nikolai konstantinovich wrote a lot, he has a whole large essay dedicated to this. contain artifacts that tell the story of the creation of the pact. everyone wears the same security sign and the motto pak culture. peace through culture. in magazine, which was published by the ossetian community in paris, a reproduction of this wonderful painting was published, which is called the patron saint or madonna protectris. here our lady protects cultural monuments that require protection. here we can see objects of russian architecture, the famous vladimir cathedral, here is notre dame de paris, here is st. peter's cathedral in rome. who faced a very real danger on the eve of the second world war, although many told him in the thirties that for mercy, do we even care about culture now, what are we doing? you see what terrible times are out there, and nikolai konstantinovich answered invariably, precisely because no one cares about culture and what is happening is happening. in 1954, the hack convention for the protection of cultural heritage was signed, however, only durin

nikolai konstantinovich wrote a lot, he has a whole long essay dedicated to this. artifacts that tell. the history of the creation of the pact, everyone has the same security sign and motto, pak sculpture, peace through culture. in a magazine published by the ossetian community in paris, a reproduction of this wonderful painting was published, which is called the patron saint or madonna protectris, here the mother of god protects cultural monuments that require protection, here we can see how famous russian architecture objects are. st. vladimir's cathedral, here is notre dame de paris, here is st. peter's cathedral in rome, which were in very real danger - on the eve of the second world war. and the decision of the gaga conference of 1899 and 1907, that is, you and i can say with full justification and pride that the international legal system for the preservation of cultural heritage rests on three russian documents. the treaty itself did not seem to protect many monuments, although this little-known fact from 1945 year says the opposite. initially, after all, in

nikolai konstantinovich did.l series, many temples will remain only in his paintings, the bulk of the etiids are monuments, and it’s not about money, there’s always money in russia there was a lot, little interest, little love, with a report on the topic of protecting antiquity, roerich addresses nicholas ii in 915, as soon as the first world war began, on... in the guide poster , the enemy of the human race, he depicted kaiser wilhelm in the image of the devil and the bombed cathedral in french reims, all european newspapers, and so to speak, the cultural public , the european intelligentsia, just so to speak , believed that such crimes really should be held accountable. one of the main roerich places is the memorial cabinet in the museum of the east in moscow. under the match. after 917, roerrich was forced to remain outside of russia. first he ended up in finland, then his family traveled around the world to the usa, england, an expedition to central asia, india, but the idea of ​​the pact did not leave him. t

christian tradition, he was brought up in the pietist tradition, there is a wonderful work by nikolai konstantinovichative kant scholars, one might say, who believe that kant i was an atheist, yeah, aleksandrovich, so in general, what should we do with this topic and maybe you have some kind of personal relationship here? no, i don’t think that he was an atheist, i think, moreover, the thought did not occur to him, that is, he, he would not have formulated the question for himself, his philosophy, on the one hand, you know, it did not stand on place, she was in motion. tried to avoid the question of god, to come into very close contact with it, as a result, to leave it as a question, it was not closed to him until the moment of death, and i don’t think that he would categorically went along some path, there are no denials, in no case, for him, to the fore, and this is also actually a conversation with god, so what i said came out, this is the apriority of the subjective... the doctrine of kant’s morality, then religion will be a consequence of kant’s morality, whereas in fact there is such an idea th

there is a remarkable work by nikolai konstantinovich govryushin, a professor at the moscow theologicalfessors, pietists, yes, who gave him education, in this regard, when we come into contact with his moral teaching, with his categorical imperative, and with ... then philosophy, on the one hand, you understand, it did not stand still, it was in motion, tried to avoid the question of god, to come into very close contact with it as a result leave it as a question, it was not closed to him until the moment of death, and i don’t think that he would categorically take any path of denial, no, in no case, but for him it comes to the fore, and this is the same actually talking to god. this is what i said, this is the apriority of the subjective, which is born from somewhere, who is the author of this birth, this was the main question for him, i understand correctly what we say if we look at kant’s teaching on morality , then religion will be a consequence of morality according to kant, whereas in fact it is such an idea that a religious view, it tells us about a different cause-and-effect rela