there was vickie lynn marshall and there was anna nicole smith. atter if you had a cell phone, a polaroid camera, any kind of camera, you just yelled out her name, anna nicole. >> when she turned around, it was on the spot. you saw anna nicole. it's like, wow. >> anna, look this way. >> there you go. >> whoo. >> and the minute that camera left, it was a whole other person. she was back to vickie lynn. and how she did it, i don't know, but whatever she was doing, it was making everybody watch. >> reporter: in 2011, anna is offered a show that's pretty new to television. ♪ anna, anna, anna, anna, anna nicole ♪ >> reporter: she says yes to a reality show. >> two thumbs up. my dream house. >> reality shows are really pretty much fresh-baked at this point. people like the osbournes. >> rock 'n' roll! >> or people like nick lachey and jessica simpson were doing these shows, revivifying their stardom. so here comes anna nicole smith into this brave world of celebrity reality television. >> that's my son. isn't he cute? >> was that who she really was? the

. >> ainsley: he represented usher and stern in the anna nicole smith case. >> brian: he served as chiefel and feels this whole thing is unnecessary. >> ainsley: and he's a democrat. >> brian: likalan alan dershowitz, the law is the law. >> if you bring a case against a former president, it has to be a compelling case. i am a democrat, how did it take nearly four years to bring this case? why have they not answered the question about fani willis conflict of interest? she held a fundraiser for one of the opponents in this prosecution. president trump has three or four trials. too much politics for me. >> brian: i watch people who just despise trump, legal experts say, why did she do this? she complicated, jack smith had challenged this. i don't see a reason to bring this case forward. others are saying, it is great. resources in fulton county to bring a president 2-1/2 years, who happens to be leading contender for republican nomination in for that shot and to post $200,000 bail, as if he was going to run or hideout. >> ainsley: he is accused of challenging the election. hillary clinton d

matt: anna nicole smith. that is what i think of. don't you think of her when you think of guess?: i think about being insecure as a teenager walking into the stores and feeling like maybe i was on the wrong side of puberty. nevertheless, i tried to be a guest girl. that 90's look and you are seeing it show up in abercrombie as well and i am wondering if a 90's were buyer is what the gap need. --needs. they have the person behind the barbie resurgence at the helm of the clothing retailer. simone: all of the focus is going to be on what the brand-new ceo richard dixon says for his future of the brand. you mentioned abercrombie. you look at what they've done and they change the product mix and they have pushed toward -- we used to be this exclusive brand where only people where washboard abs are acceptable and now we will be more inclusive and have different sizes and cater to do -- different ethnicities. for gap, the challenge has been they have relied on their other brands like -- those brands have seen a slowdown in shares. everyone expects the earnings numbers will be ugly. the

during august, the penal chaise rule between 19731990. 0, less in america correspondents, nicole re smith's people interested. they hoping they will finally find out what's happened to the left ones a. so to enter some memories, all that you select, we'll see that i have scope left. she was only 5 years old when she lost her father, who didn't just promise to come back with a new adult. after he left he was arrested then never seem to get to it. guess i need a therapy because i was so convinced that my daddy would be walking through the store at any moment saying look, and i got you the door. it was very tough on me to to even today 3 beta and her family are still suffering. they had no closure, there was no good by no funeral. nobody knows what head office remains off to tactical quasi benavides was just one of thousands of victims of chillies, military dictatorship, which began with a coup d'etat 50 years ago. his name, along with a many others can be found in scribed on this memorial and chillies, capital, santiago, asylums, reminder, those who vanished after the military took over many

nicolle wallace. court filings between spouse jack smith and donald trump in the cal case involving trump's efforts to

nicolle wallace. we are learning about jack smith's case against donald trump for his efforts to joan overturn the 2020

