what is fascinating is that the "new york times" stopped acknowledging it. s not a single mention of the 9-11 anniversary on the front page of yesterday's paper. the paper that purports to represent new york the epicenter of the 9-11 attack. why would the "new york times" ignore 9-11? a good question. because the "new york times" and the tiny leadership class it represents now endorses the nationwide crackdown on civil rights that 9-11 made possible. they benefit from it. it's how they keep power. so 9-11 was less a trag than an opportunities. if you don't believe that watch how joe biden commemorated that anniversary yesterday -- >> it's not enough to gather and remember september 11th. those we lost more than 2 decades ago. on this day it's not about the past; it's about the future. we have an obligation. a duty and a responsibility to defend, preserve and protect our democracy. >> tucker: it's not about the past. it's about the future. this was in a speech supposed to mark the anniversary of the deaths of thousands of americans at the hands of foreign adve

the new york times reports that qanon believes quote. es having them arrested, and potentially executed on live tv. most of the new york times article this weekend, about the twin threats to democracy did not concentrate on the ninth illegitimate results of the legitimate elections. concentrated on the constitutional divide over the federal government. being actual threat to democracy. when it is working exactly as designed by the founders. by, for example given the presidency to the two most recent republican presidents after they came in second in the vote but won the electoral college. many of the democracy established in the 19 to 20 century our limits from our constitution. but, none of them. established the electoral college. because the world unanimously agrees that the electoral college capacity to design democracy makes a pollution dangerous idea. the other major threat to democracy identified by the new york times is the formula of two senators per states. which is to the protests the united states and that defies the policy vie

and that was a very deadly mix that an essence blind in the new york times as an institution. it wasn't just one or 2 reporters right after $911.00. i remember the director of the cia george kenneth calling me. i was the washington bureau chief for the new york times and on that call, enlisting my agreement that the times would not do any reporting or disclose and of intelligence sources and methods. he just tied to the washing and posts, and he kicked off the networks and everybody had agree. and the times ended up giving huge play some seriously flawed news stories that were based on for rocky defectors, who turned out to have very little information of value about the current state of affairs in iraq in 2004, the times published and editorial may a copa of sorts admitting that some of its coverage, leading up to the iraq war was not as rigorous as it should have been. it said editors who should have been challenging reporters and pressing for more skepticism, were perhaps too intent on rushing scoops into the paper. the editorial ended with a promise to continue aggressive r

what is the new york times saying? i these floodwaters. what is the new york times saying? i mean, these pictures, they make you stop - york times saying? i mean, these pictures, they make you stop and| pictures, they make you stop and look, don't they? they are obviously very different to a lot of papers that we've got over here in the uk at the moment, and i think itjust goes to show that despite us remembering the monarch and her 70 years of fantastic service, that there are real issues happening right now in the world beyond this. and once this week of national mourning comes to an end, i think it will be very interesting to see what our new pm will be doing about this. it does remind us, doesn't it, that we almost feel like we have been in a bit of news vacuum when it comes to other stories because certainly before the news broke last thursday that there were concerns about the queen's health, coverage of pakistan was much more prominent, suddenly here. so, it is interesting to get his perspective from the new york times, which of course is talking about the royal fami

and then, the week after it appeared in the new york times sunday edition to show you how crazy the new york times is, i became an editor of choice. so, the editors of the new york times repudiated their own reviewer. it just goes to show you, if any of you out here are familiar with fair haven i am probably the reject from fair haven. >> i am not sure where to go with a question after that but what i would ask is, why is writing about richard nixon's still so controversial? >> there are several reasons, the main reason is one of the reviews that i received, which was a nice review. it was not bad. it said i cannot see it, nixon was so bad and kennedy was so good. there is no way that this book that was written as well as it was written, and the arguments that are made are so reasonable. it just cannot be. and, one of the reviews i got from a syndicate in canada was, this is an important book and you ought to read it, but 60 years they have gotten it wrong, gellman it is swimming up stream. the general tenor of nixon being a despicable individual. one of the greatest things that i remem

