it was pretty cool to see the judge go after the new york times by the way, the new york times has never been held accountable in their lives. they think they're above the law. they think they're god. i think it was dean bucket the head of the new york times said we don't get religion. they think they're more powerful than the government. nothing holds. accountable but we are. this is the judge. in the case. both sides here are media organizations. the times is claiming that it has a different status as a news organization doesn't the law applies equally to all people involved. so project veritas will be deposing new york times reporters under oath on video asking them questions and releasing those deposition videos for the world to see speaking of deposition videos you might i've been deposed many times by the way, i like being deposed. you know why because i've got nothing to hide. i don't really see the names of our sources that's protected. i don't release the names of our donors. that's a first amendment, right? but everything else is pretty much fair game in a lawsuit. and by the w

this is on christmas eve the judge ruled against the "new york times" but somehow the "new york t timesuments. these are the documents written by the attorney representing me in the lawsuit against the "new anyork times". this is science fiction but it is not science fiction it is real life. the judge is saying the "new york times" are sanctioned. they should not be publishing these in turn attorney-client documents for. >> this is index number 639 to one of 2020ew project veritas versus "new york times" company. i am cognizant there are basically two bedrock principles of our republican issue here. certainly freedom of speech and freedom of press and the p attorney-client privilege to significant bedrock snow in this country would want to live without. ask very quickly pointed out we packnowledge our front there ae two fundamental bedrock principles of our republic i believe was the fashion camper. >> that would be the first time you quoted me right, thank you. >> it's pretty cool to see the judge go after the "new york times" whether the "new york t times" had never been held accounta

speaking of the new york times we have sued. w york times. nothing happens to these people.in you look at f an oral that does this. they work hard toig chapel i dot thinkship prize fighting. what isck important is we get back-up. we don't stop. this new york times lawsuit involved an article written about us. the article in september of 2020. the headline was project verita releases misleading video. this is a coordinated disinformation campaign. i don't know who the experts are. they call up a professor at stanford. it looks like evidence of voter fraud to me. there is one tape people say where is the voter fraud. you are looking at voter fraud. it's v an antidotal peace. thisat is a criminal act in indianapolis. you see a a voter give money to a voter in exchange for al ballot. that's a federal felony. okay, there is indeed fraud. obviously fraud in various places.s so, it is -- it's definitely hard w to digest. one thing they wrote is project verita making claims without evidence. hasn't made any claims. i'm showing you a vide

. >> start calling in now, here's the headline lead story on today's new york times, framework for gun safety calling it rare bipartisan deal in the sub headlines. putting together the proposal, here's the statement from the group of 27 years. families are scared and our duty to come together to get something done to help restore their sense of safety and security in their communities. our plan increases health safety and secure dangerous criminals and those adjudicated as mentally ill, can't purchase weapons. most important, our plans save lives while protecting the constitutional rights of law-abiding americans. we look over to brought bipartisan support and common sense proposal into law. as a statement from yesterday along with the statement, a breakdown of main provisions in the agreement. here's a few of them thisg. morning, funding for states to intimate crisis intervention order and so-called red flag laws. to close the so-called boyfriend who pull to ensure no domestic abuser can buy a gun if convicted of abuse against her partner. school basement the health services, there's

. >> new reporting from the new york times, one day before january 6th. the vice presidents chief of staff warned security details that the president was going to publicly turn against mike pence and put his personal security at risk. >> i hope mike is going to do the right thing. i hope so. i hope so. >> tonight, former pence aide olivia troye on confirmation of her worst fears. former impeachment manager joe neguse on why we didn't know this during the impeachment trial. and former dhs secretary jeh jeh johnson on with this means about how close we came to successful coup. then, some surprise arrests of an alleged coup plotter. >> it intercepted me getting on the plane. they put me in handcuffs. brought me here. >> and ari melber on what we know about the rest of peter navarro and what it means for the criminal investigation of the president. >> we had over 100 congressmen and senators on capitol hill ready to implement -- >> do you realize you are describing a coup? >> that's when all in starts right now. good evening from new york, i'm chris hayes. th