quickly, nicole, in your career in law enforcement how often have you seen the charges that jack smith brought here? >> i've never seen them in had this context. i have not. in my time as an fbi agent i have not seen this, no, i have not. maria: nicole, it's great to see you. thanks so much. >> my pleasure, thank you. maria: coming up, we have exclusive fox business reporting on a new batch of facebook files, we'll bring you the breaking news in the next hour. don't miss that. you're watching "mornings with maria" live on fox wh business. we'll be right back. ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, ♪ ♪ but i manage it well. ♪ ♪ it's a little pill with a big story to tell. ♪ ♪ i take once-daily jardiance, ♪ ♪ at each day's staaart. ♪ ♪ as time went on it was easy to seee ♪ ♪ i'm lowering my a1c. ♪ jardiance works 24/7 in your body to flush out some sugar! and for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease, jardiance can lower the risk of cardiovascular death, too. jardiance may cause serious side effects including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration, that can lead to sudden worsening

pete, what would jack smith be looking for? >> nicole, a lot. i've served i don't know how many search warrants on twitter over the years and investigations. we need to put our investigator's hat on. twitter gathers a lot of information. they don't just have your tweets, they have your draft tweetss are in some cases they have deleted tweets, they have dms which are not encrypted, the ip address on which you logged on to the time, sometimes the location at which you accessed the count amongst other data. so there's a lot there. now, in terms of the wave the fbi or jack smith would get this informations are it appears that well before jack smith was appointed, early on there's a law, 2703, which allows the government to request that carrier providers preserve data. in this case an investigator would say, hey, look, trump engaged in something relevant to our investigation, in this case, twitter, here is a letter and we're asking you to take a snapshot of everything in that account right now and we're going to go out and get enough information to g

nicolle wallace. court filings between spouse jack smith and donald trump in the cal case involving trump's efforts to overthrow the 2020 election. though the dispute is technically over the handling of evidence, it's become a proxy war of the ex-president's mob boss tactics. it's a little complicated, but incredibly important. here is where things stand right now. federal judge chutkan was ordered a hearing over the justice department's request for a protective order. the rules governing the process between prosecutors and the defense team. "the washington post" notes such orders can be technical but are routinely approved by judges to protect witnesses and government investigative methods and priorities by limiting evidence by the defense to people authorized by the court. in its argument for a protective order, the justice department made a nod to the fact that the defendant has -- prosecutors explained they wanted to immediately turn over evidence to speed defense trial preparations but were concerned in part over trump's history of posting on social media associated with cases against him. trump'

nicolle wallace. we are learning about jack smith's case against donald trump for his efforts to joan overturn the 2020 election. documents hours ago reveal that jack smith sought a search warrant for donald trump. an appeals court opinion states, quote, the district court found probable cause to search the twitter account for evidence of criminal offenses. turns out that twitter and jack smith squared off on whether trump should be told about the search warrant, with the federal court ultimately ruling to keep the warrant a secret from trump. it says that, quote, the district court found there was reasonable grounds to believe that disclosing the warrant to former president trump would seriously jeopardize the ongoing investigation by giving him an opportunity to destroy evidence, change patterns of behavior or notify confederates. it's hard to remember now given that the ex-president was banned for twitter for years and has not posted since his return, but his twitter account was one of the most powerful weapons in the aftermath of the 2020 election. he used it to spread baseless conspiracy theories

nicolle wallace. there are now two federal cases involving the words the united states versus donald j. trump. both brought by special counsel jack smith

process jack smith is proposing, trump's trial, to be on january 6, that should start in january, 2 of next year before iowa caucus month before nevada south carolina primaries joining me nicole parker great to see you things very much for being here this morning. >> thank you so much for having me. >> we talk all the time your story you left fbi you were special agent saw wind shifting at the fbi whats your thoughts on fbi role in stopping trump? >> you know, this is a country where we are supposed to have law and order based on fabs fot political persuasion i think we are seeing criminal justice system weaponized, very strong, aggressive, investigation to those certain political views republican conservative side on opposite end almost get a pass almost a turn blind eye, thank you to whistleblowers from irs and fbi, these are noble brave courageous fbi agents speaking the truth upholding oath to the execution letting american public know what is actually happening. maria: yeah. the fullerton county clerk of courts office admitting to posting trump indictment on line hours before a garage actually voted to indict him watch this. >> i do the work -- in the system, and, when -

