what was your role at the new york times? my role at the times eventually was i was a staff writer, and i was also the editor of the daily staff critics there. so there were three people. and then eventually, actually for who were book critics full time critics for the times, whose reviews appeared then in the art section, the paper, not the sunday book review, and so i would worked closely with them and edited their reviews. well, a lot of new york times reporters write books as well. washington post reporters as well. what's it like to review, you know, a co-worker's book? you know, on the one hand, it's it's delish. it in a personal way, but in a professional, you just do the job, which is to make sure that, you know, you're assigning the books that are important. but post reporters are writing their and times reporters but that you make sure that you're getting a reviewer who is going to be fair like any other review so who doesn't know the person doesn't have you know hasn't expressed strong invective against them in the

reports corroborates with the findings by the new york times by the russian official. has there been any response from key as the senior advisor to ukraine's presidential chief of staff told the new york times that key of has nothing to do with it. but he also said that during war time, any kind of murder should have some practical significance. and according to mr. paul, the lack someone like do not was in a tactical or a strategic target for ukraine. we have other targets on the territory of ukraine. i mean, collaboration is and representatives of the russian command who might have value for members of our special services working in this program, but certainly not do enough. right now, key of is enormously dependent on all kinds of media support from all kinds of support from the west. and that includes media support, whether this is a signal that new york times report, whether it's a signal for the administration of or demarus lensky. we don't know, but it could be i'm surprised that the new york times hasn't come under criticism for even publishing this article ali

maya king, politics reporter covering the south for the new york times. t reporting, maya king, that thanks for your time tonight. >> thank you. >> still ahead here tonight, a new chapter in the shameless republican political stunt involving vulnerable migrants. we have new reporting directly from the front lines. that's coming up next. stay with us. (vo) you can be well-dressed. (man) wahoooo! (vo) you can be well-groomed. or even well-spoken. (man) ooooooo. (vo) but there's just something about being well-adventured. (man) wahoooooo! (vo) adventure on a deeper level. discover more in the subaru forester wilderness. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. subaru is the national park foundation's largest corporate donor. >> my fellow new yorkers. we are in a crisis situation. new york city now has more than 61,000 people in our shelter system. that includes thousands of new yorkers experiencing homelessness and thousands of asylum seekers who have been bussed in over the past few months from other parts of the country. this is a humanitarian crisis that star

that was "the new york times." of people who agree on anything. >> they've been saying trump is the biggest threat. it's ended up being them. i get thousands of text messages for "jesse watters primetime." they come in, we read them, don't let them affect the show. we get, i never want to see that guest on your show again," mostly piers morgan, and i don't don't ban piers morgan from "primetime." if we had listened to the guy that wrote the op-ed, we would have saved lives, billions in dollars of property damage after those riots raged throughout the entire country all summer. they mobilized the national guard to get rid of, like, 50 migrants, but don't want to mobilize the guard to save our cities. they fired the guy that put out on open sa op-ed about how to se riots, and endorsed a presidential ticket bailing out rioters. the people fell for the russia hoax. those reporters are still inside the building, but this guy who ran on op-ed is out the door. it doesn't make sense. >> he's pretty mad about it. he said he

that is where the new york times is these days. really made me think, exposed the story, the weakness at the heart of the new york times. come back home soon. here we go with new fox polls. ashley is with us. how much of a concern is education for voters this november? ashley: education is becoming a bigger issue, with 8 in 10 parents concerned about what is being taught in school, most parents especially republicans think there are problems in the school system including book banning by school boards, parents not having enough say, too much focus on race and transgender policies, the new survey finds what is taught in schools ranks fifth among voters with 72% confirmed, inflation 89%, crime ranked higher, political divisions ranking 74% more russia coming in at number 5 with 73% but among democrats, all the way down in tenth place among the key issues, climate change and abortion policy at the top of the democrats list of concerns. stuart: thanks. the rollout of president biden's student loan forgiveness website facing problems. g

called inside the identity crisis at the "new york times." trying to figure out what does the "new york times" want to be going forward. >> brian: when it grows up. >> steve: they bought wordle the word game we play every morning on the show and they bought the athletic or tech company or news company or what? he writes there are two defining mommy's in the recent history. one was the 1619 project and the other was when the "new york times" op-ed page ran the tom cotton editorial calling for the military to be brought in during the george floyd riots and looting. >> brian: which is what donald trump wanted to do too by the way. would. >> rachel: no, no. you go go ahead. >> brian: tom cotton writes this column and came on the next day. the editor who wrote this column says i quit. go ahead. james bennett decides i'm going to quit but he was outraged that a.g. soles berger, the owner of the newspaper did not stand up for him and he just says that nobody did. and he said the "new york times" has got to decide whether they are going to be just fo

