what was he going to do the nih fund him to start deal including fetal cell lines. a lot of money came from the nih under this contract to lean leonard. ... >> those harbored silent by the late 1950s tens of millions of children in this country has been vaccinated with the salt vaccine and silent monkey viruses were in the vaccine up to 30 million children were exposed to -- monkey kids monkey viruses that had penetrated the vaccine. that it was thought to have been killed from formaldehyde and seem perfectly healthy so they did not worry too much. quick high school and viruses are basically a piece of genetic material surrounded by protein coat on their own they don't eat, sleep, drink, have sex or move around the or anything else. they must invade cell thord to produce thelses is a virus will invade a cell. hijack the c hijacked the cellular machinery make copies of itself that is how viruses replicate and those vaccine factories. but on the left bernice eddy came from a town of less than 200 in west virginia and worked through ph.d. at the university of cincinnat

and nih was fit to be tied. can pros ski even more so, camping i will call it with the cells was discovered. however nothing was done about it until hayflick who had been handing cells out for free decided to set up a company in the early '70s.in he began selling cells including to merck.. he signed a contract with merck, once merck decided to switch to plotkin's rubella vaccine, that would be worth one million dollars to him personally had it been executed. shortly after he signed it, the nih heard and got wind he wasd selling the cells and sent out the chief investigator of waste, fraud and abuse, a no-nonsense guy james shriver to investigate.e. he resigned under pressure from stanford and spent many years in the academic wilderness. i think his colleague stan plotkin really put it so accurately when he said the science, hayflick went to public, this is brokerage youre did i. this man who at height of his powers brought about his own downfall. that is the front page of "new york times" on march of 1976 where

the reason for that is what the nih does, works. it improves human health, lowers health costs and creates growth. if you look at the impact of the nih over the last two decades, you will see that over the last 40 years, we have actually lowered deaths associated with heart attacks and strokes in part driven by research the nih has funded. we have also seen a drop in deaths from cancer over the last couple decades. we know that for every 1% cancer deaths drop, that saves the economy $500 billion. we are also seeing when you invest in health research, you actually create jobs. research studies have shown that for every dollar invested by the nih it's creating $2.21 of growth. one of the biggest projects they have done, studies have shown the return was 178 to 1. as we look to the future, there are big challenges in front of us the nih can help address. if you look at type ii diabetes, we have 29 million people in the u.s. that live with that condition. it costs it about $300 billion a year. funding from the nih can help that. it's a

the disease as i have described in the other long list of afflictions we have as human beings that nih is not working to make a difference in their lives and so we need to continue that support for the national institute of health as we pursue appropriation bills in the future and our ability to do that together is important and a source of satisfaction that can come. i have indicated from time to time that it is sometimes difficult to find the things in the jobs that we have as united states senators in which you get the sense of. the there's a lot of challenges in getting things done, but the idea that we have come together to support medical research and find life-saving tours gives us something to take great satisfaction and gives us hope of what we have been able to accomplish in this regard is hen publicans and democrats, but a really as americans and be a role model as we find solutions to other problems. hope we try to find solutions as how we help the american people. uni, madam president, come from rural states and in any kind of healthcare solution we find we need to make ce

i said i'd better brushup so one of the first things i did look at the nih budget i was startled to discover it had been undergoing severe gyrations from 2003 since 1998 which seemed like good news for biomedical research but after 2003 the dollars flattened out in the spending power a decreased by 20 percent so i thought this is not a good formula for things to be happening. fifty% increase of academic labs for biomedical research and basically congress said we have done enough that is not a good thing to be happening -- happening. so sure the there after i came across a paper published in the journal nature that looked at what was coming out of these academic labs the main researcher was that a amgen and head of research and what back to review studies that was published in scientific journals and discovered that when they originally came across he thought if these were good results this is how pharmaceutical companies work these days they rely on the academic science. he said i could not get them the first time so let's try it again so the second cycle they tried to replicate. fifty-three

