "the deep places." what happened to you in 2015? >> guest: my wife and i set out to full till a fantasy -- full till a fantasy and were appropriately punished for it. we were living in washington d.c. we had at that point two little girls. we were planning to have more kids. we lived in a very small rowhouse not that far from the capitol dome, and we were both from new england, from connecticut. our families were from the if northeast, and we had this idea of escaping from, you know, the corruptions of the beltway and the swamp and getting out of d.c. and getting back to where we'd grown up. .. with our kids, not spend all that's our time on our

"the new york times" reporter that prompted the law school to change its name. >>> thanks for joining us. this is nbc bay area news tonight. i'm raj mathai. we want to start with developing news in the east bay. a beloved politician has died. not just a politician but a guiding light really in the asian-american community across the bay area. she was hit and killed by a car. alameda county supervisor wilma khan was walking her dog when she was struck by a car crossing the street. it happened this morning at shoreline drive and grand street in alameda. our sky ranger was overhead late this afternoon. paramedics rushed khan to highland hospital where she later died. right there is the intersection she was hit by that car. the driver of the car stayed on the scene and is cooperating. it's still unclear what led to the crash. governor newsom releasing this statement. quote, we are deeply saddened by the tragic loss of wilma khan. her decades of service to the community championing health care, affordable housing and support for families touched the lives of many. our thoughts are with her

the new york times and bloomberg and stanford university, he also published those reports. you can find them online, they're not buying. so it has been the case that they have been supporting surplus . lemme and that today. that's what elections mean. elections don't mean only a serious test of public opinion as what they meant in 2011. they mean are online movements that can be manipulated in social and political sentiment that can be manipulated, manufactured the idea that popularity is something that you can hold in your hand and put in your pocket is a myth. it's something that is curated, it's wipe and, and it's fashioned. and that's what, that's why over the last 24 hours, we can see our social media end of year, a massive, massive uptick in unorganized traffic and things trickling down through civil society and to libya, trying to get traction for civil lamb and trying to push his agenda on to live in people just the iconography alone. i can also just the final asked about what he chose to were. it wasn't one that was the only thing left in his closet had a bit more

producer had he served as presidential historian for both new york post new york historical and sandinista a contributor to the new york times, the washington post, the boston globe and the author of numerous books in his most recent new york times bestseller, is american moonshine, john f. kennedy in the great space race. just before we begin i ask you please turn off your cell phones and other electronic devices and remember to keep your mask on. please note with the exception of her house photographer, we are not permitting photography this morning afraid and please join me in welcoming our guests. thank you. [applause] >> good morning, welcome bob fast, robert caro and as the added attraction, bob woodward and what an honor it is to spend some one-on-one time with you. new york historical society and will then going to open it up for questions and some were putting up cards out for about a 40 minute conversation and with trent his book, just number one in the charts, he done incredibly well and so much news going on. i would be remiss to buy did not ask him the burning question of the moment braided right out of the gate

elizabeth: we have the come-to-jesus moment from "the new york times." rk times" saying how did so much of the media get the steele dossier so wrong? even bob woodward said hillary's steele dossier was quote garbage. "the new york times" op-ed calls out the media reporting it at fact. for all of trump's many and grave sins he was victim of gigantic slander abetted by the fbi. when we read through the durham indictments, a speaking indictments, road map to the potential future charges a lot of lawyers say it looks like he might be zeroing in on the clinton campaign. what do you think? >> very well might be. there might be an allegation of corruption and conspiracy that they bring forward. look it is not against the law to lie in a political campaign. what i think they should focus their efforts on adam schiff and eric swalwell. adam schiff was the chairman of the intel committee. he would walk into the meetings. would walk out of them. i have classified information. i have seen it first-hand. the evidence is there. that was an absolute total and complete l

the new york times as identified, the task force 9. they have a lot of leeway. they can sidestep all or circumvent almost any, you know, the normal process by which ash rugs are approved. so they could order an air strike from the ground, cutting out the chain of command, and the people they said to investigate the scene of this bombing were the same. people had ordered it and they came in and they reported that it was all awful by rules of the law because most of those who would be killed had been competence. and that only a small number of civilians had died. they bulldozed the site, they bulldoze the site, all evidence is, is gone. there was no official reprimand. those nobody was, are held accountable for this. it was basically ended there. and what they argued laser death told by the way, was revised from the 50 that the initial shocked officer reported to 60, to 70 to 80. now we're hearing from the pentagon respond in response to the new york times am. and what they're saying is that this was self defense. so bombing a crowd, a crowd of mostly women and ch

. >> new york times columnist, author doses douthat. before we get to religion, politics, et cetera, let's talk about your book the deep places. >> we were planning on having more kids and lived in connecticut and our families were from the northeast and we had an idea of escaping from the corruptions of the belt way and the swamp and getting out of dc and getting back to where we have grown up and in my case especially i had this idea that we were going to live in the country, we were going to have a farm, we were going to raise chickens and spend a lot of time with our kids and not spend time on phones and computers and we put our house on the market and sold a lot more for what we expected. the dc market was crazy back then and we took the money and, you know, i like instead of doing something sensible like investing in bitcoin, you know, we plotted all in the 1970's farmhouse with 3 acres, pasture, stonewalls, basically everything that you imagine when you imagine the new england country side and unfortunately while we were in the p