cnn and the new york times fact-check, i like cnn and the new york times, but they're the most targeted they now have the most distrust for them on the right. the mere fact that they say it's not true is proof that it is true. fact-checking cannot be the way in which we are going to win the war on truth. we are going to need some other ways to do it. it can be voices and experts to do it. >> you mentioned school boards, that is a local election. what your book talks about is largely the larger scale elections, national, statewide. one of the things that brings fear into my soul is seeing some of those people from the mega world campaigning and winning for local school boards. they are really infiltrating our society on a ground up level. it used to be from a top down, now it's kind of on the ground up. can you speak to that or what role -- how important you think these local elections are going to become in times of this overall strategy? there's people that are just plain idiots that have no awareness of what the real issues are. they're campaigning on things that aren't even real lee

new york. -- it is a national security attorney. gentlemen, you are convening tonight. we knew would be discussing the appeal. now, we have breaking news from the new york times for eric herschmann he was clearly an important witness in this case saying you told donald trump last year about the legal imperative to return these documents and the legal jeopardy he would face if you did not return these documents. andrew weizmann, your reaction first to his news of his standing now is a witness in this case. >> lawrence that, is definitely the right thing to start with the two stories we are discussing tonight that someone to keep your eye on. in order to bring a criminal case, the key issue in any upcoming prosecution, is how is the government going to prove knowledge and intent of donald trump. you could not ask for anything better than a lawyer meeting with the person you are thinking of indicting this is what the lies, this is why you have to do it. having been a defense lawyer, this is like the world's worst news who is an upstanding lawyer. there's criminal exposure saying he had a conversation with your client advising exactly what the world requires le p

new york. take bernie carrick, former new york city police commissioner. he was pushing the voter fraud claims. i'm reading from "the new york times" here. he was doing it with giuliani who of course has been facing multiple legal problems. the subpoena to seek information about the plan to submit. quote, slates of electors pledged to mr. trump from swing states that were won by joe biden in the 2020 election. maya, i appreciate "the new york times"' clinical reference. another way to say it is massive elector fraud trying to steal the votes of the people in those state who is voted for biden. however you put it, what does it tell you that individuals like mr. carrick are now under this heat newly reported tonight? >> well, the primary thing it tells me is don't do the crime if you can't do the time. in other words, if in fact there are law violations that -- and you are part of it, you are going to get caught up in it. and i want the go back to something emily said that was so important in terms of the players, right, and giuliani holding himself as an attorney for donald trump. but also jack willencheck, the attorney in arizona and pho

it then made the sunday edition of the new york times and my sales went up three times. and then the week after it appeared in the new york times sunday edition. to show you how crazy the new york times is i became an editor's choice. so the the editors of the new york times repudiated their own reviewer. so it just goes to show you if any of you are familiar out here with fairhaven. i probably am a reject from fair haven. and i'm not sure where to go with a question after that. but i think what i would ask is. what? why is writing about richard nixon still so controversial? there are several reasons, but i think the main reason is one of the reviews that i received which was a nice review. it wasn't bad it. it said i can't see it. i mean dixon was so bad and kennedy was so good. there's no way that this book that is written as well as it is written and the arguments that are made are so reasonable. it just it just it just can't be. and one of the reviews i got from a syndicate in canada was an important book in your water read it, but 60 years they've gotten it wrong gil

thatew yo because "new york times" doesn't want you to know that the new york times wants you to believethat alex jones is morem ordiscredited in the new york times, the paper that started the iraq war by lying about weapons of mass destruction, about got a million people killed. but dow jones is worth ira he's. mental patient. no one listens to him. t so he lied about his book. what else are they lying about? you wonder? e ar are two part documentary seriess called transgressive is out. now, in the documentary, weex expose the activists who are trying to indoctrinate children with lies about biology and thee about thhis has, including castration and sterilization.e o chris rufo is one of the bestf g journalists in the country. he's beey n looking into this in great detail for quite a long time. we just spoke to him for an hour for tucker carlson today, and we asked him how gender askd ideology began to spread, even though most people think it's ridiculous. here's part of his answer. gende what's happening in schools>> wa is that the decision making ends and the elevation of authority r