we talk about nih fresno, cutting $5.5 billion out of nih, i think anybody that believes we ought tor efforts to solve the issue of cancer or heart disease or diabetes, alzheimer's or any other diseases that kon front us. as a matter of fact nih and i know a lot about it because i served on the subcommittee for three years, pay lines, that is the number of research proposals that we found are now down to 10 to 15%, that's called a pay line. a third of the suggestions are good science that may result in better health and better life spans for our people and better results for our economy. >> i don't think anybody, sir would want to cut medical spending, nobody wants their family -- >> well you say that but the president's just proposed a $5.5 billion cut which is about a 15% cut. >> is that a cut or decrease in foreign spending over time? >> well it's a decrease -- it's a decrease if forward spending, you're correct on that but it's a decrease in terms of effort. because as inflation occurs obviously a dollar doesn't buy tomorrow or the nueces year or five years from now. so, yes, oka

think we need to do more than that and better than that. >> boston has thrived from nih funding. number one city in terms of spending. are you worried about the recession development area? up until the congress passed the short-term budget through september. in that budget it seems like everything is ok. i think it is important today. when you look at the research and in boston and cambridge, there are a lot of discoveries, things are happening here in our city and it helps us keep young people and talent in the city. i am a cancer survivor and i was treated at the cancer institute and the children's hospital and the pretty woman's -- and the brigham woman's. so knowing that what i had is cancer 40 years ago, today the cure rate is a lot higher than when i had it. >> talking of you and your , you're the son of immigrants. there are concerns about the trav b. what does that mean for talent? do you feel there is a concern for talent coming into your academic institutions? next it was a concern before hand. because there wasn't enough eases being given out to people -- there were no

and louisiana recover from natural disasters part of the bill includes a significant wit increase of nih funding dealing with cancer research that obama invited pushed for with the year-round program won't -- bell grant to benefit 1 millionp students to help them stay on the ladder to include significant increased funding for infrastructure as well as to combat the scourges of all punitive use which affects all parts of the country under bin and suburban areas affect support in the middle class and their rich. good news their projects 99% of the environmental protection agency's budgetan soda quest to keep water and air clean can continue and increases funding for the clean energy research as well and that was one of thes great hopes for jobs in this country and from my home state of new york else please the agreement support programs better needed in most popular in my pace delaware the community development block grant program and small cities depend on the great restoration initiative out of all the great lakes with the lake erie on the shores of new york and those that have done so m

he wants to cut more than $5 billion from the nih budget. that's america's future that president trump wants to cut by more than $5 billion. then there's the republican effort to blow up our existing health care system. the republican bill would open the door to discriminating against people with preexisting conditions, and there's more. insurance companies could drop coverage for mental health and substance abuse disorder, insurance companies could decide not to cover pregnancy or maternity care. insurance companies could impose lifetime limits on diseases like cancer and heart conditions, even for people on employer plans in states like massachusetts that want nothing to do with the waivers that the republican bail louse. -- republican bill allows. the c.b.o. said that the out-of-pocket costs would rise, quote, thousands of dollars a year. but cutting cancer patients and mommas and newborn babies and people with preexisting conditions wasn't enough for republicans. president trump used the budget to cut hundreds of millions of dollars to t

cole to get things done at mih, our dear friends at nih. i believe they are effectively using the wisdom, the dollars that you've given them, these heroes of our country from the medical community and research and development. thank you very much. >> thank you very much. i want to congratulate my chair and ranking member on a terrific job. when you were here less than a week ago we asked for your closing to get it done and you said you would and you could and you have. i think you are both to be commended. i know how much work went into this and how much give-and-take you are both involved in. in a good-faith effort to find common ground. i think this is actually a much more consequential bill in some ways then just quote unquote on running the government. although that's consequential enough. this is actually the first bipartisan, bicameral compromise working with a new administration. this is actual real legislation across the floor that both parties have participated in and have come to a common agreement on. it's my hope that your good

