this protest the issuance to nextg inc. for a wireless box permit. >> good evening. i'm the appellant. this is similar to the previous case. they installed this visually intrusive device. this is approximately 100 feet from my residence. they accepted jurisdiction at the january 12th hearing. three equipment boxes were attached to the polls. the antenna was affixed to the top. the fiber-optic line now goes into the facility and steps were added. as i expect breast in the previous item, nextg rushed to do this before the avalos legislation passed. the planning department was overwhelmed with the sheer volume of applications. a result -- as a result, the facility violets any regulations governing the placement of wireless devices. this does not meet the regulations established by the public utilities commission public order 95. for either or both of these pieces, they should be revoked. the most salient reasons is in proper review by the planning department that resulted in the placement of the wireless facilities adjacent to an architecturally -- building. the applica