drew the line at dealing with information that was not handed to us through official channels, newspaaerse press releases. >> ssith: it would be a small paper. >> keller: that's thee3 reality. the pentagon documents too, but i ddn't think too many people think they were not a momentous contribution to the national conversation. i think the wikileaks documents have done, done that too, not only in the united states, but in a lot of countries wheee the &-tangible.been perhaps more >> smith: right.3 >> keller: tunisia, for example. so no, i -- you know, e are in a business that agonizzs over our ethics, rightty ss, on every occasion. anddwe've talked about it a lot in this case, but i don't -- i don't feel a sense that we did something wrong. >> smith: another thing that happened -- we have a ew minutes left and i want to ask you about ttis, that happened in yourrtenure is you created the public editor's osiiion, which is basically a proctological exammnation of the times' processes and ultimately, it's like the most extraordinary self examination. about that? i read those columns occasional