we have breaking news tonight on top of breaking news about herschel walker, the new york times revealed tonight that the woman who said herschel walker made her pregnant and paid for her abortion has now also documented for the new york times a second pregnancy that herschel walker asked her to abort. she refused, that child is now ten years old. after that story broke in the new york times, the daily beast, which did their first reporting on herschel walker paid for her abortion, released these text between the woman who first had an abortion for herschel walker, and then had a baby the next time herschel walker got her pregnant. and, herschel walker's current wife. here are those texts. did you know herschel pay for my abortion the first time? or that he told me it wasn't the right time to have the baby that she did have. this makes me incredibly sad is the reply from herschel walker's wife. herschel walker's current wife does not say anything about the abortion. she says this makes me incredibly sad, you know i have continually try to bridge a better relationship between you and hers

hunt, it appears the new york times has now abbreviated that quote. and they are not the 1st time the new york times has painted colonial gallows all over india coverage in 2014. after the big launch of miles orbital mission. it published a cartoon featuring an indian man wearing a line cloth and dragging the cow one knocking on the door of the leak press club with white men reading newspapers inside the newspaper. apologize them. and now again, how often do you hear people talking about it or pronouncing it in fact, look at the media coverage. what does the media cover? what does the media not cover? not cindy, all the external affairs minister in washington dropping to bombs on the american press on the policy makers getting the message across loud and clear. you know, what united kingdom actually was a better country. they had rob rob in millions of dollars, they had left the country with the 3 d, b from the 7, the global g, d p, which was a bought from that they had created the systems of the creation mostly lead. so they basically left the country

"new york times." we talked about the history of "new york times," "new york times" supports this thing. they are behind the 1619 project, "new york times" lied to american people on behalf of joseph stalin. and new york times covered up holocaust, and lied about third reich, they were asked to by roosevelt and owners of newspaper were concerned that people would be critical of new york times. and so it has chief correspondent and berlin, a man who sympathized with th the nazis, ne "new york times" brought us castro. they breathed life into his revolution. the people of cuba have suffered since, and "new york times" caught time again with hires sea anti-semitism. let's look at democrat party's history. was party of confederacy. president of confederacy jefferson davis was a democrat, generals were democrats, the kkk was spawned out of confederacy and embraced by democrat party, to oppose reconciliation and that is what they did. took a republican president, grant to send u.s. army to 29 thewipe che them

the famed new york times, trump whisper, she sometimes called. utt. it's called, confidence now. and it's out this week. and it to reveal something info that might have been useful to knows a long time ago. like how, donald trump may have stolen government documents. he may have stolen the government documents when he left office in january of 2021. this is from the epilogue of confidence man. he demurred when i asked if he had taken any documents of nodes upon departing the white house. nothing of great urgency, no. he said. before mentioning the letters that kim jong-un had sent him, which he showed off to so many oval office visitors that advisers were concerned he was being careless with sensitive material. you are able to take those with? you i asked. he kept talking. seeming to have registered might surprise and said. no i think that's in the archives. but most of it is in the archives. but the kim john and letters. we have incredible things. it seems kind of important now. that conversation of hers with trump almost a year before the fbi se

maya king, politics reporter covering the south for the new york times. t reporting, maya king, that thanks for your time tonight. >> thank you. >> still ahead here tonight, a new chapter in the shameless republican political stunt involving vulnerable migrants. we have new reporting directly from the front lines. that's coming up next. stay with us. with us imagine having to use the wrong tool at your job. (upbeat music) - let's get into the numbers. - why would a company do that? especially with hr and payroll software. with paycom, employees enter and manage their own hr data in a single, easy-to-use software. visit paycom.com and schedule a demo today. ♪♪ here goes nothing. hey greg. um...hello? it's me, your heart! really? yes! recording an ekg in 30 seconds. tada! wow that was fast! good news, pal. i'm not detecting any of the six most common arrhythmias. what next? let's get some fresh air. been cooped up for too long. yeah... ♪♪ get kardia mobile card at kardia.com or amazon. >> my fellow new yorkers. we are in a crisis situation. new york city now