and then answer the question post me i think new york times versus sullivan got it. exactly right the premise of new york times were sullivan as there's the open and robust debate about those who hold and run for public office and i think in order to protect that we need a standard like new york times or sullivan that limits defamation liability. so i think on this issue you and i very much in agreement. let me try in our last minutes to get two more questions in first is how would you recommend including information about disinformation misinformation in critical thinking skills in schools, and they about high school levels and above. is it being taught? so this is kind of like here's another area where i'm not an expert. i'm not an expert on on education digital literacy, but i have read what those experts say, and it is being taught and i think it's there's a really interesting dichotomy on the basis of age right now. so older people turn out to be more likely to share false election related disinformation then young people in part because they're i think less disc

we were talking about it, we settled on the same word for what this "new york times" report reveals, york times" article in particular has detail that when you read it it's absolutely horrific. what's important, i think, is that people shouldn't look away from this. it is absolutely a devastating scene of what took place for more than an hour as the school that was under attack waited for police to respond. we still lack a lot of facts and as time goes on there are two investigations going on right now, one by the state of texas, one by the department of justice and i expect as that continues what we know will continue to involve and hopefully allow not only uvalde, texas, but police departments around the nation to update their tactics, techniques and procedures to ensure nothing like this happens again. >> what about this question of who was in charge and of chief arredondo seeming to say now that he was not in charge but what do some of the apparent communications at the time reveal about whether he thought he was? >> it certainly appears from the reporting in the "new york times"

that's according to the new york times. it's unclear if details of the conversation were relayed to pete arredondo. the new york times report breaks down other details about the response of the shooting, including frustrated agents who eventually formed a group of officers and went against orders to kill the gunman. quote, no one entity or individual seemed to have control of the scene. and quote, the person said, it was chaos. it's a failure in police communication that potentially cost lives, potentially the lives of 19 children and two teachers. the funerals of three more children were held today, including a joint service for two cousins killed in the attack. by now, local officials are refusing to answer any questions. the chief, pete arredondo, has avoided any questions from reporters. there has not been a public press conference by police or state officials about the investigation since last week. texas state senator roland gutierrez, whose district includes uvalde, says that the district attorney, the latest official

just like that and didn't go through the editorial policy, through the editors, we know that the new york timesdoes powerful investigations, the probes were published video evidence but it was and it was. the kyiv school of economics even wrote an appeal to the new york times. and they said that ukraine had already made a difficult decision to oppose the destruction of its people in the territories occupied by russia, to fight for its complete freedom and for its people, and the american whether the support lasted or not will not prevent ukraine from negotiating peace if it ever becomes possible, but it will determine whether ukraine will have everything necessary to continue the struggle for what ukraine deserves. this is what we believe and you know some now, uh, even the kyiv school of economics and some experts say that these journalists write such things, but what about people who found themselves in the occupation , we just have people who found themselves in such a situation, but this whole story, i want to turn to of our mr. specialist, this is the whole story of dispersal of treason, t

munitions will be provided to ukraine and regarding by the way, regarding the article in the new york timesation personally, but i don’t comment on the new york times after one of the journalists wrote such an andrew hammer on the pages of this publication an article about the fact that it was on the eve of a full-scale invasion of ukraine when volunteer battalions were formed, units to protect ukraine from the preparations for an invasion by the russian federation , he published an article that was devoted to because in ukraine nationalist nazi units are being formed, which threaten not so much russia as ukraine itself and its neighbors. here is such a wonderful article. by the way. these are the ones andrew kramer once injected himself with satellite 5 to tell the readers of the new york times what it really is it is an underestimated vaccine, and how good it is. well , it is also necessary to somehow filter the western press, because there is actually a lot of manipulation, it is a russian information company, it was published in the western press, because it does not exist in the ukrain