when you saw the spending bill that did pass, nih got $2 billion extra dollars.hey were going to be cut. obviously people on both sides of the aisle are interested in the nih getting funded. i have no idea how marking say that this is left-wing proselytizing. he used the public airways, that's why. he tugd on everyone's heart strings. god bless that child. i want that child to be healthy and have a productive life. the american government needs him to have a productive life because he's going to be saddled with the debt that jimmy kimmel is promoting. >> do you think sexual assault should be a preexisting condition? >> that's a ridiculous question. we want healthcare to be based on private innovation. >> the way republicans frame the conversation about healthcare is inhumane. what jimmy kimmel was talking about is humanity. liz: where does sexual assault come in. >> republicans want sexual assault to be considered a preexisting condition. liz: i think we ne another night on this one. >> for you to use sexual assault is insulting and ridiculous. liz: we have to le

the top four funded from nih are in boston.hen the funding dries up, it means people who are entrepreneurs and want to start companies will think about private funding, and we are there to fill the gap. caroline: how much are we seeing the vc community expand here in boston? many feel that silicon valley is just so much of a bigger brother. are you seeing people coming from there, or is there a building up of money to build support? >> in traditional technology, silicon valley, where we also have offices, is of course, the big brother. it might actually be the grandfather. however, in biotech, this is the center. you see venture capitalists swarming from around the country because we have the three ingredients. universities that draw students, big pharma which bills of clusters of entrepreneurial excellence, and radically decreasing costs of building a company in this space, which means that if you are a young researcher at one of these companies and you have an idea, it doesn't require $50 million to see whether it works. caro

we have a little bit of an nih funding.n ih fundin i think it is important to stay strong on that.boston and massachusetts, we are in this together. cambridge, other cities, a lot of discoveries and a lot of things are happening in the city and it helps us keep young people and talents here in boston. it helps our doctors and the hospitals advance -- i am a cancer survivor who was treated at dana-farber cancer institute and the children's hospital. we have important assets in the city. the cancer i had 40 years ago, is higher than when i had it. caroline: you are the son of immigrants and there is a lot of concern about the travel ban and what it means for talents and technology talent in silicon valley. with boston, do you feel there is a concern? >> it was a concern before hand. now, there is really a concern. in this very room where we are having this interview right up to the president came out with his executive order on the hospitals comead all the hospitals in massachusetts, colleges and universities, tech companies in this room at three different meetings, and every single

. >> the nih we support research in this area. we especially research, what we call basic research, the stuff that's early in the process that's far away from the marketability and stuff that's less likely to get done unless the government does it. i encourage the committee to consider this, the biggest change we made is to look at the overhead costs f. a private foundation gives the university money, typically the university is required to spend 90% on research. with our money it's 72% actually goes to research. i encourage you ways to lower the overhead. 90% research in our budget you would be roughly spending the same amount on actual research as previous years. >> we'll have that debate another day. i want to thank my friend for being here and thank him for his service. >> gentleman's time has expired. i recognize the gentleman from california for five minutes. >> thank you, madam chair. thank you, director mulvaney for being here. i want to recognize that representative cole's thoughtful comments on the nih and appreciate you

the president did not get the cuts he wanted for the nih and planned parenthood. is the president feeling about the plan and what is the state of play in d.c.? let's talk with jim jordan of ohio. a member of the freedom caucus. how do you feel about it? >> look, money goes to planned parenthood. money continues to go to sanctuary cities. no money for the border wall. i think you will see conservatives against this plan this week. >> how did it happen? >> why did we do a short-term spending bill if we were not going to fight for these? if this is the deal we get, we should have done the bill for the year. we specifically held a vote for -- a short-term spending bill so the republicans control the government, we can do the things we campaigned on. this doesn't do that. this maintains, chris, for every new defensive liollar you spend, you give the democrats in non defense. that is not what we campaigned on. you will see conservatives with concerns. >> you see democrats coming out and hailing it. you did not hear from the republicans. mcconnell or ryan. what happened?