and the new york times a senior advisor to ukraine's presidential chief of staff told the new york times that key of had nothing to do with the killing. and he also said that in the times of war, any murder should have some kind of practical significance. and according to mr. paul, the lack someone like do get out. wasn't a tactical or strategic target for you. great. we have other targets on the territory of ukraine. i mean, collaboration is some representatives of the russian command who might have value from members of our special services working on this program. but certainly not do gonna right now. key of is enormously depended on all kinds of support by the u. s. including media support. whether this report in the new york times was some kind of signal to mr. zalinski, the president of ukraine and his administration. we don't know, but it could be, oh, okay, i've says this is herman to hunt down any one it believes to have collaborated with russia. british tabloids, the daily mail has published an article about the apparent extrajudicial killings by ukraine who are poor side. se f

and then, the week after it appeared in the new york times sunday edition to show you how crazy the new york times is, i became an editor of choice. so, the editors of the new york times repudiated their owner of your. it just goes to show you, if any of you out here are familiar with fair haven i am probably the reject from fair haven. >> i am not sure where to go with a question after that but what i would ask is, why is writing about richard nixon's still so controversial? >> there are several reasons, the main reason is one of the reviews that i received, which was a nice review. it was not bad. it said i cannot see it, nixon was so bad and kennedy was so good. there is no way that this book that was written as well as it was written, and the arguments that are made are so reasonable. it just cannot be. and, one of the reviews i got from a syndicate in canada was, this is an important book and you ought to read it, but 60 years they have gotten it wrong, gellman it is swimming up street. the general tenor of nixon being a despicable individual. one of the greatest things that i reme

maya king, politics reporter covering the south for the new york times. that thanks for your time tonight. >> thank you. >> still ahead here tonight, a new chapter in the shameless republican political stunt involving vulnerable migrants. we have new reporting directly from the front lines. that's coming up next. stay with us. ♪ ♪ this is the moment. for a treatment for moderate-to-severe eczema. cibinqo — fda approved. 100% steroid free. not an injection, cibinqo is a once-daily pill for adults who didn't respond to previous treatments. and cibinqo helps provide clearer skin and less itch. cibinqo can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb. before and during treatment, your doctor should check for infections and do blood tests. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b or c, have flu-like symptoms, or are prone to infections. do not take with medicines that prevent blood clots. serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma, lung, skin and other cancers, serious heart-related events, and blood clots can happen. people 50 and older with heart

sort of the founder of wikileaks because, you know, all journalists, certainly including "the new york times the same sort of balancing act all the time. we write stories all the time that people would rather not have us write and that cause people no end of grief and trouble and sometimes, you know, ends up with them in jail, and that's the nature of, you know, sort of informing the public about important things. certainly though, julian assange drew the line in many instances in a different place than we would've drawn it, and sometimes he argued there was no line. michae ineasing, assanghimself was becong a storyis collabators could not ignore michae scott: at some point, you know, we wrote a "new york times magazine" story about assange that talked about his dirty socks, and he took great offense, and, you know, and that did capture the tension in the relationship because, on the one hand, he was a very significant figure in the news and a very colorful figure in the news, and if you describedim in a sort of direct and honest way, you know, the result was not always pretty. alan: i mean,

in all of that time no other major news organization in this country has bothered to follow up. the new york times never interviewed tony as part of the investigation into the biden family business deals, which is strange because he was a partner with the biden family. but neither has the washington post. neither have the other television networks. they have ignored it. the fbi, whose job it is to enforce federal law, did take a lengthy statement from tony bobulinski back in 2020 and during that conversation he outlined several felonies the biden girl s had committed. he saw it. he provided extensive documentation to prove that it happened. the agency spoke to seemed shocked and they promised to get back to tony for a follow-up interview. but they never did. the fbi never called tony bobulinski again. no one was ever indicted for these crimes. the investigation into them was squelched. to this date the fbi continues to suppress evidence, proof that the most powerful family in the country has committed crimes against the united states. that is the definition of corruption. it is unacceptable.

new york. dad is from buffalo, new york. they moved to new jersey the time i was born. project veritas is located in westchester county, new york 45 minutes north of new york city. we have a few dozen journalists roaming the country undercover. >> was your life like zero to 18? >> are right about that in my first book. my father and grandfather were in construction and property maintenance and i help them up until my teenage years. i write about some of that story and the story of resilience in my life. i didn't ever think i was going to be a journalist, but i watched local news in new york fox five nbc four abc seven. i read the new york times every day. i read newspapers every day for a year or two. i found mike wallace once said this. he said it best. things were not as they seemed and rarely as they should be. i didn't know what to do with that sentiment. i didn't know what that meant to meet. was i going to be an actor? work in finance? work with my dad? i wanted to do something about that. things were not portrayed accurately. as a student at rutgers, i became a co