new york correspondent, pain of movie. now kayla. good to see. could you bring the latest place? sure, the new york times, which has been generally quite sympathetic to the united states and support for ukraine seems to be bringing forward some interesting information. it appear that while the key of government is demanding the more weapons. ready not providing washington with classified information and operational details about what plans to do. this is what was revealed by the new york times. how much do i really know about how ukraine is doing? can you find a person who will tell you with confidence, how many troops has ukraine last? how many pieces of equipment has ukraine last? though it appears the united states doesn't have a clear picture of what ukraine is doing with the weapons it is receiving with the funding it is receiving. and this seems to add to the ongoing concerns many have expressed with the huge amounts of money in weapons. united states is piling into ukraine. some analysts are looking at this and asking some more serious questions like this. for example, the new york times report if

the confiscated assets of the russian central bank, but as he writes the new york times in the whiteouse changed their minds, and the financial policy of the current administration is not so optimistic either among foreign investors or among their own citizens. according to polls, 72% of americans consider biden's economic course to be wrong . peak. and inflation at historical highs, the country will not be able to exit inflation - is this a problem - is it a difficulty or is it a crisis? what is it that people are facing? this is really how we just experience. now difficult time with this inflation, but president biden is doing his best biden, as his new press secretary continues to blame vladimir putin's russia at all angles. gallon. the national average is 4 dollars and 67 cents exactly a year ago. the price was less than $3 per gallon denis davydov nikolay koshkin anna lvova news from the united states the us economy may face a recession this year quarter declined, and inflation reached record levels almost half of adult americans are dissatisfied with the state of their own econ

what talked about "the new york times" about hunter's arrangements with the chinese oil companies. >>. i saw the article could be printed tomorrow and the times it's good. i think it's clear vita chance give me a call, i love you. >> tucker: i think you are clear it sounds like you knew. he's written a book about the content of the he is a columnist with "the new york times" thanks so much for coming on it seemed succumbed about bombshell given joe biden's denials. >> well it is tucker again it just puts the lie to joe biden's repeated insistence that he knew nothing about hunter's business dealings fit is intimately involved this on voice where he says to his son about us "new york times" story i think that you are clear as in your out of trouble this is at least evidence of some sort of guilty knowledge and what it shows is that they were in trouble because "the new york times" had come very close to the story of the whole biden family and his brother uncle jim biden they are involvement with this chinese energy company in a multimillion dollar partnership and settle me when the exe

the new york times chose not to. west is still interested in the production of anti-russian fakes, including on the topic of ecology, why not uh, the new york times can't write another article that ukraine, uh, has mined its, uh, maritime space in the odessa region. but these mines , they do not threaten, uh, dolphins. well, we will not see such articles with you. at least in part, a colleague of journalists excuse the fact that they raised an important topic this year. in the black sea, an increase in mortality among dolphins is indeed recorded, and thousands of individuals are not talking about a couple of hundred more animals thrown ashore than the usual phenomenon, both turkish and russian scientists studied version of the impact of hostilities. they tested one of the first on cetaceans, but found no connection. in preliminary studies, this epizootic occurs in dolphins, a disease caused by various bacteria and viruses. so far , we are finding out what kind of hostilities it is, first of all, either stunning or dis

this new york times article today, got a lot of attention and i want to go to a quote from that article if we can, and this is from members to the new york times coming to say our country was on the right track, would flagrantly depart reality, about internet announced his intent not to seek reelection and 24, right after the midterms and democrats need fresh and bold leadership for the 2024, presidential race that cannot be biden, and so it sounds like a lot of folks in the party, if you like that he should go ahead and announce that is not letting his 24th by listen to it chris coons had to say. >> is president biden running a 24 judy. >> yes he is and i will tell you, it is my understanding and let me be clear, i'm not speaking on his behalf for announcing again this become i'm just saying that as of now, is my understanding that the president intends to seek a second term. >> all right, so guy, you hear some mixed messages here in the democratic party does anybody really believe that joe biden is going to run again in 2024, do we really believe that. >> i tend to believe that he wil

so at this point, it seems the new york times is joining this echo of concern about us activities in the region. me while rush as thorn intelligence service says president zalinski has seemingly agreed to give warsaw financial power over his country. effectively handling the pos of ukraine sovereignty to parents. according to moscow, keith has provided warsaw with secret information about the financial situation and ukraine. russia had only a warrant that poland is allegedly preparing to annex parts of ukraine. historian john law cleanser says he has cannot retain its grip on power without a lifeline from its allies. ukraine is under life support. it says it's a 100 life support. it would have crumbled a long ago even before the war. i think if it hadn't lived off this like support from, from the west. and so this latest piece of information really early on the lines, the trend, it underlines the trend and it, and it throws into relief. the fact that ukraine is not an independent country. it cannot survive as an independent country. the americans are giving us mixed messages at the m