smith about trump's role in january 6? >> yeah, it is difficult to know, nicolle. i was very surprised when we mark meadows name on the indictment coming out of georgia. because the fact he was not described as an unindicted co-conspirators in the federal case had led me to conclude that he was cooperating with jack smith. but he is an excellent lawyer and he most certainly would not have cooperated in one form and not the other. and any defendants wants to have a global resolution if they're going to plead and cooperate. so it causes me to wonder to what extent he has cooperated in jack smith's investigation. that remanes to be seen. so he was -- his testimony on monday is going to -- was not reffa lattory. he talks about things that are very much in the public record. so maybe he thought he had nothing to lose by doing that. knowing that anything that he said that was false would be used against him by jack smith and could kill in i sort of deal he might have there. >> so interesting. we need all of you to stick around a little bit longer. we to sneak in a break.

nicole. the victims were not just people like ruby freeman, the victims were the entire american people and jack smith's indictment focused on that type of attempted coup, the thwarting of democracy that trump took. this one does that and as andrew says, much more. it was a sprawling indictment because there was a sprawling criminal enterprise that was basically harnessed to interfere with the election and throw out our votes. and so this indictment basically calls the trump operation a criminal enterprise, pure and simple. and, yes, it does indict a variety of individuals in a way that the federal indictment doesn't. the federal one was just named one person, donald trump, and had six unindicted, unnamed co-conspirators. jack smith, the federal prosecutor may decide to name some of those six in the days and months to come but that's a much smaller indictment than the 19 people georgia indicted. it's people like mark meadows, rudy giuliani, jeffrey clark, the untorrid official. but in a sense her indictment really does focus on one person. at yesterday's indictment, donald trump was named 193 times in i

nicolle wallace. donald trump said it himself, any day now, he's expecting it, we are expecting it. at some point, we'll see. but no official word as of yet on an indictment in special counsel jack smith's20 election. we are aware that the grand jury heard testimony in this case they have left for the day, and a few minutes later, the special

nicolle wallace. the ex-president's legal team responding just minutes ago before today's 5:00 p.m. deadline to special counsel jack smith'sote, shield only genuinely sensitive materials from public view. the request came because the prosecution felt compelled to ask judge tanya chutkan to prohibit the defendant, here in this case the former president, from publicly disclosing evidence gathered during their investigation. the protective order motion apparently not enough to deter the ex-president from making more problematic public comments throughout the weekend as we saw and even today. he attacked judge chutkan, the former vice president mike pence, and of course the special counsel jack smith. this breaking news is where we start this hour. former acting assistant attorney general for national security at the u.s. department of justice mary mccord is here. editor at large for the bulwark charlie sykes. plus with me here on set maya wily, a former assistant u.s. attorney, now the president of the leadership conference on civil and human rights. and just to start off, you know, we are getting this document just a few min

nicolle wallace. there are now two federal cases involving the words the united states versus donald j. trump. both brought by special counsel jack smithch making an extraordinary set of allegations in its criminal probe into efforts to overturn the 2020 election the 190th person to be charged in connection with the insurrection according to one count is a former president and a current front runner for the nomination of a major political party who is already facing 74 criminal counts. who stands accused of trying to defraud the government that he led at that time. trying to obstruct the proceedings of a branch of government and trying to overturn the will of millions of voters in the swing states that determined the outcome of the electoral college. the big question now that trump has been booked and fingerprinted, what's next in this case? which is really unlike any other in american history. here is what team trump has planned according to the "new york times." his lawyers used the arraignment to hint at one of his central defense strategies, a request to delay a second pending federal trial for months if not years. delaying the pro