new york. they moved to new jersey about the time i was born. project veritas is located in the suburbs of new york city. about 45 north of new york city. we have headquarters there. we have a few dozen journalist running the country undercover. >> what was your life like from zero to 18. >> i wrote about that my first book breakthrough. my father and grandfather were in construction and property maintenance. i helped them up until my teenage years. and then i write about some of that story. and the story of resilience in my life. i did not really everything is gonna be a journalist. i did enjoy -- i watch local news in new york. nbc four, abc seven. i read the new york times every day. 18 years old. 19 years old. i read the usa today. i just read newspapers every day for a year or two. mike was one said this. he said it best. i found things were not as they seemed. rarely as they should be. i did not know what to do with the sentiment. i did not know what it meant to me. was i going to be an actor? was i going to work and finance? was i going to

i left the new york times about six months ago, and i loved the new york times. i had 16 great years there. and before that, nine great years of the washington post. and they i mean, i loved working for great newspapers, institutional. it was a very, you know, heady and weighty and actually kind of pressure filled activity and place to work. but i also feel like i'm a new stage of my career where i am now writing about freely. but i do feel it's at a moment where the stakes higher and i am i am sort of using a new voice. and i think that try out a lot of this here. you know, unfortunately was was, you know, execute it during difficult times and also during the pandemic. and it was cold and i was between jobs and i was probably not a lot of fun to be around as my family can attest to there's a my wife shaking her in the back but again having said all that i do think it's a fun book. i hope you'll read it. i also hope you'll ask questions because i as a print reporter, much more enjoy interactive formats and sort of being able to hone in on what people are actually

the "new york times" said you killed people. >> there were no covid deaths. people caught covid. ut weekly videos to my employees. enjoy this time with your family and relax. if you get covid or anybody you care about gets covid, make me your first call. we will get you taken care of. if you need toilet paper, you will get you that. if you need food or need anything call us and we will take care of you. through covid me and my team became stronger than we have ever been. once it it was time to get back to it work -- there are companies not back to work yet. my whole team is back to work 4 weeks into the pandemic and worked straight through. >> tucker: did you lose anyone? >> we didn't lose anyone. >> tucker: you were loyal to your employees and never had staff problems? >> my employees were loyal to me for the last 20 years. when the [bleep] hit the fan i was loyal to my people. they were loyal back. we got through this thing. we threw one hell of a christmas party last year and brought kidd rock in and played for everybody. it's like it never happened here. >> tucker: you are sho

the "new york times" likes this new war, too. alls the maga movement anti-american. this is the first time the "new york times" has not defended something anti-american. and they are saying there is proof of it everywhere you look. trump is leading an assault on the institutions of american self-government and that assault implicates much of the republican party. the american left has been leading an assault on our institutions for decades. this party is hell bent on packing the court. scrapping the electoral college defunding the police, blirk ice. banning free speech online ripping away your second amendment. nuking the filibuster. the democratic party burned down cities. the summer of 2020 was much deadlier than january 6th. they tried to assassinate a supreme court justice. they are tearing down statues of thomas jefferson and renaming schools named after abe lincoln. what is this really about? it's about questioning the legitimacy of an election. that's what the whole thing is about. if questioning an election makes you a ter

if you are saying you want to destroy the washington post and the new york times didn't screw you. i am not changing my journalism to try to appease you, someone who is not interested in a public square and not interested in fact-based journalism. we spent so much time in our industry trying to appease lunatics and stead of just telling the truth. >> i will come back in a second. >> the insanity of social media is that you are attacked constantly by people who don't know what they are attacking you about. >> have you read the article? >> that should be the standard response. those people are not media critics, they are basically people looking for reasons to vent and they are finding it every day. i think what we can and should do is become more transparent about what we do. you asked how you engender trust and i think there has been too much in my career as a journalist -- too much has been shrouded in secrecy. it has been -- it has been done in a dark, back room. i think we need to be more transparent about how we do what we do, what resources are, where information comes from and

