first of all, the ban on the export of natural gas to europe, nikolai yuryevich, but it seems to me that firstly. uh, chaos contradicts itself, because it speaks of some new russian political regime, and secondly, it suggests that europe simply commit economic and political hara-kiri. completely abandoning russian gas despite the fact that europe is trying to keep e these supplies. how do you consider such a formulation of the issue by the main american international affairs officer today. i see another contradiction here. here he says that we are now , uh, we will, uh, lead to an escalation of the economic war with russia, we are conducting additional sanctions europe will join them, gas supplies will be cut off oil supplies, and then someone in russia should agree to some concessions to the united states in exchange for the lifting of these sanctions, but the thing is, they've always called for political concessions and promoted, uh, regime change, except. naturally, where they did. this is purely by force. and in exchange for some benefits of globalization, some benefits of global lib

i completely agree with you nikolai yuryevich it seems to me that the undermining of northern flows is really a tectonic shift, the consequences of which we still have to realize why because a is an explosion? and the infrastructure that formed the basis of the geo-economic big europe , but the geo- big europe in the geo-economic sense is no more, because it was based on the russian german russian european economic and energy cooperation and instead europe becomes finally the periphery of the atlantic world and the united states, while russia is uniting and consolidating with the big eurasia but , and also the undermining of the northern streams - this is a continuation of the american policy of colonizing europe, namely the colonization of europe, depriving it of no only remnants of the political subjectivity of sovereignty, but also of economic competitiveness, but the united states forgets that every action leads to opposition, and along with attempts to colonize europe, we see some attempts. the latest example of colonization is the victory of george meloni in the parliamentary ele

something who was not kind, and then some kind of mixture, but he took energy and it’s clear he is nikolai yuryevich that one was so explosive, too, wow, everything was on fire with him. white assignments of good people, the son of ustudy, shukay impudent, i run around myself, this should be outstanding. it should be bright. he must want to do it himself. it is he who must know that this work will have the success of this consciousness. these requirements did not come to me immediately, but thank god i had to from my shirts. i have inherited such voices from the ships. i just had oleg's voice reflect yours mine. nikolay is now standing here. here are my shores, where i began to live. here my parental home is reliable the wharf carried me away my life the river never lost. i sing a song on my shores. he can perform quite calmly at the level of an artist and he makes it a success. so he has a more harmonious future for him. i think it will still be oh-oh-oh. this is the street, this house, where my early preschool childhood passed. i think it's because of the location. now you can talk about this hous

actually, how many times did he say, and doesn’t it seem to you that nikolai yuryevich is switching arrowsom the war of the west against russia, because it seems to me that, including at the un general assembly, russia managed to form and strengthen this narrative that the west is waging war against russia using ukraine as a proxy and in part to break this narrative in part, just to switch attention . and, of course, in order to demonize russia in the eyes, and russian partners, china, india, and so on. here they are now completely by the ears they are trying to artificially attribute to russia supposedly. the intention to use tactical nuclear weapons, so i completely agree with you. i would add one more thing. in my opinion, the united states is categorically unwilling to acknowledge and unwilling to accept this. and they do n't even want to. even silently agree with this that they are a party to the conflict in ukraine, because they proceed from the fact, and they are trying to approve such an order in which they are the sheriff, and russia is the violator. they want as well symbolically

they can put american power in jeopardy on several fronts at once, and nikolai yuryevich, how importantations with ira and for russia and china, and how fair are such assessments from the tripartite anti-western alliance, because at the same time russia continues to cooperate with saudi arabia and with israel from turkey, that is, they are still pursuing a balanced and multi-vector policy in the middle east. by the way, this is a rapprochement between russia and iran when, let's say, declarative statements about strategic partnership began to receive real content. this caused concern. not only in the west. this has caused alarm in the region, and the saudis and israelis are already looking at this rapprochement with caution, what will happen next, how iran will behave, how russia will behave, but in any case , this is, uh, this is the trend towards that indeed russia china uh, iran cooperate in one way or another. he has another question that everyone understands perfectly well, including in the gulf understand that this is friendship. against this friendship against , uh, the united st

as nikolai yuryevich says, we will enter the security process of our region on an equal footing with allies. we already have. well, you know, there are a lot of colleagues here said. i didn’t want to interrupt, i know that it’s useless to interrupt vadim. this means that it is beginning, and as regards the shanghai cooperation organization, that is absolutely correct. this organization began precisely with issues of regional security, but again we must understand that this is not a military bloc, like nato, this is not a military organization, like the dkb. the shanghai cooperation organization and the shanghai spirit, how does it sound? yes, this is, first of all, the openness of the countries that are members of this organization for each other, the readiness for some contacts of partnership relations, with regard to the republic of belarus and its benefits and disadvantages of joining this organization. well , firstly, the shanghai cooperation organization today, as already mentioned, in terms of its economic potential already exceeds what is called the collective west. in our cou

first of all, but nikolai yuryevich will suffer europe . how do you understand?ize this and change their policy accordingly, maybe barrel already thinks that he has won on the field, and therefore, given somehow the level of political thinking that we we observe in the west, i would not rule it out. something like that , right? i would ask this question. how and why? they didn’t talk about it six months ago, why didn’t they talk about it a year ago, because these are quite obvious things and, unfortunately, after all that was said and done by the european union, and long before february 24. it is very difficult to perceive them as partners and negotiations , even if we leave aside the european union and the apparatus of the european union, uh, take our old partners france germany what was their behavior on the issue of the implementation of the minsk agreements? by the end of last year, they simply switched to ukrainian positions completely. they could not act as reliable partners. i'm not saying reliable means agreeing with us, but reliable as people who have so

nikolai yuryevich what do you think?e europe is the west, in the end they will lift those sanctions that prevent the export of russian food to world markets. i wouldn't expect it. if they were really going to cancel it and were really determined to solve the problem. they would have kept their end of the grain deal because they didn't for no reason. expect that they are ready for this trouble, developing countries, as were just an argument in favor of opening trade through ukrainian ports. so they will remain just an argument in order to explain that russia is allegedly to blame for everything. i think that the west does not assign any other role to them here, uh. it seems to me that this is an obstacle to the export of russian food. the west itself discredits itself even more in the eyes of the developing countries on whose support it vainly counts its hybrid war against russia and, in contrast , selfishness. west russia, as vladimir putin said on friday, is ready to transfer fertilizers accumulated in european ports to