the topic favored by the western media is the absence of armenia: nikol pashiyan’s demarche, accordingo analysts, looks situational. yerevan itself has repeatedly stated: they do not plan to leave the csto, and such an internal dispute is even beneficial, an organization, a living organism that goes through various stages of maturation, it is worth saying without undue modesty that the year of belarus’ chairmanship in the csto allowed the bloc to build up both its muscles and geopolitical convolutions. today the csto is an extremely important regional military-political union, it is gaining strength, it is an organized structure of the cis, it has shown itself to be a powerful peacekeeping force, especially after the events in kazakhstan, today, of course, powerful coordination is needed, especially among the three central asian states, where the united states of america would like not only to penetrate, but to drive a wedge, between the central asian states and the russian federation. and here, of course, the odb must play the most important peacekeeping and coordinating force. follow

the conversation that took place between alexander lukashenko and the prime minister of armenia nikol pashiyanwe understand, this is a sovereign right. but on the other hand, when you observe the turbulence that you said, when you see the ukrainian experience, how they slammed doors leaving all possible events that, well, we are no longer naive, we no longer hope that maybe they'll go differently in some other way, we see how an absolute, total turn to the west turns out, ignoring those ties that have developed over centuries, you know, as for armenia, in principle, the coming to power of the current ruling elite and pashinyan, first of all, are precisely the immigrants from those very western funds, because firstly , the velvet revolution itself, which brought mr. pashinyan to power through a not entirely legal route, the change of the entire ruling leadership, immediately after his arrival, if you remember, questions began with the csto and then she did not refuse to chair and recalled her secretary general, who was then an armenian general, then he was, yes, that is, even then it was clear

intervene in this conflict, since even armenia itself, through the mouth of its own prime minister nikol pashiyank itself a blow, there are several key signs of collapse, we are simply saying, the polar world has collapsed, what happened, the crisis that began back in 2007 has gripped the whole world, the global economic the crisis began in the world's largest economy, the united states, with worldwide consequences. is still in crisis. the concept of a unipolar world is a crisis-free world. they failed and, moreover, they were not the driving force behind the way out of this crisis. the second point, a series of military-political conflicts , is very important in this regard, the five-day war with georgia, when the americans fought for georgia, but russia was able to defeat a direct ally of the united states, and the americans did not take any effective measures. now in this the key plan is a special military operation. here's what's happening, why they can't. russia, because this will be a clear signal of the military weakness of the west, the third component, they are losing information and pro