i am very happy that there are twelve hundred people working in the new york times news new york times news room. but you don't want. a situation where too elite news organizations or three or five are the gatekeepers for what news gets gone after and what news you should see and as an illustration of that i wanted to show you what happened on- halloween and twenty six and- which of. today when your time is published a story on the left. in mother jones published a story on the right. and had that that to me is a real illustration of how you want many different voices and many different perspectives. and the great news is those are starting to happen. that collage look you know mother jones is just of one of the tiles over there on the right there are now more than two hundred nonprofit news organizations all over the country i'm sure there's one where you live there are ones you know focusing on particular issues there are ones focused on particular community there are ones have to. is there when. the there are in total of two thousand people now working in nonprofit newsrooms all ove

i want to read you more from this breaking story in the "new york times." orstep of republican members of congress and senators. it also sounds like it is already on donald trump's doorstep. from the "times," "bernard kerik, a former new york city police commissioner who promoted baseless claims of voter fraud alongside his friend rudy giuliani, was issued a subpoena by prosecutors with the u.s. attorney's office in washington, d.c. his lawyer timothy parlatore said on monday. mr. parlatore said his client initially offered to grant an interview voluntarily. the subpoenas seek information in connection with the plan to submit slates of electors pledged to trump from swing states that were won by joseph biden in 2020. trump and his allies promoted the idea that competing slates of electors would justify blocking certification sf biden's electoral victory during a joint session of congress. the subpoenas also seek information into the activities of the save america political action committee, the main fund-raising conduit for trump since he left office." it so

new york. and they join me now. first, let's start with the news reported by the new york times., this has been an incremental and moving story, we now have the best sense of the scope here david. 40 subpoenas, to cell phone's taken from individuals close to trump, or mike roman. subpoena being served to bernie kerik. this seems bigger than just a focus on the super back. this seems like a big case that the federal government is making. what do you make of it? >> i think they are systematically collecting evidence. they are being aggressive as they can be. and i think they are pressuring these various trump associates to become cooperating witnesses. we see that in all of these different investigations, you know, the subpoenas that they want to come, turn over records, maybe they want some of them to testify before grand jury. you mentioned the case of christina bob, who signed that letter, saying there were no classified documents at mar-a-lago. she is now in legal jeopardy, and i think investigators in that case are eager to get her under oath, because she is a choice. she sort

you mentioned that, the d.n.a. >> they got it all. >> bill: wow, geraldo, thank you. >> dana: "new york timesmaking them livid. the word -- is the publisher keeping up with the times or chasing trends? jimmy failla has thoughts and a light blue jacket. ♪♪ businesses have to find new ways to compete in order to thrive in an ever-changing market. the right relationship with a bank who understands your industry, as well as the local markets where you do business, can help lay a solid foundation for the future. pnc provides the resources of one of the nation's largest banks and local leaders with a focus on customized insights to help your business achieve its goals. that's how we make a difference. ♪ >> tech: when you have auto glass damage... choose safelite. we can come to you and replace your windshield. >> grandkid: here you go! >> tech: wow, thank you! >> customer and grandkids: bye! >> tech: bye! don't wait, schedule now. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ people with plaque psoriasis, are rethinking the choices they make. like the shot they take. the memories they create.