"the new york times" knew this. hunter was devastated about that.ges showing him accusing his various partners and friends of leaking to the times. he was really beside himself. then his lawyer just a couple months before comes out and re-assuring him that it's okay, the story won't be too bad. they're not going to mention joe biden with relation to cfc. there's little mention of hunter. that is the way the story panned out. and afterwards, there's another texas message from hunter thanking his lawyer saying he did an incredible job keying it to a big fat nothing. >> martha: it would be great to know the background of all that went back an forth between "the new york times" and the reporters and some of these players in what would and wouldn't be in that story and exactly how much the president knew about his son's involvement in the belton road initiative, the most aggressive program of the chinese government to infiltrate itself to countries around the world. thank you. so the biden administration is looking at new steps to counter the reversal of

the new york times is generally been quite support in the u. s. actions supporting ukraine it's demonized. russia is celebrated the relationship between us officials and the ukraine government. however, this latest article seems to indicate things between the united states and ukraine are not as cosy as you might have been led to believe. from what this latest article indicates, us officials are not receiving classified briefings and information about ukraine's upcoming military operations. ukraine is not sharing information with united states while ukraine continues to demand more weapons and funding. here's what a former senior us intelligence official had to say about us relations with the granting government. how much do i really know about how you green is doing? can you find a person who will tell you with confidence, how many troops has ukraine last? how many pieces of equipment has ukraine last? now, at this point, the united states is spending $100000000.00 her day on arming the ukraine. whether it's in terms of direct financial aid or

ahead, did the new york times make it safe to question joe biden's agent ability?hen we come back what's behind the media backlash behind bill barr and others who testify behind these hearings? ♪ (music) who said you have to starve yourself to lose weight? who said you can't do dinner? who said only this is good? and this is bad? i'm doing it my way. meet plenity. an fda -cleared clinically proven weight management aid for adults with a bmi of 25-40 when combined with diet and exercise. plenity is not a drug - it's made from naturally derived building blocks and helps you feel fuller and eat less. it is a prescription only treatment and is not for pregnant women or people allergic to its ingredients. talk to your doctor or visit myplenity.com to learn more. the. >> bill barr another wormer officials testified in the house committee probe briefly hailed by the press for the candid accounts, look out here comes the media backlash. maybe the former trump days are telling the truth now but what took them so long? >> bill barr down the block, look at all the swagger in

and then the "new york times" this is when you know it's bad. times" what should i do if i run out of tampons and they give you rather gross alternatives that i will not go into here on watters prime time. >> jesse: thank you for sparing us the details. you could say this is a new war on women. it started early with the baby formula, and now this. i mean, you saw what they did with the schools about locking down all these people and, again, it's just -- i don't see how women are going to turn around and vote for this guy, do you, after all this? >> no they're not. and it would be suburban housewife that, you know, allegedly fled president trump as he was out there saying and i remember vividly, you know, there will be $7 gas and everyone said you're crazy, that's not going to happen, president trump. well, i don't even think he could have predicted as prescient as he was that women would not be able to find feminine hygiene products or feed their children. i don't know that anyone predicted it will be this -- would be this bad but i have a predic

if this "new york times" reporting is accurate, it is remarkable. walk us through what is alleged to have happened here. >> that's right, poppy and alex, this "new york times" reporting is the story of two lawyers working for donald trump after the election, before january 6th. and these two lawyers are plotting, talking about two things, going to the supreme court, to try to block the election results and also expecting potentially rallygoers for donald trump to descend upon washington, d.c. and bring a level of intimidation into this city and potentially to the supreme court itself. i want to walk through these emails, there is a lot here. "the new york times" reports that john eastman emailed on christmas eve 2020 to other people in the trump campaign and other lawyers about the approach in court. he wrote, so the odds are not based on the legal merits, but an assessment of the justices' spines and i understand there is a heated fight under way. he then writes, for those willing to do their duty on the supreme court, we should help them by giving