particularly cnn new york times. nd i like the new york times, but they're the most targeted news organization, trump targeted the most and have the most distrust of them on the right, but the mere fact that they say it's not true that it is true. so fact checking can't be the way in which we're going to win the war on truth. there are other ways to do it and there can be voices and experts to do it. >> you mentioned school boards and a local election and your book talks about is largely the largest elections and national and statewide, but one of the things that brings fear to my soul, seeing some of the people from maga world, infiltrating our society like from the ground up, and it used to be from the top down and now from the ground up. can you speak to that or what role do you-- how important do you think that these local elections are going to become in terms of overall strategy because there are people that are just plain idiots that have no awareness what the real issues are and campaigning on things that aren

colleague said, let's check with senator schumer before we run it. >> he never ran it in "the new york timeshocking and i agree with katrina on this and you said it too, kayleigh that the way conservatives have been treated in legacy media because that's what new york times is, it does not shock me. it should not shock anybody. what it should do is point to the issue that they are not doing their job. their job is to make sure anything on the right side of speech and anything on the left side of the speech that's protected speech and not hate speech is the speech that we all speak and it is protected by the constitution. these are not threats. these are not things of hate speech. that should be the line of delineation for what makes it in the the paper or coverage. anything else is political opinion. yep. >> let's be clear about that. they're not being paid a little extra carbon the side not to run something by senator tim scott, if they are, we got bigger problems. it is most likely political. there is no room for that. there is no room for that for the journalism we say we need. if we want

it then made the sunday edition of the new york times and my sales went up three times. and then the week after it appeared in the new york times sunday edition. to show you how crazy the new york times is i became an editor's choice. so the the editors of the new york times repudiated their own reviewer. so it just goes to show you if any of you are familiar out here with fairhaven. i probably am a reject from fair haven. and i'm not sure where to go with a question after that. but i think what i would ask is. what? why is writing about richard nixon still so controversial? there are several reasons, but i think the main reason is one of the reviews that i received which was a nice review. it wasn't bad it. it said i can't see it. i mean dixon was so bad and kennedy was so good. there's no way that this book that is written as well as it is written and the arguments that are made are so reasonable. it just it just it just can't be. and one of the reviews i got from a syndicate in canada was an important book in your water read it, but 60 years they've gotten it wrong gil

you are a propagandist for the new york times. again, listening to you and reading other individuals from the new york times has convinced me that you are a paper that has very little if any credibility whatsoever. host: go ahead. guest: i am proud to work for the new york times. i think it is one of the best if not the best daily newspapers in the world. adding the value of what we do is going to people entering things like this and tell you our process. i am not saying things based off of conjecture but saying things based off of going to people and talking to them directly. i believe in the process and translating that accurately. i do not believe in calibrating between a middle point. i believe in being honest and fair and that is what i have done. bring our show we try to talk to democrats and republicans. talk to trump supporters and progressives and people across party lines to create a level of clarity and do that work. i understand people can be upset with that and i respect people's minces with the newer times and be indi

hi, it appears the new york times has now abbreviated that quote. and this is not the 1st time the new york times has painted colonial gallows all over its indian coverage in 2014. after the big launch of miles orbital mission. it published a garden featuring an indian man wearing a line cloth and dragging the cow while knocking on the door of the leak press club with white men reading newspapers inside the newspaper. apologize then, and now again, how often do you hear people talking about it or pronouncing it in fact, look at the media coverage. what does the media cover? what does the media not cover? not cindy, all of external affairs minister in washington dropping to bombs on the american press on the policy makers getting the message across loud and clear. the biden administration has introduced a new series of sanctions against iran in an effort to curtail rainy and oil from reaching energy hungry world markets. so long as the iran refuses a mutual return to the full implementation of the joint comprehensive plan of action, the united states

let's look at how the new york times previews the hearing that will happen at 1:00 p.m. eastern. the new york times article headline says "house of january 6 panel plans a sweeping summation of its case against trump." i will read a little bit of the article. the new york times writes "the house committee investigating the jan six attack is planning thursday to present a sweeping summation of its case against former president donald j. trump , at what could be its final public hearing seeking to reveal new evidence about mr. trump's state of mind and his central role in the effort to overturn the 2020 election." armed with a new witness interviews and unreleased footage of the violence of january 6, 2020 one, the panel plans to argue that mr. trump lies about widespread voter fraud inspired far right extremists and election deniers that present a continuing threat to american democracy. 25% of americans said the house investigation of the event that the u.s. capitol helped strengthen american democracy while 34% said it helped weekend democracy. another 35% feel the investigation

