you read nietzsche. - yeah, that's pretty com-- - you read machiavelli. yeah, that's kinda complicated, nietzsche. - harvey:yeah, yeah. - mike:nietzsche's first time having sex, he got a venereal disease. - i did not know that. - first time he ever had sex, he had a venereal disease. he never had sex since. that's your takeaway from nietzsche? huh? no. i just find that very interesting. commentator:with the uppercut is tyson. catches him with a light left hook and he goes down! he goes down. he should be able to get up from this. his legs may be shut-- they are! it's all over. we've got a brand-new heavyweight champion of the world, mike tyson. what did it feel like when suddenly you become the champion of the world? mike: it's everything me and cus talked about. harvey: that was sad because cus was not able to see it, was he? -he died a year before. - mike:yeah. harvey: you think about cus when you walk in the ring? all the time. even now. harvey: you walked around with the championship belt for three weeks without taking it off after you won it. mike: y

and nietzsche is the philosopher who made that most powerfully. it is a rejection of the idea of natural law. therefore a rejection of the idea of natural right. does everyone follow that? it is a great question. therefore, ultimately a rejection of the idea of human equality. ok? ok? if all individuals are born naturally free, how is political authority created? this is to connect where our summary. we are all born free, that means no one can bless, direct, take our labor without our consent, right? that is what natural freedom means. but we need government to protect our rights. we cannot protect our rights alone. .o government is created that's what the founders referred to as the social compact. there are two stages. this is a little technical but it illustrates an important point. there are two stages. the first is a people becomes a -- that you become members of the political community and the founders argument there is, they are following law, that must be by unanimous consent. because of your natural freedom come you have no obligation to

. >> waveguide nietzsche infrastructure with potholes and bridges that are in trouble.e need to do something together to fix our infrastructure if we are going to stay competitive as the nation. reporter: we'll have to see what this paper aims than perhaps the president will let us know through his preferred means of communications, twitter. add-on and leah. adam: somehow when researching the pre-pay their property taxes before the new tax law kicks in january 1st because the new law will cap a $10,000 the state and local taxes that a homeowner that itemizes can deduct. then they can pay more tax this year when the deduction has no limit. lea: let's talk about this. fake news could be a thing of the past. adam: tracee carrasco joins us. good morning to you, tracee. >> college students have found a way to fight fake news from the 36 hour problem-solving competition caught attack upon at yale university. they found a way to create something called a plug-in. a browser extension that alerts users to fake news, tells them if they found an article that may have been shared o

." >> the beast embodied nietzsche's will to power, stopping at nothing to achieve its ends. >> his belief beast was so real. it was very real. the whole idea of the beast. i mean, you're either for the beast or you're against the beast. you know, there's no in-between. >> narrator: the film portrays reagan as a political warrior willing to fight the beast. but bannon did more than glorify reagan. at the film's end, he issued a warning. >> there's a note to myself in the script. "steve, i know you have your own ideas about what to do with the coda." well, what happened was, he went into the editing room and the coda... suddenly, the beast still lives. >> the wolf had not passed by the door. war had not been wished away. (rachmaninoffvespers playing) >> suddenly, the narrator is talking about the beast and we see muslims praying. >> reaching out, first to convert, then turning into destroy, that was the nature of the beast. >> and then we see people jumping out of the world trade center and falling to their death. (rachmaninoffvespers playing) >> narrator: increasingly, bannon was a man on

for the moment we don't see that in a sense that in three states into nietzsche sort of what we call revolution 2011, first between 2011 and 2013 the growth of jihadi is him. it was a attempt to unify different groups with institution idolization of the jihadism into tunisia. in 2013 there was a first measure of regression with the groshong jihadism backed by isis and al qaeda and it was the moment where jihadism was very popular in urban area and all that stuff. from 2016 in southeast asia with the libyan tunisian border we see both isis variance and there are new regional uncertainty and i think the situation in the gulf back in the form of jihadism trick we see that an upcoming years maybe five or six for the moment in tunisia we have to step back a bit. they are like according to security forces like 250 armed jihadism. they are in small monday and generic border. people are linked to al qaeda and isis and they are like slping sales-- sleeping cells of like maybe two or four people gathered and that might play a role of supply in case of deterioration of security situation at a r

trumpith this stuff with and the racism and that whole collection of sort of nietzsche nietzschean- ethics, i think it is horrible. the republicans that support him, i think there's a range in there. some are reluctant supporters in some are enthusiastic supporters. i'm happy to say that i am deeply discouraged by what the party did and by what is now represented in donald trump. i'm not sure how much longer i'm going to hang around either. if i come to the conclusion that this is not an ugly parenthesis, that this is the rejection -- the trajectory of things to come, that this is the heart of the republican party represented steve bannon and stephen miller, i will leave that train soon. from myit is too early position to say this is done. i hope that more people who have a different view of what the party of lincoln should be and what conservatism is will fight for it. but i don't know that people who have my view will prevail. i don't know that by any means at all. there is a way that trump has of the ugliest instincts and the darkest impulses of people, which is horrifying. it can't be

despite the fact that chairman of eps swiss bank said this is a nietzsche player and he doesn't considernderstood i could give you my opinion. i don't. i will send it back to you. >> the digital circumstance. exist in my systems and banks. >> here's the deal. this is currency. there you go. trade you need a bigger role than not. either way,, don't drop it on the street. >> somebody will pick it out. trendy joining us now, former fdic chairman sheila barrett on the crypto currency. i'm old enough to remember bubbles. even before the housing mania and the fact that everybody seems to be excised and fixate on something they don't quite understand. >> this is a very volatile asset and, you know, it is a bubble. you never know when it will pop until you see one. people shouldn't put their rent money there and if you're doing it. there is some confusion about bitcoin versus block chain. a lot of people think they're getting exposure. they do not. they are completely separate. including one where on the board they are talking to block chain technology, the method of transferring ownership and t

reading i iran out list shrug means the question right god is not jesus but their god is a kind of nietzscheeneur type who epitomizes the kind of petty walk mentality and could you expand. >> host: we will start with cornel west and then robert george. >> guest: no, brother sean was on fire and laid it out there. when you talk about the christian right certainly there is such a thing that danger with hatred and the contempt that we see too often but it's not homogeneous either. there's a variety of different voices there. the case thate is it's not justt a question right the american right as a whole has suchnm a deep suspicion of government playing a fundamental role in the lives of everyday people that they can easily overlook theai ways in which government intervention to the lives of everyday people can be probably empowering as opposed to simply being authoritarian and repressive. we had to keep track but certainly when you look to norway andan finland and other placespo the government and we look to canada with what is north of the border and the government is very important role in in