they won't go. >> cheryl: major banks require employees to return to office, workers at the "new york times so. 1300 staffers pledging not to come back. this journalist tweets, the "new york times" is giving employees branded lunch box, we want respect and fair contract. i'm working from home this week along with 1300 colleagues with support from the union. to be clear, they are being asked to return three days a week issue not five days a week, three days a week. >> todd: the horror. >> carley: people are soft. what is going on with twitter? >> cheryl: elon musk may not want to go through with purchasing the company. early voting suggest the acquisition will be approved by a large margin, trying to force musk to go through with the deal, he is trying to get out of it. musk contends twitter has more spam accounts than they admit. he offered to buy for $54.20 a share, tit closed yesterday lowr than that. >> todd: they want the higher price, interesting. >> carley: you did the math in your head. thank you so much. >> carley: the august consumer price index will be released this morning as ame

last 20 years has been reviewed quite favorably and major american publications including the new york times the la times, the new yorker, the new york review books. stephen king doesn't need another prize for literature for his fame. he already has it. and with an estimated fortune of around $370000000.00, he is one of the richest writers in the world. hard to imagine. but there are fans who have read every stephen king book available will stick with the most famous kerry with stephen king's 1st novel in 1974. when he was still a teacher and living in a trailer with his wife carry is the story of a young girl who has telekinetic abilities. and she uses against all her classmates who bullied her for years and against her religious fanatic mother who wants to kill harry. it's a slaughter of a book. the book, like almost all his stories was made into a movie and made stephen king famous. wow, i know new to the sooner does the shining came out in 1977, a horror novel that gained a cult. following 3 years later in the film, adaptation by stanley kubrick, the story of jack a dry, alcoholic. like

the business investigations editor at the new york times. congratulations on the book. author of the new book servants of the . we will be right back. i wish that shaq was my real life big brother. turns out, some wishes do come true. they'll never know. and it turns out the general is a quality insurance company that's been saving people money for nearly 60 years. for a great low rate, and nearly 60 years of quality coverage- go with the general. - common percy! - yeah let's go! on a trip. book with priceline. you save more, so you can “woooo” more. - wooo. - wooo. wooooo!!!!! woohooooo!!!! w-o-o-o-o-o... yeah, feel the savings. priceline. every trip is a big deal. ♪ ♪ away suitcases come in many colors. so you can find your color. colors. choices. happiness. away. ♪ ♪ every search you make, every click you take, every move you make, every step you take, i'll be watching you. the internet doesn't have to be duckduckgo is a free all in one privacy app with a built in search engine, web browser, one click data clearing and more stop companies like google from watching yo

. >> the legislation had bipartisan support and the media most recently "the new york times" was a violationhould there be greater penalties that if you do put forward with a violation. >> i'm not big on "the new york times" in the investigation. but here is the thing. members had been working just because somebody introduces a bill it doesn't mean it becomes the law of the land. there has been discussion about it and just recently this morning the committee has been going back-and-forth refining things and talking to members what they think will work. and we believe we have a product we can bring to the floor this month. >> when the bill comes out you will see what it is and those are the discussions to go back and forth. but that's only a quarter of what we need to pass a bill regardless how bipartisan it is but the committee of jurisdiction has the administration committee with the ethics committee and next call legislating. it is women's day. >> and at this point the president and first lady are the only one so do you expect that to change if they are not able?e >> with those members who

host: the story that we show you and the viewers from "the new york times," it was because the president had read recently a different story from "the new york times" finding that there were minority communities in the south where there was literally sewage in their backyard. sewage backing up into their bathtubs. guest: well, that's right. as i said in jackson, the biggest problem financially is there sewage system. we are not even talking about that here. basically the water has just stopped quant -- stopped coming out of their taps in the quantity that they need. they cannot even get quality. but now the water is stopping and there is not enough water coming out of their taps to even flush toilets and the bigger problem in the midst of all of that is sewage. host: mark edwards, thank you very much for your time this morning. the [bell

