maybe the first point to make is one that nikolas concluded on which is, you know, the nehru problem, as it were. i prefer nehru to mao and a democratic india to totalitarian china. we don't expect every country when they become democratic to somehow do our business, you know, do our bidding. but democracies tend to be friendlier than dictatorships which, you know, often rely upon needing enemies which whip up extreme nationalism to deal with their legitimacy problems. i prefer south korea to north korea. south korea's not perfect, and a lot of people in south korea that have problems with the current government. but i assure you, it's better than north korea and not just that it doesn't have a gulag and murder its own people, but it's friendlier to us than north korea. and those are the choices we face in the world. and it's not irrelevant, you know, that dem can accuracies are not perfect -- democracies are not perfect and 100% allies. second point, yeah, change sometimes difficult. first of all, we don't bring all, about all that change. mubarak was not going to be permanently ther