nicolle. it's five if you count the superseding indictment. so start thinking to yourself, and they'll be a sixth with the second jack smith case. you say to yourself, are these people really that gullible? are they really that stupid to follow this man into the dumpster fire of the cult of donald j. trump? why? what do they get out of it? the answer is, they get absolutely nothing. and everybody else that's in that inner circle, these 18 other co-defendants, the only thing that they're going to get is a lot of pain and a lot of legal bills. and that's it. >> so to carlos de oliveira and 18 other charged individuals in fulton county, accused of crimes that could, this is down the line, but if they go to trial, if they're convicted and found guilty they could go to jail. you talked about the demp stur fire. i think from talking to you jail sounds worse than a dumpster fire. what is it like to go to jail for doing what donald trump told you to do? >> it's very difficult, putting your head down on the pillow to go to sleep each night and to waking up and staring at cinder block walls. you know, obviously being directed, being away

long time viewers of this program know that nicolle likes to remind us from time to time that we only know a small portion of what the special counsel jack smiths proverbial sleeve in terms of evidence or in terms of the legal threads he might be pulling on. and today we got a reminder of that fact. thanks to some provocative new reporting from "rolling stone magazine." the headline alone is eye popping. jesus christ smith grilled witnesses about rudy giuliani's drinking. now in the face of it, that might sound like below the belt but this is about a series legal thread that jack smith and his team are pulling on. rog stone reports that they are interesting in rudy giuliani's drinking on and after election day. investigating whether donald trump was knowingly relying on an even re ated attorney. smith's team of federal investigators have asked questions about how seemingly intoxicated giuliani was during the weeks he was giving trump advice on how to cling to power. according to a source, one witness's attorney and a third person familiar with the matter, the spaesh counsel's team had asked witnesses if trump had ever gossiped with them about

smith would be able to punch through those privileges and go even farcter. what is your feeling today having gone through all this? >> you know, it's a swirl, candidly, nicollehat vindicated. it is yet another affirmation that the fact that the select committee found are credible, that the story we're able to piece together through our investigation has stood up. jack smith has only made that story stronger, so there's candidly some feeling of satisfaction about that. at the same time it's a sad day for america, we're talking about the indictment of a former president and the understandable consternation that is causing this country. i used to feel this way when i was a prosecutor and there would be a conviction in the case. sort of satisfied it's a just outcome, but it's not a reason to celebrate. it's a sadness and a lot of victimization this doesn't undo. i have a mix of reaction tuesday the indictment. >> i'm so glad i started with the swirl. i think i http://found that yet but i think that's exactly right. i waited stupidly until august to take my family vacation and was honored to come back to be here today to get to talk to you guys, but i felt the sw

nicolle, and i've said this repeatedly, the former president has -- he has attacked, viciously attacked, americans -- america's democracy, the constitution and the rule of law. the former president, he dared and provoked jack smithcuments and finally he succeeded in forcing jack smith to indict him also for january 6th, lest the former president succeed in making a mockery out of america, the constitution and the rule of law. the former president of the united states of america wanted to be indicted for these offenses on any given day from january 6, 2021, until the indictments were brought, he could have avoided and prevented prosecution. he did not want to. we now know that he wanted to be indicted so that he can run on the same platform that he has been talking about since january 6, 2021, namely, that the election was stolen from him by joe biden and the country -- i don't know who he's referring to, but it was stolen from him, when, in fact, he lost that election fair and square in what was, we now know, perhaps the fairest election in american history. >> you are making a constitutional argument and i just want to read your tweet about the 14th amendment. the 14th amendment itself in section 3 answers the

nicolle wallace. donald trump said it himself, any day now, he's expecting it, we are expecting it. at some point, we'll see. but no official word as of yet on an indictment in special counsel jack smith'sestigation into efforts to overturn the results oh of the 2020 election. we are aware that the grand jury heard testimony in this case they have left for the day, and a few minutes later, the special counsel arrived back at his office. what any of that portends is anyone's guess at this hour. we have eyes on entrances and exits of that courthouse. journalists there standing by and a few trained ears to the ground. as soon as we know something, anything at all, we will let you know. we should know today marks two weeks since donald trump announced that he had received a target letter in this case. it suggests he could be charged with conspiracy to defraud the united states, conspiracy to obstruct the january 6th session of congress, and depriving voters of their rights. here with me are my guests. >> first, let's bring in justice and intelligence correspondent ken dilanian, who has been following all this for us today. ken, bring us up to speed for what we do know at this hour. >> repor