james jake yeah, josh, it seemed to be the underlying myth in the new york itemses -- new york timest minority voters don't want policing, don't care about this issue. i find it by. i thought a lot of media with folk had figured out that have not the case. we saw the two ads, wisconsin and pennsylvania, where you have democratic candidates who made very radical comments in '20 and '21 now coming out with new messages in their ads. it's working? what do democrats need to be doing this fall? >> it is working. if republicans win back the senate majority, it's going to be because of the issue of crime, and it's going to be because of some democratic senate nominees in pennsylvania and wisconsin that ran as proponents of criminal justice reform. in the case of mandela barnes, the democrat running in wisconsin, he came out against bail after that awful, awful christmas parade attack that killed a half dozen people. he came out with that position after that happened, and given the public outcry about criminal being released on bail, a low amount of bail. so that is a huge political issue in

last 20 years has been reviewed quite favorably in major american publications, including the new york times, the yellow times the new yorker, the new york review of books. stephen king doesn't need another prize for literature for his fame. he already has it, and with an estimated fortune of around $370000000.00, he is one of the richest writers in the world. hard to imagine. but there are fans who have read every stephen king book available will stick with the most famous kerry with stephen king's 1st novel in 1974. when he was still a teacher and living in a trailer with his wife carry is the story of a young girl who has telekinetic abilities, as she uses against all her classmates, have bullied her for years. and against her religious fanatic mother who wants to kill carrie. it's a slaughter of a book. the book, like almost all his stories, was made into a movie and made stephen king famous. i knew to the sooner done the shining, came out in 1977, a horror novel that gained a cult. following 3 years later in the film, adaptation by stanley kubrick, the story of jack a dry, alcoholic. li

today 11 weeks on "the new york times" best seller list.nks for the support. >> sean: have a great show, my friend. >> pete: thank you, brother. i appreciate it. i am pete hegseth and for lauren graham and this is a special edition of "the ingraham angle." have we seen this story before? russia collusion, ukrainian phone call, alleged hush money payments to stormy daniels. never-trumpers always think they have the former president right where they want him. the aftermath of the mar-a-lago raid, it has been no different. >> let's about trumpers reaction which has been which is to throw any criticism back in the face of the doj. do you get the sense he feels like the walls are closing in? >> i think he is very worried. i don't think he'll admit it. i think for the first time things are really -- i'm going to say the walls are closing in. >> pete: yes, the oft repeated, never realized walls that are closing in. like the knives are out. it isn't just the resistance folks playing into this. but also biden's doj. in last night's close to midnight

heard of michelle coddle, i was tempted to let it stay that way, but i can't, she is a liberal "new york times, she is upset this wives of republican candidates are appears in television ads for their husbands, she wrote about it in a high-minded pe piece, that use gag and spare me, she rights for "new york times," kacie desantis would appear in a ad for her husband ron desantis, michelle referred to ron desantis as authoritarian and trump's, i wonder how many times coddle has met desantis. strange, she who does not ron feels empowered in use code words for fascism to describe him. but god forbid kacie desantis say a word about her man she has been married it over for a decade and has three children work it isn't change people who don't know the candidate and never met that candidate can gave their opinion but those who do, cannot. >> do you know last republican presidential candidate that paper endorsed. think hard it was a long time ago like half a century ago. is >> not ronald reagan much not even three presidents who won new york. nope. general is eisenhower the last republican worthy of y

>> right, it's really important new reporting from my colleague in the new york times tonight. the fact eric herschmann warned donald trump personally he could face legal exposure if he continued to keep these documents at mar-a-lago, particularly the classified documents, but really that all of them had to be returned, and the fact he kept them there, for months and months after repeated requests, a subpoena, and eventually a search warrant, and they were both non classified and classified information that should have been returned to the national archives it really does get to the fact donald trump either knew or should have known he should have returned these documents, and that is what prosecutors, the justice department, we'll be looking at i think it's important new evidence we do know there has been a grand jury subpoena for eric herschmann in the january six investigation, so it would not surprise me at all, given this reporting, if there is also, if the prosecutors also want to talk to him about the mar-a-lago search now. o talk to him about th >> claire mccaskill, you