>> carley: comedian bill marer accusing "new york times" of burying the assassination plot of supremeourt justice brett kavanaugh. >> the "new york times" buried this, if this had been a liberal supreme court justice someone came to kill, it would have been on the front page. they wear their bias on their sleeve and if it is not part of the narrative [bleep] it. >> todd: the author of "the gray lady," how "new york times" fabrications radically alter history join us now. ashley, how dangerous for the paper that some consider the paper of record completely dismisses story like the kavanaugh assassination attempt by kicking it off the front page strictly because kavanaugh is republican. >> ashley: it is a horrible trend and the biggest issue, we no longer trust the media we need to trust. we've lost trust in them and i'm not talking just among conservative viewers and readers, i'm talking across the board. it's become painfully obvious to everybody what is going on here. >> carley: news of this assassination report wasn't just ignored by them, it was ignored by cnn, abc others. targetin

that means abc, cbs, "the new york times" barely cover the story. from hbo's bill maher. hardly a conservative, take a look. if >> york times buried this. if this had been a liberal supreme court justice that someone came to kill them it would have been on the front page. that's what's so disappointing about "the new york times." they wear their bias on the sleeves and if it's not part of something that feeds our narrative, [bleep] it. >> sean: kayleigh mcenany and mike huckabee about to be displaced as the former best governor of arkansas as his daughter i expect will win the race handily. let me start with you, this is a big story. an assassination plot against a supreme court justice. then we've got the approval of the biden white house, jen psaki, and chuck schumer threatening on the steps of the u.s. supreme court. they seem okay with that. we are fine as long as they are peaceful. if i start giving out the addresses of liberals that i don't like and something happens, do you think i'm going to be the one that gets blamed for it? i would think

stuart: in his new york times editorial president biden says he is giving the ukrainians these new weapons so ukraine will be in the strongest position at the negotiating table, strongest possible position at the negotiating table. is the president pushing negotiations, not winning on the ground in ukraine? >> i took exception to that statement myself. i am glad you brought it up. in the past the president and his national security team for the last several weeks have been talking about feeding the russian army inside ukraine and certainly that is the objective and this statement is not that. this is having leverage against the russians so you can have a better position at the negotiating table that is not where mr. zelenskyy is coming from. he wants to destroy their army and drive it out of his territory. that is the objective he is pursuing and that is the objective we should be supporting in our public statements certainly by giving him these arms and munitions we are supporting that objective. despite the fact that that

the new york times cites similar structures that were created by the americans at one time in afghanistance, logistics and training, but not a word it is said in the material that all this eventually turned out. it is pointless, of course, that your functionality also includes the provision of military assistance to the armed forces of ukraine, in addition to this, they also have other tasks, namely, to collect the heyday of data on the military-political situation in ukraine of the ukrainian armed forces, the main russian armed forces, and they already knew this very well even before the start of the armed everyone had conflict. it is known that western military instructors assist in the training of the ukrainian military and that the service security of ukraine maintains the closest contacts with western intelligence agencies. it is worth recalling that in addition to the team with which they interact with the ukrainian general staff and administration in ukraine, there are hundreds of foreign mercenaries from dozens of countries, almost everywhere mercenarism is a criminal offense, but

former new york times, new york times reporters had written extensively on the subject at 2012 papernd the journal of interpersonal survey of more than 9,000 adolescents found that marijuana use was associated with a doubling of domestic violence in the u.s. then there is this, the nationa library of medicine, recent illicit in medical marijuana is a much higher potency and more likely to cause violent behavior . marijuana is a predictable and preventable cause of tragic violent consequences. my question tonight is why isn' there a national conversation happening right now about this? why aren't reporters doing more to demand information on the potential drug use in this case and others. illicit drugs and prescription drugs. great antidepressants have bee a problem for some young people or are we just going to pretend that joe confiscating all that gun back program is going to heal our youth. i would rather operate in the real world in that world is a lot more complicated than the anti- second amendment anti-gun activist would suggest. whenever there is a societal cultural familial,

