i'm nick foster with the planning department staff. also before the board today is whether to uphold or overturn the conditional use authorization or the ceu for this project. the planning commission on september 5th approved the conditional use for a vote of 7-3 to allow structures to exceed 40 feet in a zoning district and for a planned unit development from select requirements of the planning code. as you've heard, the appellant contends the board shall authorize this because it's not desirable or compatible with the neighborhood. in granting the cieu, including the new and reused structures, with nonresidential uses. and the commissions found the project is indeed necessary or desirable because it will provide new opportunities for housing with no displacement and new site amenities including 2.y accessible space and new childcare facility. the size is on balance consistent with the policies and objectives of the city's general plan. the appeal also demands specific modifications to the project including the following. limiting the

separate matter from the eir appeal, so i'm going to refer that question, then, to our colleagues, nick foster and the team for that. the planning commission approved the proposed project it was the version with the greater residential and the arrangement design permeability through the sites through the review design process. >> supervisor mar. >> thank you, president. actually, i did have a few other questions about the tree removal aspect. >> i just wanted to understand how it includes significant tree removal, in this case approximately 200 mature trees in your analysis and i think in your comments, something about it didn't sit right with me. i think i heard you say that the project is aligned with our greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy because it's a transit oriented development and it's building housing near joshes anjobs and transit and tl positive. but i seem to hear you say because of that, therefore, it's ok that 200 mature trees are going to be removed. because they're not as significant. we're looking at more aggressive steps to greatly expand it. >> thank you, supervisor

not only can nick not tell me any of those accounts, but he doesn't look like he knows how to foster m, either. nick: i'm not saying i did great, but i mean, when i relaxed, you know... lemonis: i would say it was, uh...not good. it was not good. nick: i would have to agree with you on that. sal: hey, guys. how we doing with this job? fabio: well, it's coming along. we got it started now, so we should be good. sal: all right. lemonis: hey, sal. let me grab you outside for a minute. sal: sure. lemonis: after seeing nick's performance at the firehouse, or lack of performance, i need to talk to sal about nick. he's making over $100,000 a year in salary. something's gonna change. i'm concerned that the guy that's leading the sales organization doesn't understand the basic fundamentals of a sales presentation, so we're gonna have to make some adjustments there. sal: okay. all right. -lemonis: hey. -nick: hi. how are you? lemonis: good. i thought maybe we could chat for one minute. nick: sure, sure. -lemonis: the three of us. -nick: yeah. lemonis: um... you know, there's no question that yo

nick. >> in other foster homes they do it for the money. pete didn't ask for any money in return.nd now i look at pete like a dad. and anybody that has anything bad to say about pete never really took the time to get to know him because he is a good, loving person with a huge heart. we need more petes in this world. >> reporter: why were the cops so focused on pete to begin with? well, as pete tells it his cousin paul planned the whole thing. set out to frame him. first by lying to him telling him that roberto or robert as pete calls him was out to steal his birth right. >> paul would come over and tell me horrible stuff about ed and robert like he said robert told paul that he was going to get my share of what my dad was going to leave me of the ranch. so paul would come over and say stuff to me and he knew he was going to make me want to go say something or fight with somebody. >> reporter: and pete? said he was simply blind to paul's manipulation. >> when you're going through your everyday life, and someone has set you up for over a year and a half, you don't know who to believ

once again, foster attempting some heroics, but he was denied this time. nick parrott, bbc news.nited you can see up there gatecrashing the big six, with bournemouth alongside them on points. at the bottom, newcastle have moved four points clear of the relegation zone while norwich and watford will start to feel the need for urgent points soon. watford still without a victory 11 games and three months into the season. it's starting to look a bit bleak and cold for them at the beginning of winter. not a good day if you're afan of of winter. not a good day if you're a fan of them, is it? thanks, joe. in the championship a late goal saw swansea city beat wigan athletic 2—1. kieffer moore's penalty had wiped out nathan dyer‘s opener for the swans in the first half but the winner came in injury time when connor roberts picked out fellow substitute sam surridge — his header securing the three points and that briefly moved swansea top of the table. that didn't last long. their rivals leeds united's hard—fought 2—0 victory over queens park rangers at home moved them back to the top. at t

nick paton walsh on the scene there. we'll come back to you soon. max foster is joining us from our london bureau. we are waiting on a press conference from scotland yard, from the london metropolitan police. given what we have heard from them today, which is not a lot of detail, i'm wondering if you can read between the lines when they say that as a precaution they are treating this as a terror-related incident. and then from the london ambulance services calling this a major incident. they are not trying to tamp this down, are they. >> reporter: no. the ambulance service obviously number of people stabbed and someone's been killed that is a major incident. the police will be looking at containing the incident, of course, but trying to look for the motive here. we have to consider the language. when i've spoken to anti-terror police quite recently, their response when there is an instance when it looks serious is to overreact and treat it as a terror-related incident before they've got it confirmed. the language, they say they're treating it as terror related as a precaution. they're not saying t