because before the member from newton abbott turns herself into nick griffin, this is the question she was trying to ask. what does no deal actually mean? for our businesses, for our people and for issues such as the irish land border? so can the first secretary address this question now? what does no deal look like in practice? >> i'm very happy to address her first point about consensus, i'm always, as you know, moderate person keen on consensus, so i very much look forward to sharing the labor party's views this morning on the unemployment figures. unemployment, unemployment is now down to its lowest level since the early '70s. there are many members of this house who weren't born when unemployment was as low as this government has made it. i would hope that she can bring herself in the course of her questions actually to welcome lower unemployment. on the substance of her question, as she knows, we are seeking a good deal for britain that will enable us to trade as freely as possible with the european union to protect our prosperity, at the same time as getting trade deals with oth