"the new york times" reports previously undisclosed emails from trump lawyer john eastman claiming he was aware of a, quote, heated fight among supreme court justices over whether to take up a case on the 2020 election. but even more than that, the "times" reports a response from another pro-trump lawyer, quote, odds of action by the supreme court before january 6 will become more favorable if the justices start to fear that there will be wild chaos on january 6 unless they rule by then either way. this was about two weeks this email before the insurrection. the "times" says this raises questions about a link to the idea of the violence that ultimately took place. much more on this in just a moment. >>> but first cnn is learning exclusively what an adviser to former vice president mike pence will say at today's hearing which focuses on the pressure that donald trump put on pence to deny votes. retired republican federal judge j. michael let tig is expected to condemn trump for instigating a war on democracy so he could cling to power. he said had the president of the united states obe

"the new york times" buried this. a liberal supreme court justice someone came to kill it. would have been on the front page. that is what so disappointing about "the new york times." they wear their bias on their sleeves. if it is not part of something that feeds our narrative [bleep] it. >> protests in front of amy coney barrett house where they have seven children inside. >> congressman this is dangerous stuff. why isn't attorney general merrick garland upholding the law? he was told to and took an swore an oath to do? we have a group, shutdown, d.c., they're going to blockade, shut down the streets around the supreme court? >> liz, there is a federal statute on the books, 1507, that makes that illegal. often times what liberals do, they don't like a law they ignore it. that doesn't make us a rule of law nation. i can't believe i say this, i agree with bill maher. he has been increasingly right on things of late. if this had been a liberal supreme court justice like ruth bader ginsburg and her life was threatened,

in the process, creating the acclaimed “new york times” 1619 project. dad flying that flag and you talk about the duality. right. he's in mississippi, which has this track record of terrible violence against black people, but also that he loves america. nikole: i mean, my father was like generations of black people who believed that service to their country was how they could finally get treated and recognized as full citizens. people like to trot out stereotypes and statistics about black people. well, black people are overrepresented in criminal justice system. black people are overrepresented in out of wedlock births. but the one statistic that they never seem to bring out is that black people are overrepresented in service to our country, that of all racial groups, we join the military and serve in the armed forces at the highest rates. and that is what my father did, as well. and i think that's where people seem to forget, is black americans were fighting in wars to democratize other countries and then coming home and facing brutal suppression of t

here's until biden told his son after reading the new york times piece with post that it's easy to whoaccused can be called governor . just this one. i thought the article at least has been done online. times it's goingng to be proved one time is i need to clear the way if we get a chance toe recall i love i think you're clear . it sounds like, you know, miranda devine has written a book on the contents of that laptop. she's a columnist with the a new post and of courseth our friendship joins us tonight. miranda, thanks so much forh coming on .g on this seems like a bit of a bombshell given biden's denialss. >> it is, tucker . again, just puts the lie to joe biden's repeated insistence that he knew nothing about hunter'sns overseas business dealings. in fact, he was intimately involvedde in you here withoi his own voice wherece he says to his son about this new york times story, you are i think your clear as in you're out of trouble. this is youou know, at least evidence of some sort of guiltyi knowledge and what it shows is that they were in trouble because the new york times had t co

finally in the new york times on sundays. there is a full book review section where dozens of books are reviewed weekly. a recent review of who killed jane stanford the widow of leland stanford who built railroad served as california governor and founded the university that bears his name says that richard white's look into the mysterious 1905 death of jane stanford is a quote deep dive that gleefully analyzes the conflicting testimony newspaper accounts and stanford documents and points to a probable culprit. well all three of these nonfiction offerings are the type of books covered on book tv. so look for the authors in the near future on c-span 2. and a reminder you could always watch all of our author programs online at booktv.org. book tv has a monthly program called in depth. we invite one author on to talk about his or her body of work recently author and journalist. sam quiÑones joined us to talk about the opioid and drug epidemic in the united states he also talked about the legalization of drugs. here's a portion of