katie vetere is a pulitzer prize-winning reporter for the new york times covering department of justicee, there's some breaking news from your colleagues in the new york times i want to get to in a second. first, there is huge movement between the last time the committee got together and we are now thinking it will probably be next week and now in terms of what has happened on the department of justice's side. back in the summer, the department of justice, the committee was the only game in town, the department of justice was pretty silent, there was criticism, merrick garland had to testily knock that back a little bit. we're doing our thing and leave us alone. since then, we've had multiple high-level officials going in front of the grand jury, multiple subpoenas, to 40 people in trump's orbit. it's just a different world right now in terms of the maturity of the department of justice investigation. how and what does your reporting say in terms of where it is? >> in terms of the department of justice, we have reported that there are two parallel investigations, one is into the documen

but we begin our discussion tonight with the new york times breaking news about the 40 subpoenas hitting trump associates. joining us now is katie benner, she's a justice department reporter for new york times, and an msnbc contributor. katie, what else can you tell us about what you're finding in this reporting? >> sure, well first of all, thank you for having me. second of all, i want to clarify, i'm not one of the byline on the story, i just don't want that to be an accurate, but thank you for including me. i can tell you tonight, that whether justice department is done is sent out a blanket of subpoenas for requests for information for a number of trump's associates. related to a couple of different investigative threads that we know the justice department has been pursuing. including, a look at the effort to have the slates of electors was legal, and funding around the postelection efforts to discredit the result of the election. i think one of the most interesting things about this is that it really speaks to the strategy of the justice department this point, which is to try to obt

in any event, the new york times praised my appointment. two weeks later, the new york times called on me to resign. in those two weeks, i had not done much bad. in fact, i had done nothing at all. but the political view changed, the spin cycle inside the clinton propaganda machine, and i am not being political here, this is just reality and history. this comes back to who is the team -- i see some people here who might be as old as i am who remember something called watergate. one of the heroes, a truth seeker of watergate was sam dash. sam had been successful a distant -- assistant pa in philadelphia. i knew sam well. sam comes to my office and says, ken, you are being pilloried because of your republican credentials. i said, i have noticed that. he said, i am not a republican. he was a well-known and prominent democrat. he said, you should consider retaining your evidence counsel. there was a check and balance. that was something i had not expected to have to do, but as we geared up, the final thing i will say for the trial, it turned out

suzanne craig, new york times investigative reporter, it's really good to have you on set like nights. i really appreciate your time. thank you for being here. we have more ahead this hour. coming up next, i will talk with kurt anderson, the former magazine editor who covered donald trump back in his new york city real estate mogul days. and later, kim schneider, an expert on authoritarianism joins us to discuss flattering putin's major escalation of the war in ukraine. stay with us. ♪ ♪ ♪ your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire woman tc: my a1c stayed here, it needed to be here. doctor tc: ruby's a1c is down matchinwith rybelsus®.ription. man tc: my a1c wasn't at goal, now i'm down with rybelsus®. son tc: mom's a1c is down with rybelsus®. song: a1c down with rybelsus® anncr vo: in a clinical study, once-daily rybelsus® significantly lowered a1c better than the leading branded pill. anncr vo: rybelsus® i

two of the people that are mentioned in "the new york times" report walking out of that courtroom areat were with hershman trying to block him. "the new york times" report says he said to them, if you get a court order to block me, then they wouldn't testify. then there is this tanned liesing end to "the new york times" story. his testimony has been delayed. i think that's the most likely that we're in the realm of speculation. >> how do you like the privilege claims on this? >> i think it's pretty clear that they'd be dead in the water in the d.c. circuit. there is a d.c. circuit court of appeals decision that is so squarely on point and it says can you not assert executive privilege when you have a grand jury calling for your testimony. in fact, in that case, it was an incumbent deputy white house counsel. more so there would have been interests on the side of executive privilege for the incumbent white house counsel. here we have a former white house lawyer and the incumbent president has waived executive privilege for the january 6 inquiry. of so it's really remarkable. it's almos