it is based on the groundbreaking new york times series about legacy of slavery in united states. we will talk about the project -- it symbolized -- all that and more, coming up. welcome to democracy now!, democracynow.org, the war and peace report. i'm amy goodman. a jury in brunswick, georgia, is set to determine the fate of three white men charged with hunting down and murdering 25-year-old black jogger ahmaud arbery. lawyers for the defense made closing arguments monday. a nearly all-white panel of 12 jurors and three alternates is set to hear a rebuttal from prosecutors today before beginning deliberations. defense attorney laura hogue, who represents greg mcmichael, the former police officer, blamed arbery's own actions for his death. and she drew outrage over these comments. >> turning ahmaud arbery into a victim after the choices that he made does not reflect the reality of what brought ahmaud arbery to satilla shores. in his khaki shorts with no socks to cover his long dirty toenails. amy: hogue's comment drew audible gasps from the courtroom. ahmaud arbery's mother, wand

nikole hannah-jones cover civil rights and racial justice for the new york times magazine.creator of the 1619 project for, which she won a pulitzer prize in 2020. and the new book called the 1619 project, a new origin story. nicole, it's great to have you. on congratulations on publication. this has become such a part of the american discourse. i think to a degree that i imagine you didn't necessarily anticipate becoming quite the central axis of the national debate. i wonder if someone comes up to you and says i've heard about it, i've heard about the 1619 project, what is it? what is your summary to someone who may? what is the project? what does it mean? >> thank you for having me on. your absolutely right. i couldn't have predicted any of this. what the 1619 project does is the year 1619's the year that the first africans were sold into the colony of virginia. that marks the beginning of american slavery. what we argue in the project, which commemorated the 400th anniversary of that moment, was that slavery is so foundational to the united states that its legacy can be

blog engaged in those debate it made me seemed like a good person or national newspaper like the new york timeshire at a time when newspapers everywhere are bringing bloggers on board or figuring out how to integrate the new journalism into the old system so that was part of the story and the other part, i am a religiouse conservative and at that time's, i believe never had an explicitly religious conservative on its op-ed page and i think there is a desire from the people who ran the newspaper to add that kind of voice to the discussion so in that sense, i was sort of in the right place at the right time, large part of what you need to do to get an extraordinarily fortunate job like the one i am lucky to have the newspaper. >> in 2012 your book bad religion came out, i want to read a quote from that. the eclipse of christian belief led inevitably to the eclipse of public morality private virtual like. >> that strong stuff. i was a book i wrote about three years after i started at the times. the argument in that book, it was partially history, storytelling, a book about the decline of instituti

you wrote another piece called the big lie and was about "the new york times" book review. what was that about? >> guest: this wasn't a new story for the insiders on the book publishing world but unfortunately, it is used to most that are consumers of both's on the bestseller list. they've actually claimed that as an editorial product. for a given week it should pretty straightforwardly be the number one duck. number one best-selling book and sometimes it didn't appear at all on the list and that is one of unfortunately many, many examples, increasing numbers of examples in the media irresponsibly in my opinion. >> host: when it comes to conservative books and awards, how were they treated, pulitzer prizes, national book awards, book of the year et cetera flex. >> guest: they are largely ignored and marginalized. it's very rare that you will see a conservative book when any sort of award where there is, you know, editorial discretion and judgment as opposed to simply looking at the sales members or the quality of the work. when i say editorial discretion, i mean, when somebo

i am doing my work not from a small publication somewhere, but from "the new york times." not possible i think what powerful people to completely erase the knowledge that folks are getting. in fact, would not be seeing all of these laws being passed in millions of americans were not embracing this and wanting to learn more and really wanting to confront the truth of who we are. juan: specifically, about this resurgence in the greater attention now to antiracism occurring in corporate america, occurring any university campuses -- on university campuses, ministers and corporate leaders recently talking about diversity, equity, and inclusion. they even have a new acronym on their list. all kinds of research projects, foundation funds, plans to diversify staff, yet most of these institutions continue to pursue exploitative connections to the mass of black and brown communities around them. what is your view the pitfalls of this current type of focus that we have to be vigilant? >> ok, so if you follow me on twitter at all, you know i would never use the word "willss." it is --

the "new york times" was a liberal and has been for decades. the problem is liberals didn't have the courage in saying to the radicals we have may agree with you on a lot of these policies but you don't get to destroy individual rights and individual freedoms and freedom of the press and the ability to think broadly. you don't get to destroy that in the name of your agenda but liberals are embarrassed. they have gone along with the woke because they decide the woke have a point which is ie are the beneficiaries systems of power. i did inherit this newspaper, i am privileged so how can i a privileged white person safe to nikole hannah-jones that my standards of individual rights are correct while she's arguing those standards are merely be enshrinement of hierarchy that keeping might vanish in the first place. there is this deep level of guilt. it is linked to white guilt that has pervaded so much of our institutional life and it means there's almost a waiting and ready surrender caucus inside these institutions the woke up taking advantage of.

little bit and take us not just through your reporting for this book but also a reporter for "the new york times." how would you assess new york's public healthcare response to this pandemic? you may have some of the most of close knowledge of any reporter in the country and i think you are going to be pretty popular versus as we start to move these investigations into where things went wrong. the city report made that those of color were more likely to be working jobs where they couldn't socially isolate. there were so many people who were not able to shut themselves in at home and isolate. and then on top of that i remember talking with a doctor who also has historians in the book and talking about how he saw all these headlines in the early weeks of the pandemic that kind of blamed their racial disparities are put a spotlight on them and this was something that he had a cms since day number one of medical school and how the racial disparities played out in new york. they were not really even able to focus on protecting themselves because they were focused on trying to find shelter and where t