i'm not even talking about nih. by cutting research and job training, you can't, that's what you need to grow the economy. >> it's a next line question. and if you look at total r&d spending it is that. if you look at the nih spending with the reforms proposed and gr i can very quickly if you get a grant that averages 27 or 20%. if you take the federal level to the same spend as much on nih research as the shares herehe before. >> is a. >> gail: the cuts in the budget are not really cuts, the end result will be the same. >> were trying to be more efficient with taxpayer money. we think we can do that negatively impact the things you mention. >> i don't have time to ask another question but i will -- if you cut the state department i think you're going toheti havo buy me more ammunition and that's a quote from general mattis. >> thank you. this is a hear about the president's budget so you're here with the questions and these are the president's decision. >> this is the job i asked for. i do enjoy doing it. these are

the top four nih funded hospitals are all in boston. this could be a good thing.funding dries up, if it does, it means these people who are entrepreneurs and who do want to start companies will think about private funding. we are there to fill the gap. caroline: how much are we seeing the vc community expanding? because many feel silicon valley is a bigger brother. are you seeing them come over, or is there a building up on money? jon: in traditional technology, silicon valley is the big brother. it might be the grandfather in many ways. however, in biotech, this is the center of excellence. you see venture capitalists from the bay area swarming here from around the country because we have the three ingredients. we have the universities that bring the students, you have big pharma with a cluster of entrepreneurs, and you have radically decreasing pricing costs of building a company in this space. which means if you are a young researcher at one of these companies and you have an idea, it does not require $50 million to see if it works. maybe you can do it with fiv

the government for another six months or so, no funding for the border wall, increased funding for nih, no halt of funding for planned parenthood. democrats go the a lot of what they wanted in this. 102 days i guess is where we are in this administration, 102 days in. what are your opinions of president trump as a negotiator? >> well, we he's the king of the deal. he wrote a book about it but this is a clear victory for democrats i think. it shows that the organization, the mobilization of people across the country it's working and to have for me particularly the nih funding is crucial because it has many research institutions, columbia university, many of the hospitals are in my district, new york presbyterian, mt. sinai, mt. fiore, this is country cat to research in my district. i think it's a big victory. no money for wall, no sanctions for smpanctuary cities, more funding for planned parenthood through september. we'll take it up again at the end of the year but right now we could call it a victory. >> we have to get you on with joe biden. >> he was up in new hampshire last night s

kidding ready to kill myself because i was afraid to be david then saved a life again i stormed the nih and fda to change the way we were tested. we are facing a lot of challenges right now in this country and people of all sides can acknowledge we have challenges ahead of us my life is living evidence of that. >> caller: i appreciate speaking with you actually have a two-part question. i work in the health care field and i see a lot of people do you consider the health care hindrance? and the second question how is the gay community working with the government? >> host: before we get an answer are you gay? >> guest: yes. i have been no for a long time bought. >> guest: for those who are tuning in and don't know curvy the only drug that has been approved for the pre-exposure prophylactics what we know from any rigorous studies just one today taken regularly can prevent almost entirely the transmission of hiv positive to negative individual there is controversy some people have suggested this will increase high-risk behavior leading to the transmission of other nasties but for me it is a

as you point out planned parenthood, funding for nih. that all stays in place. it is true the democrats didn't get continuing subsidies they wanted for obamacare. but the president did have to compromise on a number of different points. i can tell you there's been a real attempt to try to drive the narrative here at the white house. yesterday omb director mick mulvaney held a briefing with reporters. he did again today to try to cast it as a victory. it is a subtle acknowledgment that the narrative has gotten away from them. it is bothering the president that he isn't looking like he came out on top of the key issues. today you have the president coming out himself in these remarks we learned about rather last minute which would include talk of this budget. so i anticipate when we hear from sean spicer in the briefing that gets under way an hour and a half from now, you will hear him reiterate what the president is trying to say. on the border wall, you heard the president say it will include funding to start construction of the border wall. based on what we hea

