southern area, and you can see there's a very large structure here which is blocking totally higher than nilgts, so a three foot partial reduction up here does nothing for the mid block light and air, and that's a major problem. you can see, this does not match it, it completely disrupts the pattern of development and the d.a. has pointed out the pattern of development is a major concern. if you look at the mid block open space we discussed the last time, you can see it's completely disruptive to that area, the building doesn't extend the entire way in it extends a significance distance in and impacts this well established line of development here. so i want to just go back to touch on another point and that is that in the variance decision letter that the d.a. will be familiar with from 1991, that the heights of the building was limited to 40 feet and the current building is 54 feet, there was only 4 floors, they like to describe it as three floors over a basement but it's essentially four floors so there's a massive difference here between what's being entertained here as a reduction compare