more with harry markopolos and nicole gelinas in a moment. after words with harry markopolos and nicole gelinas continues. >> host: hello, we're back with harry markopolos talking about his new book "no one would listen: a true financial thriller" purell harry, you know that alan greenspan the former of federal reserve chairman who was in office from 1987 to 2006, during the time when much of this was building up certainly not just madoff but the entire succession of two financial baubles, one based on data that eventually brought the system and the economy to its knees. just last week alan greenspan came out with a paper on the crisis called, the crisis, and he said in the paper in the aftermath of an actual crisis we will find highly competent examiners failing to have spotted madoff and he goes on to say that that's why we still have little choice but to rely upon a counterparty surveillance as their first line of crisis defense meaning for the free markets. helpless dissect this, where the examiners at the sec confidence? was this simply

nicole gelinas is the chanel governance. in her sharp book with her -- "after the fall," she marks the spots in our past history that took us to the current financial crisis. that made it inevitable, in fact, that we would come this way with equal mastery, she pencils the pattern for the reform. you didn't know it was right until you saw it. so we want to welcome you all to hear this. nicole is the freedom trust fellow at the manhattan institute, a contributing editor to their strong magazine city journal. nicole is also a chartered financial analyst, i.e., master of her craft. two or three things i want to mention before she comes up to talk to you. one is that this book "after the fall" is a history book. today we have our assumptions, deposit insurance is good we just need more of it maybe. another assumption that we have that the world will implode if we don't save institutions that are too big to fail. unless you go back to history, you won't know that these are new and controversial views. your irony -- your sense of i

more with "harry markopolos and nicole gelinas in a moment. "after words" with harry markopolos and nicole gelinas continues on c-span2's book tv. >> host: are backed with speed kentucky that his new book "no one would listen." harry, you may know that alan greenspan the former federal reserve chairman who was an office from 1987, 2006 during the time much of this was building up certainly not just madoff but the entire succession of two financial walls one based on it and eventually the financial system and the economy to its knees and just last week alan greenspan came out with a part of the crisis called the crisis and he said in the paper in the aftermath of an actual crisis we will find highly competent examiners failings who have spotted a madoff and he goes on to say that that is why we still have little choice but to rely upon counterparties surveillance as the first line of crisis defense, meaning the free-market. helpless dissect this. were the examiners at the fcc competent? was this simply the case of having too much work to do not

he's interviewed with nicole gelinas and author of "after the fall: saving capitalism from wall streetd washington." >> host: hello. i have the honor to be here thi

. >> host: >> "after words" with harry markopolos and nicole gelinas continues. >> host: we're back witharry markopolos talking about his new book "no one would listen," a true financial thriller. kerry, you may know that alan greenspan, the former federal reserve chairman who was in office from 1997 to 2006, during the time and much of this was building up certainly not just madoff, but the entire succession best to financial bubbles, one based on to route the financial system to its knees. this last week alan greenspan came out a peep from the crisis called the crisis. and he said in the paper, in the aftermath of an actual crisis, will find highly competent examiners sailing who have spotted a madoff. he goes on to say that's why we still have little choice but to rely upon counterparty surveillance as their first line of crisis defense, meaning for the free markets. you know, were these examiners at the sec combatant? was this simply an honest case of having too much work to do, not been able to figure out every five. and should free markets be the first line of defense. if so, how c

he discusses his book with gusto's nicole gelinas, contribute haverty, saving capitalism for wall streetand washington.

my question to you is whether you are satisfied with professor nicole gelinas's view on the role of islamicand society. >> well, we have heard them all exposed tonight, but i think for a feminist and i certainly consider myself a feminist, the question of gender equality is not straightforward and obvious one in these discussions. in fact, i would say that gender equality has been used as a kind of veil for the social and economic inequalities that muslims experience, certainly in western european society. so for example in a country like france, there's a grey to a discussion of gender inequality and much less discussion of social and economic equality, which is like for example to unemployment rate among muslims being at the same level of education and age and so on being too and half times as great as unemployment levels among french nationals, without any change for the last 15 years, a steady, constant, inequality side of discrimination. if you go to the discussions that were housed in the riots in 2005, the number of kids who would say i have all the qualifications to a particular job