i don't like seeing for example the cut to nih. a big cut to nih.ard, i think republicans and democrats, conservative, liberal, house and senate and the president, we all need to work together, we share input of what we like, what we don't like. the owoone thing that is good i that the president's budget balances where one of my criticisms of his predecessor's budget is that it didn't actually balance. so part of this needs to be certainly figures calorie responsib fiscally responsible as we get into the weeds -- >> although, if we get into the weeds, the balance depends on economic growth of 3%. i don't know if you and i were born when there was 3%. i'm exthinkaggeratinexaggeratin. but that is not easy to get to. >> it's not easy work to increase the economy, to increase gdp and debate what the future of health care should look like, tax reform, trade policy, regulatory policy. everything goes hand-in-hand to improve the american economic and help american workers. so as far as boosting the economy, it's an important goal, a good goal, but certainl

also increases in domestic spending as well including things like education and medical research at nih. that's the same type of thing we should see in the fy 18 budget. i am under no delusions. a lot of times we wind up doing the right thing wants everything else has been tried. i hope we can do it sooner rather than later. democrats whot to believes that for every dollar increase in defense spending there should be a dollar increase in nondefense spending? >> security isn't just about guns, bombs and bullets. it includes things like homeland security, economic security. families don't feel very secure if they don't have a safe affordable place to live or enough to eat. andously border security support for first responders, police and fire. michael leavitt in balanced security. it's not just all in the pentagon budget where we find security. >>. though your role in the next on cyber security. what threats are you looking at in cyber or physical that you are really worried about and we should be focusing on more? one of the things that i worry about the moose is a tax on critical infras

there were scare warnings cents out about nih and environmental programs they got money on this. trump administration, shawn, jim, did not get everything they wanted, but the big picture here is they kept the government open in the long run that's a good thing especially for federal workers in d.c., virginia and maryland in d.c., virginia and maryland. >> it's a good thing become what we had the government shutdown for multiple days it's certainly a good thing we shut point out federal workers should not kick up heels and think their jobs are secure. remember on top of all this right now every federal department under auspices of the white house is under order right now to present by june 30 imd of next month a plan to scale back workforce and reduce number of people that work in departments. some of that is through attrition and some hired once they leave the government burt long term picture by trump administration to reduce number of people in this workforce and they say they'll get that there if it's not through this continuing resolution which will be passed it's through nex

and i also want to say that a think if we can't get nih, especially if we can just get nih and nsa toree on one standard for reporting an avid interchangeable. i mean, that would do a lot for all of the medical research facilities in this country. >> both the issue of putting in reports, report on effort and on topics of interest and on city progress as was what happens after something is completed, where he gets filed pic as you may know there's recent requirement that is going to be going into effect asking us to file the data for all research that is federally funded. every agency is doing this differently, right? you get many projects that are funded by multiple agencies, that creates an enormous -- >> and by the way the data is not a useful than. >> it is actually not. >> sometimes it is wrong and it has to go to different databases and what ends up happening we end up paying a contractor to make the database talk to each other when it would be much simpler if we witches require one set of data across speedy we add another layer. >> we add another way. and finally, what did you g

some people are now calling the death care, the death panel bill, will be amplified by new cuts to nih medicaid, social security disability benefits snap and other crucial social services. the president is gutting the epa and slashing funding for cleaning up hazardous substances and for enforce cutting funds for clean air and clean water. why do people even think public policy is important? as a mother, what do i need government to do for my children and my grandchildren? clean air, clean water. that you can't do for yourself. clean air, clean water, food safety. forget about it in the president's budget. the budget is you've heard me say over and over our national budget should be a statement of our values, what is important to us as a country should be reflected in how we allocate our resources, our investments for the future. president trump has shown that he does not value the future of our children, our seniors and working families in our country. with that, i'll be pleased to take any questions. okay, michael. >> reporter: thank you, madam leader. >> he comes around now, right? v

