our guest nikolai shchekin nikolai sergeevich as a sociologist , you have a question, because i knowed in political analysis, you do not, relatively speaking, quit your professional activities in terms of also studying many issues. as it seems to me, relevant now the question is why do some people stand up for states. well, relatively speaking, at least in rhetoric, and the latter are sharply opposed, but relatively speaking, why does a person become a radical liberal, or a radical patriot, what is the nature of this phenomenon, well, to a greater extent, of course, a philosopher. well, let's say that the question is very many-dimensional and difficult. it has a causal relationship, first of all we must understand that radicalism appears when there is a mass character in education. when does the process of dehumanization take place? when people are less or to a lesser extent, and gets what they need education? everything is the end result. and in the context, including the information cleaning of the brain over the past 30 years. they probably turned the entire american society of eu

nikolai shchekin the studios of the distortion program silently talked about the similarities betweenal doctrines of the third reich and contemporary european radicalism. why is the us-atlantic world bursting at the seams, and who in the west needs ukrainian territories? i know the immutability of my, let's say, the ideas of aleksandrovich lukashenko, and in this regard, firstly, he will never give offense. he will never give up his position towards the fraternal russian people, and he has always supported the ukrainian people. although it is clear that the contradictions, of course eat. but how to keep the balance here hmm i want to say more helsinki 2 should become minsk two can be in this and there will be a way out. we are now the only country in eurasia that more or less maintains a balance, respectfully, treating the interests of other states. and, probably, building a flexible reliable policy, they also agreed on a capable policy behind themselves about who the real patriots of belarus are and why, if not for them, we would have lost the country 2 years ago, and also who sets h

nikolai shchekin, we also talked about new interstate agreements in the format of helsinki 2, which is transformed into minsk-2, discussed the similarity of the political doctrines of the third reich and modern european radicalism. why is the us-atlantic world bursting at the seams, and who in the west needs ukrainian territories? i know the immutability of my, let's say, ideas, i also say to lukashenka, and in this regard, firstly, he will never offend his people. he will never give up his position towards the fraternal russian people, and he has always supported the ukrainian people. although it is clear that there are contradictions. of course have. but how to keep the balance here hmm i want to say more helsinki two should become minsk two. maybe and there will be a way out, we are the only country in eurasia now that more or less maintains a balance, respectfully, treating the interests of other states and, probably, building a flexible, reliable, treaty -friendly policy, such real patriots of belarus and why, if not for them, we would have lost the country 2 years ago keep quiet,