"the new york times" described it as a very special episode, and a jawdropping production. his a serious congressional committee or an episode of west wing? because your testimony was reviewed by a "new york times" tv critic. cassidy was cast perfectly for this role. he gave the audience exactly what they wanted to hear. a jam-packed action scene straight out of 24. i mean, the trump white house. >> when barbie -- the president said, "take me to the capital now." he said sir, we have to go back to the west wing. >> this is where the action picks up. viewer discretion is advised. >> the president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel. mr. engels grabbed his arm. mr. trump used his free hand -- motion towards his clavicle is. even the only thing missing? the reenactment. don't worry. prime time has that covered. think of no, no, no, no. [bleep] core >> jesse: see the presidential limo driving. it was tv goals, and the media loved it. articles like this saying trump lunged for an agent/january 6. excitement got the best of them. it's what hap

kahl: first of all, i think the president was pretty articulate about that today in today's new york times op-ed, so i would encourage you all, even if you are from a rival media institution to read the new york times op-ed today. i will just say this. in the first instance, the first instance, ukrainians will decide what success looks like, but we all have a vested interest, the entire free world has a vested interest in ensuring ukraine survives as a sovereign territorial democratic country. this is an assault on ukraine but also an assault on the rules-based international order. it is important that a sovereign independent democratic ukraine endures. it is important that russia pays a cost in excess to the benefits they perceive from this act of aggression. not just because aggression should be punished but we do not want vladimir putin do this again and we do not want other would-be aggressors to draw the lesson that aggression will not be met with significant costs. the military component of that is part of it. it is obviously a very important part in enabling ukraine to defend its so

this is indicated by the new york times, which also notes that its sanctions against russian states areittingly strengthening another of their strategic rivals, china, which has already gained the opportunity to purchase huge volumes of fuel from russia at reduced prices. volodymyr zelensky, by his decree, immediately dismissed six ambassadors of ukraine in georgia, iran, portugal, lebanon , tajikistan, and slovakia, the official reason is not called, but the ukrainian press indicates that if the diplomats did not pursue an insufficiently anti-russian policy, which caused zelensky’s displeasure. in addition, some of them were appointed even petro poroshenko in st. petersburg is hosting a conference on the problems of modern youth and ways to solve them. it is timed to coincide with the anniversary of the presidential platform project. russia is a country of opportunities with its help, any user can participate in socially useful activities and receive for this various promotion books, internship courses and travel more points for other 1,000 circles of the world. in one place, we show a

and in that "new york times" piece they also mentioned firefighters showed up soon after. why is this the first time we are hearing about firefighters showing up? maybe because no one released a police report yet. nothing is by the book here. was a report filed by the fire department? is there footage of the firefighters at the scene? could they have a dash cam in the engine? did they have to pull a motionless pelosi out of his wrecked porsche? "primetime" wants the truth, so we also contacted napa's fire department with these very questions. and requested all their documents and available footage. no surprise we haven't heard back yet. license almost like hunter biden smashed up his porsche because you have ever seen some people come together and cover up what happened. fancy nancy want this bottled up. the "times" actually mentioning mrs. speaker of the house swung into full crisis mode as soon as she found out about the accident. she assembled a pricy defense team hiring a crisis manager, a defense lawyer, and a p.r. exec. but nancy can afford it, you know, paul has been

inside the new york times, a look at the state of california. california state lawmakers are expected to put a state constitutional amendment on the ballot that would solicit lee protect -- explicitly protect the productive rights. the amendment would go to voters for approval as states across the country react to the sweeping supreme court decision. we will dive more into what is happening in various states but we mostly want to hear from you. what do you want in your state? what do you think the right policy is for your state? women only is who we are talking to in this first hour. (202) 748-8000 for women in the eastern and central time zones. (202) 748-8001 for women in the mountain and pacific time zones. cindy is up first out of connecticut. caller: good morning. this is so much to unpack in 10 seconds, but i really believe that the majority of the country is very torn. i do not think we should be imposing religion on other women. i believe in a woman's right to choose, but i think there needs to be some responsibility when it comes to lat