united states is atop the list of global investors in lifesons, this investment is dependent on the nih and the important research it funds in order to maintain ore international leadership in pie bee medicine we mist strengthen the partnerships ben government agencies, investos, academies and research foundations. this meeting was an important step. today shortly after this briefing we'll release a list of the president's thirdwave of forward court nominees these ten individuals were chosen to a deep 'knowledge of the law and commit upholdinges constitutional principles. if confirmed justice joan larson will be a circuit court judge of the u.s. court of appeal for the six inch circuit. justice larson is currently serving on the michigan supreme court. and justice david stroud will be a circuit court judge of the u.s. court of appeals for the eight inch circuit. es current i is a justice of the minnesota supreme court. the campaign list which was put together from input from they heritage foundation the federalist society and ace that said these, quote, hively respect peopled are the ki

resource training and research and my concern is your cutting the training and research both in the nih and also particularly the department of energy. it's cut by 50% for nuclear energy for 331% on energy efficiency and renewable energy by 70%. i don't know how you increase productivity by cutting the research and i'm not even talking about the nih by cutting the research and job training programs. that is what you need to grow the economy. >> is an excellent question and i have a reasonable answer which is if you look at the total spending is up. if you look at the spending in the reforms we proposed and i capropose and i canquickly if ym the private foundation are only allowed to use 10% and then the federal government is 27 or 28%. if you take the federal level the same you spend as much on the nih research as you did the year before. >> so it is like before. what looks like the cuts in the budget are not really cut. >> we are being more efficient and i think we can do it without negatively impacting the things you mentioned. >> i don't have time for another question that i will clo

resource training and research and my concern is your cutting the training and research both in the nih and also particularly the department of energy. it's cut by 50% for nuclear energy for 331% on energy efficiency and renewable energy by 70%. i don't know how you increase productivity by cutting the research and i'm not even talking about the nih by cutting the research and job training programs. that is what you need to grow the economy. >> is an excellent question and i have a reasonable answer which is if you look at the total spending is up. if you look at the spending in the reforms we proposed and i capropose and i canquickly if ym the private foundation are only allowed to use 10% and then the federal government is 27 or 28%. if you take the federal level the same you spend as much on the nih research as you did the year before. >> so it is like before. what looks like the cuts in the budget are not really cut. >> we are being more efficient and i think we can do it without negatively impacting the things you mentioned. >> i don't have time for another question that i will clo

stern's comments earlier about the importance of support to the nih to support new knowledge. in terms of our understanding of pain and also the understanding of addiction. nih director francis collins has observed it's amazing when we have variety of pain as a cardinal sign of inflammation that we know so little about it. but i also want to point out the critical importance of education and using the knowledge that we already have. much of which is implemented through agencies such as the centers for disease control and prevention and also samsa. so it's, i think, not an either/or. we look at knowledge and acting on the information that we already have. but it really is going to require both to address these issues. >> thank you. another component of the bill is to provide funding to state and local officials and coaches and trainers among others to recognize and address substance misuse among students. would this be helpful in your view and especially maybe mr. sailor, you'd like to comment on that. >> yes. the national athletic trainer association is in full support of this

nih. being savage there has to be balanced. that's what i want you to consider. i would just point out florida, is the state that has on its license tag the orange the citrus industry is under threat of extinction because of an imported bacteria from asia that gets into the trees and kills the tree in five years. we have the research. they have a lot of the citrus as well. they are making progress but as we make this progress we haven't found the magic here yet but what we have done is be able to hold off the effect of the killing of the tree for a couple of years. there are a lot of groves that are dead. what we need if organ have a citrus industry and the production of oranges is way down. is less than half what was seven years ago. that's how dramatic of a decline it is. the ability for the grower to go in there and plow the abandoned grove and replant. so that we could find the magic here. they need expensing. all in the first year. instead of the expenses over a number of years because of the tremendous threat to the industry. i wish you would put that in yo