was this article in the new york times. surprising indeed. wow. the new york times decided to point the finger at ukraine, which is quite astonishing because these days, whenever key of does something wrong, the western media either appears to turn a blind eye to it or decides to whitewash key of anxious, sorry actions. but in that report, you also find some crucial lines about american officials. it's claimed that they weren't involved in this whatsoever. american officials said they were not aware of the operation ahead of time and would have opposed the killing had they been consulted. afterward, american officials admonished ukrainian officials over the assassination they set. did you just hear how that sounded? it seems like it's now only natural, but key of should act on washington's orders. concept that is perfectly fine and it didn't surprise anyone any more. anyway, back to the murder, the victims car exploded on the outskirts of moscow in august study. do you know who was the daughter of prominent anti western author and political comment

but the "new york times/sienna poll," economy, not abortion that matters. york times" is saying that? >> 100%. families are much more concerned about being able to feed their kids this winter than frankly kill their kids. abortion is not nearly as big of a concern as inflation and the dramatic rise in the cost of living. what is really getting scary now energy going into the winter. when you look at diesel stockpiles, for example, especially at the commercial level, how low they are. these are historically scary numbers we're talking about right now. we have and energy crisis on our hands. elizabeth: we also have this, independent female swing voters to your point in "the new york times" poll are now going swinging towards the gop. it is 18 percentage point margin into the midterms. we've talked about it. recessions have tripped up next son, ford, carter, george hw. watch morgan stanley's jamie gorman on inflation. he says it is not transitory. look at top democrat warnock and you watch the white house on this. watch your reaction, ej. >> money is a bit too

and then, the week after it appeared in the new york times sunday edition to show you how crazy the new york times is, i became an editor of choice. so, the editors of the new york times repudiated their owner of your. it just goes to show you, if any of you out here are familiar with fair haven i am probably the reject from fair haven. >> i am not sure where to go with a question after that but what i would ask is, why is writing about richard nixon's still so controversial? >> there are several reasons, the main reason is one of the reviews that i received, which was a nice review. it was not bad. it said i cannot see it, nixon was so bad and kennedy was so good. there is no way that this book that was written as well as it was written, and the arguments that are made are so reasonable. it just cannot be. and, one of the reviews i got from a syndicate in canada was, this is an important book and you ought to read it, but 60 years they have gotten it wrong, gellman it is swimming up street. the general tenor of nixon being a despicable individual. one of the greatest things that i reme

linda is a journalism professor at the city university of, new york and a contributing writer at the new times magazine, where she covers the intersection of race health. she has also served as executive editor at and as a science editor at, the new york times. her article on, maternal and infant mortality, was a finalist for the national magazine award. and she is a contributor to the 1619 project. so welcome to. and we are really, really, really glad to have you here. i want to bring van back. and while we were doing that, i'm going to turn it over to empty, anderson, as i said, marc is the director of development and communications at the feminist women's health center, the feminist women's health center is a reproductive health and justice organization. they provide direct services, including care, and they provide education, advocacy and leadership development, opportunity. they also build movements, people across all axes of oppression so that we have the right resources, respect to make empowered, informed decisions about our own bodies and health. you can learn more about their work at

i'm an investigative reporter for the new york times. i don't want to be quoted, period. understood. before 2017 u. s. movie mogul harvey weinstein. was one of hollywood most influential figures for the investigative new york times article actress ashley judd and other women went on the record for the 1st time about the harassment and abuse they had endured . the article was a turning point. numerous female hollywood stars subsequently denounced systemic sexual abuse in the film business. but our disney, what that means, it's important that we all talk and support each other, and the people understand that it's wrong. because many men didn't even understand that it was wrong in the i get more and more women in the industry showed solidarity as here and can. in 2018 or 82 filmmakers and actresses made a statement against silence in 2020 harvey weinstein was found guilty and sentenced to 23 years in prison in new york, among other felonies for rape. now he's on trial in los angeles for more sexual assault allegations. the me to movement, which has been ongoing since the scan

>> the new york times does credible journalism. they do really -- does incredible journalism. huge stories they broke. they do great stuff. i picked the times and facebook because they are by far the most influential parts of their respective elements. facebook is by far the most important social media company, the new york times is by far the most influential traditional media organization in the country. and they are way more influential than they have probably ever been because there is so much less competition now. and i think the criticism of the new york times and every answer to the larger traditional media is really that this is not a both sides issue. democracy is at stake here. we cannot have a political conversation where we treat them across trying to run on kitchen table issues the same as republicans trying to steal elections. press is not an unbiased entity. they have biases, they have things they advocate for. we know the press cares passionately about how many questions joe biden answers every week. like, that seems trite and annoying compared to a lot of thing