effect with a $20 trillion debt interest takes away resources to be used to fund vital programs like nih and they just need to be careful about the enormous amount of debt. so thinking that congress can work their way through this so we will have to see what happens. >> it is unlikely of will ever see office again but i never know. we said nothing good is ever lost. and to give them some hope. that is not a common political vision. >> anybody breed that? it is really good. >> so i know it is true if you were living in the shadows but you are powerless you have no political clout that is wrong in our country everybody has to have the essence that there is an opportunity and first of all, i just want to make it clear he eliciting around this table is not a hypocrite? idol spend enough time with people but i don't want to be that way at all like to be that way. but i think politics has changed. with the rise of independence if it is possible to see the realignment with this serious erosion of both political parties. because of the parliamentary system under know who you are but the divide t

in terms of the government funding nih and basic research, i fully support that. private sector companies can't invest a huge amount of money for decades with no return whatsoever. host: cap put some numbers with that for a second? thepresent cost -- president's budget looking at cuts for the national institute of health. the national cancer institute will receive a billion dollars less than 2017. the overall budget will drop to about $26 billion could ♪ the . the national science foundation losing and 11% cut. guest: you are hurting the very research that could help cancer patients, alzheimer patients, with a number of diseases that affect americans. basic research is really something that only the government can fund and do because the government can't keep funding research that is on the cutting edge. one day that will be a breakthrough in the will be a breakthrough for all humanity. that happens repeatedly and that is why we had an increase in funding for the national institutes of health with our spending plan that was but don't recently. that was bipartisan.

we won't fund nih, we will got the affordable care act and all the programs that help people who are drugs and then we say we will go after the gangsters and solve the drug problem. >> dana: that's a good debate. >> jesse: before they come into the country? >> richard: stop the drugs. >> jesse: locking them up once we cuff them. >> kimberly: walls apart, part of the framework to protect public safety. part of the equation is drug trafficking, these gangs seem to embrace their own free-market. there's also weapons, the criminality in terms of of building their and core group and jumble people into gangs and have them commit crime. violence is at the core of it. it's not isolated to drug trafficking. that's the reality of this situation. by the way, no problem with sessions and the rest of the doj saying let's get rid of ms-13 and other violent gangs that are plaguing our urban communities. that's the beginning of it. bottom line, and forced immigration laws are on the boo book. >> jesse: richard doesn't believe in walls so when he staying at his hotel room, everybody come in. open doo

the nih, puerto rico, everything there, the democrats got everything they wanted. there is a lot more leverage on border security. the democrats in 2013 were willing to go in charles: when chuck schumer praises this as a good agreement for the american people. that's the biggest red flag. >> it's ugly. >> what you want is long-term fixes to the budget that are dramatic and conservative. you get that by doing healthcare reform. char require want you to walk us through this next step. in my mind the republicans gave up a lot on this. when they go back to the negotiating table, what do they say? >> it was terrible with that bill. but at the end of the day you have to build momentum. once you get a 3 per from economy, 3.5% economy, then you telecast attention of those democratic senators up for reelection. and you come back next year and say are you really willing to vote against our budget? then you have a true budget. charles: how do you get to that 3% if we can't get trump temperatures agenda through. how do you get to the ultimate goal of 3% or 4%. >> i agree in fo

right now every dollar the nih spends results in about $2.25, roughly about that much. and other immediate economic activity. play it out. the nanotechnology comes out. when basic science comes out, they are approaching it because they understand that this is how we build a dynamic future. a dynamic future not for bunch of people right at the top who just sit around in the dynamic future for the people that do the work. it's not like it's a secret building the dynamic economy what it takes to build good jobs. it takes political courage to say no to the rich and powerful thaare building a country that works for the rest. [applause] >> he will vote republican if you vote to run for the higher office. [cheering] how do i convince him that you won't destroy his job? i say only if you are lying and cheating. [applause] if that is the business model, then you are in trouble. you should be in trouble. let's show people mortgages that they are just dying to blow up. show the remains with the pins already pulled out. they are showing them to the municipalities. and also the whol

. >> well, i testified about there was a projected cuts at nih. those didn't happen.ing about alzheim alzheimer's, it's a bipartisan su people of both parties have parents and loved ones affected by alzheimer's, which is one form of dementia. they know what it's like to be caregivers up front. we can all agree that funding science and finding cures for whether it's alzheimer's, m.s., all of these brain-related diseases is in our national interest, because this is an incredibly expensive disease, on track to bankrupt our country. 10,000 baby boomers turn 65 every day. so it behooves us as a nation to come around this issue to do a brain shot, much like my uncle did with the moon shot, to fund the research and find a cocktail or something that would benefit people as they grow old. people want to grow old. we know how to grow old physically, but we don't know how to grow old and be cognitively healthy. >> as you talk about healthy brains and the need for sleep and good nutrition, the fact is, there's a lot you can do in the way you live. >> exactly. >> and the genetic d

this because it increases domestic spending to larger levels than the last four years so whether it is nih agencies and government or funding for planned parenthood or not funding trump priorities, this is not a good deal for people who voted for donald trump, to be a fiscal conservative, which is ironic because many congressional republicans ran -- that they were not going to support trump because he wasn't a real conservative but look what they did. trump went out and republicans said they were not going to do it. >> what does conventional wisdom say. everyone is blaming republicans, it was conventional wisdom but it didn't hurt them in the end so what were they fearful of? a government shutdown? >> they are worried about 2018 because they think moderate voters and independent voters don't want them to shut down the government or cut any programs. that is the truth, they ran on reforming government. this just adds more money to the pile, the truth is a lot of people show up to vote for donald trump and house republicans because they thought finally we have a shot at a balanced budget, re

nih, she was head of the she published a report that warned about the failure of schools and institutions of higher learning to transmit knowledge about the past to future generations. she said "a system of education that fails to nurture memory of the past denies students a great deal better go one of the most successful series she funded while she was there was the civil war theory -- series by ken burns, which we all loved. she said some projects were good and some were not. ey has authored 15 books. the most recent, "james madison: ," is aboutnsidered one of the smallest first fathers but also one of the -- and he also had one of the most exciting wives. i asked mrs. cheney when she liked best and she said she -- she compared him to mozart. both were geniuses who with their gracias works changed forever the way people think. on as currently working book about the virginia dynasty, washington, jefferson, madison, and james monroe. that will be out in about two years. what fascinates her is that for the first 36 euros of our republic, with the exception of four short years of john adams

and employees at nih in bethesda told "the post" clinical work, patient care and recruitment are suffering there. >>> and republican congresswoman barbara comestock is asking the justice department for nearly $2 million to fight gangs in northern virginia. in a letter sent to attorney general jeff sessions, she cited the murder of 15-year-old alex reyes rivas. ten members of the ms-13 gang played a role in his murder. co comstock says the community needs help more than ever now. >>> and police are looking for a person who hit a this was happening on farmington road early thursday morning. investigators are looking into whether she was walking on the shoulder or in the road. we are told this stretch of road is very dangerous. aaa confirmed there have been more than a dozen deadly crashes there in the last four years. >>> meanwhile, we have learned it was a hospital patient that stole an ambulance and led police on a wild chase. the man climbed into the ambulance and just drove off. a gps system inside the ambulance allowed police to crack it and locate it. when person made his way to charle